Rexford Industrial Announces Second Quarter 2014 Financial Results

– Reports Recurring FFO of $0.24 Per Diluted Share –

– Same Property Portfolio Occupancy Increases to 89.8% –

– Acquires More Than $224 Million Year-to-Date –

Business Wire

LOS ANGELES--(BUSINESS WIRE)--

Rexford Industrial Realty, Inc. (the “Company” or “Rexford Industrial”) (REXR), a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) that specializes in acquiring, owning and operating industrial properties located in Southern California infill markets, today announced financial results for the second quarter of 2014.

Second Quarter 2014 Financial and Operational Highlights:

  • Reported Recurring Funds From Operations (FFO) of $0.24 per share for the quarter ended June 30, 2014. Adjusting for non-recurring items, FFO was $0.22 per share.
  • Same Property Portfolio occupancy was 89.8%, an increase of 140 basis points compared to the second quarter of 2013. The consolidated portfolio was 90.5% occupied and 91.1% leased.
  • Same Property Portfolio NOI increased 8.3% in the second quarter of 2014 compared to the second quarter of 2013, driven by a 4.8% increase in Same Property Portfolio revenue, and a 4.1% decrease in Same Property Portfolio expenses. Same Property Portfolio Cash NOI increased 3.3% compared to the second quarter 2013.
  • Signed new and renewal leases totaled approximately 572,620 square feet. Rental rates on new leases were 17.1% higher than prior rents on a GAAP basis, and 5.2% higher on a cash basis.
  • Since April 2014, including transactions closed after June 30, 2014, the Company has acquired 17 industrial properties totaling approximately 1.77 million square feet, for an aggregate cost of $192.0 million. Year-to-date, the Company has acquired 22 industrial properties totaling approximately 2.17 million square feet, for an aggregate cost of $224.9 million.

“We are extremely pleased with the strength of our operating metrics and accretive portfolio growth that we achieved during the second quarter,” stated Michael Frankel and Howard Schwimmer, Rexford Industrial’s Co-Chief Executive Officers. “During the quarter, we executed over 570,000 square feet of new and renewal leases and recorded a 140 basis point year-over-year jump in our Same Property Portfolio occupancy to nearly 90%. On the investment front, our acquisition activity accelerated as we closed on $192.0 million of attractively positioned properties since April 2014. Since our IPO in July 2013, we have acquired 2.9 million square feet of industrial property in our target infill Southern California markets, resulting in a 52.94% expansion of our portfolio.”

Financial Results:

Financial results for periods ending on or prior to June 30, 2013 reflect the results of Rexford Industrial’s predecessor entities.

The Company reported net income of $0.1 million ($0.1 million before non-controlling interests), or $0.00 per diluted share of common stock, for the three months ended June 30, 2014. In comparison, Rexford Industrial’s predecessor entities reported a loss of $2.3 million (a loss of $0.5 million before non-controlling interests) for the three months ended June 30, 2013.

For the six months ended June 30, 2014, the Company reported net income of $1.4 million ($1.5 million before non-controlling interests), or $0.05 per diluted share of common stock. In comparison, Rexford Industrial’s predecessor entities reported a loss of $2.0 million (income of $1.6 million before non-controlling interests) for the six months ended June 30, 2013.

The Company reported Recurring FFO of $6.1 million, or $0.24 per diluted share of common stock, for the three months ended June 30, 2014. Adjusting for non-recurring acquisition expenses of $0.7 million incurred during the second quarter, FFO was $5.5 million, or $0.22 per diluted share of common stock.

For the six months ended June 30, 2014, the Company reported Recurring FFO of $11.4 million, or $0.45 per diluted share of common stock. Adjusting for non-recurring acquisition expenses of $1.0 million incurred during the first six months of 2014, FFO was $10.5 million, or $0.41 per diluted share of common stock.

Operating Results:

For the three months ended June 30, 2014, the Company’s Same Property Portfolio NOI increased 8.3% compared to the second quarter of 2013, driven by a 4.8% increase in Same Property Portfolio revenue, and a 4.1% decrease in Same Property Portfolio expenses. Same Property Portfolio Cash NOI increased 3.3% compared to the second quarter 2013.

