Mon, May 28, 2012, 4:08 PM EDT - U.S. Markets closed for Memorial Day

Obama's new budget: Higher taxes for the wealthy

Obama unveils $3.8 trillion budget with $4 trillion in deficit cuts projected over decade

WASHINGTON (AP) -- President Barack Obama unveiled a $3.8 trillion spending plan on Monday that seeks to achieve $4 trillion in deficit reduction over the next decade but does little to restrain growth in the government's huge health benefit programs, a major cause of future deficits.

Obama's new budget was immediately attacked by Republicans as a retread of previously rejected ideas. The budget battle is likely to be a major component of the fall election campaign.

The president would achieve $1.5 trillion of the deficit reductions with tax increases on the wealthy and by removing certain corporate tax breaks. Rejecting GOP charges, he said in his budget message, "This is not about class warfare. This is about the nation's welfare."

In a message that repeated populist themes Obama also sounded in his State of the Union address, the president defended his proposed tax increases on the wealthy. It is important, he said to make sure the burden of getting deficits under control be a shared responsibility.

"This is about making fair choices that benefit not just the people who have done fantastically well over the last few decades but that also benefit the middle class, those fighting to get into the middle class and the economy as a whole," Obama said.

Obama used an appearance before students at Northern Virginia Community College to unveil the budget and highlight an $8 billion proposal that aims at boosting the ability of the nation's community colleges to train students for the jobs of the future. He told the students his budget was a "reflection of shared responsibility."

While administration officials defended the overall plan as a balanced approach, Republicans criticized it as failing to sufficiently restrain the deficit. Obama had promised in 2009 to cut the deficit in half by the end of his first term.

House Speaker John Boehner said that Obama's budget was a "collection of rehashes, gimmicks and tax increases that will make our economy worse."

"This isn't really a budget at all. It's a campaign document," said Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky. "The president is shirking his responsibility to lead and using this budget to divide."

Republican Rep. Paul Ryan, chairman of the House Budget Committee, said that Obama had ducked "the responsibility to tackle this country's real fiscal problems.

Ryan is preparing an alternative to Obama's budget that will be similar to a measure that the House approved last year but failed in the Senate where many lawmakers objected to a major overhaul to Medicare.

"We do not intend on backing off on anything," Ryan said in an interview. "We intend on giving the country an alternative and a solution to our biggest problems."

Republicans challenged the math underlying Obama's budget, saying it double-counted deficit reductions already approved in an August budget deal and also claimed $848 billion in savings from ending the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan even though this money would not have been spent.

Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney assailed Obama's spending plan for failing to "take any meaningful steps toward solving our entitlement crisis."

This year's budget debate is expected to dominate the presidential contest and congressional elections with the issue not finally resolved probably until a lame-duck session of Congress after the November election, when lawmakers will have to decide what to do with expiring Bush-era tax cuts and looming across-the-board spending cuts.

Obama's new spending plan projects a deficit for the current budget year of $1.33 trillion, marking the fourth straight year that the deficit would top $1 trillion.

The spending plan projects the deficit would decrease to $901 billion in the 2013 budget year, which begins Oct. 1. That reflects $3.8 trillion in spending next year, an increase of 0.2 percent over this year's expected outlays, and a 17.5 percent increase in revenues.

The deficits are projected to gradually go down to $575 billion in 2018, which would still be higher in dollar terms than any deficits run up before Obama took office. It would be below 3 percent of the total economy, however, and thus at a level economists generally consider sustainable.

At a budget briefing, Alan Krueger, head of the president's Council of Economic Advisers, said the administration's economic forecast was essentially in line with private economists and the unemployment outlook was actually more pessimistic in light of recent improvements.

But the administration's expectation of economic growth of 3 percent this year and in 2013 is above the forecasts of many private economists. IHS Global Insight is looking for growth of just 2.1 percent this year and 2.3 percent in 2013.

Obama's budget hewed closely to the approach he outlined in September in a submission to the congressional "supercommittee" that failed to agree on at least $1.2 trillion in additional spending cuts to keep across-the-board cuts from taking effect next January.

The Obama budget stuck to the caps on annual appropriations approved in August that are designed to save $1 trillion over the next decade. It also put forward $1.5 trillion in higher taxes, primarily by allowing the Bush-era tax cuts to expire at the end of this year for families making $250,000 or more per year.

Obama, as he has in the past, also proposed eliminating tax deductions the wealthy receive and would also put in place a rule named for billionaire Warren Buffett that would seek to make sure that households making more than $1 million annually pay at least 30 percent of their income in taxes.

