I want to convert my IRAs to Roth IRAs in 2009. We are retired and don't make over $100,000 a year. Could you please give me the parameters for doing a conversion? Can you spread the taxes over two years?
—John and Deborah Sellers, Hoover, Ala.
Moving assets from a traditional individual retirement account to a Roth IRA is a way to take advantage of the stock market's dive.
You do have to pay income taxes upfront on the account's value when you roll over traditional IRA assets to a Roth. But most IRA owners have seen their account balances tumble due to the liquidity crisis. And income-tax rates are relatively low at the moment as well, says Ed Slott, an IRA consultant in Rockville Centre, N.Y. So, that income-tax bill could turn out to be a relative bargain.
| More from WSJ.com: • Some Breathing Room for IRAs • Annuity Addresses Longevity Issue • Financial Pressure Is a Family-Room Topic |
Other advantages: With a Roth, there are generally no taxes on withdrawals or future earnings, unlike with traditional IRAs. There also is no mandatory distribution schedule -- again in contrast with traditional IRAs, from which account holders must begin taking minimum distributions by April 1 of the year following the year they turn 70½ years old (though not in 2009 -- more on that below). And if you're hoping to leave an inheritance, it is more advantageous for your heirs to receive a Roth than a traditional IRA, because they would never have to pay tax on Roth withdrawals.
Legislation approved by Congress earlier this month suspends retirement-account distribution requirements for 2009. That means you could roll over assets from a traditional IRA to a Roth next year without first having to take a mandatory distribution, Mr. Slott says. In other words, the taxes you pay on your IRA assets' presumably beaten-down value would all be helping you get those savings into a Roth.
And if your assets fell in value after doing the conversion, you could "recharacterize" the account as a traditional IRA so you wouldn't have to pay income tax on value that no longer exists. You would have until Oct. 15, 2010, to recharacterize a Roth you converted at any point in 2009.
As you note, to be eligible to convert traditional IRA assets to a Roth, your modified adjusted gross income must be no more than $100,000 a year, either for an individual or a married couple filing jointly. Your mandatory IRA distribution (in years other than 2009) wouldn't count against that limit, and neither would the assets you convert to a Roth. But those amounts still count as taxable income, Mr. Slott says. (You can figure out your modified adjusted gross income using a work sheet in Publication 590 at irs.gov.)
Starting in 2010 -- not next year -- there are no income limits for Roth conversions. And for any conversions done in 2010, you can spread any resulting taxes across 2011 and 2012. The big wild card: Tax rates may increase in the next few years. "Paying the tax now removes the uncertainty of what future tax rates might be," Mr. Slott says.



There are no comments yet