Mon, May 28, 2012, 4:08 PM EDT - U.S. Markets closed for Memorial Day

Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

Explore news, videos, and much more based on what your friends are reading and watching. Publish your own activity and retain full control.

To get started, first

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    Obama's budget: Government still getting bigger

    Obama unveils record election-year budget: It includes some cuts, but government still growing

    Fantasy Finance

    WASHINGTON (AP) -- Taking a pass on reining in government growth, President Barack Obama unveiled a record $3.8 trillion election-year budget plan Monday, calling for stimulus-style spending on roads and schools and tax hikes on the wealthy to help pay the costs. The ideas landed with a thud on Capitol Hill.

    Though the Pentagon and a number of Cabinet agencies would get squeezed, Obama would leave the spiraling growth of health care programs for the elderly and the poor largely unchecked. The plan claims $4 trillion in deficit savings over the coming decade, but most of it would be through tax increases Republicans oppose, lower war costs already in motion and budget cuts enacted last year in a debt pact with GOP lawmakers.

    Many of the ideas in the White House plan for the 2013 budget year will be thrashed out during this year's election campaigns as the Republicans try to oust Obama from the White House and add Senate control to their command of the House.

    "We can't just cut our way into growth," Obama said at a campaign-style rally at a community college in the vote-rich Northern Virginia suburbs. "We can cut back on the things that we don't need, but we also have to make sure that everyone is paying their fair share for the things that we do need."

    Republicans were unimpressed. While the measure contains some savings to Medicare and Medicaid, generally by reducing payments to health providers, both programs would double in size over the coming decade.

    "It seems like the president has decided again to campaign instead of govern and that he's just going to duck this country's fiscal problems," said House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan, R-Wis.

    By the administration's reckoning, the deficit would drop to $901 billion next year — still requiring the government to borrow 24 cents of every dollar it spends — and would settle in the $600 billion-plus range by 2015.The deficit for the current budget year, which ends Sept. 30, would hit $1.3 trillion, a near record and the fourth straight year of trillion-plus red ink.

    Obama's budget blueprint reprises a long roster of prior proposals: raising taxes on couples making more than $250,000 a year; eliminating numerous tax breaks for oil and gas companies, and approving a series of smaller tax and fee proposals. Similar proposals failed even when the Democrats controlled Congress.

    The Pentagon would cut purchases of Navy ships and F-35 Joint Strike Fighters — and trim 100,000 troops from its rolls over coming years — while NASA would scrap two missions to Mars.

    But there are spending increases, too: The Obama plan seeks $476 billion for transportation projects including roads, bridges and a much-criticized high-speed rail initiative. Grants for better performing schools would get a big increase under Obama's "Race to the Top" initiative, and there would be an $8 billion fund to train community college students for high-growth industries.

    Republicans accused the president of yet again failing to do anything meaningful to reduce deficits that could threaten the country with a European-style debt crisis unless they are wrestled under control.

    As a political document, the Obama plan blends a handful of jobs-boosting initiatives with poll-tested tax hikes on the rich, including higher taxes on dividends and income earned by hedge fund managers. That would allow Obama to draw a contrast with GOP front-runner Mitt Romney, whose personal fortune and relatively low tax rate would be an issue in the general election campaign.

    Another contrast with Republicans will come on Medicare, the enormously popular health care program for the elderly. Obama leaves the program mostly alone, while Republicans are on record in favor of gradually replacing the current system in which the government pays doctor and hospital bills with a voucher-like plan that would have government subsidize purchases of health insurance.

    Nor does Obama tackle Social Security's fiscal imbalance. Payroll taxes paid into the program fall well short of what's needed to cover benefits; the shortfall is made up by tapping into a $2.7 trillion trust fund that's built up since the last overhaul of the program in the early 1980s.

    Said Romney: "We can save Social Security and Medicare with a few commonsense reforms, and — unlike President Obama — I'm not afraid to put them on the table."

    The president's tax proposals and most of his new jobs initiatives are likely to arrive as dead letters on Capitol Hill, where the immediate focus is on Obama's proposal to renew a 2 percentage point cut in Social Security payroll taxes and jobless benefits for the long-term unemployed. House GOP leaders did an abrupt about-face on Monday and declared that they are willing to add to the deficit the $100 billion cost of renewing the payroll tax cut.