In the second quarter, the Company signed 116 new and renewal leases in its consolidated portfolio, totaling 572,617 square feet. Average rental rates on comparable new and renewal leases were up 17.1% on a GAAP basis, and up 5.2% on a cash basis. The Company signed 44 new leases for 208,819 square feet, with GAAP rents up 12.9%, compared to the prior in place leases. The Company signed 72 renewal leases for 363,798 square feet, with GAAP rents up 18.9% compared to the prior in place leases. For the 44 new leases, cash rents were up 2.9%, and for the 72 renewal leases, cash rents were up 6.1%, compared to the ending cash rents for the prior leases.

The Company has included in a supplemental information package the results and operating statistics that reflect the activities of the Company for the three months ended June 30, 2014. See below for information regarding the supplemental information package.

Transaction Activity:

Since April 2014, including transactions closed after June 30, 2014, the Company has acquired 17 industrial properties totaling approximately 1.77 million square feet, for an aggregate cost of $192.0 million, as detailed below.

In April 2014, the Company acquired Saturn Way, a 170,865 square foot Class “A” industrial building, for $21.1 million, or $123 per square foot. The property is located in Seal Beach, within the Orange County West submarket, and is currently 100% occupied.

In May 2014, the Company acquired 2980 San Fernando, a 130,800 square foot industrial property located on San Fernando Boulevard, Burbank for $15.4 million, or $118 per square foot. The property consists of two industrial buildings that are currently 100% occupied by a single tenant, located within the San Fernando Valley submarket.

In May 2014, the Company acquired Crescent Bay, a 46,178 square foot industrial building situated on 2.47 acres, for $6.5 million, or $140 per square foot. The Crescent Bay industrial building is located in Lake Forest, within the South Orange County submarket, and is 100% leased through 2016.

In June 2014, the Company acquired Birch Street, a 98,105 square foot industrial building along with additional land which together total 7.9 acres located in Santa Ana, for $11.0 million, or $112 per square foot. At the end of the current short-term lease, the Company intends to execute a value-add plan to renovate, modernize and reposition the property as a single-tenant or two-tenant industrial project.

In June 2014, the Company acquired Dupont Business Center, a two-building industrial complex totaling 110,890 square feet on 5.7 acres for $10.2 million, or $91 per square foot. The 100% occupied buildings are located in the Ontario / Inland Empire West submarket, and contain big box features for smaller dock high spaces.

In June 2014, the Company acquired a nine-property industrial portfolio, containing an aggregate of 817,166 square feet for $88.5 million, or $108 per square foot, across its target markets within Los Angeles County, Orange County and San Diego County. The properties include:

  • Salt Lake, a 126,036 square foot multi-tenant industrial building located in City of Industry. The property, situated on 6.62 acres, was built in 1979, offers 24 to 30 foot clearance and dock-high loading. The project is currently 100% occupied by four tenants.
  • Valley, a 108,703 square foot industrial building located in Pomona. The property, situated on 7.50 acres, was built in 1980, has 22 foot clearance and excess paved land. The building is currently 100% occupied by one tenant.
  • Hunter, a 119,692 square foot industrial building located in Anaheim. The property, situated on 6.00 acres, was built in 1987, has 24 foot clearance and expandable dock high loading. The building is currently 100% occupied by three tenants.
  • Alton, a 124,000 square foot industrial building located in Irvine. The property, situated on 5.82 acres, was built in 1974 and has 28 foot clearance. The building is currently 40% occupied by one tenant and provides an immediate value add opportunity to reposition vacant space.
  • 9340 Cabot, an 86,564 square foot industrial building located in San Diego. The property, situated on 4.88 acres, was built in 1975/76 and has clear heights of 22 to 24 feet. The property is currently 84% occupied by two tenants.
  • 9404 Cabot, a 46,846 square foot industrial building located in San Diego. The property, situated on 2.53 acres, was built in 1975/76 and has clear heights of 22 to 24 feet. The property is currently 100% occupied by one tenant.
  • 9455 Cabot, a 96,840 square foot industrial building located in San Diego. The property, situated on 5.06 acres, was built in 1975/76 and has clear heights of 22 to 24 feet. The property is currently 84% occupied by one tenant.
  • Distribution I, a 47,666 square foot industrial building located in San Diego. The property, situated on 2.12 acres, was built in 1974 and has clear heights of 27 feet. The property is currently 100% occupied by two tenants.
  • Distribution II, a 60,819 square foot industrial building located in San Diego. The property, situated on 3.08 acres, was built in 1983 and has clear heights of 22 to 24 feet. The property is currently 100% occupied by two tenants.

