Mon, May 28, 2012, 12:24 PM EDT - U.S. Markets closed for Memorial Day

Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

Explore news, videos, and much more based on what your friends are reading and watching. Publish your own activity and retain full control.

To get started, first

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    House GOP have backup on payroll tax

    Fantasy Finance

    WASHINGTON (AP) — In an abrupt about-face, House GOP leaders announced Monday that they are willing to extend the two percentage point cut in the payroll tax through the end of the year and add the approximately $100 billion cost to the nation's $15 trillion-plus debt.

    House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, Majority Leader Eric Cantor, R-Va., and GOP Whip Kevin McCarthy of California said the House could vote on the payroll tax measure this week, but that the fate of unemployment benefits for millions of the long-term jobless and efforts to forestall a scheduled cuts in fees to doctors who treat Medicare patients would remain in the hands of a House-Senate negotiating panel that's looking for ways to pay for them.

    The GOP statement came after intense talks this weekend failed to produce an agreement. Republicans were pressing for pay cuts for federal workers and requiring them to contribute more to their pensions. They recoiled at a Democratic proposal to raise Transportation Security Administration per-ticket airline security fees.

    "Democrats' refusal to agree to any spending cuts in the conference committee has made it necessary for us to prepare this fallback option to protect small business job creators and ensure taxes don't go up on middle-class workers," the GOP leadership statement said.

    Without action by Congress by the end of the month, payroll taxes will rise for 160 million Americans. The two percentage point tax cut delivers about $20 a week to a worker making $50,000 a year and a tax cut totaling $2,000 this year for someone making a $100,000 salary.

    Democrats were encouraged and said the development could break an impasse over the payroll tax proposal and the other expiring provisions.

    "We've been making the point that when (it comes to) tax cuts for folks at the very top, the House Republicans went to great lengths to change their rules to say you don't have to pay for those," said Rep. Chris Van Hollen, D-Md. "And yet they've been saying that when it comes to a short-term, 10-month payroll tax cut for middle-income people all of a sudden you have to pay for it."

    "This is a major step forward in these negotiations," said Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y.

    But Democrats also warned that decoupling the payroll tax from the larger legislation could jeopardize efforts to renew the jobless benefits and the fix to the Medicare payment formula.

    "It's completely irresponsible to leave behind nearly five million unemployed Americans whose benefits will expire and 47 million seniors and disabled Americans whose access to health care would be jeopardized," said Rep. Sander Levin, D-Mich., a member of the 20-lawmaker House-Senate negotiating panel.

    "There is no reason all three of these priorities cannot proceed at the same time," said House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif.

    The GOP move reflects a desire by party leaders to avoid a political hit if the payroll tax expires at the end of the month. And it would avoid burdening businesses with uncertainties regarding their payroll systems. On the other hand, jobless benefits lapsed for several weeks in 2010, and delays in adopting a so-called Medicare "doc's fix" can be dealt with by delaying the processing of Medicare claims.

    "It is prudent for our leadership to take whatever action is necessary to ensure American workers are not hit with a tax increase on March 1," said Rep. Dave Camp, R-Mich., the lead GOP negotiator.

    The White House did not embrace the House leadership idea.

    "We are willing to work with them to offset it in a responsible way," said White House Press Secretary Jay Carney. "And we expect Congress to get its work done and to extend it — the payroll tax cut, unemployment insurance and the doc fix."

    The move by the GOP leadership still would leave it to negotiators to come up with $30 billion or $40 billion in deficit savings to extend jobless benefits averaging about $300 a week to people who have been out of work for more than six months. Republicans have pressed to cut the number of weeks from the maximum 99 permitted under current policies and economic conditions down to as few as 59 weeks. They also are pressing to require people receiving unemployment to enroll in GED classes and allow states to condition benefits on the passage of drug tests.

