For-profit colleges look worse than ever following a study from Stanford's Caroline M. Hoxby and Harvard's Christopher Avery.
The new study found that for-profit schools spend much less on instructional cost per student than all other schools.
At the same time, for-profit schools can have a higher out-of-pocket cost due to limited financial aid.
The real losers, according to this study, are the many low-income students who could attend more competitive schools for less money if they were aware of their options .
Here's a chart from the study showing how for-profit schools are actually more expensive for low-income students after financial aid:
For-profit schools spend less on instruction than any other type of institution, at $3,257, or 15 percent of the total costs to the student, on an average pupil's instruction:
That lack of investment shows itself in student outcomes. A study from Kevin Lang and Russel Weinstein at Boston University found that students get no benefit or increase in income from attending a for-profit school.
There are large, statistically significant, positive effects of obtaining certificates/degrees from a public or not-for-profit institution among those starting in associates degree programs. We find no evidence that students gain from obtaining any certificate or degree from a for-profit institution.
Not much of a value proposition there.
More From Business Insider
- HTML5 vs. Apps: Where The Debate Stands Now, And Why It Matters
- Brand New Photo Confirms That Kim Jong-un Is A Mac User
- North Korea Releases New Photos That Reveal Its 'US Mainland Strike Plan' In The Background
- Financial Aid