Mon, May 28, 2012, 5:43 PM EDT - U.S. Markets closed for Memorial Day

Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

Explore news, videos, and much more based on what your friends are reading and watching. Publish your own activity and retain full control.

To get started, first

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    Prepare for the Retirement Tax Bite

    When the time comes to tap your tax-deferred retirement accounts, Uncle Sam will be waiting for his share.

    One of the nastiest surprises awaiting some retirees is the devastating impact that taxes can have on their cash flow. Although many people welcome the upfront tax breaks of contributing to traditional IRAs and 401(k) plans during their working years, they're not so thrilled when Uncle Sam demands his cut when they start tapping those retirement accounts.

    Imagine you are retired, plan to buy a new car for $30,000, and have all your savings tied up in a traditional IRA or company 401(k) plan. If you're in the 25% tax bracket, you'll need to withdraw $40,000 to have enough after-tax money to buy that $30,000 car. Ouch! Welcome to the IRA tax trap.

    The same issue arises if you're following the 4% rule of thumb for withdrawing assets from your retirement portfolio. Many experts believe that your nest egg has a far greater chance of lasting throughout your lifetime if you withdraw no more than 4% of your portfolio during your first year of retirement and then increase later withdrawals to keep pace with inflation. But that 4% withdrawal rule does not take taxes into account.

    So if you have a $2 million IRA, $80,000 in the first year of retirement may seem like enough to meet your needs, but you'll only have $60,000 of spendable after-tax income. "Life is about cash flow whether you are retired or not," says Craig Brimhall, vice-president of retirement wealth strategies at Ameriprise Financial. "It's not what you make but what you keep."

    To avoid such pain, some financial advisers are suggesting that investors diversify their retirement assets among taxable, tax-deferred and tax-free accounts. Because no one knows what future tax rates will be, retirees with a tax-diversified portfolio are in the best position to manage cash flow, says Brimhall.

    When it comes to taxes, not all income sources are created equal. Withdrawals from traditional retirement accounts are taxed at ordinary-income rates. So is interest on taxable savings. Depending on your income, your Social Security benefits may be tax-free, or you may pay taxes on up to 85% of the benefits at your ordinary-income tax rate. Meanwhile, withdrawals from Roth IRAs are tax-free, and interest earned on municipal bonds is tax-free, too.

    Long-term capital gains from the sale of investments held more than one year, as well as qualified dividends, are taxed at a maximum 15%. But investors in the two lowest tax brackets -- individuals with up to $34,000 of taxable income and married couples with up to $69,000 of joint income in 2011 -- pay no tax on long-term gains and qualified dividends (and pay 15% on long-term gains and dividends that lift taxable income above those thresholds).

    Tax Diversification Can Boost Net Income

    Brimhall demonstrates how two retired couples with the same pretax income of $144,000 per year can have very different tax liabilities. He assumes each couple receives identical amounts of income from Social Security ($24,000), interest on savings ($3,360), qualified dividends ($38,664) and distributions from a company retirement plan ($36,000). The only difference is the first couple withdraws $41,976 tax-free from a Roth IRA, while the second couple withdraws the same amount from a traditional IRA.

    Based on 2011 tax rates, the first couple would owe $7,278 in federal taxes while the second couple would owe $18,446. Why the huge difference? Tax-free distributions from a Roth IRA allowed the first couple to shield nearly 30% of their gross income from taxes, reducing their taxable income and tax bracket and allowing some of their dividend income to be tax-free.

    Withdrawing assets in a tax-efficient way will not only reduce your tax bill, it will allow your remaining assets to last longer. Learn about strategic withdrawals at www.retireeincome.com. For $500, you can also get a personalized plan to reallocate your investments and minimize future taxes.

    The best time to start planning for the impact of taxes in retirement is while you are working. Consider contributing to a Roth IRA or Roth 401(k) if you are eligible or converting some of your traditional retirement savings to a Roth account. You'll owe taxes on the amount you convert now, but future appreciation and withdrawals will be tax-free. Also strive to build up a stash of savings and investments outside your retirement accounts.

    We apologize. An error has occurred. Please try again.
     

    5 comments

    • Auld Phart  •  5 months ago
      One stupid assumption is that your typical retiree is in the 25% bracket. My wife and I could have a gross income of $90,000 and still be in the 15% bracket because, for us (both over 65), the first $21,300 is free of taxes (taking the standard deduction), and we don't move into a higher bracket until we make an additional $69,000 in income.

      The next stupid assumption is that all income comes in the form of IRA withdrawals.