Subsequent Events:

Subsequent to the end of the second quarter, in July 2014, the Company acquired three additional properties. The Company acquired Avenue 32, a 100,500 square foot industrial building for $11.0 million, or $109 per square foot. The property is located in the City of Los Angeles, adjacent to Burbank and Glendale within the East San Fernando Valley, which is a part of the Greater San Fernando Valley submarket. The Company also acquired Chatsworth Industrial Park, a 153,212 square foot industrial complex for $16.8 million, or $110 per square foot, located in the West San Fernando Valley. And finally the Company acquired Avenue Kearny, a 138,980 square foot industrial building for $11.5 million, or $83 per square foot, located in the North San Fernando Valley.

On August 4, 2014, the Board of Directors declared a dividend of $0.12 per share for the third quarter of 2014, payable in cash on October 15, 2014 to stockholders and unitholders of record on September 30, 2014.

Earnings Release, Investor Conference Webcast and Conference Call:

The Company will host a webcast and conference call on Thursday, August 7, 2014 at 5:00 p.m. Eastern time to review second quarter results and discuss recent events. The live webcast will be available on the Company’s investor relations website at www.ir.rexfordindustrial.com. To participate in the call, please dial 877-407-0789 (domestic) or 201-689-8562 (international). A replay of the conference call will be available through August 21, 2014, by dialing 877-870-5176 (domestic) or 858-384-5517 (international) and entering the pass code 13586542.

About Rexford Industrial:

Rexford Industrial is a real estate investment trust focused on owning and operating industrial properties in Southern California infill markets. The Company owns interests in 88 properties with approximately 9.5 million rentable square feet and manages an additional 20 properties with approximately 1.2 million rentable square feet.

For additional information, visit www.rexfordindustrial.com.

Forward Looking Statements:

This press release may contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws, which are based on current expectations, forecasts and assumptions that involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual outcomes and results to differ materially. Forward-looking statements relate to expectations, beliefs, projections, future plans and strategies, anticipated events or trends and similar expressions concerning matters that are not historical facts. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by the use of forward-looking terminology such as "may," "will," "should," "expects," "intends," "plans," "anticipates," "believes," "estimates," "predicts," or "potential" or the negative of these words and phrases or similar words or phrases which are predictions of or indicate future events or trends and which do not relate solely to historical matters. While forward-looking statements reflect the Company's good faith beliefs, assumptions and expectations, they are not guarantees of future performance. For a further discussion of these and other factors that could cause the Company's future results to differ materially from any forward-looking statements, see the reports and other filings by the Company with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, including the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013. The Company disclaims any obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statement to reflect changes in underlying assumptions or factors, of new information, data or methods, future events or other changes.

Definitions / Discussion of Non-GAAP Financial Measures:

Funds from Operations (FFO): We calculate FFO before non-controlling interest in accordance with the standards established by the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (“NAREIT”). FFO represents net income (loss) (computed in accordance with GAAP), excluding gains (or losses) from sales of depreciable operating property, real estate related depreciation and amortization (excluding amortization of deferred financing costs) and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures. Management uses FFO as a supplemental performance measure because, in excluding real estate related depreciation and amortization, gains and losses from property dispositions, other than temporary impairments of unconsolidated real estate entities, and impairment on our investment in real estate, it provides a performance measure that, when compared year over year, captures trends in occupancy rates, rental rates and operating costs. We also believe that, as a widely recognized measure of performance used by other REITs, FFO may be used by investors as a basis to compare our operating performance with that of other REITs. However, because FFO excludes depreciation and amortization and captures neither the changes in the value of our properties that result from use or market conditions nor the level of capital expenditures and leasing commissions necessary to maintain the operating performance of our properties, all of which have real economic effects and could materially impact our results from operations, the utility of FFO as a measure of our performance is limited. Other equity REITs may not calculate or interpret FFO in accordance with the NAREIT definition as we do, and, accordingly, our FFO may not be comparable to such other REITs’ FFO. FFO should not be used as a measure of our liquidity, and is not indicative of funds available for our cash needs, including our ability to pay dividends. A reconciliation of FFO before noncontrolling interest to net income, the nearest GAAP equivalent, is set forth below.

Recurring Funds from Operations (Recurring FFO): We calculate Recurring FFO by adjusting FFO to exclude the effect of non-recurring acquisition expenses. A reconciliation of FFO to Recurring FFO is set forth below.

