Mon, May 28, 2012, 4:09 PM EDT - U.S. Markets closed for Memorial Day

Obama's proposed tax hikes at odds with GOP rivals

Obama's proposed tax increases on wealthy individuals, corporations at odds with GOP rivals

WASHINGTON (AP) -- President Barack Obama proposed tax increases on wealthy individuals and some corporations Monday, setting the stage for an ideological battle that won't be resolved until after the November election — if then.

Obama's proposed tax hikes put him at odds with the Republican presidential hopefuls. They have all called for tax packages that would lower taxes but possibly add to the federal deficit.

Obama's 2013 budget proposal mixes tax cuts designed to improve the economy with long-term tax increases aimed at reducing the federal budget deficit.

The plan calls for a tax reform package that would increase revenue by $1.5 trillion over the next decade. Obama did not offer a detailed plan for tax reform. Instead, he proposed a series of changes to the current tax system and several principles for what comprehensive tax reform would look like.

Administration officials said Monday that Obama would release a framework for corporate tax reform by the end of the month. The top corporate income tax rate of 35 percent is among the highest in the industrialized world. But the system is filled with so many deductions, credits and exemptions that many corporations pay taxes at a much lower rate.

Obama says he wants to simplify the tax code, lowering marginal tax rates while eliminating or reducing tax breaks enjoyed by wealthy individuals and U.S.-based multinational corporations.

Obama's plan would allow Bush-era tax cuts for the wealthy to expire at the end of the year, and would impose a new rule that people making more than $1 million a year pay at least 30 percent of their income in taxes. The "Buffett" rule, named after billionaire investor Warren Buffett, would replace the alternative minimum tax, which was originally designed to ensure that wealthy families pay at least some tax.

Obama did not detail how the Buffett rule would work. He said it should be a guiding principle for comprehensive tax reform.

"I believe that in our country, everyone must shoulder their fair share — especially those who have benefited the most from our economy," Obama said in his budget message. "In the United States of America, a teacher, a nurse, or a construction worker who earns $50,000 a year should not pay taxes at a higher rate than somebody making $50 million. That is wrong."

Obama's tax proposals have no chance of passing a divided Congress in which most Republicans oppose all tax increases. Obama has included many of them in previous budget proposals, only to have them ignored by Congress.

Instead, Congress appears headed for another year-end showdown over whether to extend tax cuts first enacted under former President George W. Bush.

"The president offered a partisan, election-year budget that ratchets up spending while ignoring the biggest drivers of our debt and calls for massive tax increases on hardworking families and small businesses," said House Majority Leader Eric Cantor, R-Va.

The tax cuts, which expire at the end of the year, affect taxpayers at every income level. Obama wants to extend them for individuals making less than $200,000 a year and married couples making less than $250,000. He wants to let the tax cuts expire for those who make more.

Obama's plan would increase the taxes on qualified dividends for the wealthiest investors. The top tax rate on qualified dividends is currently 15 percent. For the wealthiest investors, Obama would tax them at the same rate as ordinary income, with a top rate of 39.6 percent.

Obama's rivals, including former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, have proposed tax plans that independent experts say would result in lower taxes for corporations and the wealthy.

Romney's tax plan would make permanent all of the Bush-era tax cuts, including those for the wealthy. Romney's plan, however, would reduce revenue by $180 billion in 2015, adding to the federal budget deficit, according to an analysis by the Tax Policy Center, a Washington think tank.

Romney's campaign disputes the estimate, saying tax cuts in the plan would help improve the economy, leading to more revenue.

Among Obama's tax proposals:

— Make permanent the American Opportunity Tax Credit, which provides students with up to $2,500 a year for college expenses, saving taxpayers $137 billion over the next decade.

— Enhance and make permanent the research and experimentation tax credit, saving businesses $109 billion over the next decade.

— Extend through 2012 a provision that allows businesses to more quickly write off the cost of new equipment such as computers, saving them $31 billion over the next decade.

— Provide a tax credit for employers that increase their payrolls in 2012. Employers could get a tax credit equal to 10 percent of the increase in wages subject to Social Security taxes. The tax credit would save businesses $18 billion.

— Raise $143 billion over the next decade by increasing estate and gift taxes, and changing the way some trusts are taxed.

— Increase taxes on U.S.-based multinational corporations by $148 billion over the next decade, in part by changing the way foreign tax credits are calculated and restricting the ability to defer taxes on foreign profits by limiting deductions for interest expenses.

— Raise $61 billion over the next decade by imposing a fee on financial institutions with more than $50 billion in assets. The fee, which is designed to recover the costs of the Wall Street bailout, would be based on the covered liabilities of a financial firm.

— Raise $30 billion over the next decade by eliminating tax breaks for oil, gas and coal companies.

— Raise $87 billion over the next decade by requiring businesses to change the way they value their inventory for tax purposes.