     
    • killer  •  26 days ago
      Has anyone looked a variety of local newspapers and found that counties and cities are constantly giving sizable amounts of taxpayer money to corporations? On any given day those municipal governments are giving away millions of dollars of tax payer monies for corporate welfare. And many times those corporations don't live up to expectations so the taxpayers lose again.
    • Robert r Bobe jr  •  Indianapolis, Indiana  •  3 months ago
      End Congress and the Senates pension program and health care. Along with if you want to serve in the Congress, Senate, Prez no trading on Wall Street, No Bank trading real estate deals etc. Your there to serve the PEOPLE not make them rich. Since 2008 over all they have gained 25 percent in Wealth while the Majority is getting laid off, Homes are being lost.
      Make to where this folks running for office make real sacrifics for the People, For the Country then maybe we would get folks in Wash that want to serve the peoples interests
      • Vox clamantis in deserto 3 months ago
        Add term limitations, strict $ amounts from all sources for campaigns, limited time for campaigns, and no jobs ever with any outfit that .lobbies!
      • Oppy 3 months ago
        #$%$ would that do?
      • Wild Bill 3 months ago
        The whole system is flawed with enough holes to hide endless amounts of assets. If they congress can lower your taxes they can raise them 2.
    • dino  •  3 months ago
      Has ANY congressmen/women offered to give up their benefits and join their constituents (us) in a similar fate, such as cut in pay, reduced benefits, higher retirement age?
      • David1 3 months ago
        NO
      • dino 3 months ago
        Are you sure? Not one? doesn't that mean that each congressperson is NOT willing to put some skin in the game? The same game that WE all are forced to play?
      • Brian 3 months ago
        yes one bufftet mach him 50,000
    • hardluck  •  The Villages, Florida  •  3 months ago
      Let's face it, congress is a very, very expensive house of prostitution!!!!!!!!!!!
      • SteveJ 3 months ago
        Dey be hoes fo dem wit $.
      • redfishtexas 3 months ago
        Love your reply hardluck.
      • Use your brains, ppl! 3 months ago
        Actually no; at a house of prostitution I get something for my money, and I end up feeling better afterwards.
    • Demetri  •  Newark, New Jersey  •  3 months ago
      Funny how they never back away from giving themselves wage increases, or time off or even 100% paid medical coverage for them and family all for a part time job, go figure.........
      • rascal 3 months ago
        No need for a vote, it's all automatic. Eat 'em and smile...
      • J 3 months ago
        Your talking about Democrats right?
      • Demetri 3 months ago
        ALL OF THEM ARE CROOKS
    • carl  •  New York, New York  •  3 months ago
      I say we limit the terms to congress,like the Mayoral office 2-3 terms and out ya go.
      • doceussmattie 3 months ago
        And then the only ones in Washington that have any seniority or experience are the lobbyists.
      • Bill 3 months ago
        no only single terms - they can then spend the whole term working instead of spending 3/4 of it campaigning
      • 3C-PO 3 months ago
        One term is fine...for a Republican it's actually one too many.....
    • Raven  •  Chattanooga, Tennessee  •  3 months ago
      Do the pay cuts for federal workers apply to the the President, Representatives, Senators, and all their staffs? How much would it save if it was just limited to this group?
    • A Yahoo! User  •  3 months ago
      545 vs. 300,000,000 People
      -By Charlie Reese

      Politicians are the only people in the world who create problems and then campaign against them.

      Have you ever wondered, if both the Democrats and the Republicans are against deficits, WHY do we have deficits?

      Have you ever wondered, if all the politicians are against inflation and high taxes, WHY do we have inflation and high taxes?

      You and I don't propose a federal budget. The President does.

      You and I don't have the Constitutional authority to vote on appropriations. The House of Representatives does.

      You and I don't write the tax code, Congress does.

      You and I don't set fiscal policy, Congress does.

      You and I don't control monetary policy, the Federal Reserve Bank does.

      One hundred senators, 435 congressmen, one President, and nine Supreme Court justices equates to 545 human beings out of 300 million that are directly, legally, morally, and individually responsible for the domestic problems that plague this country.

      I excluded the members of the Federal Reserve Board because that problem was created by the Congress. In 1913, Congress delegated its Constitutional duty to provide a sound currency to a federally chartered, but private, central bank.

      I excluded all the special interests and lobbyists for a sound reason. They have no legal authority. They have no ability to coerce a senator, a congressman, or a President to do one cotton-picking thing. I don't care if they offer a politician $1 million dollars in cash. The politician has the power to accept or reject it. No matter what the lobbyist promises, it is the legislator's responsibility to determine how he votes.