Net Operating Income (NOI): Includes the revenue and expense directly attributable to our real estate properties calculated in accordance with GAAP. Calculated as total revenue from real estate operations including i) rental revenues ii) tenant reimbursements, and iii) other income less property expenses (before interest expense, depreciation and amortization). We use NOI as a supplemental performance measure because, in excluding real estate depreciation and amortization expense and gains (or losses) from property dispositions, it provides a performance measure that, when compared year over year, captures trends in occupancy rates, rental rates and operating costs. We also believe that NOI will be useful to investors as a basis to compare our operating performance with that of other REITs. However, because NOI excludes depreciation and amortization expense and captures neither the changes in the value of our properties that result from use or market conditions, nor the level of capital expenditures and leasing commissions necessary to maintain the operating performance of our properties (all of which have real economic effect and could materially impact our results from operations), the utility of NOI as a measure of our performance is limited. Other equity REITs may not calculate NOI in a similar manner and, accordingly, our NOI may not be comparable to such other REITs’ NOI. Accordingly, NOI should be considered only as a supplement to net income as a measure of our performance. NOI should not be used as a measure of our liquidity, nor is it indicative of funds available to fund our cash needs.

NOI should not be used as a substitute for cash flow from operating activities in accordance with GAAP. We use NOI to help evaluate the performance of the Company as a whole, as well as the performance of our Same Property Portfolio. A calculation of NOI for our Same Property Portfolio, as well as a reconciliation of NOI for our Same Property Portfolio to net income for our Same Property Portfolio, is set forth below.

Cash NOI: Cash NOI is a non-GAAP measure, which we calculate by adding or subtracting from NOI i) fair value lease revenue and ii) straight-line rent adjustment. We use Cash NOI, together with NOI, as a supplemental performance measure. Cash NOI should not be used as a measure of our liquidity, nor is it indicative of funds available to fund our cash needs. Cash NOI should not be used as a substitute for cash flow from operating activities computed in accordance with GAAP. We use Cash NOI to help evaluate the performance of the Company as a whole, as well as the performance of our Same Property Portfolio. A calculation of Cash NOI for our Same Property Portfolio, as well as a reconciliation of Cash NOI for our Same Property Portfolio to net income for our Same Property Portfolio, is set forth below.

Same Property Portfolio: Determined independently for each period presented. Comparable properties must have been owned for the entire current and prior periods presented. The Company’s computation of same property performance may not be comparable to other REITs.

REXFORD INDUSTRIAL REALTY, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (Unaudited)
   
June 30, 2014 December 31, 2013
 
ASSETS
Land $ 298,705,000 $ 216,879,000
Buildings and improvements 403,639,000 312,216,000
Tenant improvements 17,834,000 13,267,000
Furniture, fixtures, and equipment   188,000   188,000
Total real estate held for investment 720,366,000 542,550,000
Accumulated depreciation   (66,572,000 )   (58,978,000 )
Investments in real estate, net 653,794,000 483,572,000
Cash and cash equivalents 9,272,000 8,997,000
Restricted cash 379,000 325,000
Notes receivable 13,136,000 13,139,000
Rents and other receivables, net 1,467,000 929,000
Deferred rent receivable, net 4,213,000 3,642,000
Deferred leasing costs, net 2,650,000 2,164,000
Deferred loan costs, net 3,197,000 1,597,000
Acquired lease intangible assets, net 22,652,000 13,622,000
Acquired indefinite-lived intangible 5,271,000 5,271,000
Other assets 2,583,000 2,322,000
Acquisition related deposits 1,450,000 1,510,000
Investment in unconsolidated real estate entities 5,758,000 5,687,000
Assets associated with real estate held for sale   -   11,898,000
Total Assets $ 725,822,000 $ 554,675,000
LIABILITIES & EQUITY
Liabilities
Notes payable $ 369,873,000 $ 192,491,000
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities 6,281,000 6,024,000
Dividends payable 3,075,000 5,368,000
Acquired lease intangible liabilities, net 1,977,000 1,160,000
Tenant security deposits 7,451,000 6,155,000
Prepaid rents 964,000 1,448,000
Liabilities associated with real estate held for sale   -   260,000
Total Liabilities 389,621,000 212,906,000
Equity
Rexford Industrial Realty, Inc. stockholders' equity
Common Stock, $0.01 par value 490,000,000 authorized and 25,623,645 and 25,559,886 outstanding at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively 255,000 255,000
Additional paid in capital 312,451,000 311,936,000
Accumulated other comprehensive income (410,000 ) -
Accumulated deficit   (10,784,000 )   (5,993,000 )
Total stockholders' equity   301,512,000   306,198,000
Noncontrolling interests   34,689,000   35,571,000
Total Equity   336,201,000   341,769,000
Total Liabilities and Equity $ 725,822,000 $ 554,675,000
 
