Mon, May 28, 2012, 11:52 AM EDT - U.S. Markets closed for Memorial Day

Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

Explore news, videos, and much more based on what your friends are reading and watching. Publish your own activity and retain full control.

To get started, first

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    Happy Birthday? Watch Out for Age-Sensitive Tax Rules

    A primer on what to watch for when your calendar turns.

    Across economic cycles, two things remain constant: you get older and you pay taxes. As the new year turns, you should also turn to your own age-related tax and financial planning milestones.

    Age 0-23: Beware the Kiddie Tax

    Under the Kiddie Tax rules, part of a young person's investment income can be taxed at the parent's federal rate. This means investment income for a young person, which would be taxed anywhere from 0% to 10% to 15%, could be taxed at rates up to 35%.

    The Kiddie Tax can bite until the year when the person turns 24. After the year the young person turns 18, however, the Kiddie Tax can only bite if he or she is a student with at least five months of full-time school attendance.

    For 2011 and 2012, the Kiddie Tax can only bite investment income in excess of the threshold amount of $1,900 (the threshold is adjusted for inflation every few years). Investment income below the threshold is taxed at the young person's lower rate.

    Age 18 or 21: Custodial Account Reverts to Child's Control

    If you've set up a custodial account for a minor child, that account comes under the child's legal control when he or she reaches the age of majority under applicable state law (usually 18 or 21). That means the child can drain what was supposed to be a college account to buy a red Corvette, tattoos, and cigarettes. Not good!

    Age 50: Extra Retirement Account Contributions Allowed

    Those who are 50 and older at year-end can make additional catch-up contributions to 401(k) plans (up to $5,500 for 2012), Section 403(b) tax deferred annuity plans (up to $5,500), governmental Section 457 plans (up to $5,500), and SIMPLE plans (up to $2,500).

    You can also make an additional catch-up contribution of up to $1,000 to a traditional IRA or Roth IRA for both 2011 and 2012. In fact, you have until 4/17/12 to make an extra contribution for the 2011 tax year if you are 50 or older as of 12/31/11.

    Age 55 and 59.5: Penalty-Free Retirement Account Withdrawals Allowed

    After age 55, you can receive penalty-free pay-outs from your former employer's qualified retirement plan(s) without getting hit with the 10% premature withdrawal penalty tax that usually applies to pay-outs received before age 59.5. To qualify for this penalty exception, you must have permanently left your job (it doesn't matter why).

    After reaching 59.5, you can receive penalty-free pay-outs from any plan (including one run by your current employer) and from your IRAs.

    Beware: Penalty-free pay-outs still count as taxable income.

    Age 62: Start Date for Reduced Social Security Benefits

    You can start receiving Social Security benefits at age 62, but they will be lower than if you wait until you hit the current full-retirement age of 66 (for those born between 1943 and 1954). If you work before reaching age 66, your benefits will be further reduced if your 2012 earnings exceed $14,640. Beware: depending on your income from other sources, up to 85% of your benefits may be subject to federal income tax.

    Age 66: Start Date for Full Social Security Benefits

    If you were born between 1943 and 1954, you become entitled to full Social Security benefits at age 66. You won't lose any benefits if you work in years after the year you turn 66. However if you turn 66 in 2012, your 2012 benefits will be reduced if your 2012 earnings from working exceed $38,880. Beware: depending on your income from other sources, up to 85% of your benefits may be subject to federal income tax.

    Age 70: Start Date for Enhanced Social Security Benefits

    You can defer Social Security benefits until after reaching age 70, and your benefit payments will be higher than if you start earlier. If you make this choice, you don't have worry about reduced payments if you continue working, but this option only makes sense for those in good health. Beware: depending on your income from other sources, up to 85% of your benefits may be subject to federal income tax.

    Age 70.5: Retirement Account Mandatory Withdrawal Rules Kick In

    You must start taking annual required minimum withdrawals from your tax-favored retirement accounts (traditional IRAs, 401(k) accounts, and the like) and pay the resulting income taxes after reaching 70.5. (You're not required to take any withdrawals from any Roth IRAs set up in your name.)

    Please don't think you can simply ignore the required withdrawal rules without dire consequences. The IRS can assess a penalty tax equal to 50% of the shortfall between the amount you should have withdrawn for the year and the amount you actually withdraw (if anything). That's one of the harshest penalties in our beloved Internal Revenue Code.

    The initial required withdrawal is for the year you turn 70.5, but you can postpone taking that one until as late as April 1 of the following year. The downside of choosing this option is that you must take two required withdrawals in that following year and pay the resulting double tax hit. For example, if you turned 70.5 in 2011 and did not take your initial required withdrawal in 2011, you face a 4/1/12 deadline for taking that initial withdrawal (that one is actually for the 2011 tax year). Then you must take another required withdrawal (that one is for 2012) by no later than 12/31/12. For each subsequent year, you must take your annual required withdrawal by December 31.