      The third stupid assumption is that if your income is $80,000 that you'll have to pay $20,000 in taxes. 25% is the marginal rate and is not charged on every dollar of income. In our situation, if the only income we had was the $80,000 from the IRA, we would actually only have $58,700 in taxable income ($80,000 - $21,300) and our total Federal income tax would be $7,955. That's a far cry from $20,000. It's also an effective tax rate of just under 10% even though our marginal rate is 15%.

      I don't HAVE to withdraw anything from my IRA for another 5 years and the RMD (required minimum distribution) is less than 4% until I'm 73.

      BTW, you don't need a 6 figure income to retire on and you certainly don't need a $2,000,000 IRA.
      • Art 5 months ago
        Well, I plead guilty to being stupid. It turns out that all three of the assumptions hit me. Tell me where I am making mistakes in calculating my tax bill:

        1. My wife has an excellent retirement income from pension and a part-time job. With just her income alone, we reach the $69,000 taxable income point where the 25% bracket begins. ( I understand that the 10% and 15% rates apply up to this point )
        2. I, on the other hand, do not have a pension and I have no other income. My ONLY source of income is IRA withdrawals ( I am 64 now, but plan to wait to age 70 to take SS, as my family tends to live into their 90's )
        3. Yes, I do pay 25% on ALL the dollars that I take from my IRA. Refer back to my stupid assumption #1 - taxable income due to wife's income alone puts us in the marginal bracket of 25%. That 25% rate is applied to EVERY dollar OVER the $69,000 threshold. So, if I take a distribution of, say, $60,000, then I am hit with a federal tax of $15,000 (plus my state income tax of 5%, equal to $3,000) So, the point of the article is accurate - if I decide to buy a $40,000 auto, my IRA account balance drops by $60,000.

        I do agree with your BTW comments, but that is it.
    • Cobranut 1  •  5 months ago
      So what happens if eventually we go to a consumption tax system and eliminate the income tax, ie: the so-called "fair tax"?
      Will all these after-tax contributions that we've already paid tax on, as well as the Roth IRA gains that we're promised are tax-exempt, be taxed a second time when we must spend that money in retirement?
      This is the question I've asked of EVERY fair-tax supporter I've talked to and NOT ONE of them has offered a solution to this flaw in the plan.
      • RJ_McBean 3 months ago
        You paid taxes on those contributions because that was the tax code at that time. Actually, this is a moot argument because the taxes that have already been paid represent a "sunk cost", and sunk costs are always irrelevant in economic/financial decision making. There is no solution because there is no real problem other than the emotional trap of fixating on the water that's already passed under the bridge.
      • Cobranut 1 3 months ago
        RJ Mcbean: It may not be a PROBLEM for you, if you're one of those bums who has always SPENT every dollar they made and are relying on us RESPONSIBLE TAXPAYERS to take care of you in your old age.It's a BIG F...ING PROBLEM for those of us who have BUSTED OUR #$%$ AND SACRIFICED all our lives to achieve the ability to RETIRE and PROUDLY SUPPORT OURSELVES without becoming a WELFARE BUM.This issue is THE MAIN REASON we'll never accept a switch to a consumption tax system.
    • Tony  •  5 months ago
      I wish Mary Beth would address the real world; I mean $2,000,000 IRA's, pretax income of $144,000 etc. How about some numbers closer to JW's comment below?. That seems to be more realistic to me.
    • gottamouthoff  •  Des Moines, Iowa  •  5 months ago
      some rollovers although taxable, may excape the tax bite if the amounts are below your taxable threshold. not for the onepercenters though.
    • J.W  •  5 months ago
      If a retiree plans for taxes, or no taxes, it is possible to not pay taxes even with Required Minimum Distributions. . For 10 years I have received almost all of my income from IRAs (Roth and Traditonal) and Social Security exclusively and pay no more than $400 a year in federal taxes. By taking distributions from a mix of the TIRAs and Roth IRAs is how it's done. This year (2011), I will have taken distributions of $22,500 from my Traditional IRA (which is more than the RMD) and $4000 from my Roth IRAs. Our Social Security payments will be about $30,000. The $56,500 total income is virtually tax free (will be about $300 to $400 ).
      Plan ahead. When I retired in 1998, and for 4 years I lived off of Social Security and sold off my taxable accounts for expenses and conversion to I Bonds. I converted about 20% of my TIRAs to Roth IRAS. I paid the taxes then so that I haven't had to for 10 years and shouldn't in the future until my death.
      I don't worry about taxes.
      • Cobranut 1 3 months ago
        You'll worry if they ever shove a "Consumption Tax" or so-called "FairTax" down our throats.

    FOCUS ON RETIREMENT