Thu, Feb 23, 2012, 9:26 AM EST - U.S. Markets open in 4 mins.

Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

Explore news, videos and much more based on what your friends are reading and watching. Publish your own activity and retain full control.

To get started, first

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    Oldest Baby Boomers Face a Jobs Bust

    Many older Americans fear they will be working well into their 60s because they didn't save enough to retire. Millions more wish they were that lucky: Without full-time jobs, they are short of money and afraid of what lies ahead.

    Deborah Kallick was a professor of biomedical chemistry at the University of Minnesota until she ventured into the private sector in 2000 with a job in genome research. She is now one of more than four million Americans aged 55 to 64 who can't find full-time work. That number has nearly doubled in five years, according to U.S. Department of Labor figures in October.

    Ms. Kallick, 60 years old, has been unemployed since 2007 and lives in the Northern California home of an ex-boyfriend. She has run out of unemployment insurance, used up most of her retirement savings and is indebted to relatives and credit-card companies.

    [More from WSJ.com: Make Your Nest Egg Last Longer]

    A good job could settle her accounts, she said. Until then, Ms. Kallick relies on generosity, occasional consulting work and the sale of sweaters, purses and other possessions on eBay.

    "It is very hard to work through this and learn to be calm and happy day to day," said Ms. Kallick, who never married. "It has taken a lot of strength and courage to learn to do that."

    Older Baby Boomers are trying to postpone retirement, as many find their spending habits far outpaced their thrift. With U.S. unemployment at 8.6%, and much higher among people in their teens and 20s, younger members of the labor pool accuse Boomers of refusing to gracefully exit the workplace.

    But their long-held grip is slipping, as employers look past older Americans to younger, cheaper workers.

    The Labor Department counts people as unemployed only if they have looked for a job in the previous month. By that definition, 6.5% of workers aged 55 to 64 were unemployed in October, below the national average but more than twice the jobless rate for the group five years earlier.

    Taking into account the number of older people who want full-time work but are unemployed, working part-time or need a job but have quit looking, the percentage jumps to 17.4%, or 4.3 million Americans ages 55 to 64, according to the government data. The number has grown from 2.4 million in October 2006.

    This group without full-time work now accounts for more than one in six older Americans seeking positions.

    In some ways, older people are doing better than everyone else: Among all U.S. workers, 20% are unemployed, underemployed or have given up looking for jobs. But older people have far less time to rebuild savings.

    "This is new. It is different. It is worse than we have experienced before and it is very widespread," said Carl Van Horn, head of the John J. Heldrich Center for Workforce Development at Rutgers University. "It is going to get worse. You are going to have a higher level of poverty among older Americans."

    Older people have more trouble finding new jobs. Among unemployed workers older than 55, more than half have been looking for more than two years, compared with 31% of younger workers, according to the Heldrich Center. Among older workers who found a new job, 72% took a pay cut, often a big one, the Rutgers data show.

    The problem has been building for decades: Inflation-adjusted, middle-class incomes have stagnated in parallel with a free-spending culture of indebtedness that has left many Americans with too little saved. Over the same time, many U.S. companies cut pensions and shifted to less-generous retirement-savings plans such as 401(k) accounts that have stagnated or diminished in the market tumult of past years.

    Older families aren't just failing to save, they are increasingly draining accounts that were supposed to help finance retirement.

    [More from WSJ.com: When Heaven Is a Harley]

    The median household headed by someone aged 55 to 64 has $87,200 in retirement accounts and other financial assets, according to Strategic Business Insights' MacroMonitor database. If each of the 4.3 million unemployed or underemployed people in this age group runs through half the family savings, that will, in theory, total $188 billion in lost retirement money.

    The typical retirement-age household has too little saved to maintain its standard of living in retirement, according to actuarial and Federal Reserve data.

    Financial planners often advise that retirement resources be large enough to provide 85% of a person's working income. Median households headed by a person aged 60 to 62 with a 401(k) account have saved less than one-quarter of what is needed in that account to live as well in retirement, according to Fed data analyzed for The Wall Street Journal by the Center for Retirement Research at Boston College.

    The trouble spreads across generations. Older people hang on to jobs or, out of desperation, take lower-level jobs for which they are over-qualified. Either way, they displace younger workers.

    In the past, older people who lost jobs often gave up and retired. No longer. In October, two-thirds of people aged 55 to 64 had jobs or wanted them, up from 59% in 1994, according to Labor Department data.

    At an age when they should be generating peak incomes and savings, many unemployed and underemployed Americans are applying for early Social Security benefits and spending what's left in their retirement accounts.

