Mon, May 28, 2012, 1:48 PM EDT - U.S. Markets closed for Memorial Day

January Up - Now There's a 92.3% Chance that 2012 Will be a Good Year

RELATED QUOTES

SymbolPriceChange
^GSPC1,317.81995-2.86
^IXIC2,837.53-1.85
^DJI12,454.83-74.92
^RUT766.410.00
^VIX21.760.22

January has been a month of superlatives - positive and negative.

Here are the positive:

The S&P 500 was up 4.36% in January 2012, the biggest January gain since 1997.

For the entire month of January, the S&P 500 never suffered any more than a 0.6% drop. This is the first time ever.

Unemployment, at least the official number, dropped to 8.3%.

Here are the negative:

Trading volume has been abysmal. You may remember me harping about low volume last year at this time. Well, the average number of daily NYSE volume last year was 891 million shares. This year it was 661 million shares, a 26% drop. As point of reference, in 2008 an average of 1.12 billion shares were traded every day in January, 59% more than this year.

The state of California is out of cash again (sooner than expected) and may not be able to pay for tax refunds.

The debt-to-GDP ratio for the United States is now north of 100%.

U.S. home prices dropped another 3.7% nationwide based on the most recent S&P Case/Shiller Home Price Index.

Two Questions:

The stock market's January performance raised two obvious questions:

1) Why are stocks rallying that hard?

2) Will they continue to rally?

Why Are Stocks Rallying so Hard?

Doesn't 2012 thus far feel much like 2011? It does for a number of reasons. The Fed was pumping cash into the market via QE2 in 2011 and the Fed is once again pumping cash into the market via a covert version of QE3.

The Fed is sending billions of dollars to Europe through its U.S. dollar liquidity swap agreement with the European Central Bank (ECB). In addition to the Fed's donation, the ECB is providing unlimited, three-year 1% loans to European Banks. This is not officially QE3, but it's pretty close and it does the trick for stocks.

But there's also a similarity between 2012 and 2011 in terms of the rally's technical structure.

The October 11, 2011 ETF Profit Strategy Newsletter anticipated that: 'This rally from the 1,075 low is a miniature version of the March 2009 - May 2011 rally. I expect some difficulties in forecasting the exact route (including the end) of this rally.'

The above assessment followed the October 2 prediction of a major market low: 'The ideal market bottom would see the S&P dip below 1,088 intraday followed by a strong recovery and a close above 1,088. From a technical point of view this counter trend rally should end somewhere around 1,275 - 1,300.' S&P 1,300 sounded ridiculous at the time, but look where the S&P is today?

Will Stocks Continue to Rally?

Purely based on past performance and statistics, it is near certain that major market indexes like the Dow Jones (DJI: ^DJI - News), S&P (SNP: ^GSPC - News), Nasdaq (Nasdaq: ^IXIC - News) and Rusell 2000 (Chicago Options: ^RUT) will end 2012 with gains.

The Stock Trader's Almanac follows three separate indicators, all of which are pointing towards full year gains:

Santa Claus Rally (SCR): If Santa fails to call, the bears may come to Broad and Wall. There was a 1.9% SCR gain, so the bears are unlikely to occupy Wall Street.

First Five January Days: The first five January days are an early warning system, but the S&P was up 1.8%.

January Barometer: As January goes, so goes the year. The S&P was up 4.36% in January.

Composite Indicator: Since 1950, there have been 27 years (including 2012) where all three above indicators were positive. Full year gains followed 92.3% of the time (Datasource: Stock Trader's Almanac. This does not reflect my personal outlook).

Fly in the Ointment (or on the Windshield?)

This all sounds great, but we should keep in mind that 2011 started out exactly the same way. A positive SCR, first five days and January Barometer coincided with a low VIX (Chicago Options: ^VIX) reading and were followed by a financial yo-yo ride.

The chart below shows the S&P's performance from January 1 - August 1, 2011. Despite much fluff and good will established early in the year, stocks didn't go anywhere the first eight months (or the entire year).

                            

Keep in mind that 2011 was also a pre-election year, the strongest of the 4-year election cycle. There hasn't been a down pre-election year since 1939. The S&P avoided breaking that streak by a mere 0.1%.

In summary, seasonality-based statistics are great, but they need to be taken in context with a big picture approach to investing.

Important Resistance

I thought the market would reverse in the 1,307 - 1,330 range. 1,307 is the 78.6% Fibonacci retracement of the points lost from May - October 2011 and 1,328 is trend line resistance going back to October 2007.

