Mon, May 28, 2012, 4:13 PM EDT - U.S. Markets closed for Memorial Day

Oil industry chief warns Obama on Canada pipeline

Oil industry to Obama: Approve Keystone XL pipeline or face 'huge' consequences

WASHINGTON (AP) -- The oil industry's top lobbyist warned the Obama administration Wednesday to approve the Keystone XL oil pipeline or face "huge political consequences" in an election year.

Jack Gerard, president of the American Petroleum Institute, said it would be a "huge mistake" for President Barack Obama to reject the 1,700-mile, Canada-to-Texas pipeline. Obama faces a Feb. 21 deadline to decide whether the $7 billion pipeline is in the national interest.

"Clearly, the Keystone XL pipeline is in the national interest," Gerard said at the trade association's annual "State of American Energy" event. "A determination to decide anything less than that I believe will have huge political consequences."

Gerard said the oil group has teamed up with at least 15 unions to support the pipeline, which would create thousands of jobs.

"We will stand shoulder to shoulder" with labor unions that have backed the pipeline, including the Teamsters and the AFL-CIO's Building and Construction Trades Department, Gerard said.

"Over the next 60 days, they will not be silent," he said.

Gerard repeatedly referred to the Keystone pipeline at his annual speech assessing the energy industry, calling it the business group's top near-term priority.

While the pipeline has not been a focus of the GOP race for president, Gerard said the issue has the potential to become a major factor in the general election.

"It's already an election issue" in the presidential race and is likely to be a focus of several U.S. Senate races, Gerard said, calling the pipeline the largest "shovel-ready" project in the country.

The pipeline, proposed by Calgary-based TransCanada, would carry oil derived from tar sands in western Canada to refineries in Texas, passing through Montana, South Dakota, Nebraska, Kansas and Oklahoma.

TransCanada says the pipeline could create as many as 20,000 jobs over two years, a figure opponents say is inflated. A State Department report last summer said the pipeline would create up to 6,000 jobs during construction.

The pipeline proposal has forced the White House to make a politically risky choice between two key Democratic constituencies. Many unions back the project as a job creator in a down economy, while environmental groups fear it could lead to an oil spill disaster.

A payroll tax law signed by Obama just before Christmas includes a Republican-sponsored provision that sets a Feb. 21 deadline for Obama to decide on the pipeline. The administration is warning it would rather say no than rush a decision in an election year.

Environmental advocates, already disappointed with Obama's failure to achieve climate change legislation and his decision to delay new smog standards, have made it clear that approval of the pipeline would dampen their enthusiasm in his bid for re-election.

Some liberal donors even threatened to cut off funds to Obama's re-election campaign to protest the project, which opponents say would transport "dirty oil" that requires huge amounts of energy to extract.

If he rejects the pipeline, Obama risks losing support from organized labor, a key part of the Democratic base, for thwarting jobs.

Obama appeared to have skirted what some dubbed the "Keystone conundrum" in November when the State Department announced it was postponing a decision on the pipeline until after this year's election. Officials said they needed extra time to study routes that avoid an environmentally sensitive area of Nebraska that supplies water to eight states.

The affected area stretches just 65 miles through the Sandhills region of northern Nebraska, but the concerns were serious enough that the state's governor and senators opposed the project until the pipeline was moved.

Republican Gov. Dave Heineman, who opposed the initial route, says he supports efforts to accelerate the project, noting that provisions in the payroll tax bill allow the project developer to find a new route avoiding the Sandhills.

There was no immediate response from the White House.