    Exception: If you continue working after age 70.5, and you don't own over 5% percent of the business that employs you, you can put off taking any required withdrawals from that employer's plan(s) for as long as you keep working.

    We apologize. An error has occurred. Please try again.
     

    61 comments

    • Jim  •  5 months ago
      I grew up also with very little money, but when I was seven years old the local bank president gave me 10 dollars and told me that I should always save part of everything I earned, and not to live beyond my means. Look that to heart. I went in the army in 1969 in the middle of the war, so I could go to school on the GI bill. From there I worked hard played hard but also saved and was able to take ea,rly retirement at 48. I had seen the hand writing on the wall companies laying off people in their 50's. Seeing what has happened to them I think GOD everyday for that bank presidents advice and my following it. We do not have to live with our children and we can help them and our grand children when they need it As they say if you need anything mention it to nanna and poppy will get it.
      • RobertM 5 months ago
        I totally agree. But, you forgot to mention that the key word is "NEED" from nanna & poppy not "WANT"!
      • StevenT 5 months ago
        A Bank President gave away 10 dollars without requiring opening a non-interest bearing account that charged a $13 monthly service fee?
        Either this is a fairy tale or the world certainly has changed.
      • Sophocles 5 months ago
        StevenT.... Jim's message went totally over the top of your cynical disposition. (There is nothing in Jim's post to suggest that the account was non-interest bearing. In the 1960's and before, non-interest bearing savings accounts and exorbitant service fees were virtually unheard of). You probably took that $10 (symbolically, regardless of source), spent it without saving any part of it for your entire life, and wonder why you can't have what others have saved and earned. And, yes, the world has changed. Back in the day, people took personal responsibility for their own lives and did not look to the government to take care of them. When help was NEEDED, it came from neighbors, churches, and private charitable organizations. Of course, since control was local, slackers and freeloaders were not tolerated quite as much either.
    • Obomney  •  5 months ago
      You know what I get a kick out of, everytime someone complains about federal taxes, statists start rattling off services like roads, police, fire, and teachers, all of which are *STATE* services. It's a tacit admission that the federal government is a giant wealth sinkhole providing no tangible benefit to us.
    • Padmanabham  •  5 months ago
      We are brought to a state to be in constant fear of every changing tax laws. This shows how poor our tax system is.
    • WilhemenaCooker  •  5 months ago
      i grew up with no money at all - but i worked my way through college, paid my bills on time, and saved for retirement - there's no excuse for being an ignorant fool - i'm worth 10X what i was 10 years ago - but then again, i worked tomorrow and saved for tomorrow instead of living for today
      • Bobby 5 months ago
        So you you want a metal. There are many just like you.
      • ZiaoZi 5 months ago
        Wilhemena and I rarely agree politically but I agree completely with every word in that post. Every word is as true of me as it is of Wilhemena. I am sure that neither of us wants a medal. Study and learn for yourself, analyze facts for yourself, think for yourself and make decisions for yourself. There is no excuse for being ignorant.
      • Harry Assenback 5 months ago
        It's medal not metal.
    • Raymond  •  5 months ago
      I find these converstations facinating. To say we can take a "rich persons" money, but we say nothing of taking a "poor persons" time..Why are people collecting benefits from society not expected to contribute to society? They may not have money but they may have time..With all that's being paid out I don't see why a single state park should be closed or why our streets aren't safe for children. The system is unfair because it demands sacrific from some while asking for none of others..
      • Sophocles 5 months ago
        Raymond..... the short answer is society has X amount of resources and no more. When you attempt to allocate resources, there will ALWAYS be differences of opinion how that should be accomplished, regardless of methodology initiated. Since "fair" is subjective, if there is no agreement what constitutes "fair" allocation prior to distribution, unrest is guaranteed. The size of "X" is totally irrelevant, since "fair" always subjective, infers one's "share" to be received, and generally tends to ignore one's contribution.
    • Toooldtofail  •  5 months ago
      Taxes are the price we pay for a civilization. Try building roads w/o them, or maintaining police and fire departments. If you want fairer taxation (and don't we all) elect representatives who champion them and can't be bought.
      • Tool 5 months ago
        Those are local taxes, not federal.
      • James 5 months ago
        I understand we need taxes for police . . . but not for brand new Chevy Tahoes, Camaros, Ford Mustangs, Ford Expedition, Dodge Charger is still in price comparison with the Ford Crown Victoria but the others are very expensive rides!!! That is not using the State Government money very efficiently blowing it on high dollar vehicles just because they want to feel bad #$%$ and arrogant about what they sit pull people over in!
      • Chuck B 5 months ago
        Read article 1, section 8 of the US constitution. This defines what the federal government is authorized to do. Yes, government is necessary, but only in the most limited form. It must be paid for, but when the limits are exceeded the cost becomes prohibitive.
        You might try to find out how we did without the IRS and the income tax from 1788 until 1913.
    • Ken  •  5 months ago
      I would offer one small correction to the "Age 55 and 59.5: Penalty-Free Retirement Account Withdrawals Allowed" write up. As I read the tax law, THE ONLY qualified retirement account that this applies to is your 401k plan (not pension plan, etc).