___

Online:

Treasury Department: www.treasury.gov

 

15 comments

  • Frank  •  3 months ago
    Obama is trying to fix the current mess of unfair and confusing loopholes and these idiot Republicans are trying to stop it?! What the hell is wrong with them?!!
  • DenvertoNO  •  Denver, Colorado  •  3 months ago
    Can we please make the elimination of tax breaks for oil companies priority #1? Maybe job #2 can be to eliminate the subsidies paid to the tobacco companies. What the hell are we still doing subsidizing those companies? We've met the enemy and it is definitely us. And, for those of you awash in naivety, do you think for a second that the oil companies aren't gouging us for everything they can now just because those subsidies exist? Hello, reality calling.
  • Maceb  •  Newark, New Jersey  •  3 months ago
    Wow, that is an aggressive plan. I wonder how corporations will pay for all the new taxes?
  • Skipto  •  Denver, Colorado  •  3 months ago
    Tax the wealthy, are they mad? The rich have NO money, just ask them, you'll find them on one of their many yachts or in one of their many luxury homes!

    Brahahahahahahaha!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
  • A Yahoo User  •  3 months ago
    The 80 yr old communist, like Soros, wants everyone else to pay their taxes but Buffet himself owes the IRS millions in back taxes for years.. He hopes Osama would forgive him these back taxes by helping the Class-warfare in chief politically divide this nation some more. His dorky secretary pays more tax percentage because she made $500000 a year in income. Her hosebag is NO middle class and her bozo boss does not work but just invests - so he has no work income tax- just investment tax at lower rate. What fricking liars they are? Jesus never said to steal earnings from one for another. "Much is given.." is about Christian decipleship - not abot income EARNED from one's blood, sweats and tears! Even Satan perverts the scripture like Osama - his deciple.
  • ElGatoMagnifico  •  Austin, Texas  •  3 months ago
    It's pretty back and white to me as far as the voter is concerned. More of the same GOP screw U crap, or higher taxes. Let us know at the Polls.
  • Lisa Stewart  •  Tacoma, Washington  •  3 months ago
    has anyone noticed the lack of infrastruture-bridges collapsing,underground explosions-since Bush tax cuts?Does it only occur to us when our own is effected.Personally these things are vital.Where are the jobs?Wake up America.God gave us brains to use.
  • Les Grossman  •  3 months ago
    So Obama says everyone should pay their fair share, well I agree, the 50% that pay no taxes at all and are mostly Obama supporters should start paying taxes immediately!
    • Warren 3 months ago
      He'll never ask them to because he is a gutless coward. Its easier to write off the 2% that provide jobs to the rest of us and pander to the 50% that pay no taxes. He is an absolute joke.
    • Skipto 3 months ago
      They need to pay the super rich less (now at 500 times that of the average worker) and pay the average worker money, Then, the poorer Americans will earn more and pay taxes and the super rich will earn less and pay less taxes. It's a win win!!!!!!!!!!!
    • Frank 3 months ago
      Thats what it comes down to isn't it? They are Obama supporters so you want to raise their taxes? Tehy don't have money you idiot.
  • Lala planet  •  3 months ago
    4 more trillions! 4 more trillions! No budget democrat senate!
  • john s  •  3 months ago
    Go broke saving money...how stupid do they think we are?
  • Rich  •  Concord, California  •  3 months ago
    An election year is a great time to iron out tax rates and the Budget. What do they got?
  • Ally Cat  •  Atlanta, Georgia  •  3 months ago
    Said it once, will say it again: The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again (Let's tax the rich!) and expecting a different result each time. I am truly amazed at this man's cluelessness, as well as that exhibited by both parties. The truly sad thing is the GOP doesn't have a candidate that's either worth a crap or is non-polarizing and we will have four more years of total incompetence under the Community Organizer's (non) leadership. The Roman Empire fell and so shall we unless things change......
    • Frank 3 months ago
      Ally, under Clinton taxes went up and we ended up with a surplus. Under Bush we cut them and got a deficit...who is arguing for what?
  • Martin  •  3 months ago
    Any tax hike should be used ONLY to directly reduce our DEBT, not to reduce an outrageous spending deficit.
    • Rich 3 months ago
      The Debt pays interest to our bondholders, our investors. Too bad we don't have a balanced budget... but then there are emergencies (recessions, wars).
  • Shorty  •  3 months ago
    Get rid of this POS AMERICA!
  • Noah Bonneville  •  Pleasanton, California  •  3 months ago
    That's one hell of sh** sandwich he's servering up here! Unfortunately Ally Cat is right, its illogical to believe we can solve this economic clusterf*** with tax increases. Cold hard truth is that the jobs lost in 08' are not coming back. Those working class positions in industry and construction are irrelevant today. Robots and illegals are so much more productive and cost efficient. Hate to say it, but we need to reinvent American industry not unlike ze Germans did a decade back.
    • Frank 3 months ago
      So the GOP platform is to cut all taxes and just give the f up huh? Sorry, not on our watch. You guys have effed things up enough in the last decade under Bush.
 
Recent Quotes
Symbol Price Change % Chg 
Your most recently viewed tickers will automatically show up here if you type a ticker in the "Enter symbol/company" at the bottom of this module.
You need to enable your browser cookies to view your most recent quotes.
 
Sign-in to view quotes in your portfolios.

Trading Center

Yahoo! Finance on Facebook

  YAHOO! FINANCE ON TWITTER