___

Matthew Daly can be followed on Twitter: http://twitter.com/MatthewDalyWDC

 

15 comments

  • John  •  Wrightsville, Pennsylvania  •  4 months ago
    Please tell me why must the pipe line go to Texas. Is a lot of water needed to refine the dirty oil? If yes, then we could run a water pipeline from the Pacific to Colorado and the oil pipeline from Canada to Colorado. Water should be safer and the oil pipeline distance would be cut in half.
  • NunYa B. Ness  •  4 months ago
    So... we can't drill for oil in the US, we can't drill for it offshore, we can't use our own oil sands, we can't pipe it from Canada, we can't use nuclear, we can't put up windmills (they hurt the little birdies and/or ruins the view of the Kennedys), all the domestic solar companies are going belly up no matter how much cash "we" give them, we can't use biofuels because it uses up land that could be growing cheap corn for Mexico... Soooooooooo..... what's the plan? Anyone? Bueller?
  • acct  •  Coram, New York  •  4 months ago
    Why must the oil go to TEXAS? Why can't it be refined NORTH? Stinks of political kickbacks from lobbyists and oil execs to GOP and TEXAS slave masters.
  • acct  •  Coram, New York  •  4 months ago
    Sooooo....the OIL LOBBYIST WARNED the president ??????? What the F is going on here????
  • nelsonk  •  Raleigh, North Carolina  •  4 months ago
    what a #$%$ more evidence that we need to get rid of this guy and run this country like a business instead of a wetnurse nanny. he obviously thinks new jobs are created by the national endowment for the arts.
  • NunYa B. Ness  •  4 months ago
    Is there ANYTHING that isn't being delayed until "after the election?"
  • C-note  •  Issaquah, Washington  •  4 months ago
    There are 2.5 million miles of oil pipeline in this country. Any leaks yesterday? Cmon!!!
  • sue  •  Dayton, Ohio  •  4 months ago
    Guts? we need this or do you want the gas prices to keep going up?
  • Bill  •  Richardson, Texas  •  4 months ago
    I am glad that Pres. Obama has the guts to stand up to the oil interests. These guys need to get the message that they don't control everything even though they have the most powerful lobby in D.C. After the BP disaster that happened on the southern coast, I am surprised anyone could back this pipeline. They will just put the oil on the world market instead of using it in this country. Throughout the entire worldwide economic downturn, oil companies have done absolutely nothing to ease the situation even though they are the real underlying problem. They have no conscience - it is all about profits.
  • wazzel2u  •  4 months ago
    Cut off ALL Oil and Gas from CANADA!!!!! Canada accounts for more than 35% of all of the oil that is consumed in the US so cutting off Keystone is just the start. Cut it all off ASAP
  • me  •  4 months ago
    ..and WHY does it have to be UNION jobs?? ..let's get this pipeline started and finished within budget and on time!
  • David Koch  •  4 months ago
    What are we supposed to do? Go build it in Iran?
  • penguin39cubed  •  4 months ago
    This pipeline will create not just 10,000 jobs building it, it will create 50,000 jobs cleaning up spills.
    It will also bring in tourists who will look at all it's beautiful lines, and abstract colors on the ground of purple hues from benzine, and the sweet smell of mercaptan. Screw the water shed, who needs it?
    • FrankieV 4 months ago
      Another clueless lib posting here. An Obummer plant. They want to keep oil prices high. All the envoirmental wackos are wacky.
  • BTN  •  Arlington, Virginia  •  4 months ago
    The US has had record levels of gasoline EXPORTS this year. That's not the way to energy independence. Keep the oil and gas in the US. The pipelein will divert oil overseas. As an alterantive job creator, why not build more refineries outside of Texas?
    • Voice of Reason 4 months ago
      Because environmentalists have not allowed a new refinery to be built in the US in over 25 years.
    • Homer 4 months ago
      environmentalists=idiots
    • FrankieV 4 months ago
      Homer, I'll second that.
  • todd  •  Portland, Maine  •  4 months ago
    Why not keep the entire pipeline in Canada, from Hardisty to the Pacific Ocean?
    • Amanda 4 months ago
      The oil will then go to China. We will be more dependent on oil from middle east. Dumb question you ask.
    • todd 4 months ago
      Keep the entire pipeline in Canada, from Hardisty to the Pacific Ocean.

      Better Amanda! : D
 
Recent Quotes
Symbol Price Change % Chg 
Your most recently viewed tickers will automatically show up here if you type a ticker in the "Enter symbol/company" at the bottom of this module.
You need to enable your browser cookies to view your most recent quotes.
 
Sign-in to view quotes in your portfolios.

Trading Center

Yahoo! Finance on Facebook

  YAHOO! FINANCE ON TWITTER