Obama would also impose a new $61 billion tax over 10 years on big banks aimed at recovering the costs of the financial bailout and providing money to help homeowners facing foreclosure on their homes. The proposal also would raise $41 billion over 10 years by eliminating tax breaks for oil, gas and coal companies and it claims significant savings from ending the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

It would save $25 billion over 11 years through cutting costs in the U.S. Postal Service, including eliminating Saturday mail delivery.

Among the areas targeted for increases, Obama proposed $476 billion in increased spending on transportation projects including efforts to expand inner-city rail services.

To spur job creation in the short-term, Obama is proposing a $50 billion "upfront" investment for transportation, $30 billion to modernize at least 35,000 schools and $30 billion to help states hire teachers and police, rescue and fire department workers. Republicans in Congress, opposed to further stimulus spending, have blocked these proposals in the past.

The Obama budget seeks $360 billion in savings in Medicare and Medicaid mainly through reduced payments to health care providers, avoiding tougher measures, advocated by House Republicans and the deficit commissions, which supporters said were critical to the cause of restraining health care costs. The projections in Obama's budget show that he is doing little to restrain the surge in these programs expected in coming years with the retirement of baby boomers. Obama's budget projects that Medicare spending will double over the coming decade from $478 billion this year to almost $1 trillion in 2022.

Medicaid, the government health care program for the poor and disabled, would more than double from $255 billion this year to $589 billion by 2022.

___

Associated Press writers Andrew Taylor, Kimberly Hefling, Ben Feller, Jim Kuhnhenn and Erica Werner contributed to this report.

 

