Mon, May 28, 2012, 4:25 PM EDT - U.S. Markets closed for Memorial Day

Pepsi Beverages pays $3.1M in racial bias case

Pepsi Beverages pays $3.1 million to settle federal race discrimination charges

RELATED QUOTES

SymbolPriceChange
PEP68.64-0.17

WASHINGTON (AP) -- Pepsi Beverages Co. will pay $3.1 million to settle federal charges of race discrimination for using criminal background checks to screen out job applicants — even if they weren't convicted of a crime.

The settlement announced Wednesday with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission is part of a national government crackdown on hiring policies that can hurt blacks and Hispanics.

EEOC officials said the company's policy of not hiring workers with arrest records disproportionately excluded more than 300 black applicants. The policy barred applicants who had been arrested, but not convicted of a crime, and denied employment to others who were convicted of minor offenses.

Using arrest and conviction records to deny employment can be illegal if it's irrelevant for the job, according to the EEOC, which enforces the nation's employment discrimination laws. The agency says such blanket policies can limit job opportunities for minorities with higher arrest and conviction rates than whites.

The company has since adopted a new criminal background policy and plans to make jobs available to victims of the old policy if they are still interested in jobs at Pepsi and are qualified for the openings.

"I commend Pepsi's willingness to reexamine its policy and modify it to ensure that unwarranted roadblocks to employment are removed," EEOC Chairwoman Jacqueline Berrien said in a statement.

Pepsi Beverage spokesman Dave DeCecco said the company's criminal background check policy has always been neutral and that the EEOC did not find any intentional discrimination. He said after the issue was first raised in 2006, the company worked with the EEOC to revise its background check process "to create a workplace that is as diverse and inclusive as possible."

"We are committed to promoting diversity and inclusion and we have been widely recognized for our efforts for decades," DeCecco said.

He said the new policy would take a more "individualized approach" in considering the applicant's criminal history against the particular job being sought.

Pepsi Beverages is PepsiCo's beverage manufacturing, sales and distribution operating unit in the United States, Canada and Mexico.

Under the settlement, the company will provide the EEOC with regular reports on its hiring practices and offer antidiscrimination training to its hiring personnel and managers.

About 73 percent of major employers report that they always check on applicants' criminal records, while 19 percent do so for select job candidates, according to a 2010 survey by the Society for Human Resource Management.

But increased federal scrutiny of such policies has led some companies to reevaluate their hiring process. Pamela Devata, a Chicago employment lawyer who has represented companies trying to comply with EEOC's requirements, said there has been an uptick over the past year in EEOC charges over the use of background checks.

"The EEOC has taken a very aggressive enforcement posture on the use of criminal background and criminal history," Devata said.

The commission held a special meeting on the topic last summer, and Devata said employers have been expecting the EEOC to issue more specific guidance.

EEOC officials have said, for example, that an old drunken driving conviction may not be relevant to a clerical job, but a theft conviction may disqualify someone from working at a bank.

Julie Schmid, acting director of the EEOC's Minneapolis office, said the EEOC recommends that employers consider the nature and gravity of offenses, the time that has passed since conviction or completion of a sentence, and the nature of the job sought.

"We hope that employers with unnecessarily broad criminal background check policies take note of this agreement and reassess their policies to ensure compliance" with antidiscrimination laws, Schmid said in a written statement.

 

23 comments

  • DonG  •  4 months ago
    obozo encourages these baseless lawsuits, they cost American business billions of dollars each year, and help to further divide us, two big obozo goals
  • Viet Vet  •  Lafayette, Louisiana  •  4 months ago
    Gawd, I almost died FIVE times in Nam to help build this #$%$! And I laid in mud for 18 months eaten on by rats at night. Hangovers, the clap, lonliness, fear, all of the real war #$%$. Worst of all, I killed innocent farmers for "The American way"!! I could puke!! Viet Nam will be around when this insane country lies in ashes.
  • Chicome  •  4 months ago
    if they don't want criminals to work, then just keep them locked up
  • Linda  •  Conroe, Texas  •  4 months ago
    I read "policies can limit job opportunities for minorities with higher arrest and conviction rates than whites." I wonder why they think it is unfair to not want a convicted felon working for them? It should be up to each individual company. A convicted child molester should not work in a bank. (banks were one of their examples). They have proven to not have ethical practices!
    Each type of business should decide for themselves if they want a convicted felon working there. I would not want to spend 8 hours a day with a murderer that served their time and was released! I choose carefully who I am around and I stay away from the criminal element.
    • Common 4 months ago
      First of all if you know anything about America, it is easier for a White American with a conviction to get a job before an African-American with a high school diploma and no conviction. That isn't what the article is about. It is just pointing out to you, that whether it be an arrest (which isn't a conviction) or a conviction, almost all cases regardless of the infraction there is bias. So if you want to bring out one or two articles that point to terrible crimes and use those for the basis of your response you can do that all day. The fact is as a whole there is bias and that is why pepsi is paying. So are a lot of companies. You can not discriminate against a person for color or an arrest. PERIOD. Put people of all colors back to work. Stop the excuses. We have convicted child molesters working in banking.