    Kathi Paladie, 64 years old, lost her job as an executive assistant at a mortgage company in Tacoma, Wash., six years ago. She hasn't found full-time work since but works occasionally as a phone interviewer for a political survey firm.

    Her retirement savings is spent, and she said her monthly $800 Social Security checks, $100-a-week unemployment benefits and occasional paychecks barely cover expenses.

    "If I don't buy a lot of groceries, then I am OK," said Ms. Paladie, who is divorced. "I do a lot of puzzles sitting here and watching TV. And I play with my bird. And that's about it."

    She rarely goes out, she said, "but I've got a clean house." To save money, she sometimes eats Frosted Flakes for dinner. She shares them with her African Grey parrot, Muffin, who also likes the sweetened cereal.

    Ms. Paladie hasn't been to the doctor for five years, she said. She frets about paying rent after her unemployment benefits run out next year. Her daughter lives nearby but doesn't have the room for her, Ms. Paladie said.

    "It is kind of a standing joke," she said, "that if this fails, that I can always move in with them and sleep in the garage."

    The problem of older, out-of-work Americans extends beyond individuals to the U.S. economy. Among jobless people aged 55 to 64 who want to work, lost annual wages exceed an estimated $100 billion, based on the median income of this age group.

    Retirement savings losses exceed $10 billion a year, assuming contribution rates of 8% for employees and 2% for employers. Even if only half the people were working, the economy would gain $50 billion a year in income and another $5 billion in retirement savings.

    That doesn't count the lost wages of people who have taken salary cuts to get new jobs.

    Richard Foster, 59 years old, a former computer programmer and software analyst in Arvada, Colo., near Denver, has been unemployed several times over the past decade. The older he gets, the more trouble he has finding jobs in computer mainframes, his specialty, amid changing technologies. And the longer his absence from programming, the harder it is to attract recruiters, who prefer people with experience in the past six months, Mr. Foster said.

    These days, he works on the telephone nearly full-time as a customer-service representative. His employer grades him on how fast he finishes each call and how customers rate his service. Mr. Foster recently contracted Bell's palsy, a temporary facial paralysis thought to be stress-related.

    The work pays a lot better than a previous job, delivery driver for a dry cleaner. Still, Mr. Foster said, it pays 40% less than what he earned as a programmer at the University of Colorado Hospital, a job he lost in a restructuring that kept more tenured employees.

    Mr. Foster's wife, Tina, has complications from a detached retina, which keeps her from working. Her treatment is only partially paid for by his medical plan, which classified Ms. Foster's eye problem as a pre-existing condition.

    He has a retirement-savings plan at his new employer, he said, but it's hard to save, given the couple's struggle "to make ends meet day to day." He is putting off dental work, for example, to save money.

    While out of work, Mr. Foster said, he sometimes depended on food banks. He filed for personal bankruptcy in 2003. He and his wife got a break recently: his wife's sister and her husband helped them purchase a home. Mortgage payments to his in-laws are less than his rent. Retirement? He said he has no idea when.

    Mr. Foster's worries aren't unusual. More than two-thirds of unemployed people older than 50 report extreme stress, trouble sleeping or family strains, according to surveys by the Heldrich Center at Rutgers. More than 60% of respondents said they didn't expect to hold another full-time job in their field and a similar percentage said they were pessimistic about finding any job soon. One-third of those over 55 reported selling possessions to stay afloat.

    In another unfortunate consequence, the younger people are when they apply for Social Security retirement benefits, the lower their monthly checks for the rest of their lives. Two-thirds of Americans older than 50 expect to file for the benefits earlier than they would prefer, or already have done so, according to the Rutgers survey.

    [More from WSJ.com: What's Next? The Outlook for 2012]

    "People are taking in boarders, they are moving in with their kids, selling their homes for the cash that they can live on," said Abby Snay, executive director in San Francisco for JVS, a community agency that teaches work skills.

    Although her agency has long focused on young people, the fastest-growing client group is closer to retirement age. Before the recession, only 11% of her clients were older than 55; now, it is 17%.

    "We are seeing people in a panic, in survival mode," she said. "They are about to finish their financial assets and all they have after that is their retirement funds. They are trying to figure out some kind of bridge so they won't have to pay an early withdrawal fee for their retirement incomes."

    Ms. Snay has even seen former donors return as clients. "There is a level of shame and humiliation," she said, "and, 'What have I done wrong?' "

    She recently offered older clients a workshop on the website LinkedIn. She recalled some people said, "'If I put up a picture, no one will hire me.'"

    Her response: "We advise people to put up a photo, put their best foot forward."

