Mon, May 28, 2012, 3:56 PM EDT - U.S. Markets closed for Memorial Day

More ND oil will be railed with no US pipeline

Rail shipments of North Dakota crude to increase with decision to block Keystone XL pipeline

RELATED QUOTES

SymbolPriceChange
CLR75.951.53
TRP41.220.12
BRK-A119,500.00-717.00
BRK-B79.25-0.55
TRP.TO41.99-0.46

BISMARCK, N.D. (AP) -- North Dakota oil drillers increasingly will rely on trains to move barrels of crude to market after the Obama administration's decision to reject plans for a pipeline that would run from Canada to refineries on the Gulf of Mexico, state and industry officials say.

"Pipelines are by far the safest and most economically efficient way to transport oil, but we are left with a limited number of options if pipelines are off the table," said Tony Clark, chairman of the North Dakota Public Service Commission. "Once the oil is flowing, it has to go somewhere."

Obama on Wednesday temporarily halted the $7 billion Keystone XL pipeline, saying an arbitrary deadline set by Republican lawmakers didn't give his administration enough time for review.

Calgary-based TransCanada Corp.'s 1,700-mile pipeline is designed to carry crude oil from tar sands near Hardisty, Alberta, through Montana, South Dakota, Nebraska, Kansas, Oklahoma and Texas. The pipeline also would move 100,000 barrels of crude daily, largely from North Dakota's burgeoning oil patch and some from Montana.

Billions of dollars of infrastructure improvements have been made in recent years to allow North Dakota's oil shipping capacity to keep pace with the skyrocketing production. North Dakota is the nation's fourth-biggest oil producer and is expected to trail only Texas in crude output within the next year.

Alison Ritter, a spokeswoman for the state Department of Mineral Resources, said the state's so-called takeaway capacity is adequate, though producers and the state were counting on the on the Keystone XL to move North Dakota crude.

Shipping crude by pipeline in North Dakota adds up to $1.50 to its cost, compared to $2 or more a barrel for rail shipments, producers say.

"Oil that would have moved by the Keystone XL is now going to shift to rail transportation," Ritter said.

While producers and state officials from both parties blasted the Obama administration's decision to block the Keystone XL, others in the Dakotas supported the decision. South Dakota's Rosebud Sioux Tribe had feared damage to water resources and cultural sites.

Wayde Schafer, a North Dakota spokesman for the Sierra Club, said Obama's decision was appropriate though oil that would have moved on the pipeline will be transported by environmentally riskier rail or trucks

"There is no question that oil by rail or truck is much more dangerous than a pipeline, but then again, you have to have adequate time and you have to site a pipeline appropriately or you're just asking for trouble," Schafer said.

"There is no good solution to the oil transportation problem and it's frustrating," he said. "What we need is to develop other energy sources other than fossil fuels."

Mile-long trains laden with North Dakota crude began running in 2008 when the state first reached its shipping capacity with existing pipelines and infrastructure, said Justin Kringstad, director of the North Dakota Pipeline Authority.

Rail shipments now account for about one-quarter of the more than 510,000 barrels produced daily in North Dakota and will increase exponentially with increased oil production and the shortage of pipelines, Kringstad said.

"If the (Keystone XL) is blocked or delayed, we still have to meet our transportation needs," Kringstad said. "It's pretty simple."

BNSF Railway Co. hauls about 75 percent of the oil that currently leaves North Dakota by train, Kringstad said.

The railroad is a unit of billionaire Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway Inc., and Buffett is a longtime Obama adviser.

Neither BNSF officials nor Buffett at his Berkshire Hathaway office in Omaha, Neb., returned telephone calls from The Associated Press.

Billionaire oilman Harold Hamm, chairman and chief executive officer of Continental Resources Inc., said he believed Buffett had no influence in Obama's decision to block the pipeline. Instead, he called it a "lucky break" for Buffett.

"Warren is smart and I like his intuition. He is a friend of mine," Hamm said. "I don't agree with his political leanings and his liberal outlook on things. But certainly he's favored by this decision — it's easy to figure that one out."

Hamm's Enid, Okla.-based company is one the oldest and biggest operators in North Dakota's booming oil patch, which incorporates most of the Bakken and underlying Three Forks formations.

Hamm said most of his company's production already is shipped by rail. If the Keystone XL is not built, oil production will be slowed in North Dakota but the domestic oil will be more valuable without the competition from Canadian crude, he said.