      Most African-American crime is financial, just like most White crime. Minorities are stealing pennies and Whites are stealing millions. You do the math.
  • DUB  •  4 months ago
    Can't earn a living? Hell, file a frivolous lawsuit, Some liberal jury and judge might agree. Duh, no need to work anymore. Kumbayah! The EEOC is the most corrupt and biased agency in government.
    • Viet Vet 4 months ago
      Negative!! FEMA is by far the most racist agency. If you are white in the Nawlins area, don't waste your time bidding a FEMA contract or trying to become an employee. U just as soon be trying to push a rope UP Niagra Falls.
  • E.Z.F.  •  4 months ago
    I only buy Mexican Cokes in glass bottle. They have the original receipi. No for me on Pepsi...
  • Chicome  •  4 months ago
    i applied at a refinery once and they brought a traffic ticket from 25 yrs ago,
  • E.Z.F.  •  4 months ago
    I love Rum and Coke anyway. Can't make a good drink out of Poopsi.
  • Common  •  Calabasas, California  •  4 months ago
    Ok, did you people read the article? It did not say CONVICTED of a crime. Sometimes we can't wait to be biased against people. We don't want fairness. We want people to not have employment so we can call them lazy and worthless. If someone shows up for work, let them work, if they fail on the job then fire them, but stop with the excuses to be bias. The article said arrested. That means if you are a teenager get pulled over and get arrested for failure to show proper ID or insurance that should stop you from getting a job 20 years later? That is STUPID!
    • Tariq 4 months ago
      Most intelligent comment I've ever seen on Yahoo. It proves that you actually READ the article.
    • whataboutit 4 months ago
      Why would anyone want to read? That might take away a chance to make a racist comment.
    • Linda 4 months ago
      Yes they did. Here I cut it or you. Re-read the article.
      policies can limit job opportunities for minorities with higher arrest and conviction rates than whites.
  • Jason  •  4 months ago
    What a ridiculous EEOC ruling! If I own a business and don't want to hire someone because they've been convicted of a crime, that should be my right. I would love for someone to commission a study to look at the correlation between people arrested and people who are later convicted of a crime (either current or future). My bet is that there is a high correlation, which would be cause for not hiring someone.

    If you're a job-seeker and you want a tip on getting the job......obey they law. This applies whether you are white, black, or purple.
    • Casey 4 months ago
      Absolutely right! If you own a business and don't want to hire someone who's been convicted of a crime that speaks to his/her ability to do his/her job (i.e. money-handling, security, etc.) you are totally within your legal and moral rights - not to mention SMART!

      Take a look at the first lines of this article, though . . .

      "Pepsi Beverages Co. will pay $3.1 million to settle federal charges of race discrimination for using criminal background checks to screen out job applicants — even if they weren't convicted of a crime."

      Third paragraph states . . .

      "The policy barred applicants who had been arrested, but not convicted of a crime, and denied employment to others who were convicted of minor offenses."

      People are wrongly arrested . . . or arrested for "minor" offenses, like unintentionally writing a bad check, etc. In some instances a spouse is arrested at the request of another spouse in spiteful (pre-) divorce situations. What if the minor offense was traffic-related?