But, there's a more important trend line a bit higher. In April 2011 this trend line traversed through 1,377. The April 2, 2011 ETF Profit Strategy update referred to this trend line and warned that: 'The 1,369 - 1,382 range is a strong candidate for a reverse of potential proportions.' The S&P reversed at 1,371.

With the S&P nearing that trend line, we should not forget that if you take away the key ingredient from a momentum-driven market - momentum - you get a house of cards that quickly crumbles. The last several years provide many examples of such post-momentum meltdowns.

What will constitute broken momentum and how far could momentum take stocks?

The ETF Profit Strategy Newsletter identifies the two key levels (one is support beneath current prices and the other is trend line resistance that serves as target for this rally) that are likely to break momentum and increase selling pressure.



More From ETFguide.com
 

18 comments

  • A Yahoo! User  •  Irvine, California  •  3 months ago
    These jerks have predicted doom throughout this entire rally. Anyone who listened to them missed a chance to make an enormous profit.
    • WILLIAM 3 months ago
      Hang on not an enormous profit. More like a modest one yeah?
    • Ralph 3 months ago
      This guy nailed it. I have no idea what your talking about. He called the reversal in October, but told people to becareful. We are still in a trading range with a top. The Vix is near 15, everytime it has gotten there it explodes northward in a few days. Take some profits if you have them.
  • TodG  •  Newark, New Jersey  •  3 months ago
    There's a 92.3% chance that if its said there is a 92.3% chance of the market being up that it will not be. Recall the last year predictions.
  • Brendan  •  Woodbridge, New Jersey  •  3 months ago
    So the market didn't reverse at 1330? That's ok just draw a new line at 1370. If not a new line at 1405, eventually you'll be right and that's the only forecast you'll repeat 6 months after.

    The only thing lower than your credibility is the odds of one of your calls coming true.
  • Raoul  •  Montreal, Canada  •  3 months ago
    Irvine, California makes a good point. This etfguide definitely has been insinuating a downward reversal was imminent. But now that stocks have gone straight up everyday, where down days have become seemingly impossible, they are turning bullish! It looks a lot like buying high selling low to me. We'll see how things turn out.
  • Kirk  •  New York, New York  •  3 months ago
    this guy is master at talking out of both sides of his mouth, then cherry picking the correct statement later to repeat endlessly. he frames his arguments so he wins no matter what the outcome is.
  • Dawgzilla  •  3 months ago
    I'm don't have total conviction in this rally, but here are the facts:

    1) We have better employment numbers, but I still don't believe that they tell the whole, real underlying truth about unemployment (the government uses a "grey" model=neither black/nor white, but one that 'accomodates" their desired interests (political gamesmanship, if you will). If they actually told the REAL truth about unemployment and the federal deficit, we might have a HUGE selloff=PANIC!..
    2) Shorts are getting aqueezed the higher this market goes
    3) Banks still are having a hard time lending
    4) The federal deficit is STILL rising
    5) Underfunded pension, S.S. and medicare is still on the horizen
    6) Home prices continue to be under pressure, maybe not as much though! this doesn't even take into account for those underwater either.
    7) E.U. economic problem(s)
    8) Potential Isreal conflict with iran
    9) Increasing oil/gas prices, not to mention hogher food prices of which government x-factors out in calculating their "inflation numbers"
    10) Etc..

    BUT,.......there still is ALOT of cash on the sideline, and this has been a low volume rally, for the most part. Unemployment, eventually, has to bottom out; afterall, consumers do what they do best: CONSUME (and no one is consuming less, let alone there are more of them every year). Businesses need to update their technology. Cars are the oldest they have been for decades (number of years the original owner owns before updating). The market has, eccentially,,been flat for 11+ YEARS; there is no way that the market can be PERPETUALLY flat, especially with more developing nations coming into play, not to mention more people (7 billion+ =potential consumers).etc..