"Frankly, our reserves are worth more with (Obama's) decision," Hamm said. "But I don't think it's a good thing for America. I am an oil and gas businessman but I'm an American first."

 

13 comments

  • Scrap  •  4 months ago
    Hmmm...BNSF rail owned by Buffett who is a buddy of beloved Leader?.... Beloved Leader kills the pipeline.... Something is rotten in the Dakotas...
  • Alex  •  4 months ago
    There you have it. Proof Obama is bought and paid for by Warren Buffett. Nice to know Obama would hurt the middle class so he can keep his campaign cash cow happy.
  • Sad  •  Herndon, Virginia  •  4 months ago
    Three years+ isn't enough time for Obamdamass administration to clear this project. The enviromentalist conerns about Nebraska subsurface water is a joke..pipelines already run through that area. This is not only about transporting Canadian oil through the pipeline it's also for US oil to southern refineries. Major increases in Baaken oil production are forcasted in the near future and transporting it by rail seems to be the only way to go right now. Thanks damass for giving China a foothold on Canadian oil and having more trainloads of oil traveling rail routes in the US.
    • p 4 months ago
      All that oil you want to cross the country will only go to ports in the Gulf to be shipped to the highest bidders...grow up and realize how capitalism works...you do not need to destroy your country bozo!!!
  • Robert  •  4 months ago
    I'm only surprised AP actually mentioned the Buffet connection.
  • jack kreg  •  Surfside, California  •  4 months ago
    building on the pipeline will start by mid year, once obummer sees his re-election campaign is a total flop!
    • Seedaview 4 months ago
      Sad, but I think you are right. He would endanger the enviornment to hold an ace up his sleeve. He is the ultimate slimeball.
    • William 4 months ago
      Endanger/ The Alaskan pipeline is in an extreme locale. No problems there. Even the caribou like it. They huddle near it to enjoy the warmth.
    • Robert 4 months ago
      He's slimeball for many reasons, but that's beside the point. There is no "endangering" the environment here unless you're a brainwashed greenie fanatic.
  • usu-al  •  4 months ago
    I think it's more of that protectionism coming to the forefront, he's been doing it to Canada since he got into office, with his use of American produced steel only on stimulus projects, passports for Canadians to get into the country etc
  • Seedaview  •  4 months ago
    Nobody will ever accuse Obama of being an enviormentalist. His only concern is his own neck.
  • Common Sense  •  4 months ago
    Why not build a northern refinery for the oil, seems like it would be easier and not as risky as the pipeline. Wouldn't have to take away private land either.
    • Robert 4 months ago
      How do you think they move the finished products from the refinery?
  • Privateer  •  Miami, Florida  •  4 months ago
    And if you want a Stock Play on this TRN makes the tank cars. COG is going to split and CLNE will Clean Up when their Nat Gas Highway is completed next year. Pipes ? ATLS.
  • A Yahoo! User  •  Medicine Hat, Canada  •  4 months ago
    send obama to fight the war for oil in the middle east and maybe he would change his mind. He is a spineless sock puppet
  • Privateer  •  Miami, Florida  •  4 months ago
    We don't Need No Stinkin Oil Sands Sludge, Hi Carbon Crap. America needs to use OUR NATURAL GAS. There is Already a Pipeline from Canada with cleaner drilled oil and how about that Alaskan Pipeline that was the Cure to Americas Energy Problem ? Sold to Japan.
  • grumpy  •  De Pere, Wisconsin  •  4 months ago
    They don't need to build it across the Ogallala aquifer. Remember what happened in Alaska,Gulf of Mexico, and Yellowstone river oil spills. Nebraska needs that clean water for agriculture and human consumption.
  • Marjan  •  4 months ago
    Every time we dig under the obama adm. machinery we find cronyism, bribery, political shakedowns, filth, corruptions. He goes looking for people to buy him out -- you pad my pocket and help me Occupy_WH, I scratch you back!! This president is filth, nothing more, and shame on us for tolerating his sleazy destructive vice and corruption.
 
Recent Quotes
Symbol Price Change % Chg 
Your most recently viewed tickers will automatically show up here if you type a ticker in the "Enter symbol/company" at the bottom of this module.
You need to enable your browser cookies to view your most recent quotes.
 
Sign-in to view quotes in your portfolios.

Trading Center

Yahoo! Finance on Facebook

  YAHOO! FINANCE ON TWITTER