Mon, May 28, 2012, 2:30 PM EDT - U.S. Markets closed for Memorial Day

Kodak sues Fujifilm as stock slumps

Kodak's stock slumps on report it's seeking bankruptcy financing; sues Fujifilm over patents

RELATED QUOTES

SymbolPriceChange
AAPL562.29-3.03
C26.47-0.19
NOK2.820.08
RIM.TO11.370.03

ROCHESTER, N.Y. (AP) -- Even as the specter of bankruptcy protection looms, Eastman Kodak Co. is intensifying its efforts to defend its intellectual property.

In a lawsuit it filed here Friday against Fujifilm Corp., Kodak claimed some of its Japanese rival's cameras infringe its digital-imaging technology. At the beginning of the week, Kodak sued Apple Inc. and HTC Corp. claiming some of their smartphones, tablets and other devices infringe Kodak patents related to transmitting images.

The ailing photography pioneer has relied on patent licensing fees and lawsuits to collect $1.9 billion since 2008.

Kodak's stock slumped Friday amid renewed fears that the 132-year-old business icon is preparing to seek bankruptcy court protection from its creditors.

Based in Rochester, N.Y., Kodak has amassed more than 1,000 digital-imaging patents, and almost all of today's digital cameras rely on its technology. Mining its rich array of inventions — through both licensing deals and lawsuits — has become an indispensable tool in its long and painful digital overhaul.

Kodak claims Fujifilm is infringing five separate patents related to various aspects of capturing, storing, previewing and transmitting images. It said it has licensed the same technology to more than 30 companies, including mobile-device makers such as Motorola Inc. and Nokia Corp.

Years of negotiations ended with Tokyo-based Fujifilm suing Kodak in October for patent infringement, a claim Kodak's chief intellectual property officer, Timothy Lynch, called "a thinly veiled attempt to redirect attention from their continued use of Kodak patented technology."

Calls to Fujifilm were not immediately returned.

Kodak is pursuing a third dispute before the U.S. International Trade Commission in Washington, D.C., against Apple and BlackBerry maker Research in Motion Ltd. over image-preview technology. Kodak has said it hopes to get $1 billion from a resolution of the two-year-old claim. But the commission, a U.S. arbiter for trade disputes, recently put off its decision until September.

Earlier Friday, Citigroup Inc. and Kodak both declined to comment on a Bloomberg report that Citigroup is in talks to provide Kodak bankruptcy financing.

Bloomberg said three anonymous people familiar with the negotiations said Kodak may seek protection from creditors within weeks and then auction its digital-imaging patents, which analysts estimate could fetch at least $2 billion. Kodak put them up for sale in July, but has seen little interest.

Worries about a bankruptcy protection filing surfaced in September after Kodak hired major restructuring law firm Jones Day as an adviser.

On Friday, Kodak shares fell 15 cents, or 22.3 percent, to close at 52 cents. They touched a record low of 36 cents Jan. 5.

 

6 comments

  • Richard S  •  Pleasanton, California  •  4 months ago
    Too bad Kodak did not have forward thinking new technolgy, and/or improvements of their own existing patents. Others' simply found a need and filled it based, on older patented technolgies. Kodak could have made a few updated tweaks to their existing patents, and have made it faster better and smarter, rather than shuttering "non performing" business sectors. But the Board and their selected overpaid Executives continue to collect their checks and watch their common stockholders (including me), the workers who have/had pride in the red and yellow logo, go down the winding road. Almost like a hostile takeover, but from the inside.
    Very Disapointing .
  • Jim Shorts  •  Rochester, New York  •  4 months ago
    Kodak should sue Antonia Perez!
    • Richard 4 months ago
      Kodak cannot, for they have to defend him. Kodak should kick out the id???
  • Richard  •  Newburgh, New York  •  4 months ago
    Who next is Kodak going to sue in order to avoid bankruptcy and increase "sound-bites?" Perhaps they will sue me because I dare express an opinion about them that differs from their view of themselves. Please, someone, tell me why Kodak did not sue FUJI years ago? Is there such a thing as estoppal in this type of litigation? If there is not, I think there should be. What about statute of limitations: One day twenty years later Kodak wakes up and says, "Oh, Fuji used the technology we discovered but we did not have the SMARTS to use ourselves!" GIVE ME A BREAK, KODAK. Richard (Trysson) owns 50 shares of Kodak.
  • Mr Common Sense  •  4 months ago
    All those chink ratholes (especially Korea) steal everyones technology.
  • James  •  Toronto, Canada  •  4 months ago
    Patents are patents, Kodak should be compensated by FujiFilm, Research In Motion, HTC and Apple. Problem is Research In Motion is already deeply in extremely troubles itself, Kodak must expedite effort to collect its claims from Research In Motion before Research In Motion apparently goes bankrupt.
    • Richard 4 months ago
      RIMM is not going to go bankrupt. Kodak is. Kodak is mis-managed, cannot see clearly; RIMM is managed much better, it will overcome its tech-blunder!
  • Jim Shorts  •  Rochester, New York  •  4 months ago
    Kodak and Antonia S U K #$%$ K!!!!
 
Recent Quotes
Symbol Price Change % Chg 
Your most recently viewed tickers will automatically show up here if you type a ticker in the "Enter symbol/company" at the bottom of this module.
You need to enable your browser cookies to view your most recent quotes.
 
Sign-in to view quotes in your portfolios.

Trading Center

Yahoo! Finance on Facebook

  YAHOO! FINANCE ON TWITTER