      Not all 300 of the affected individuals was convicted or even GUILTY of a crime . This ruling is protective of all citizens. If I'm wrongly arrested - due to a records snafu, mistaken identity, etc., should it render me unemployable? That's a lifetime sentence. Having dealt with HR and security departments, I can tell you that more people than you know (of all races) have, for example, DUI's on their records than you would ever imagine. If I have a DUI on my record (perhaps from my young, dumb college years) , should I be unable to work? Isn't that counter to the notion of people "moving on" and becoming/remaining self-sufficient? Welcome to the notion of the viscious cycle. How can you learn from a mistake if society won't let you move past it - regardless of your race?
  • Louis  •  Ndola, Zambia  •  4 months ago
    that's #$%$
  • Gerry  •  Westland, Michigan  •  4 months ago
    more government intervention, just what we need, all businesses should do away with their HR departments and let the EEOC do all the hiring .
  • whataboutit  •  4 months ago
    As some of you continue to miss the part about even being arrested, but never convicted, I hope you have the same feeling when your kid is denied employment because some make false charges against them. Unlike a conviction, an arrest is not as easy to remove from the public records or many search engines out there that never get updated or corrected information. I hope that if you need to do a new job search and find that your arrest for disorderly conduct 20 years ago keeps you unemployed. I hope that when you go to look for housing that charges that the cops arrested you for and later drops does not haunt you. Be careful what you cheer about. Today it is that group that you dislike, tomorrow it is you.
  • jaimeg  •  4 months ago
    wow, even if they werent convicted tells me they hang around the wrong people.
  • the truth  •  Irvine, California  •  4 months ago
    I DON'T BLAME PEPSI AT ALL. I WOULD DO THE SAME THING IF I WAS IN CHARGE AT PEPSI. I HAVE WORKED WITH EX-CONS AND SOME WHOM WERE JUST ARESTED AND NOT CONVICTED. THEY STEAL, LIE AND DO DRUGS DURING WORK HOURS. THEY ARE NOT TRUSTWORTHY.
  • Chicome  •  4 months ago
    pepsi needs to understand that even people in prison buy their products
  • Phil R  •  Muncie, Indiana  •  4 months ago
    Oh, for heaven sake. It is racial bias not to employ ex-cons? I sure would not want any criminals working for me. But this is America where only the undeserving get all the breaks, I guess.
    • Casey 4 months ago
      No, it's not racial bias to not emply ex-cons - unless the crime has nothing to do with the scope of the person's job? This ruling is not a blanket ruling about ex-cons. Note that the article references people who were arrested and not convicted . . . as well as those guilty of minor (perhaps traffic) offenses. Is someone - regardless of race - who commits a traffic offense "undeserving?" Take race out of the conversation and consider that the notion of the ruling ensures fairness to ALL.

      The underlying and unspoken element in this article is the potential likelihood of using these minor offenses to deny employment to minorities . . . but not using the same litmus test for non-minorities. The issue isn't always that the minority applicants have done something that non-minority applicants haven't done . . . it's that they're disproportionatly barred from employment when they do.

      I have PERSONALLY seen company security personnel go over the background checks of minority/foreign applicants "with a fine-toothed comb" - even going so far as to do research on the applicants family members . . . while unceremoniously approving the hire of a non-minority applicant with a similar background. Not making it up. Not making excuses. Just telling you why there is aneed for rulings like this in our "fair" country.

      It boils down to biased individuals finding excuses not to hire minorities with backgrounds on-par with non-minorities. Rest assured there are plenty of minorities with NO criminal record. Bear in mind, however, that the term minority speaks to the numerics of the situation. If I am, say 15% of the population, and someone is unreasonably excluding me from employement in comparison to the standard being set for non-minorities in hiring, then I am being disproportionately affected (as a minority group) in great part, because there are fewer of me to start with. It's a mathematical phenomenon, as well as the result of disparate treatment in the hiring process. Please don't walk away from this article thinking that the problem is that minorities are all thieves, rapists and killers . . . and that there aren't enough of them who are non-criminals to get hired. That's way off base.
  • Dana Washington  •  Toronto, Canada  •  4 months ago
    Hmmm, the Morrons are out in force today,

    When was the last time anyone of you folks picked up a book or entered school that did not have Disney written on the classroom walls. The blogs are self evident that not only are you all unable to grasp the basics concepts of "systemic racism" it would be pointless to even bother to explain it using this medium.
    However, there is hope!!! Perhaps you morrons on here could visit a local university Hint:
    (not the ones where you get a degree in 6 weeks) and speak to any professor with a ""PhD"""which stands for a person who is not a social foul. S/he can break it down to your level. However, do bring your friends for birds of a fellow... ..well, I think you morrons can finish the rest!!!

    regards,
  • thatdude  •  Louisville, Kentucky  •  4 months ago
    just them good ole boys.....#$%$ in 2012....REALLY
  • rasheed  •  San Diego, California  •  4 months ago
    OMG you can't even do background checks anymore? Of course it will hurt those Jigkgs and spy-cks, they're THE ONES WHO COMMIT THE CRIMES! Then when someone gets hurt or raped on the job site, people ask "why wasn't there a background check" and blah blah blah. Listen the only good thing these people are good for is manual labor. And their women.....you can send them to my house. I'll glaze their minority doughnuts and breed them out of existence.
 
Recent Quotes
Symbol Price Change % Chg 
Your most recently viewed tickers will automatically show up here if you type a ticker in the "Enter symbol/company" at the bottom of this module.
You need to enable your browser cookies to view your most recent quotes.
 
Sign-in to view quotes in your portfolios.

Trading Center

Yahoo! Finance on Facebook

  YAHOO! FINANCE ON TWITTER