Mon, May 28, 2012, 3:31 PM EDT - U.S. Markets closed for Memorial Day

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    Living to 100? That Will Be $3.5 Million

    Here's to your long life -- and the heaps of cash it will require.

    The average American who lives to the ripe old age of 100 will spend $3.5 million in his or her lifetime, according to an analysis of data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. A good chunk of that bill, more than $1.5 million, will have been racked by your 50th birthday. The next 30 or so years -- the average 50-year-old today can expect to live until 81 -- will run another $1.4 million. And the lucky few who make it to 100 will need an additional $630,000. Experts say these high costs of living often come as a shock to retirees, many of whom expect to dramatically cut back on their living expenses as they get older and stick to a fixed budget. "A lot of time people actually end up spending more money in retirement than they may have spent when they were working," says Heidi Schmidt, a wealth manager in Dallas with USAA.

    Just where that money goes depends largely on your decade. Most people in their 60s spend a lot of their savings on entertainment -- finally buying that sail boat or splurging on trips to the Caribbean. Those in their 80s, on the other hand, typically swap a good portion of their leisure budget for medical bills.

    Of course, not all expenses come down to age, experts say. A healthy octogenarian with wanderlust might have spending habits more in line with people twenty or thirty years younger. And certainly many Americans will spend much less in retirement -- either through careful planning, a good bit of luck or both. Whatever the retirement goals, here's a breakdown of how spending tends to vary through the retirement years.

    60's

        Housing (mortgage, utilities and decor): $155,500
        Furnishings and appliances: $15,000
        Entertainment and eating out: $46,700
        Transportation: $71,000

    In this decade of transitioning into retirement, 60-somethings spend more than older age groups on everything from housing to clothes. Many who retire in their 60s often find themselves with the time -- and savings -- to finally splurge a little on traveling or a big-ticket item like a car. Or to indulge their favorite hobbies: According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the average recently retired American spends $2,300 a year on activities like going to the movies, caring for a pet and buying the latest gadgets. That drops to an average of $1,300 after age 75.

    70's

        Total health care costs: $48,400
        Prescription drugs: $8,100
        Household repairs: $16,400
        Utilities: $33,900

    Aging's challenges come with bigger price tags. When people hit their 70s, health care costs begin to spike. Longer life spans and the rise of chronic illnesses have pushed up national health care spending, according to the Kaiser Family Foundation. People in their late 60s and early 70s spend an average $4,900 a year on healthcare, an increase of almost 30% from people in their late 50s and early 60s, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Adding to the burden, health-care costs are expected to grow faster than income over the coming years, according to Kaiser.

    80's

        Health Insurance: $30,300
        Entertainment and eating out: $26,000
        Groceries: $26,400
        Gasoline: $9,800

    Eighty-somethings spend 57% more on health insurance and half as much on entertainment as folks in their 50s. More retirees are saving money in their later years of retirement by moving in with their adult children. A survey by the Pew Research Center released in 2010 found that 21% of adults age 85 and above live in a multi-generational household that includes at least two adult generations or a grandparent. That is up from 17% of people in their late 40s and early 50s.

    90's

        Nursing home (private room): $87,200
        Out-of-pocket long-term care: $14,000
        Assisted living: $89,000
        Adult day services: $36,400

    Health costs grow exponentially from one's 50s to mid-90s. And America's 1.9 million nonagerians depend heavily on Social Security and pensions. But the former source may come up short by the time most baby boomers are in their 90s: the Social Security Administration has already started tapping its trust fund to cover benefits and current projections estimate that Social Security will only have enough funds to cover 75% of scheduled benefits after 2036.

    Have you calculated how much money you’ll need if you live into your 90s?

