Mon, May 28, 2012, 6:11 PM EDT - U.S. Markets closed for Memorial Day

Rating the Rating Agencies

RELATED QUOTES

SymbolPriceChange
BAC7.150.01
C26.47-0.19
GS96.70-0.16
JPM33.50-0.47

Last week Moody's Investors Service announced a review of many banks and securities firms with global capital markets operations for a possible downgrade, citing “fragile funding conditions, wider credit spreads, increased regulatory burdens and more difficult operating conditions” for these companies.

Financial stocks were the second best performing sector in the S&P 500 the next day, with banks on the review list like Citigroup (NYSE:C - News), Goldman Sachs (NYSE:GS - News), JPMorgan Chase (NYSE:JPM - News) and Bank of America (NYSE:BAC - News) ending the day up between 1% and 4%. Either the investors did not care about Moody’s warning or these factors were already known and priced in. Also, the investors focused on better macroeconomic data in the US and the positive news from Europe.

S&P had downgraded the credit rating of the United States on August 5, 2011. This was followed by a sustained rally in Treasuries.  Similarly many European countries that were downgraded recently saw their yields fall, as their problems were already known for quite some time and downgrades did not bring out any new information.  

Credit rating agencies are supposed serve the purpose of assisting investors in evaluating the safety and soundness of their investments but their record for the past few years has not been impressive at all, to say the least. They completed failed to recognize the risk embedded in mortgage-backed securities and complex structured credit vehicles. Billions of dollar of paper rated triple A by these agencies proved to be worthless.

Both S&P and Moody’s failed to see the warnings signs in MF Global’s exposure to European sovereign debt and were very late in downgrading their credit rating on the brokerage.

As such, it appears that the investors have stopped trusting these agencies and their rating changes do not affect the markets the way they are supposed to.

If you were to rate these agencies, what would your rating be?

Read the analyst report on BAC

Read the analyst report on C

Read the analyst report on GS

Read the analyst report on JPM

Zacks Investment Research



More From Zacks.com
 

2 comments

  • Cami  •  3 months ago
    At least Moody's and Fitch have decent models with decent analysts. S and P is pathetic and should be rated FFF. With people like Diane Vazza (their head of "research" with a mere BA in languages (!) and Cliff Griep (the former chief credit officer, who knows nothing about ratings) on their books, S and P looks pretty pathetic. The list of badly qualified people at S and P is endless. People like Vazza and Griep should go. They are a nuisance and S and P would be much better off without them!
  • ANON  •  3 months ago
    S&P really stinks! One can smell their crap all over the place. Shame on Terry McGraw for not clearing out the vermin once and for all.
 
Recent Quotes
Symbol Price Change % Chg 
Your most recently viewed tickers will automatically show up here if you type a ticker in the "Enter symbol/company" at the bottom of this module.
You need to enable your browser cookies to view your most recent quotes.
 
Sign-in to view quotes in your portfolios.

Trading Center

Yahoo! Finance on Facebook

  YAHOO! FINANCE ON TWITTER