Fri, May 25, 2012, 12:09 PM EDT - U.S. Markets close in 3 hrs 51 mins

Romney would rank among richest presidents ever

Fantasy Finance

WASHINGTON (AP) — Just how rich is Mitt Romney? Add up the wealth of the last eight presidents, from Richard Nixon to Barack Obama. Then double that number. Now you're in Romney territory.

He would be among the richest presidents in American history if elected — probably in the top four.

He couldn't top George Washington who, with nearly 60,000 acres and more than 300 slaves, is considered the big daddy of presidential wealth. After that, it gets complicated, depending how you rate Thomas Jefferson's plantation, Herbert Hoover's millions from mining or John F. Kennedy's share of the vast family fortune, as well as the finer points of factors like inflation adjustment.

But it's safe to say the Roosevelts had nothing on Romney, and the Bushes are nowhere close.

The former Massachusetts governor has disclosed only the broad outlines of his wealth, putting it somewhere from $190 million to $250 million. That easily could make him 50 times richer than Obama, who falls in the still-impressive-to-most-of-us range of $2.2 million to $7.5 million.

"I think it's almost hard to conceptualize what $250 million means," said Shamus Khan, a Columbia University sociologist who studies the wealthy. "People say Romney made $50,000 a day while not working last year. What do you do with all that money? I can't even imagine spending it. Well, maybe ..."

Of course, an unbelievable boatload of bucks is just one way to think of Romney's net worth, and the 44 U.S. presidents make up a pretty small pond for him to swim in. Put alongside America's 400 or so billionaires, Romney wouldn't make a ripple.

So here's a look where Romney's riches rank — among the most flush Americans, the White House contenders, and the rest of us:

—Within the 1 percent:

"Romney is small potatoes compared with the ultra-wealthy," said Jeffrey Winters, a political scientist at Northwestern University who studies the nation's elites.

After all, even in the rarefied world of the top 1 percent, there's a big difference between life at the top and at the bottom.

A household needs to bring in roughly $400,000 per year to make the cut. Romney and his wife, Ann, have been making 50 times that — more than $20 million a year. In 2009, only 8,274 federal tax filers had income above $10 million. Romney is solidly within that elite 0.006 percent of all U.S. taxpayers.

Congress is flush with millionaires. Only a few are in the Romney realm, including Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., and Massachusetts Sen. John Kerry, who was the Democratic presidential nominee in 2004. Kerry's ranking would climb much higher if the fortune of his wife, Teresa Heinz, were counted. She is the widow of Sen. John Heinz, heir to the Heinz ketchup fortune.

Further up the ladder, top hedge fund managers can pocket $1 billion or more in a single year.

At the top of the wealth pile sits Bill Gates, worth $59 billion, according to Forbes magazine's estimates.

—As a potential president:

Romney clearly stands out here. America's super rich generally don't jockey to live in the White House. A few have toyed with the idea, most notably New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg, whom Forbes ranks as the 12th richest American, worth $19.5 billion. A lesser billionaire, Ross Perot, bankrolled his own third-party campaigns in 1992 and 1996.

Many presidents weren't particularly well-off, especially 19th century leaders such as Abraham Lincoln, James Buchanan and Ulysses S. Grant. Nor was the 33rd president, Harry Truman.

"These things ebb and flow," said sociologist Khan. "It's not the case that all presidents were always rich."

A few former chief executives died in debt, including Thomas Jefferson, ranked in a Forbes study as the third-wealthiest president.

Comparing the landlocked wealth of early Americans such as Washington, Jefferson and James Madison, with today's millionaires is tricky, even setting aside the lack of documentation and economic changes over two centuries.

Research by 24/7 Wall St., a news and analysis website, estimated Washington's wealth at the equivalent of $525 million in 2010 dollars.

Yet Washington had to borrow money to pay for his trip to New York for his inauguration in 1789, according to Dennis Pogue, vice president for preservation at Mount Vernon, Washington's Virginia estate. His money was tied up in land, reaping only a modest cash income after farm expenses.

"He was a wealthy guy, there's no doubt about it," Pogue said, and probably among the dozen richest Virginians of his time. But, "the wealthiest person in America then was nothing in comparison to what these folks are today."