    Loading...
    Poll Choice Options
    • Yes
    • No
     
    • Joey Biden  •  Northbrook, Illinois  •  3 months ago
      I plan to work an additional 5 years after I'm dead.
      • Don 3 months ago
        Don't blame your lack of planning or stupidity on the politicians, it's all all on you.
      • Mike 3 months ago
        And that's just to pay for gasoline.
      • Lucky 3 months ago
        half time or full time
    • Terri  •  Panama City, Florida  •  3 months ago
      My mother-in-law will be 101 next month and she had only modest savings 20 yrs ago, $250,000. She still has $100,000 left. She spends very little--what would she spend it on--flashy clothes, cars, & electronic gizmos?! These kind of scary tactics are meant to sell more insurance & mutual funds, & encourage risky stock sales to obtain higher earnings.
      • Chad 3 months ago
        You hit the nail on the head. Exactly
      • Cali 3 months ago
        I had to help my parents get their money out of these plans so these brokers don't take advantage of them. They're both 88 and don't need no 30 year plans. Both in good health and want to travel more.
      • Papa Frank 3 months ago
        God Bless 80 somthings that want to travel. It gives me hope. THX
    • YOUBETCHA  •  3 months ago
      This article would have been MUCH more useful if it had broken out expenses by economic group. Statistical median figures (Maybe not even the SAME across the different studies mixed together for the article) arent really helpful to anyone. (Except to be misused to scare your customers to buy Mutual Funds or Insurance!)
    • Kate  •  San Bruno, California  •  3 months ago
      This article is worthless. It doesn't even give the same categories for each decade. It's comparing apples and oranges. Just a lot of gibberish taken from several studies and thrown together to take up space.
      • John 3 months ago
        the categories change with age....example more health care in older group,,get it?
      • Living on an island 3 months ago
        I agree. I was really concerned when I read the section on 70s costs. Since there is no money for eating out or groceries, I guess you have to fast for 10 years until your 80s when you can again buy groceries.
      • Mo 3 months ago
        They don't even till you if it is inflation adjusted or what assumptions they used for the numbers.
    • Pointandclique  •  3 months ago
      I'm going to continue saving in my 60's. I wanna buy something, but nothing that's being sold interests me. Still, what can you buy with a coffee can filled with pocket change and an old comic strip from Bazooka Bubble Gum?
      • Mo 3 months ago
        My bubble gum baseball cards might be worth a whole lot. But I am saving too unless I see something I want. If I see it I wait for a month and then see if I still want it.
      • Richard 3 months ago
        If the coins are old, they might be worth a lot more than face value. The older I get the fewer things I want or need.
      • Les 3 months ago
        Buy a 1 dollar lotto ticket at least once a week. Yo can't hit if you don't play.
    • cowboy47201  •  Bloomington, Indiana  •  3 months ago
      I am almost to the end of my 60's and have not spent anywhere close to that number. Who are these people talking about? Should be "living til 100 in NYC".
      • JLJR 3 months ago
        Where do they come up with these figures? I'm 56 and living fine and will never make 500,000 in my lifetime. Own a home, have a new car and still have money to golf.....LOL!
      • Howard 3 months ago
        40 years of work and made less then $500,000. Have you been part-time your whole life?
      • My2cents 3 months ago
        Agreed, a lot of these articles inflate the numbers a lot. The reality is that only 1-2% of the people will have this kind of money. Guess what? Almost everyone else will do just fine.

        My grandma had lots of friends; entertaining was to bake a cake (not even $5), brewing some tea ($1 for 4 people) and let the gossiping and card playing begin ($0). I'll bet that she had more fun than this hypothetical couple.
    • John  •  Carrollton, Missouri  •  3 months ago
      The AVERAGE person dosen't even make that much in a life time.
    • michael  •  Los Angeles, California  •  3 months ago
      If you are debt free in your seventies, eighties, and nineties, it is hard to spend more than a few thousand per month. We are in our early seventies and get along fine on social security and modest savings. While it is important to plan for retirement you will do OK by simply staying out of debt and saving what you can. It helps a lot if your children like you.
    • william  •  3 months ago
      At least in your 70's you won't have to pay for groceries, gasoline, transportation or eating out and entertainment. What?
    • J  •  3 months ago
      When you think about it, articles like this are sort of silly. You can't spend more than you have, right? Simple.
    • TOG  •  Manchester, New Hampshire  •  3 months ago
      Are these numbers per annum or per decade? Either way they are rubbish!
    • Bill  •  Monroe, Louisiana  •  3 months ago
      I don't think so. Housing expenses in the 60s but not after that? The whole thing seems unrealistic.
    • penurius  •  Orlando, Florida  •  3 months ago
      The bottom line here is if you don't have it you can't spend it. In that case you find a way to get by on what you do have. For many if not most people in retirement their spending is throttled by their income and assets, not by how much they would like to spend.
    • CrnaLegia  •  3 months ago
      Entertainment and eating out $46000. Is that a joke, I did not spend half of that all my
      life for that purpose, and I am over 50
    • Myra  •  3 months ago
      And people lived together in multigenerational homes. Grandkids watched grandparents age and die with dignity in their own beds. Sounds good to me. That'd take a chunk out of the big pharma/traditional medicine business pocket. Back to nature.
    • Mel  •  3 months ago
      Survival of fittest has been replaced by survival of the financially fittest.
    • yahoo user  •  3 months ago
      You would swear Fidelity was trying to sell anuities or something.
    • ONE MORE COMMA  •  Oklahoma City, Oklahoma  •  3 months ago
      None of us have the realistic luxury of knowing when we'll die, it would be handy to know for financial calculating... I hope to see 85, and realize I am there. You can't have too much saved/invested - I haven't read one story about a retiree complaining they saved TOO MUCH.

      My wife and I are setting back 15% (before match)... we may step that up next year depending on how our spending goes.

      It had better be enough!
    • Rico  •  Tampa, Florida  •  2 months ago
      The article is useless because people can only spend what they can afford. I am 67, retired at 58 and my lifestyle has not changed. Came to US with only $50 when I was 34 and put 4 kids thru college without gov help. Like most I took a loss on 401K and house but still take at least 3 foreign vacation per year and do not need $3.5
    • Scott  •  Denver, Colorado  •  3 months ago
      I've decided to start smoking cigarettes and snorting cocaine so I don't make it past 60. Do you know what that will cost me? I'm 53 now.

    FOCUS ON RETIREMENT