    While Obama and Congress appear headed for deadlock over big-picture questions such as Medicare cuts and tax hikes, there's still the work of filling in the details of last summer's budget and debt pact, which set tight caps on annual appropriations bills funding the day-to-day operations of government.

    Those caps are putting most agencies in a pinch, though the Department of Veterans Affairs would win a 4.5 percent increase, the Energy Department would get a 3.5 percent hike, while Treasury gets a 4.2 percent boost reflecting increases for the IRS.

    The Pentagon, which had grown used to budget increases well in excess of inflation until recently, would absorb its first outright budget cut since the post-Cold War "peace dividend" of the early 1990s, including cuts to major weapons systems, fewer combat ships and the reduction in troops.

    The budget for medical research at the National Institutes for Health would be frozen after years of reliable increases and the Environmental Protection Agency would bear a 4 percent cut after coming under assault by Republicans for two consecutive budget cycles. Special education grants to schools would be essentially frozen.

    On taxes, Obama proposes allowing the Bush-era tax cuts to expire at the end of this year for families making $250,000 or more per year.

    Obama, as he has in the past, also proposed limiting tax deductions taken by the wealthy and would also put in place a rule named for billionaire Warren Buffett that would seek to make sure that households making more than $1 million annually pay at least 30 percent of their income in taxes.

    Obama would also impose a new $61 billion tax over 10 years on big banks aimed at recovering the costs of the financial bailout and providing money to help homeowners facing foreclosure. The proposal also would raise $41 billion over 10 years by eliminating tax breaks for oil, gas and coal companies.

    The plan contains a host of other proposals whose budget impact would be modest but would be felt by almost everyone, among them an end to Saturday mail delivery. There's also a plan to raise $593 million by eliminating deductions for golf course conservation easement and a plan that would raise the one-way security fee on airline tickets to $7.50, up from fees that are now as low as $2.50 for a nonstop flight.

    To spur job creation in the short term, Obama is proposing a $50 billion "upfront" investment for transportation, $30 billion to modernize at least 35,000 schools and $30 billion to help states hire teachers and police, rescue and fire department workers. Republicans in Congress, opposed to further stimulus spending, have blocked these proposals in the past.

    The Obama budget seeks $360 billion in savings in Medicare and Medicaid mainly through reduced payments to health care providers, avoiding tougher measures advocated by House Republicans and the deficit commissions, which supporters said were critical to the cause of restraining health care costs.

    The projections in Obama's budget show that he is doing little to restrain the surge in these programs that is expected with the retirement of baby boomers. Obama's budget projects that Medicare spending will double over the coming decade from $478 billion this year to almost $1 trillion in 2022.

    Medicaid, the government health care program for the poor and disabled, would more than double from $255 billion this year to $589 billion by 2022.

    ___

    Associated Press Economics Writer Martin Crutsinger contributed to this report.