     
    • WM  •  2 months ago
      Today I am 62 years of age...my great job was outsourced 3 years ago. There is no work for me in Dayton Ohio so I have been taking contract work in other states and I never thought that my career would end like this. I get home to see my family as often as possible. I am the new migrant worker.
      I don;t like living away from home but my bills are paid
    • .  •  2 months ago
      Outsourcing was the other guy's problem. It made us go overseas over 20 years ago. Now, it is the 99%'s problem. This country needs to work as a unit so all can work. We can not survive on government, military, insurance, and health care jobs. There is nothing being produced. Wall Street, Congress, and stockholders sold out this country years ago. Now, we are at the end of the road, so to speak. It is time to rebuild this country, bring back the factories, and move on. If this is not done, we will have an American Spring and everything moves to the left. All will lose.
    • Victor  •  2 months ago
      About 5 years ago at age 57 I was pushed out of my job. I took a couple of low pay jobs, and about a year later, I decided to pack it in and retire.
      I always made good, but not great, money. Saving and investing were priorities and I built a nice nest egg and I have a modest pension. I now do volunteer work and I am financially secure in retirement.
      My advice to younger people who are earning good money is to save at least 15% (or 20%) of your income and always be planning for retirement. You never know what will happen to your job in the future, so be prepared!
      It is much better to be 60 something with options, than to be out looking for a work at that age to pay the bills. .
    • Roger  •  2 months ago
      Twenty-five years ago economists were predicting a labor shortage as the first of the boomers started to retire. Economists were no better at predicting future trends then than they are now.
    • Randy  •  2 months ago
      My dad was a WW2 veteran and passed away a few years back. I never forgot a lesson he taught me. Wife and I bought him a sweater for Christmas one year and he became very angry and told us, "I already have a sweater!". At the time, I thought his response was a little over the top but it illustrated that we all need to determine what we "need" versus what we "want".
    • Lawrence  •  2 months ago
      Daily Observer, a few months ago there was a story in the Wall Street Journal, they said that the Chinese took 5 million USA jobs via outsourcing. I realize Protectionism is a dirty word, but I buy American when ever I can. Walmart are the biggest importer of Chinese goods, I have never been to a Walmart, never will!!! Buy American!
    • Orion1961  •  2 months ago
      Just plain sad! Enjoy your LONG and well deserved Christmas vacation our beloved Congressmen and Senators. You all must be exhausted from all that hard work of disagreeing with one another?
    • Here's to life!  •  2 months ago
      I'm 51, lost my job almost 3 years ago and still haven't been able to find full-time work in my field (or anything close to my field). Thankfully, my wife has a decent job with benefits, and I've had a few part-time $11-an-hour-type jobs, so we haven't had to deplete our savings. But I truly empathize with those who are really screwed in this economy. Heartless people love to say, "Oh, just go get a job," but there are several applicants for every opening, and most of those openings pay minimum wage or close to it. It's not as if somebody can just "find" the kind of 90k-per-year job I lost. Hang in there, fellow Boomers, and good luck.
    • donut girl  •  2 months ago
      Save, save, save. Do not count any anyone but yourself.
    • Bill  •  2 months ago
      Hey--Congress is doing all they can--to feather their own pensions and medical plans that is.......Where do we get their type of guaranteed lifetime pensions and medical benefits for only 4-6 years worth of work?
    • chuck  •  2 months ago
      My wife and I got married in 78. The first thing we decided to do, was become debt free. We stayed home and didn't go out with our friends or to dinner. We lived a pretty quiet life. In 7 years "everything" was paid for including the house. We still live close to this style today, but we are set for life now.
    • STORMSTOCKER1  •  2 months ago
      Every Economy has ups and downs. This is no different than 1991, 1980, and 1961. It might be like 1934, if the government doesn't get its financial house in order. Taxing millionaires, is like peeing in the ocean. It ain't raising the sea level. Its the middle class that needs a tax break. lower gas tax, lower property taxes,lower sales taxes, the middle class needs more disposible income, not "tax money" that is added to our national debt, thru more spending.
    • retired4good  •  2 months ago
      We are just plain lucky with a small dose of luck delaying our entry into the workforce by getting graduate degrees early on, kept our lifestyle very much the same as we did in grad school, lived within our means and saved the rest. By the time we reached 55, we were debt free and saving over 40% of our income for retirement. The years between 30 and 55, we were looked down upon by our fellow boomers for not living the good life and not acquiring possessions. Now, approaching retirement with more than adequate savings and being able to delay social security, the others are wondering where they went wrong. Start saving early and save as much as you can.
    • JamesK  •  2 months ago
      I am at the end of the baby boomers, i see nothing that gives me a good feeling..
    • charlesp  •  2 months ago
      Some advice. Don't listen to the talking heads about it "not being smart to own a home any more". Figure out where you really want to live, buy a house within your means, plan so it is paid off by your early sixties, and stay put if at all possible. This is your major expense, once you own your home, living on much less(Soc.Sec & your savings) becomes realistic. Have a big emergency fund... Oh, and don't be so worried about keeping up with your peers by having the latest gadget. Keep things til they die, then get what’s new, or better yet, take that TV your neighbor put at the road because THEY had to have the latest 3d tech or at least 50 inches... Play poor, even if your not... Your day may come. All those tech guys whose jobs are now in India thought the gravy train was never leaving the station.
    • Dan  •  2 months ago
      I have been outsourced at age 55. It sucks. I have been able to find work. In fact I have two full time jobs. Both my jobs together pay about 2/3 of what I used to earn in one job. However at my age no one will hire you with benefits. Any job that has health and or retirement benefits will refuse to hire a person at my age because of the retirement issue.
      Then there is also the life experience factor and skill set. Most companies will not be willing to pay anything more than starting wages even though I am supposed to be in my golden earning years for salary. All I can say is I hope the young crowd coming up the ranks that keeps blaming everything on the boomer generation gets hit with the same stuff when they are about to retire. We will see how smug they are then when their lives fall apart after they get to a point of no return. From what I can tell less than 5% of the young crowd is saving enough of their money for their retirement so they will run head on into the same career ending machine that is killing us right now. Corporate greed!