REXFORD INDUSTRIAL REALTY, INC. AND
REXFORD INDUSTRIAL REALTY, INC. PREDECESSOR
CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (Unaudited)
   
Three Months Ended June 30, Six Months Ended June 30,
2014   2013 2014   2013

Rexford
Industrial
Realty, Inc.

Rexford
Industrial
Realty, Inc.
Predecessor

Rexford
Industrial
Realty, Inc.

Rexford
Industrial
Realty, Inc.
Predecessor

RENTAL REVENUES
Rental revenues $ 12,773,000 $ 9,062,000 $ 24,401,000 $ 16,822,000
Tenant reimbursements 1,681,000 1,112,000 3,192,000 1,959,000
Management, leasing and development services 249,000 170,000 483,000 431,000
Other income   15,000   49,000   57,000   167,000
TOTAL RENTAL REVENUES 14,718,000 10,393,000 28,133,000 19,379,000
Interest income   278,000   324,000   554,000   635,000
TOTAL REVENUES   14,996,000   10,717,000   28,687,000   20,014,000
OPERATING EXPENSES
Property expenses 3,892,000 2,835,000 8,026,000 5,234,000
General and administrative 2,780,000 1,396,000 5,385,000 2,535,000
Depreciation and amortization   6,003,000   3,514,000   12,133,000   6,134,000
TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES 12,675,000 7,745,000 25,544,000 13,903,000
OTHER (INCOME) EXPENSE
Acquisition expenses 652,000 624,000 985,000 717,000
Interest expense 1,537,000 4,386,000 2,788,000 8,161,000
Gain on mark-to-market of interest rate swaps   -   -   -   (49,000 )
TOTAL OTHER EXPENSE 2,189,000 5,010,000 3,773,000 8,829,000
TOTAL EXPENSES   14,864,000   12,755,000   29,317,000   22,732,000
Equity in loss from unconsolidated real estate entities (51,000 ) (712,000 ) (6,000 ) (925,000 )
Gain from early repayment of note receivable - - - 1,365,000
Loss on extinguishment of debt   -   -   -   (37,000 )
NET INCOME (LOSS) FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS   81,000   (2,750,000 )   (636,000 )   (2,315,000 )
DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
Income (loss) from discontinued operations before gain on sale of real estate and loss on extinguishment of debt - (257,000 ) 21,000 (838,000 )
Loss on extinguishment of debt - (41,000 ) - (250,000 )
Gain on sale of real estate   -   2,580,000   2,125,000   4,989,000
INCOME FROM DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS   -   2,282,000   2,146,000   3,901,000
NET INCOME (LOSS)   81,000   (468,000 )   1,510,000   1,586,000
Net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests   (8,000 )   (1,818,000 )   (160,000 )   (3,544,000 )
NET INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO REXFORD INDUSTRIAL REALTY, INC. STOCKHOLDERS $ 73,000 $ (2,286,000 ) $ 1,350,000 $ (1,958,000 )
Income (loss) from continuing operations available to common stockholders per share - basic and diluted $ - $ (0.02 )
Net income available to common stockholders per share - basic and diluted $ - $ 0.05
 
REXFORD INDUSTRIAL REALTY, INC. AND
REXFORD INDUSTRIAL REALTY, INC. PREDECESSOR
Same Property Portfolio Statement of Operations and NOI Reconciliation (unaudited)
 
Same Property Portfolio Statement of Operations:
                   

Three Months Ended
June 30,

Six Months Ended
June 30,

2014 2013 (1)

$
Change

%
Change

2014 2013 (1)