     
    • Goo Goo Gaa Gaa  •  Miami, Florida  •  3 months ago
      thanks obama, this is just what we all needed--more debt and higher taxes.
      • John 3 months ago
        the bay of pigs was 50 years ago. RETARD
      • Stanley Mulaik 3 months ago
        We have no need to worry about the national debt. And we can get rid of it in an afternoon, if the President uses powers given the executive branch to coin platinum coins of any denomination and issue them. A $10 trillion coin deposited at the Fed, would allow us to pay off the debt (which was with money the Fed created out of thin air) without creating inflation. So, we can do that, or simply let the debt sit there and grow and not worry about it. It's all bookkeeping.
      • Daniel 3 months ago
        @ stanley. The Fed has to authorize the creation of a currency. If you take a dollar out of your wallet (any value) and look at the top, it says federal reserve note. The government can not make currency any denomination because the FED is in charge of the currency. Even if this somehow works because I am incorrect, You have to consider the global marketplace. If the US decides to make a $10 trillion dollar coin that is not backed by its weight in platinum/gold/silver/copper/iron/oil the world at large will see the lack of value as this causes inflation in our currency. Other countries will begin to decline our dollar, exchange of the dollar will decrease and the US would most likely lose its world reserve currency status. If you don't think we can lose world reserve currency, ask the British how they felt about losing it after WW2.
    • Michael  •  Irvine, California  •  3 months ago
      Revenue = 2.2 trillion. Budget = 3.8 trillion. China owns 1.6 trillion more of the US.
      • mike hunt 3 months ago
        A special thanks to Obama and the Democratic Socialist Party.
      • jamex 3 months ago
        Actually, the biggest owner of US debt, is the US.
      • Robert 3 months ago
        The biggest owner of US debt is the Fed. To keep rates they hope low enough to reelect this monster.
    • Purge  •  3 months ago
      It is a major disappointment that the clowns in Washington D.C. don't seem to understand that we can't keep letting government spending grow each and every year. Deficits are 10% of GDP or 40% of federal spending. Total government spending exceeds total income earned. Government is a parasite and it is killing us all. Debt to GDP is 100%. Everyone has to stop asking what can the government do for me or we are DOOMED to be Greece.
      • Larry 3 months ago
        why not just increase the GDP? or is that too conservative?
      • Actuarial 3 months ago
        @Larry for your info, tax is a transfer payment which doesn't increase GDP. When the 50%+ dependents become productive, that's when it expands GDP.
      • Honda Accord Driver 3 months ago
        Balance the budget by increasing the GDP alone? Sure, no problem. The current budget falls 34% of paying for itself. All we need to do is increase GDP by 34%. Much easier than trying to cut spending and raise taxes.
    • woah!  •  Sterling, Michigan  •  3 months ago
      Also of note, at any given time 30% of the american public depends on the US government for 100% of their support. If you don't work and take advantage of every thing the government offers it is the equilivent of 38,500 a year.
      This is simply unsustainable. A whole lot of folks need to get off the couch because you can't make me wrap my head around the fact that 30% of the US public needs 100% government support.
      • __A_YAHOO_USER__ 3 months ago
        People are used to the free stuff. It will be impossible to cut social spending without riots and revolt. The country will have to go broke and start out again, and it will not be pretty.
      • woah! 3 months ago
        This is the goal of the Democrats. once they get more than 50% on the full government dole their reign on washington is a virtual certainte. It is comming fast and hard. Unless people get a serious grip we will be Greece in 2 to 4 years, and you will see the second US civil war.
      • __A_YAHOO_USER__ 3 months ago
        When 50% of the people do not pay taxes, and 30% are totally dependent on the government for their existance, the system is going to fail.
    • Frank  •  Manila, Philippines  •  3 months ago
      Time to change the government...............before it is to late.
      • joe s 3 months ago
        The people like Ron Paul and Sarah Palin are looking better every day.
      • robert 3 months ago
        stop smoking the meth Joe.
      • FAIRTAX.ORG 3 months ago
        RON PAUL 2012!!!
    • THOMAS  •  Chattanooga, Tennessee  •  3 months ago
      Is it the real goal of the people of this country to take money from one person and give to another? All this talk of paying a fair share. What is a fair share? does everyone have a fair share? Are some people's shares more fair than other's? Why are the fair shares always determined to be unfair to some special interest groups and need special tax loopholes to make the fair shares more fair?
    • Rob G  •  Buffalo, New York  •  3 months ago
      I swear ALL these clowns in Washington want to bankrupt this country on purpose. Obama's budget is nothing more than #$%$ designed to keep the class warfare schtick alive so he can win re-election.
    • orofthepress . com  •  3 months ago
      I thought the president said Obamacare would reduce our deficit? That he wouldn't sign it unless it it led to lower costs? Somebody lied.
    • blame yourself  •  3 months ago
      F.A Hayek was right.

      The road to serfdom thru bigger government creates poverty , the loss of liberty and freedom.

      The pubs and the dems together are enslaving the nation and shackling the citizens into the service to the growing public sector.

      Downsize the public sector and avoid the greek fires in the streets while you still can. Vote yourself into prosperity by voting for less not more government.