      Oh by the way for those that say live within your means...I am I have not had a vacation since 2003. I get no paid days off. I get no paid sick days. I get no paid medical insurance. I get zero company benefits. I get no retirement benefits whatsoever. No pay raise since 2006. Cost of food,health insurance, auto insurace, property tax, gas, home and auto repairs have all gone up significantly and I am living on fixed income since 2006 with two jobs. This sucks. I am being forced into selling and downsizing my home because I no longer earn enough to stay in it. But I happen to be underwater as well even though I bought the home in 1997 with 20% down. It is not the mortgage that is the problem it is the property tax. My property tax is three times higher than when I bought the house in 1997. This sucks.
    • CTVoter  •  2 months ago
      Many boomers, like myself joined a company that promised a good salary and a pension if you worked hard and provided value to the company. If your skills became obselete, you were retrained. Starting in the late 1990's my company starting laying off employees, shutting down whole factories and sending the jobs to Asia or South America. In the 2000's, companies decided that pensions were too costly to the company and eliminated or froze them, as was done in my case. I will have to work an extra 9 years to breakeven. That is 9 years that I could have been retired and some other person had my job. I am one of the lucky ones who still has a job so I will be able "catch up". Tens of thousands of others were not so lucky. Layoffs have nothing to do anymore with an employee's job performance, you become reduced to a number which if eliminated, helps the bottom line of the company.
    • Robert  •  2 months ago
      As a Boomer that retired 2 years ago and has been working as a consultant since, I wonder why the 6% that we are talking about waited? Sorry to see any of my generational fellows, or anyone else for that matter, in dire straights. However, this appears to be a "Grasshopper & Ant" kind of thing as this was a predictable future many years ago at the height of thier earning power.....when saving in diversified investments and advancing their marketabile skill base WAS an option. My concern is that we may rush to a "Governement taking care of folks" approach for those that don't plan ....at the expense of those that do plan and with the result that it does not pay for anyone to save....a wrong answer.
    • Quick  •  2 months ago
      Article doesn't appear to have an agenda other than warning younger workers to focus more on retirement planning (not advocating another government program). It does provide ideas with actions that people have taken to adjust to economic realities. As for the class warfare promoters: The reality is that the Boomer Generation exists -- a decision by the "Great Generation" to have a lot of kids. The liberal press and Hollywood glamorized the small percentage of hippies and radicals, and then resentfully called them the "Me Generation" after they matured and turned to building assets and families. Most boomers made sacrifices, raised their families, fought a war, and put their kids through school, just like their parents did. Boomers also paid higher Social Security taxes since 1983, building up the SS "Trust" Fund to $2.7 Trillion, and have a higher SS retirement age -- so that SS could continue to cover them.
    • Jigs  •  2 months ago
      Her daughter lives nearby but doesn't have the room for her, Ms. Paladie said. Don't have room for your own mother? This is what our society is degenerated into.

    LIFELONG INVESTING ON FACEBOOK