—How does Romney stand next to a regular Joe?

He's roughly 1,800 times richer.

The typical U.S. household was worth $120,300 in 2007, according to the Census Bureau's most recent data, although that number is sure to have dropped since the recession. A typical family's income is $50,000.

Calculations from 24/7 Wall St. of the peak lifetime wealth (or peak so far) of Nixon, Gerald Ford, Jimmy Carter, Ronald Reagan, George H.W. Bush, Bill Clinton, George W. Bush and Obama add up to a total $128 million — while Romney reports assets of up to $250 million.

If you consider only those presidents' assets while in office, without millions earned later from speeches and books, their combined total would be substantially lower, and Romney's riches would leave the pack even further behind.

___

Online:

Forbes' richest presidents list: http://tinyurl.com/82erdyb

24/7 Wall St. on presidents' net worth: http://tinyurl.com/328qyu2

___

Associated Press writer Stephen Ohlemacher contributed to this report.

 
  • jeff  •  Columbus, Ohio  •  3 months ago
    Kerry was worth 1.2 BILLION and paid 12 in taxes. Of course his wife had the money. Why was this not an issue when HE ran for office
  • TIM  •  Huntsville, Alabama  •  3 months ago
    Gas prices are too high.
    • Mr Chopstickninja 3 months ago
      Talk to Bacmann then...LoL
    • JB 3 months ago
      No, just blame Obama like everyone else. This country forgets all too soon the shape it was already in when Obama got elected. There was a Republican in office for 8 years and what did he do for you exactly?? I guess nothing since most republicans jumped shipped to vote for Obama.
    • carolanne 3 months ago
      There Is a limited suppy of oil and we don't own it. Too bad!!!! America should have looked into and alternate source of energy for years but we want to go to war over the oil that there is.
  • Jerry  •  Carrington, North Dakota  •  3 months ago
    Wealth does not determine whether or not one will be a good president or not. Two things come to mind that are more important factors, upright character and integrity.
    • Barack Obama Lies 3 months ago
      Upright character and integrity is two things OBAMA is missing!
    • JulianV 3 months ago
      Right on!
    • micheal 3 months ago
      there was a study about people who are wealthy and their disconnect with humanity that would support different :)
  • primo  •  3 months ago
    Money doesn't make a good President. Wisdom, Knowledge and Understanding does.
    • Gust of Dust 3 months ago
      Along with temperance, self discipline, honor, patience, understanding, and fidelity to the original intent of our founding documents.
    • Rick 3 months ago
      Good luck finding someone who fits those qualities
    • JERRY 3 months ago
      VOTE FOR NEWT THEN !!!!!!! or Santorum !
  • Another Yahoo User  •  3 months ago
    Time to take a serious look at Congress' salaries and benefits and past time to demand TERM LIMITS! Congress was never meant to be a fulltime career! It's disgraceful the way they vote themselves raises and benefits when the rest of America makes a fraction of what they do.
    • Susan 3 months ago
      You think maybe the new guys won't do the same thing?
    • Felix mantair White 3 months ago
      Amen
    • batman 3 months ago
      run-you'll get my vote for sure! and with these characters why bother to vote. i'm serious!
  • Andrew  •  3 months ago
    Lets see, in the 40 years since we went off the gold standard we've gone from a society where it was easily feasible for the archetypical family of 4 (Husband, wife, 2 kids, dog) to live a middle class lifestyle on a single income 40 hour workweek.

    Today you have Both parents employed 40+ hours a week between multiple jobs, scraping to get by as working poor.