    My 2 cents worth, no pun intended!
  • David  •  Berlin, Germany  •  3 months ago
    A stupid projection. The odds are 50-50. Just like rolling dice, past performance isn't a prelude to currenct or future performance.
    • C 3 months ago
      Guten tag. No. 50-50 the next 11 months will be average long term growth making 2012 overall good.
  • LarryJ  •  Las Vegas, Nevada  •  3 months ago
    This year will set the tone for the election of a new President. Obama will make sure the market is good. They will fudge the unemployment numbers and anything else they can manuever to make things look sparkling before election time!! The time to get out of the market is when and if he is re-elected!!
    • C 3 months ago
      Good point! I think the market booms if Obama loses, but if unemployment drops from here, he's probably at 50% or better. The Republicans have a great case against him, but it is hard to communicate to the masses. Actually not that hard; I don't understand it - they're incompetent. I think they are so arrogant that they can't imagine others 1) wanting to think they're wrong; 2) thinking they're wrong based on misleading information; 3) or them even being wrong hence having to really communicate simply why they are right to overcome that.
    • C 3 months ago
      Obama winning won't matter that much if the House stays solid Republican. I think it will.
  • ST  •  Jackson, New Jersey  •  3 months ago
    Oh God! The ETF Profit Strategy is a joke. How does Yahoo publish these kinds of crap?
  • Barry  •  3 months ago
    Only one very important thing this article left out: Its all being done with 'funny' money......
  • Daniel Franklin  •  San Diego, California  •  3 months ago
    I feel sorry for Simon, he forecasted that rally months ago and people are getting hostile now where the market is a couple percent above his original target. In October they called him a jerk for saying stocks will rally big and now he's a jerk because stocks rallied too much. FYI, a few days ago he suggested the S&P will move above 1,350.
    • Optomist 3 months ago
      I do admire that you consistently defend Simon.... unless you are Simon. I wish Simon would apply his impressive thought process to looking at the biggest possible market picture and write about that picture. I believe it would lead to better predictions and more interesting reading.
  • Becky Mon-chu  •  Birmingham, Alabama  •  3 months ago
    Even with the DOW matching the highs in May 2011, most mutual funds and the like have not achieved values that they had in May 2011. I believe the Fed is doing something as suggested with a covert QE3. US treasuries yields look as though something like that is going on.
  • C  •  Levittown, Pennsylvania  •  3 months ago
    Well, we are still in a liquidity crisis causing low volume. You're right, cash to invest is in short supply. Ever shopping in the 3rd World? You could probably buy half of Somalia for very little. But the difference is, this is a temporal 3rd World. The stocks are cheap but whose got risk-liquidity? '08 housing USA, '11 PIIGS debt.

    There is a 92.3% chance 2012 will be GREAT ... not good. Even if not this could be not quite as great as the late 70s to own stocks (the yield then was 14% on the S&P) but it seems excellent. The yield is still kind of low, but this has been a horrible 5 years and as I said it's a liquidity crisis. I think it's a promising yield given the circumstances. And the trailing 10 year P/E S&P is high, but, again that includes the post-'00 internet bubble economic fumbling before the '03 Bush tax cut and emphatically January 2007 to January 2012. If earnings are indeed $110 on the S&P this year I think given the growth potential on a 20 year horizon from here (and 10 year but with less confidence) you'd better put a 16 multiple on that rather than 12. That's 1760. Not the current S&P BECAUSE of the liquidity crisis and slow global economy presently.
  • pat  •  Tampa, Florida  •  3 months ago
    It's only one month in, give the big o a chance he'll screw it up and screw us over
  • Alvin Tawney  •  3 months ago
    This person who wrote this totaly stupid.We're headed for A depression.
  • JM  •  3 months ago
    If there were any wrong predictions its because unlike most other years, the Fed has been pumping trillion after trillion, supposedly to encourage housing, but its mainly pushed up stocks and commodities! Therefore the surge continues and will continue as long as the big players like banks and financial institutions, have trillions pouring into their coffers. There is going to be less volume due to higher prices, and that's why the Fed will keep interest rates low, so that the rally continues to the election, and beyond. Each President wants to be remembered for adding a few 1000 points to the DOW! And was'nt it the President, who encouraged stock buying in March/April 2009? Even the IMF want a trillion and the European Central bank 700 billion euros. Everyone wants stocks to touch new highs every year! For most of us, we still need to somehow survive, on pathetic minimum/ near minimum wages!
  • Matthew  •  Murray, Kentucky  •  3 months ago
    They're telling us there will be a 90% crash sometime this year. Now they are saying there is a 92.3% of the market being up this year. Were they wrong about the crash? Are they sure this year will be good? Which one is true? Come on tell us the truth. We all deserve to know which one is true.
  • Tim  •  Raleigh, North Carolina  •  3 months ago
    The only people making money by this "journalism" is the etf guide itself. I predict based in the wind directions in early march that markets will crash than rebound with the vix to trends near the nearest root of e. where's my money?
 
Recent Quotes
Symbol Price Change % Chg 
Your most recently viewed tickers will automatically show up here if you type a ticker in the "Enter symbol/company" at the bottom of this module.
You need to enable your browser cookies to view your most recent quotes.
 
Sign-in to view quotes in your portfolios.

Trading Center

Yahoo! Finance on Facebook

  YAHOO! FINANCE ON TWITTER