$
Change

%
Change

Rental Revenues
Rental revenues $ 8,344 $ 7,906 $ 438 5.5 % $ 16,376 $ 15,645 $ 731 4.7 %
Tenant reimbursements 930 909 21 2.3 % 1,865 1,756 109 6.2 %
Other operating revenues   7   42   (35 )   -83.3 %   42   161   (119 )   -73.9 %
Total rental revenues 9,281 8,857 424 4.8 % 18,283 17,562 721 4.1 %
Interest income   279   324   (45 )   -13.9 %   555   572   (17 )   -3.0 %
Total Revenues 9,560 9,181 379 4.1 % 18,838 18,134 704 3.9 %
Operating Expenses
Property expenses $ 2,405 $ 2,509 $ (104 ) -4.1 % $ 5,190 $ 4,918 $ 272 5.5 %
Depreciation and amortization   3,411   3,042   369   12.1 %   7,094   5,802   1,292   22.3 %
Total Operating Expenses 5,816 5,551 265 4.8 % 12,284 10,720 1,564 14.6 %
Other (Income) Expense
Interest expense   58   4,167   (4,109 )   -98.6 %   115   7,941   (7,826 )   -98.6 %
Total Other Expense   58   4,167   (4,109 )   -98.6 %   115   7,941   (7,826 )   -98.6 %
Total Expenses   5,874   9,718   (3,844 )   -39.6 %   12,399   18,661   (6,262 )   -33.6 %
Net Income (Loss) $ 3,686 $ (537 ) $ 4,223   786.4 % $ 6,439 $ (527 ) $ 6,966   1321.8 %
 
 
Same Property Portfolio NOI Reconciliation:
 

Three Months Ended
June 30,

Six Months Ended
June 30,

NOI 2014 2013 (1)

$
Change

%
Change

2014 2013 (1)

$
Change

%
Change

Net Income (Loss) $ 3,686 $ (537 ) $ 6,439 $ (527 )
Add:
Interest expense 58 4,167 115 7,941
Depreciation and amortization 3,411 3,042 7,094 5,802
Deduct:
Interest income   279   324           555   572        
NOI $ 6,876 $ 6,348 $ 528   8.3 % $ 13,093 $ 12,644 $ 449   3.6 %
Straight-line rents (221 ) 92 (245 ) (71 )
Amort. above/below market leases   32   34           64   78        
Cash NOI $ 6,687 $ 6,474 $ 213   3.3 % $ 12,912 $ 12,651 $ 261   2.1 %
 

(1) Reflects the results of operations for our Predecessor for the three or six months ended June 30, 2013.

Same Property Portfolio NOI Reconciliation Continued:
                                         

Three Months Ended
June 30,

Six Months Ended
June 30,

2014   2013 (1)

$
Change

%
Change

2014   2013 (1)

$
Change

%
Change

Rental revenues $ 8,344 $ 7,906 $ 438 5.5 % $ 16,376 $ 15,645 $ 731 4.7 %
Tenant reimbursements 930 909 21 2.3 % 1,865 1,756 109 6.2 %
Other operating revenues   7   42   (35 )   -83.3 %   42   161   (119 )   -73.9 %
Total rental revenue 9,281 8,857 424 4.8 % 18,283 17,562 721 4.1 %
 
Property expenses   2,405   2,509   (104 )   -4.1 %   5,190   4,918   272   5.5 %
NOI $ 6,876 $ 6,348 $ 528   8.3 % $ 13,093 $ 12,644 $ 449   3.6 %
 
Straight-line rents (221 ) 92 (313 ) -341.1 % (245 ) (71 ) (174 ) 244.4 %
Amort. above/below market leases   32   34   (2 )   -5.9 %   64   78   (14 )   -17.7 %
Cash NOI $ 6,687 $ 6,474 $ 213   3.3 % $ 12,912 $ 12,651 $ 261   2.1 %
 
Same Property Portfolio Rollforward:
 

Three Month Same Property Portfolio
Rollforward

Six Month Same Property Portfolio
Rollforward

# of
Properties

Square
Feet

Wtd Avg.
Occupancy

# of
Properties

Square
Feet

Wtd Avg.
Occupancy

2014 2013 2014 2013
Period ended March 31, 2014 and 2013 50 4,402,399 89.1% 87.7% 50 4,402,399 89.1% 87.7%
Additions   0   0   0   0
Period ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 50 4,402,399 89.8% 88.4% 50 4,402,399 89.8% 88.4%
 
Same Property Portfolio Occupancy:
 
Three Months Ended Three Months Ended
Occupancy: June 30, 2014 June 30, 2013 Change (ppt)
Los Angeles County 92.5% 91.1% 1.4%
Orange County 99.3% 88.5% 10.8%
San Bernardino County 86.4% 81.7% 4.7%
Ventura County 87.6% 97.3% -9.7%
San Diego County 78.5% 80.2% -1.7%
Other 79.5% 67.2% 12.3%

Total/Weighted Average

89.8% 88.4% 1.4%
 

(1) Reflects the results of operations for our Predecessor for the three or six months ended June 30, 2013.

