Mon, May 28, 2012, 12:24 PM EDT - U.S. Markets closed for Memorial Day

House passes drilling-friendly energy package

Bill forces decision on pipeline, expands drilling to pay for transportation projects

WASHINGTON (AP) -- The Republican-controlled House endorsed a plan Thursday to vastly expand oil and gas drilling off the nation's coasts to help pay for a $260 billion transportation bill.

The legislation has no chance of passing the Senate and faces a White House veto. But for Republicans, the 237-187 vote showed they're willing to go further to boost U.S. energy production than President Barack Obama. Obama lately has embraced increased oil and gas production on the campaign trail, and has touted how the U.S. in recent years has produced record amounts of oil and natural gas.

"The bill we are considering ... is an action plan that clearly contrasts President Obama's anti-energy policies with the pro-energy, pro-American jobs policies of Republicans," said Rep. Doc Hastings, R-Wash., chairman of the House Natural Resources Committee.

The legislation, which 21 Republicans voted against and 21 Democrats voted for, would open the eastern Gulf of Mexico off Florida and areas off the Atlantic and Pacific coasts to drilling, lift a ban on drilling in a small portion of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge and order leases to be offered for Western oil shale.

Obama has said he would not pursue drilling off the Pacific and in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, and has pushed back offering leases in the Atlantic until at least 2017.

The measure also would force the approval of the Keystone XL oil pipeline within a month, which Obama recently rejected, saying there wasn't enough time for an adequate environmental review.

Democrats argued that the bill amounted to a gift for an oil industry that was headed nowhere and would pay only a fraction of the cost of the transportation bill. The Congressional Budget Office has estimated that the offshore drilling portions alone would bring in $4.3 billion between 2013-2022, a number Republicans say is underestimated.

It was also unclear whether the energy provisions, which were added as a sweetener to get tea partiers behind the expensive transportation bill, will help save the measure. House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, put off action on the legislation until after next week's congressional recess when it became clear even his own party wasn't enthusiastic about it.

Interior Secretary Ken Salazar, echoing the sentiments of other Democrats, said this week that the additional drilling provided "phantom revenue."

"We know that these places are not going to be developed in the near-term at all," Salazar said at a congressional hearing Wednesday on his agency's budget. "It will not fund the transportation needs of the United States of America."

___

Follow Dina Cappiello's environment coverage on Twitter: (at)dinacappiello

 

10 comments

  • burglar  •  Naples, Florida  •  3 months ago
    Harry will stall the bill, Barry will veto, Americans will pay.
  • Bob B  •  Philadelphia, Pennsylvania  •  3 months ago
    Harry Reid should be brought up on charges of treason...
  • retired  •  Baton Rouge, Louisiana  •  3 months ago
    Funny, the drivel out of this presidents mouth sounds more like someone talking from a coma. He only says what is necessary to pacify the audience he's talking to. And, the GOP aren't doing much better. It's like they're just sitting around waiting for the waitress to come by with a "what to do today" menu.
  • NON  •  3 months ago
    EXCELLENT.
  • steve  •  3 months ago
    This will force Obama's hand and reveal his anti-economic growth/recovery agenda. Good Job!!!!

    V for Vendetta
  • freedom fighter  •  Baton Rouge, Louisiana  •  3 months ago
    If its good for America or the tax-payers it will not pass,you can bet your bottom dollar on that.
    • Habiru 3 months ago
      My bottom dollar is rising to the top.
  • rrf  •  Stone Mountain, Georgia  •  3 months ago
    If it is good for America obama won't do it. odumbo out in 2012 or America is history.
  • 46thPres  •  Collinsville, Illinois  •  3 months ago
    Obama and the democrats have no interest in America being independent of foreign oil.
    Makes you wonder who's side they are on?
    • rrf 3 months ago
      How right you are.
    • Habiru 3 months ago
      hE IS NOT ON CHEAP FUELS SIDE
  • Thomas  •  Elmhurst, Illinois  •  3 months ago
    American oil production is increasing, while fuel efficiency is also increasing, all under a Democratic administration. The job of Gov't is to influence technology, and to protect us from harm. No more oil spills are allowed.
    • Bob B 3 months ago
      funny, but I don't recall seeing anything in any document regarding governments role in influencing technology...dimwit.
    • Habiru 3 months ago
      The BP excuse worked so well for the greenies to close everything W opened. Who knows how it took place. As per usual it's about appearances and deflecting responsibility.
  • Mike Ripley  •  3 months ago
    I wonder How the People in Florida feel about this drill friendly oil bill? did they forget the BP oil spill ....is that still leaking? they will never tell, ?...and how much tourism revenue was lost? what about the Fish industry I still dont eat fish because of the gulf Oil spill and the chemicals they used to hide the spill...and on top of that what about all the Nuclear Radiation in the ocean, in the 50 mile perimeter of the japan reactor?
    And the estimated 4.3 billion over 10 years? How was that figure calculated?? and really it isnt that much (480 million a year in the US economy Mitt has more money then that...) how many billion was lost from the BP Spill? And JOBS??? How many Americans really work on those Rigs anyway?
 
Recent Quotes
Symbol Price Change % Chg 
Your most recently viewed tickers will automatically show up here if you type a ticker in the "Enter symbol/company" at the bottom of this module.
You need to enable your browser cookies to view your most recent quotes.
 
Sign-in to view quotes in your portfolios.

Trading Center

Yahoo! Finance on Facebook

  YAHOO! FINANCE ON TWITTER