      If you want to keep the option to withdraw penalty free dollars the year you turn 55 - 59 1/2 (should you get laid off, fired, or quit), you must have 401k funds to withdraw from. If you move all of your 401k to an IRA, you are out of luck.
    • J.R.  •  5 months ago
      Death and Taxes!!!
    • gene  •  5 months ago
      Discouraging.
    • Tool  •  5 months ago
      I dont get investment advise from a yahoo.
    • gocky  •  Los Angeles, California  •  5 months ago
      hey IRS: FU(K YOU AND YOUR EXTORSION ASS_OLES
    • John  •  5 months ago
      Over 50 catch up amount stated in this article is wrong for Roth and IRA. Total contribution for over 50 is capped at $6k.
    • Gaye Marasaki  •  5 months ago
      Wilhemena, you were lucky. Part of it is when you are born. When I was young, I worked my way thru college, but the state university was only a few hundred dollars/semester and I could easily earn the tuition with a summer's work. Now it is $15,000/year for tuition alone at public universities ($30K at private) and who can make that kind of money in a summer? I also saved and invested, and at that time I could make 16% in a FDIC-guaranteed CD. Many of my stock investments grew an unbelievable amount - just pure luck as I happened to invest just before a huge growth in equities. I claim no medals. When we were vulnerable (mortgage, and I was home with 3 young children), my husband managed to hang on to his job, and we had no major family illnesses or medical issues. All it would have taken was a layoff at a bad time, an accident, a child with major medical problems, and things could have been very different. We were frugal and saved like crazy for our children's educations. We saved so much that they could get no financial aid based on means (they did get some minor scholastic scholarships - all 3 were Nat'l Merit Scholars). I went back to school, got my CPA, and went to work full-time after our youngest was midway through elementary school. We paid more in taxes than I got in take-home pay. But I don't complain about taxes - they pay for our roads, our relatively clean air and water, government oversight of our food (would you like to always wonder if there is melamine in your children's milk?), our safety, our children's education, and much more.
      Where are we now? Our 3 children are debt-free and all working: one is a lawyer, one is a doctor, one works on Wall Street (!?! - but not making much!). My husband still works, but only 'cuz he likes what he does. I was laid off early this year, but didn't care as we don't need the money anymore. But I know that much of this was just pure luck. I worked extremely hard & got along with others, but my job was moved to India (they couldn't do my work, but the multinational that took over our company didn't care). The same could have happened to my husband when our children were little and we had a mortgage to pay, but it didn't. We did REALLY well, money-wise, under the Bush administration, because we were high-income, high-assets people at that time, but I still voted for Obama and in spite of our very high tax burden, I feel the rich should pay MORE.
      • randy man 5 months ago
        gaye, just send a check to the irs; they will take it. I'm glad you were lucky because you don't seem very smart.
      • Sophocles 5 months ago
        Gaye, If you feel that government REALLY spends money well, feel free to increase your VOLUNTARY contribution, but please refrain from forcing your opinion on others who find voluntary contributions to much more effective, efficient, and transparently accountable organizations to better accomplish humanitarian goals (as opposed to forced government collection and poor, corrupt, and inefficient utilization of said funds).
    • Chalis  •  5 months ago
      The rich hire a "financial advisor" who can beat any new IRS tax plan.
    • Joe  •  5 months ago
      Exception: If you continue working after age 70.5, and you don't own over 5% percent of the business that employs you, you can put off taking any required withdrawals from that employer's plan(s) for as long as you keep working.So, business owners get screwed again. Why go into business and hire people if the government continues to #$%$
    • gimeabrk  •  5 months ago
      Everybody liking the new big IPOD ad on their yahoo page. Nice huh? Boycott yahoo !!!!
    • Chuck B  •  5 months ago
      Can't think of too many additional reasons to get rid of the income tax and the IRS, can you?
    • Recovering Alcoholic  •  5 months ago
      I started my own business. I now work for the 50% who do not pay taxes...(sigh).
    • JosephL  •  5 months ago
      You work hard all year long. Comes passover and there is not even a slice of bread in the house??
    • m  •  5 months ago
      Remember that all federal taxes are "fair"... 50% of the people earn money but do not pay taxes... that's only "fair"... The rest of us earn money and should pay more taxes... again that is "fair" also... Liberals are people who want to tell some people to pay more taxes/give them more money ... but do not want anyone to them them (liberals) to live within whatever money they already have...

    FOCUS ON RETIREMENT