Exhibit 99.2

     

Three Months
Ended
June 30, 2014

Six Months
Ended
June 30, 2014

FFO
Net income $ 81 $ 1,510
Add:
Depreciation and amortization, including amounts in discontinued operations 6,003 12,140
Depreciation and amortization from unconsolidated joint ventures 103 188
Deduct:
Gains on sale of real estate   -   2,125
FFO $ 6,187 $ 11,713
Company share of FFO (1) $ 5,532 $ 10,473
 
FFO $ 6,187 $ 11,713
Add:
Acquisition expenses   652   985
Recurring FFO $ 6,839 $ 12,698
Company share of Recurring FFO(1) $ 6,115 $ 11,354
 

(1) Based on weighted average interest in our operating partnership of 10.59% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013.

Contact:
For Rexford Industrial Realty, Inc.
Investor Relations:
Stephen Swett or Rodny Nacier
424-256-2153 ext. 401
investorrelations@rexfordindustrial.com

Rates

View Comments (0)

Recommended for You

  • Bill Gates Is At Least $6 Billion Richer Than He Was Six Months Ago, But Not From Microsoft

    In July, Bill Gates may or may not have lost his title as the world's richest man. According to Forbes, Gates has a net worth of almost $82 billion, which puts him in the No. 2 spot behind Mexican telecom magnate Carlos Slim, who's worth $85.4 billion. According to Bloomberg, Gates is still the…

    Business Insider
  • Anyone With $40 Could Become A Millionaire

    1 simple Warren Buffett quote explains the key investing strategy that could create unimaginable long term wealth for you and your family.

    AdChoicesThe Motley FoolSponsored
  • Live blog: What’s happening with Alibaba’s IPO?

    Live blog: What’s happening with Alibaba’s IPO? The big day has arrived, and the Chinese company that 88 percent of Americans have never heard of is making history on the New York Stock Exchange. We’re rounding up all the facts, sass and stories you need

    Gigaom
  • Can Sears Close 2,300 Stores?

    In a widely publicized note to investors, Gary Balter of Credit Suisse said that it is best that Sears Holdings Corp. (SHLD) close its Sears and Kmart locations while they, and the inventory they sell, still have value. Sears Holdings operates about 2,350 stories. Sears is generating negative…

    24/7 Wall St.
  • Eric Holder’s Shameful Legacy on Wall Street Fraud

    Right in the middle of the midterm election season, and just before Attorney General Eric Holder reportedly might step down, he made it known that the Justice Department will really really indict Wall Street executives in financial fraud cases. “We expect to bring charges in the coming months,”…

    The Fiscal Times
  • Chinese buyers lead charge in iPhone 6 global debut

    Buyers from China, deprived of the latest iPhone launch at home, were Friday among the first in line in Japan to grab the "6" and its new large-screen cousin as Apple hit back at rivals. Licensing problems in China meant the global rollout went ahead without the huge and lucrative market, in a blow…

    AFP
  • 'Bubble in everything, everywhere': Marc Faber

    Even after the Dow (Dow Jones Global Indexes: .DJI) and the S&P 500 (^GSPC) closed at new all-time highs, closely followed contrarian Marc Faber keeps sounding the alarm. Faber has long argued that the Federal Reserve's massive asset purchasing programs and near-zero interest rates have inflated…

    CNBC
  • Cramer: This is how you bottle Alibaba's magic

    On Wall Street, the Alibaba IPO feels every bit as magical as its exotic namesake as investors clamor for a piece of this exciting story and dream about its hidden riches. If you're about say "Open sesame" Jim Cramer doesn't want you to get carried away. "I am blessing paying as high as $80 a…

    CNBC
  • AARP® Medicare Supplement

    Insurance plans by UnitedHealthcare® Insurance Company. Request a free guide. Go long.

    AdChoicesUnitedHealthcare® Ins Co.Sponsored
  • Personal Finance: Use 401(k) to pay down mortgage?