    So who again benefited from an increased monetary supply and an 85% inflation since 1971?
    • Tony Soprano 3 months ago
      True, and most dont even know we used to have a system where EVERY dollar printed was backed by gold and silver.. our economy would never count on banks for sucess if we still had it....thank the French for trading dollars for gold and deflating dollars on world market, and cost of the Vietnam war..
    • dan 3 months ago
      The economy benefited. Also, to increase money suppy in a growing economy with a gold standard would be costly.
    • CodeBlue 3 months ago
      Andrew you have struck a nerve here. Let's clarify a few things here first. Backing the clock up to 1972. The "typical" family did in fact consist of 1 earner and a stay at home Mom with 3 kids. In 1972 the "typical" family had 1 car with a 1 stall garage. The family had 1 land based telephone, and 1 television on an antennae, not cable tv or sattelite. Their homes were bare by today's standards. They didn't have microwave ovens unless they were millionaires, they were in their infancy at that time. The standard of life was dramatically less expensive and much simpler. Children were entertained by themselves playing with other kids in their neighborhood with games like baseball, basketball, hide and seek, etc. Today kids are totally lost without their electronics which are incredibly expensive. Contrast the standard of living increase and you can see just the beginning of the change and the reasoning behind it. In 1972 it was absolutely possible to get a good paying job in manufacturing that offered a good pension. Today that is not going to happen, those days are long gone. In 1972 the government was incredibly small by todays standards. The cost of living has not gone up nearly as high as the standard of living. In order to return to the simpler days of less, it would seem that we would have to become Amish. Technology is not cheap, but the most expensive increase in our living is the price of GOVERNMENT. Look at the dramatical increase in property taxes. Astronomical. Look at the governmental waste that plagues our ability to balance our budget and live within our means. Sickening.
  • mother3  •  3 months ago
    money can't buy integrity and good sense
  • 777  •  3 months ago
    I dont care how rich he is or isnt. All I care about is a President that actually gives a crap about this country and is able to get the rest of the idiots in Washington to pull there heads out.
  • Sharon  •  Lawrenceville, Georgia  •  3 months ago
    It's really unfortunate that those with wealth dominate Congress. Imagine how many average-income Americans might become great members of Congress if only given the chance.
  • David  •  3 months ago
    The real question is whether or not the talent of making money includes a superior wisdom with which to properly rule a large nation. Superior wisdom is quite difficult to acquire, obviously much more difficult than the simpler skill set of mere moneymaking.
  • Brendan  •  Albany, New York  •  3 months ago
    Jefferson spent most of his life in debt, having to sell furniture and parts of his library to try and make ends meet. He took lots of handouts from friends, and very nearly lost Montcello while he was still alive.
  • FonGu  •  3 months ago
    "He would be among the richest presidents in American history if elected"....so?.....Richest or poorest - who gives a crap????? The only thing that matters is can he govern?
  • nick  •  Spring Hill, Florida  •  3 months ago
    The typical U.S. household was worth $120,300 in 2007. WHAT,WHERE,WHO ???
  • benjamin63_99  •  Los Angeles, California  •  3 months ago
    @Greg -- "John Kerry has more money than Mitt Romney."

    And Kerry made his millions it the old-fashioned way, he married it!
  • clint  •  Nome, Alaska  •  3 months ago
    We need campaign spending caps so that more qualified candidates can run for president. We need to eliminate the ability to essentially buy the office of president and any other office of government. Its no wonder our country is in such a mess, people at the top dont always deserve to be at the top.
  • bill  •  Austin, Texas  •  3 months ago
    It would be interesting to have a President from the middle class, even the lower middle class, but that's never going to happen again, is it?
  • Chris-Delon  •  Kingman, Arizona  •  3 months ago
    Crony capitalism on the top and the black-market economy on the bottom is destroying america from both sides in Washington DC. Reform the Tax code !!
  • Jerry J  •  Grand Rapids, Michigan  •  3 months ago
    Look at it this way. They all leave richer than they came in. He could crack the top 2 in four years I'm sure. Has anyone who has gone to Washington come out poorer?
  • Mookie  •  Norfolk, Virginia  •  3 months ago
    President? He's not even the Republican candidate, yet.
  • Thomas  •  3 months ago
    Something is really wrong with our election system when ONLY the wealthy are able to run for office.
 
Recent Quotes
Symbol Price Change % Chg 
Your most recently viewed tickers will automatically show up here if you type a ticker in the "Enter symbol/company" at the bottom of this module.
You need to enable your browser cookies to view your most recent quotes.
 
Sign-in to view quotes in your portfolios.

Trading Center

Yahoo! Finance on Facebook

  YAHOO! FINANCE ON TWITTER