      .
    • Eddie  •  Kansas City, Missouri  •  3 months ago
      Hey Obama...How about the 47% who currently pay no income tax start paying their fair share. Some of these deadbeats actually get a refund of tax (earned income tax credit) when they paid not income tax to begin with. Not one penny until these freeloaders start paying into the pot.
    • Grant Dub  •  3 months ago
      Obama knew a deficit was going to be hard for him to campaign on.........and this was still as low as he was willing to push it. Imagine what it would really be if he was elected to a 2nd term. Probably double his published budget..........full of the usual excuses of course.

      The true beauty of Obama's plan? He has people convinced that he is wanting to take money from the rich and give it to the poor............and yet all of his bailout policies, bank settlements, GM union bailouts and Obamacare make the rich even more filthy rich, exempt the elite politicians from the laws the poor people are subject to and grant immunity from financial fraud to all the rich bankers.

      If you are still supporting Obama at this point you are a blind sheep!
    • voteoften  •  3 months ago
      News Flash to Mr. President...We the people of the United States do not want to be like Greece - This is no budget...What happened to cutting our deficit in half (2008/2009 promise)? Very disappointed.....this may be the last straw for you Mr. President.
    • Purge  •  3 months ago
      Don't forget the Senate has not given us a budget in over 1020 days!!!! We are headed toward an iceberg everyone can admit Obozo inherited a bad economy, but Obozo, Reid, and Pelosi have made things much much worse by adding nearly as much debt to the national debt in 3 years that Bush added in 8. Obama is a complete and total failure.
    • Displayname  •  Denver, Colorado  •  3 months ago
      If he says 'fair' one more time............
      He never mentions liberty or freedom either.
    • Coppertop  •  3 months ago
      He just does not get it. So we will.
    • Ozzie Smith  •  Seattle, Washington  •  3 months ago
      That's a shocker!!
    • Teddy Bear  •  3 months ago
      Doesn't anybody get it? He wants us all working for the government. Vote for me or you don't have a job. Once there we will have a dictatorship!
    • Andrew  •  Everett, Washington  •  3 months ago
      Whoopie. More money being taken from the economy and spent by politicians. Gee, I wonder why the economy won't grow? Maybe one day--if we're lucky--congress will take 100% of our money away from us, and spend it all for us. I'm sure those strangers in DC will make better life decisions then I will. Repub or democrat, they are all the same.

      Leave me alone. I do NOT consent to this. If people really wanted all these great government services, you wouldn't have to throw people in jail for not paying taxes because people would pay them voluntarily. Contrast to my cell phone bill, which I pay because I WANT the services being provided. ALL government spending is, by definition, spent on things that the voters don't really want to pay for themselves.

      Warmongers want war, but they want the anti-war crowd to pay for it. Old people want unlimited amounts of medicine, but they want young people to pay for it. Students want to go to expensive colleges, but they want people who didn't go to college to pay for it. If all these groups had to pay the full cost, they would change their minds (not be so pro-war; save more money when they are younger; search out cheaper education alternatives). It's called the "tragedy of the commons", and it is no way to run a country.

      We are all going to pay the price for decades of this lunacy--very soon. Look at Greece, that is what is coming here... only it will be much worse for us.
    • Cobey  •  3 months ago
      Look what I found the definition of "Market Manipulation" on Wikepedia:
      Market manipulation describes a deliberate attempt to interfere with the free and fair operation of the market and create artificial, false or misleading appearances with respect to the price of, or market for, a security, commodity or currency.[1] Market manipulation is prohibited in the United States under Section 9(a)(2)[2] of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
    • Smokin'  •  Oklahoma City, Oklahoma  •  3 months ago
      Obama is a socialist. The goal is to destroy America as a free enterprise God believing country. Do not believe what he says. Believe what he does. He grows government and empowers the underachieving leaches of society.

    RATES

    Stay in touch with Yahoo! Finance

      YAHOO! FINANCE ON TWITTER

    Subscribe

    [X]

    How to subscribe

    Roll over each section to subscribe using Add to My Yahoo! or RSS Feed feeds.

    Yahoo! News offers dozens of RSS feeds you can read in My Yahoo! or using third-party RSS news reader software. Click here to find out more about RSS and how you can use it with Yahoo! News.