Among the posts this past week were entries about Carl Icahn, the Nasdaq flash freeze and quantitative easing.
Please click here for information about subscribing to RealMoney Pro.
Tweet From Carl Icahnl
Originally published on Thursday, Aug. 22 at 2:48 p.m. EDT.
He says he will meet with Apple
Spoke to Tim. Planning dinner in September. Tim believes in buyback and is doing one. What will be discussed is magnitude.— Carl Icahn (@Carl_C_Icahn) August 22, 2013
From my perch, this tweet by Icahn minutes before a possible reopening of Apple's shares (and after a breakdown under $500) is borderline promotional -- manipulative and questionable from an ethical standpoint.
But I guess Twitter, which I have left, is the new frontier (or Wild West) for all sorts of cowboys, wealthy and not-so-wealthy!
At the time of publication, Kass was short AAPL.
The Flash Freeze
Originally published on Thursday, Aug. 22 at 2:45 p.m. EDT.
Many are surprised that the levels of stock prices have been materially unaffected by the Nasdaq's flash freeze.
Upon reflection, why should this impact the short-term direction of stock prices?
As Josh Brown just mentioned, the majority of retail investors are in ETFs and not in individual Nasdaq issues.
As I wrote, the flash freeze likely only impacts daytraders who need to be flat by day's end.
But in all likelihood, their sales (as they are predominantly long) will be met by purchases form counterparties.
It's a big deal for the Nasdaq and the media that is reporting it but not as market impactful as many expect/think, imho.
The Essence of the Bear Case for U.S. Stocks
Originally published on Wednesday, Aug. 21 at 11:44 a.m. EDT.
With the release of the Fed minutes only a few hours away, here are some of my deep thoughts.
It remains my view (and apparently that of the San Francisco Fed) that quantitative easing is losing its effectiveness and that, over time, QE has done less than expected by the Fed.
In essence (and with the benefit of hindsight), QE lifted asset prices, but the sensitivity of economic growth to the rise in stock prices was weaker than it forecast, as the decline in the velocity of money has offset the growth in the money supply.
There are many reasons for this, including the private sector's deleveraging, a loss of business confidence and rather than lending out the liqudity that was provided by the Fed, the banking industry has increased its excess reserves.
After several years of quantitative easing and little growth to show for it, we are left with the question as to whether the U.S. is in a (light) liquidity trap that will lead to slowing and disappointing domestic economic growth and a challenge to corporate profits.
If we are (and I believe it to be the case), the outlook for equities is much more negative than many suggest. At the very least, this consideration/threat forms the basis for a lengthy period of market consolidation and underscores the likelihood that the U.S. stock market has topped for the year.
- 5 Biggest Auto Flops of the Past Decade
- The 5 Best Luxury SUVs of 2013
- 10 Cars That Retain Their Value When You Sell in Five Years
- Investment & Company Information
- Carl Icahn
- quantitative easing
- stock market
- Tim Cook