Presidential Power, Bipartisan Hypocrisy

The Fiscal Times

I am not a big fan of the common view that Republicans and Democrats are equally guilty of various things that the general public abhors about the way Washington works. In my view, one side is almost always more guilty than the other. But there is one area where the common view is correct and that is when it comes to dealing with presidential overreach. When your side holds the White House, you defend it; when it doesn’t, you condemn it.

The latest example of this comes from President Obama’s State of the Union address this week. In it, he said he would bypass Republican obstructionism and use executive orders to implement his agenda wherever possible. For example, Congress has thus far refused to raise the minimum wage for all workers, but he says he will require that all federal contractors do so, which is within the president’s power. It’s not much, but it’s something.

Related: Obama’s SOTU Wish List—What Will He Get Done?

Republicans were quick to attack Obama’s “imperial presidency.” In a Wall Street Journal article obviously written well before Obama’s speech Tuesday night, Senator Ted Cruz, Republican of Texas, accused the president of a “persistent pattern of lawlessness” and a “willingness to disregard the written law and instead enforce his own policies via executive fiat.”

All the press attention this week on Obama’s executive order strategy is a little silly since he’s been using it as long as he has been in office. A Feb. 13, 2010 article in The New York Times is titled, “Obama Making Plans to Use Executive Power.” Another article in that paper on April 22, 2012 is titled, “Shift on Executive Power Lets Obama Bypass Rivals.” And last year at this time, The Washington Post published a story with the title, “Obama Weighing Executive Actions on Housing, Gays and Other Issues.”

We heard the same thing during the Bill Clinton administration. Also frustrated by Republican obstructionism, he also said he would use executive orders to implement his agenda. On July 5, 1998, The New York Times quoted Clinton aide Paul Begala bragging about the new strategy: “Stroke of the pen, law of the land. Kind of cool.”

In 2000, Clinton aide Bruce Reed assured Democrats that there would be no letup in the executive order strategy. “The president will be signing executive orders right up until the morning of Jan. 20, 2001,” he told The New York Times.

Related: Obama Won’t Wait for Legislation to Advance 2014 Priorities

Then, as now, Republicans attacked the rise of the “imperial presidency.” But they were singing a different tune when Richard Nixon used executive orders to freeze all wages and prices, close the gold window and take other major actions on Aug. 15, 1971. Republicans stood behind him.

After Nixon was weakened by the Watergate revelations, he expanded his use of executive orders and executive privilege. In a series of articles in March 1973, The New York Times said his actions were unprecedented. Nixon, The Times said, “is attempting an expansion of presidential powers that could have more impact on the national government than that of any president since Franklin D. Roosevelt.”

During the presidency of George W. Bush, Republicans were huge fans of executive power and even argued in favor of the “unitary executive,” a theory which said that the president is pretty much all-powerful and could act decisively without Congress. As Prof. Dana Nelson of Vanderbilt University explained in a 2008 article:

Unitarians (for lack of a better word) want to expand the many existing uncheckable executive powers -- such as executive orders, decrees, memorandums, proclamations, national security directives and legislative signing statements -- that already allow presidents to enact a good deal of foreign and domestic policy without aid, interference or consent from Congress. Ardent proponents even insist that there are times when the president -- like a king -- should operate above the law.

The irony is that insofar as Obama has stretched the law, he did so using a firm legal foundation that was established by Bush. Nevertheless, Republicans like Sen. Cruz simply ignore this history and assert that Obama’s actions are unique and without precedent.

In truth, the whole issue of the imperial presidency was baked in the cake by the Founding Fathers, many of whom were in favor of giving the president king-like powers. Others, of course, thought Congress should hold all power, with the president as a mere errand boy. Without a clear line between executive and legislative power, we have been engaging in trial-and-error since 1789, with power ebbing back and forth depending on circumstances, personalities, court cases and other factors.

Related: Obama’s Dismal Approval Ratings Take Another Dive

Insofar as Obama is concerned, he has actually been among the least aggressive presidents in recent history to use executive orders to implement his agenda. As University of Chicago law professor Eric Posner points out, Obama has issued far fewer executive orders per year than Ronald Reagan, George H.W. Bush, Bill Clinton or George W. Bush, as shown in the chart.

Ironically, those who believe in congressional primacy and fear executive overreach are partially responsible for the latter. They have championed use of the filibuster in the Senate to block even the most routine legislation and executive branch appointments. There doesn’t seem to be any logic to it except the assumption that whatever Obama wants is per se bad or that Republicans deserve to get something in return for every vote.

The result has been implementation of the so-called “nuclear option” in the Senate, where majority leader Harry Reid, Democrat of Nevada, engineered a sharp limitation on all filibusters against executive branch nominations. In short, overuse of the filibuster led to its demise.

Similarly, Congress’s refusal to act on many Obama initiatives creates inevitable pressure on him to act unilaterally. It would be much harder for him to do so in the face of a vote in Congress explicitly rejecting one of the policies he has implemented by executive order.

Therefore, one way Congress can restraint the president is simply by doing its job. Hold hearing on presidential proposals, have committee mark-ups and floor votes, have members of Congress stay in town once in a while instead of spending all their time raising money and running for reelection. That, rather than mindless obstructionism, is the best way for Obama’s congressional critics to achieve their goals and reclaim the moral high ground.

Top Reads from The Fiscal Times:


View Comments (2)

Recommended for You

  • Obama to GOP: 'Stop just hating all the time'

    KANSAS CITY, Mo. (AP) — Pointing the finger at Republicans for congressional inaction, President Barack Obama chided lawmakers Wednesday for spending the waning days before their month-long summer break trying to sue him rather than addressing economic issues that could boost the middle class.