43 comments

  • rotorhead  •  Charlotte, North Carolina  •  3 months ago
    $4 trillion from $15.3 trillion in a DECADE??? He promised to cut that in his 1st term. Let's be honest here, does anyone take anything Obama says about his ecomonic plans seriously?
    • TenKate1098 3 months ago
      yeah because god knows the repubs didnt raodblock everything the guy tried
  • Craig  •  3 months ago
    If I wrote "less" bad checks at home than he previous month is is still unecceptable. Why is the government continueing to grow and write bad checks?
  • Thomas  •  San Antonio, Texas  •  3 months ago
    obama stop spending. cut progams that do no good. quit giving our money to other countries. reduce the size of government.
  • Bob  •  Columbus, Ohio  •  3 months ago
    I really depise these people who say I have a right to a job or a right to this and that. The Constitution say's you the right to life, liberty and the PURSUIT of Happiness. You all say they need to pay their fai share, BULLPUCKY, You want them to pay YOUR SHARE. I thought Slavery was outlawed.
    • TenKate1098 3 months ago
      really, why does romeny pay the same tax rate as a kid working at burger king??? how the hell is that fair buddy? if i get a raise at work and go to a higher tax bracket guess what!! i pay more and yet he made 42 million last year and only paid 15%% yeah keep defending the weak based on an idealogy from republicans that people just want everything free!! they count on us being dumb enough to buy into that to protect the richest people on the planet while we work our #$%$ off and have #$%$ even though we EARN IT!!!!
  • Appletree  •  3 months ago
    "Higher taxes for the wealthy" Please show me the wealth tax. Can't do it? Didn't think so. They would never tax the rich liberals, only those who haven't made it yet.....
  • Craig  •  3 months ago
    Job creation should NOT mean Government growth and Goverment job creation.
  • poptop  •  Wallingford, Connecticut  •  3 months ago
    If it aint class warfare , then what the hell is it ???STOP THE SPENDING ALREADY,You jerks ,yah you politicians ,why is it we have to bite the bullet , why is it we have to suffer before it gets better???? Are YOU people so special that this doesn't affect YOU !!! Hows about YOU take a cut in pay,hows about YOU jump on OBAMA care if its all that great, Why is it YOU can do insider trading, and we can't? Why is it YOU only get a slap on the hands when YOU cheat the IRS, and we get fined plus interest, and sometimes worse??If ya need more , I got em for ya!! Do YOU get the picture( YOU better) A lot of people are waking up, could get nasty????
  • Hugh  •  Sydney, Australia  •  3 months ago
    Some may wonder why I in the land of OZ worry about USA and UK dealings. Well, like in the 1929 Wall street crash and the Great Depression that followed, Australians suffered badly too. The web of financial dealings spans the world. The reserve currency for most dealings is the U S Dollar. Throw a stone into a pond and the ripples reach the whole shoreline.
    • gary 3 months ago
      Hugh-- I was wondering why you gave a rip, being an "Aussy" .
  • Hugh  •  Sydney, Australia  •  3 months ago
    So 4 trillion reduction in 10 years. That's only1/4 of the debt. At that rate you are looking at 40 + years just to break even? All the Government and Wall Street financial criminals will be long gone, either dead or long retired. The sad thing is the big mess left for the next generations to try and cope with? Most people on the poverty scrap heap and a much lower living standard.
    • gary 3 months ago
      Hugh- Sorry Hugh. The 4 trillion in 10 yrs. is only the reduction in the increase of the debt. The debt will be trillions higher than it is today. Maybe 10 trillion higher.
  • Hugh  •  Sydney, Australia  •  3 months ago
    Many Wall St. money practices go unregulated? E.G. How are they allowed to trade gold/silver etc. where for every 1oz of gold held the sell 100 ownership certificates(paper trading) for that 1 oz? It's off this paper trading that they reap billions. Sceptical, go online to Kitco gold charts and see the price manipulation in NY & London.Check the gold forums too.
    • gary 3 months ago
      Hugh--- You sound like about my age. haha
  • Michael  •  3 months ago
    How come citizens get in trouble for not paying on their debt but government keeps creating more and more debt. In 12 years my house will be paid off "god willing". When does our government plan on being debt free?
  • T  •  Phoenix, Arizona  •  3 months ago
    Hey ObamaNation, and tree hugger's... We need the Keystone oil pipeline. the food you eat come's from tractors that harvest your food. They get about 3 mile's to the gallon......
    How about you just don't eat and save the planet?
  • T  •  Phoenix, Arizona  •  3 months ago
    Hey ObamaNation, and tree hugger's... We need the Keystone oil pipeline. the food you eat come's from tractors that harvest your food. They get about 3 mile's to the gallon......
    How about you just don't eat and save the planet?
  • waterboy  •  Norwich, New York  •  3 months ago
    More tax for the wealthy, i thuoght we tried this yesterday, I say NO MORE TAX!
  • Larry Sibbett  •  Atlanta, Georgia  •  3 months ago
    I'm sick of hearing about how unfair everything is from the lips of this president. Does he really want to make everything fair? Then let's lower his salary, give everyone in the country a 200k per year job, like him and his constituents in congress. We'll all be getting paid to argue like they do, and nothing will get accomplished, like they don't. Sure, our deficit would soar to new heights, but does that matter one iota to him or anyone else in power?
  • nobody  •  3 months ago
    When this country changed from being great nation of independent achievers to the country where majority of people just want somebody else paying for everything...... how long you think the 3% of population could keep paying all and 47 % who pay nothing and demanding get more free without complete breakdown of the country ??????
  • Hugh  •  Sydney, Australia  •  3 months ago
    This is what the now generation and your children and grand children are facing.
    Successive Governments "have fiddled while Rome burned". The flaw in the 2 party USA system is they never do what's right to fix things for "Joe Average Citizen"? Voter apathy is a big negative too.1/3, that's 80 million, didn't vote (U S Govt. figures) in the last elelections?
  • Hugh  •  Sydney, Australia  •  3 months ago
    Eventually the QE's (Quantative easings = money printing ) will stop.Then inflation will kick in after years of artificially held low interest rates. Inflation will financially "kill" everyone. If you disbelieve go back 40 years and see what wages were and what thing's cost. Compare to now, see how relative wages are less and living costs more. Now extend that fwd. 40 years.
  • Bob  •  Columbus, Ohio  •  3 months ago
    Obama is preaching to bring back jobs aka insourcing, then in the next breath he wants to tax the hell out of the same people he wants to bring those jobs back. Right now we will be lucky if these people don't immigrate to somewhere that likes their buisnesses more.
  • investigate bush  •  Coeur D'Alene, Idaho  •  3 months ago
    In my opinion, The wealthy have nothing to offer this country of united values. The Bush administration and the Republican controlled Congress during his administration neglacted to construct reasonable regulations of our intrinsic finacial institutions. As a result, Americans were fleeced of 16 trillion dollars of American wealth. That 16 trillion dollars has been transfered to the mega wealthy 1% of this country. I want that Money back! I want to see the rich suffer and smother a terrible heart stopper. sigh.... This country has been dismantled by greed and corruption of the rich. Our politicals are worthless and corrupt.
 
Recent Quotes
Symbol Price Change % Chg 
Your most recently viewed tickers will automatically show up here if you type a ticker in the "Enter symbol/company" at the bottom of this module.
You need to enable your browser cookies to view your most recent quotes.
 
Sign-in to view quotes in your portfolios.

Trading Center

Yahoo! Finance on Facebook

  YAHOO! FINANCE ON TWITTER