      Those 545 human beings spend much of their energy convincing you that what they did is not their fault. They cooperate in this common con regardless of party.

      What separates a politician from a normal human being is an excessive amount of gall. No normal human being would have the gall of a Speaker, who stood up and criticized the President for creating deficits. The President can only propose a budget. He cannot force the Congress to accept it.

      The Constitution, which is the supreme law of the land, gives sole responsibility to the House of Representatives for originating and approving appropriations and taxes. Who is the speaker of the House? John Boehner. He is the leader of the majority party. He and fellow House members, not the President, can approve any budget they want. If the President vetoes it, they can pass it over his veto if they agree to.

      It seems inconceivable to me that a nation of 300 million cannot replace 545 people who stand convicted -- by present facts -- of incompetence and irresponsibility. I can't think of a single domestic problem that is not traceable directly to those 545 people. When you fully grasp the plain truth that 545 people exercise the power of the federal government, then it must follow that what exists is what they want to exist.

      If the tax code is unfair, it's because they want it unfair.

      If the budget is in the red, it's because they want it in the red.

      If the Army & Marines are in Iraq and Afghanistan it's because they want them in Iraq and Afghanistan ...

      If they do not receive social security but are on an elite retirement plan not available to the people, it's because they want it that way.

      There are no insoluble government problems.

      Do not let these 545 people shift the blame
    • hotdog123  •  Warren, Maine  •  3 months ago
      Cuts could start with Congress. No Congressman should make more than $60,000 and they should pay 1/2 their heath care. No endless retirement!
    • Jay  •  Salt Lake City, Utah  •  3 months ago
      Its funny to see how much money is spent in campaigns and SuperPAC's. Is this the job creation we are getting from the tax money saved by corporations and rich people?
    • BIG DAN  •  3 months ago
      Better yet, lets just fire the whole bunch of them and start over. Where are the "citizen" legislators this country was founded by?
    • Just B  •  Easton, Pennsylvania  •  3 months ago
      All politicians should take a pay cut, no perks, just basic MEN OF THEIR PEOPLE, which MANY have NO MEDICAL INSURANCE or get paid $30k a yr or more!
    • BIG DAN  •  3 months ago
      Hey, how about our elected officials take a pay cut for a change. They could cut some aid positions, downsize, etc. They are way over paid for what the actually get done.
    • dex  •  3 months ago
      thay all need a permenent vacation maybe in november they will get there wish ....
    • willr  •  3 months ago
      Which federal workers are they talking about???? My son works for the federal government and the only retirement he has is what he pays in to it. Do the boyz in D C have some special deal we don't know about? How about congress take a 20% paycut?
    • Brinkmanship  •  Middletown, Maryland  •  3 months ago
      What are they going to take hostage in return for that act of reason?
    • Mark  •  Ocala, Florida  •  3 months ago
      NewsFlash: The Middle class will pay for eveything, The Super Rich and Super poor, Nothing!
      Hasn't changed in 100 years.
    • HappySmoker  •  Issaquah, Washington  •  3 months ago
      Something just doesn't make sense. The USA is about to go bankrupt and Congress is haggling over tax cuts? My God, let's throw them all out in Nov.
    • David1  •  3 months ago
      Republicans were pressing for pay cuts for Federal Workers,,ACCEPT THEMSELVES,,,and requiring them to pay more into their pensions,,, ACCEPT FOR CONGRESS"S OF COURSE, which is 100% funded by TAXPAYERS at 100% of their wages for life PLUS FREE MEDICAL COVERAGE. Congress seems to be exempt from ANY CUTS.
    • Jane 'No Dough'  •  Milwaukee, Wisconsin  •  3 months ago
      No more 'trading this for that' or' if you don't give us this we will do that'. From now on---vote on one thing at a time and we will know who to blame when election time comes around. YOU IDIOTS, Don't you think that we are paying attention?

    RATES

    Stay in touch with Yahoo! Finance

      YAHOO! FINANCE ON TWITTER

    Subscribe

    [X]

    How to subscribe

    Roll over each section to subscribe using Add to My Yahoo! or RSS Feed feeds.

    Yahoo! News offers dozens of RSS feeds you can read in My Yahoo! or using third-party RSS news reader software. Click here to find out more about RSS and how you can use it with Yahoo! News.