    Associated Press

    Argentina's stock market is tanking after the...

    Business Insider
  • 7 Signs You're About to be Fired

    Did your mistake cost you your job? How can you tell? Here are some signs youre about to get the boot.

  • In San Francisco real estate, $1M won't buy much

    SAN FRANCISCO (AP) — San Francisco Association of Realtors President Betty Taisch has two words of advice for those who want to live here and think $1 million will buy them their dream house: Think again.

    Associated Press
  • Airbus adamant no room for more talks in cancelled Japan jet deal

    Airbus on Thursday said its decision to cancel a $2.2 billion jet order from Skymark Airlines was final, rejecting the Japanese carrier's suggestion that talks were still ongoing. The European aircraft maker said this week it had informed Skymark that its purchase of six A380 superjumbos "has been…

  • Tesla posts 2Q loss, prepares Nevada factory site

    PALO ALTO, Calif. (AP) — Electric car maker Tesla Motors widened its loss in the second quarter as it prepared for the launch of a new SUV and started work on a massive new battery plant.

    Associated Press
  • Play

    Why Do Millennials Prefer Cash to Investing Money?

    In the last year, the S&P 500 delivered 17% and cash investments delivered 1%. Which would you rather have? In a Bankrate study, millennials said they'd rather have the cash. The Mutual Fund Store's Senior Vice President of Investments Andy Smith joins Simon Constable on the News Hub to discuss.…

    WSJ Live
  • 3D Systems Shares Are Cratering

    Shares in 3D Systems were down more than 12% in...

    Business Insider
  • 4 Unusual Savings Strategies That Really Work

    It's just one of those facts of life: Saving money can be really hard. If you're trying to save and not getting ahead, it might be time to try one of these easy, everyday savings habits that will help you tighten your finances.

    U.S.News & World Report LP
  • The Lipton twist on a lemonade stand.

    The Lipton twist on a lemonade stand. #BeMoreTea

  • Wisconsin Supreme Court upholds 2011 union law

    MADISON, Wis. (AP) — The fight over Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker's signature policy achievement, a law effectively ending collective bargaining for most public employees, ended Thursday with the state Supreme Court declaring it to be constitutional.

    Associated Press
  • Sanctions will damage Russia if not lifted quickly

    MOSCOW (AP) — U.S. and European sanctions against Russia's energy and finance sectors are strong enough to cause deep, long-lasting damage within months unless Moscow persuades the West to repeal them by withdrawing support for Ukrainian insurgents.

    Associated Press
  • What SunPower Earnings Mean for First Solar and SolarCity

    After markets close Thursday, solar panel maker SunPower will report second-quarter results. Competitors First Solar and SolarCity are scheduled to report results next week.

    24/7 Wall St.
  • Adidas shares plunge 13% after Russia warning

    Adidas shares tanked more than 13 percent after it cut its profit targets for 2014, warning "tensions" in Russia would hit its bottom line.

  • Bank of America ordered to pay $1.27 billion for 'Hustle' fraud

    By Jonathan Stempel NEW YORK (Reuters) - A federal judge on Wednesday ordered Bank of America Corp to pay a $1.27 billion penalty for fraud over shoddy mortgages sold by the former Countrywide Financial Corp. U.S. District Judge Jed Rakoff in Manhattan ruled after a jury last October found the…

  • Why You Should Prepare for the Next Bear Market Now

    The stock market is going gangbusters these days, with the S&P 500 close to surpassing 2,000 points. While the index may never fall back to that level, bear markets will one day hit us hard again. It's a good idea to develop a plan for the next bear market now, while your asset values aren't free…

    U.S.News & World Report LP
  • $40-Off Limited Time Offer From Norton

    Award-winning PC protection that doesn't slow you down. Easy installation & money-back guarantee. Download today with our $40-off limited time offer.

    AdChoicesNorton by SymantecSponsored
  • Play

    Tesla's Earnings: What to Watch For

    Electric-car maker Tesla is scheduled to be released after the bell Thursday, and Mike Ramsey joins MoneyBeat with Paul Vigna to preview the results.

    WSJ Live
  • 5 Little-Known Ways to Boost Your Retirement Savings

    Saving for retirement is no easy task. Fortunately, we have several tools and strategies that can help us reach our retirement goals. Maintain your asset allocation. When you begin investing you typically select an asset allocation that suits your risk tolerance and investment goals.

    U.S.News & World Report LP
  • Panasonic, Tesla to build giant battery plant in US

    Japanese electronics giant Panasonic and US electric vehicle maker Tesla Motors said Thursday they will jointly build and operate a huge lithium ion battery plant known as the Gigafactory. Under the deal, Tesla will run the operations at the proposed US-based plant, while its Japanese partner will…

  • Can a Repair Shop I Didn't Use Send Me to Collections?

    Are you obligated to pay for car parts that a repair shop ordered after they gave you an estimate? And can they send you to a debt collector if you don't pay?
  • Alcatel-Lucent cuts losses but shares slump

    Telecommunication equipment group Alcatel-Lucent said Thursday it cut net losses by more than half in the second quarter as it battles to rebuild after years of setbacks. Alcatel-Lucent said its quarterly net loss was 298 million euros ($399 million), down from 885 million euros for the same period…

  • GE, Synchrony Financial Lower Sights for Thursday IPO

    General Electric Co. (NYSE: GE) spinoff Synchrony Financial priced its initial public offering of 125 million shares at $23 at the bottom of the expected range of $23 to $26 a share. At that price gross ...

    24/7 Wall St.
  • Summer means sizzling savings at

    Save big on appliances, apparel, lawn and garden, tools and more. For fun in the sun or a project in the shade, start your search at Sears.