Mon, May 28, 2012, 3:48 PM EDT - U.S. Markets closed for Memorial Day

Mitt's 15% Problem: Romney's Tax Rate Is Below Families Making $50,000

The GOP frontrunner acknowledged his federal tax rate is 15%, thanks to a loophole called "carried interest" that helps the GOP frontrunner pay a rate similar to a family earning $50,000

Screen Shot 2012-01-17 at 6.10.52 PM.pngIn graph, X-axis is in dollars and numbers on the top of bars represent effective federal tax rates. Click to enlarge. Data from Tax Policy Center analysis of Mitt Romney's tax plan, which returns most rates to the Bush years.

Mitt Romney's private equity problem is taking a backseat today to Mitt Romney's tax problem. The GOP frontrunner acknowledged that his effective tax rate is around 15%, thanks to the tax code's preferential treatment of income from investments and private equity firms.

As Pat Garofalo explained for The Atlantic, a considerable portion of Romney's income comes from a retirement deal with Bain Capital that continues to pay him a small share of the firm's profits. The wonky term for this cool stream of money is "carried interest" -- the share of investor gains "carried" by the private equity or hedge fund manager.*

You might expect that Mitt's millions would be treated as earned income, because it represents gains from a service rendered by a private equity manager. Normally, that sort of money would be taxed at the top 35% marginal rate. Instead, the tax code treats Romney's retirement payout as carried interest -- investment income from a private equity firm shared among its managers. As a result, Romney pays Uncle Sam only 15% of his Bain Capital income.

In 2009, 15% was the average effective tax rate for households making between $75,000 and $100,000, in the middle quintile of U.S. families. That means Mitt Romney, a mega-millionaire, pays the tax rate as if his were a firmly middle class family, which would seem to pose a considerable political problem to a candidate fighting for middle class votes. To be clear, I don't think it's a moral problem. It's not like it's his fault, or anything. It's just the natural outcome of a tax system designed to give special treatment to investors -- and private equity managers, in particular.

Whether investment taxes should be preferential is a matter for debate. You can think of investment income from, say, a company's stock, as being taxed twice: first by the corporate income tax and second by the investment tax. That's a reason for capital gains taxes to be lower, and lower investment taxes theoretically means more savings and investment. On the other hand, the rich are more likely to invest, and if we want to protect a progressive tax code and raise enough money to fulfill our promises, taxing wealthy people's investment income as ordinary income in the 35% bracket would raise money we would otherwise have to borrow or cut.

Either way, private equity's "carried interest" loophole is not capital gains. Capital gains are income from your own investments. Carried interest is income from other people's investments. "If you manage money for a mutual fund or a public company, you pay regular income taxes," James Surowiecki explained in the New Yorker. "Do it for a private fund, and you pay capital gains." That's backward.

But don't expect Romney to hear much about carried interest from his fellow GOP presidential hopefuls. Under chief rival Newt Gingrich's tax plan, all investment income would be tax free and Romney's overall rate would fall quite near to zero.

___________

*Bonus background from an explainer we wrote last year:
Private equity and hedge fund managers tend to get paid according to what's known as the principle of 2 and 20. They charge 2% annual fees for managing the portfolio of assets, and they collect 20% of the fund's annual profits.

There's nothing strange about this arrangement. It makes sense to align managers' financial interests with their clients'. There is something strange about the way the government taxes these revenue streams. The 2% fees are considered income, so they're taxed up to the 35% marginal rate. The 20% profit returns are considered capital gains, so they're taxed at the long-term capital gains rate of 15%.







More From The Atlantic
 

8 comments

  • Satyr  •  4 months ago
    This article confuses effective tax rate with marginal tax rate. They are not the same thing and the title is absolutely false. Atlantic and Yahoo are either disingenuous, or ignorant. Take your pick. Or, choose both if you like.
    • Dan 4 months ago
      You're absolutely right...and the REAL reason for the confusion is actually LIBERAL BIAS.
  • Thomas  •  4 months ago
    Derek Thompson is an ecomonic illiterate and a troglodyte. According to the IRS tax tables for 2009, the last year tax return were filed, a married family with 1 child, taking the standard deduction and 3 personal exemptions would have an AGI of $34,050 and paid $4,309 in income taxes for an effective tax rate of 8.162%. In what parallel universe is 8.1762% more than 13.9%. He must have fallen down the rabbit hole where up is down and the sun rises in the West.
  • James  •  Franklin, Tennessee  •  4 months ago
    This article is an absolute crock. If you go to IRS.gov you will see that families with an AGI of $40k to $75K pay 6.3%. What a crock. All this article does is perpetuate the tax myth
  • Name  •  4 months ago
    Who's up for ANOTHER bailout? Funded by all taxpayers of course.
  • Thomas  •  4 months ago
    Sorry, the taxes paid are according to the 2010 tax rates published on the IRS.gov website. If you don't believe go compute them yourself. A single individual would have paid an effective rate of 13.23%. Still lower!!!!
  • Mike  •  Nashville, Tennessee  •  4 months ago
    The powerful and rich make the laws. On Fox News they said it will take over 100 million dollars to make a serious run for the Presidential election. Well, that takes care of 99.99999999999% of every American. The powerful and the rich made the process expensive, so to keep out everyone but the few they (the 1%) are financing....Hey move along, nothing to see here, everythings is on the up and up, thats what the powerful and rich (the 1%) keep telling us.....trust us, nothing illegal here, trust us.....
  • John  •  4 months ago
    Fuzzy math anyone? No idea how this idiot came up with his numbers, but they aren't even close. Clearly this is someone pushing their own agenda via supposed unbiased news.
  • Thurston  •  Everett, Washington  •  4 months ago
    If a "family" is making only $50k per year, Romney's tax rate is NOT their biggest worry, LOL.
 
Recent Quotes
Symbol Price Change % Chg 
Your most recently viewed tickers will automatically show up here if you type a ticker in the "Enter symbol/company" at the bottom of this module.
You need to enable your browser cookies to view your most recent quotes.
 
Sign-in to view quotes in your portfolios.

Trading Center

Yahoo! Finance on Facebook

  YAHOO! FINANCE ON TWITTER