    Veteran personal finance journalist Robert Powell answers your questions for USA WEEKEND.My wife and I are thinking of paying down the mortgage on our house with money in our 401(k) plans. — David Love, Bedford, TexasAt a very high level, you will owe income tax on any pre-tax portion of the…

    USA TODAY
  • How Boeing's bumpy 787 launch is paying dividends

    New Boeing 787 Dreamliners taking off from Paine Field in Everett, Washington. It took Boeing Co. 10 bumpy years to turn its 787 Dreamliner concept into a commercial success. At least that's the conclusion from aerospace analysts at Jefferies, who in a note published Thursday write that all those…

    MarketWatch
  • Play

    Analyst: Alibaba Stock Is Priced Conservatively

    Morningstar director of equity research R.J. Hottovy joins MoneyBeat and explains why he views the company's shares priced conservatively at its IPO.

    WSJ Live
  • PepsiCo boss decries NFL problems, backs Goodell

    PepsiCo Inc.'s CEO Indra Nooyi has made a double-edged statement on the NFL's problems handling domestic violence, calling some players' behavior "repugnant" but saying that Commissioner Roger Goodell is "a man of integrity." The boss of the maker of Pepsi, Gatorade and Doritos, one of the league's…

    Associated Press
  • Stock Market Blogger 'Jesse Livermore' Is Calling The Top

    On Friday, Alibaba is set to make its debut on the NYSE in the largest IPO ever.  Jesse Livermore, the pseudonymous blogger of Philosophical Economics, on Thursday night noted that in 2012, Facebook's IPO marked the market bottom for the year, and sees Alibaba's debut as potentially marking the top…

    Business Insider
  • Lacker Says He Opposes Fed Plan to Hold Mortgage-Backed Assets

    Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond President Jeffrey Lacker said he couldn’t fully support the central bank’s revised exit strategy released this week because he opposes a measure to hold mortgage-backed securities. “I believe this approach unnecessarily prolongs our interference in the allocation of…

    Bloomberg
  • The 2015 Hyundai® Sonata: Innovation That Protects

    Check out the new Sonata's impressive list of advanced safety technology that surrounds you with Smart Cruise Control, Blind Spot Detection and more!

    AdChoicesHyundaiSponsored
  • What Roth Owners Should Do if They Exceed the Income Limit

    You can avoid the 6% penalty on the money you contributed if you take your 2014 contributions (and any earnings on them) out of the Roth before the tax-filing deadline on April 15, 2015 (or October 15, 2015, if you file an extension). You can also avoid the penalty and taxes if you have your IRA…

    Kiplinger
  • 3 Chinese Stocks That Are Better Bargains than Alibaba

    All eyes are on Alibaba Group Holding (BABA) as the Chinese e-commerce giant makes its U.S. Alibaba dominates Internet sales in the world's most populous nation, moving more merchandise than Amazon.com (AMZN) and eBay (EBAY) combined and serving up healthy profits. When the stock begins trading on…

    Kiplinger
  • Play

    A Favorable Prognosis for This Pharma Stock

    Recent clinical success in cystic fibrosis positions Vertex as a dominant player in this attractive rare-disease market.

    Morningstar
  • 3 Lessons An Investor Learned After Losing His Job, Reputation, And $1.6 Million

    The late Jim Paul went from a poor Kentucky boy to serving on the board of governors of the Chicago Mercantile Exchange through a series of lucky breaks and smart investments. By 1990 he was working in the futures research department at Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co., managing a team that…

    Business Insider
  • China's house prices fall further, economic gloom deepens

    China's house prices fall further, economic gloom deepens By Xiaoyi Shao and Lu Jianxin BEIJING/SHANGHAI (Reuters) - Worries that China's economy may be slowing further intensified on Thursday as data showed home prices fell for the fourth straight month, adding to expectations that Beijing will…

    Reuters
  • Why It Pays to Join the Company Wellness Program

    My employer just announced a new wellness program and says it will charge me more for my health insurance if I don't participate. The Kaiser Family Foundation's study of 2014 health benefits found that almost all large employers (those with 200 or more employees) and nearly three-fourths of smaller…

    Kiplinger
  • Why Study at GCU's College of Education?

    Bachelor's degree programs at our College of Education are aligned to national standards & prepare you to sit for licensure exams. Learn more today!

    AdChoicesGrand Canyon UniversitySponsored
  • Toyota recalling 20,000 late-model vehicles on potential fuel leak

    Toyota Motor Corp said on Thursday it will recall about 20,000 vehicles worldwide for possible fuel leaks. Most of the affected vehicles are in the United States but were also shipped to other countries, Toyota said. Toyota Motor Sales USA said the recall involves vehicles with its 2GR-FE engine.

    Reuters