Mon, May 28, 2012, 6:22 PM EDT - U.S. Markets closed for Memorial Day

Senate leaders reach tentative agreement

WASHINGTON (AP) — Senate leaders reached tentative agreement Friday night on legislation to extend Social Security payroll tax cuts and jobless benefits for two months while requiring President Barack Obama to accept Republican demands for a swift decision on the fate of an oil pipeline that promises thousands of jobs.

A vote could be held as early as Saturday on the measure, the last in a highly contentious year of divided government.

Any deal would also require House passage before it could reach Obama's desk.

Racing to adjourn for the year, lawmakers moved quickly to clear separate legislation avoiding a partial government shutdown threatened for midnight.

There was no immediate response to the compromise from the White House, which a few hours earlier had backed away from Obama's threat to veto any bill that linked the payroll tax cut extension with a Republican demand for a speedy decision on the 1,700-mile Keystone XL oil pipeline proposed from Canada to Texas.

Republican senators leaving a closed-door meeting put the price tag of the two-month package at about $30 billion and said the cost would be covered through a fee on mortgages backed by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

The legislation would also provide a 60-day reprieve from a scheduled 27 percent cut in the fees paid to doctors who treat Medicare patients.

Several officials said it would require a decision within 60 days on the pipeline, with the president required to authorize construction unless he determined that would not be in the national interest.

Obama recently announced he was postponing a decision until after the 2012 elections on the much-studied proposal. Environmentalists oppose the project, but several unions support it, putting the president in the uncomfortable position of having to choose between customary political allies.

Senators in both parties hastened to claim credit.

Sen. Richard Lugar, R-Ind., issued a statement that said the compromise included legislation he authored "that forces President Obama to make a decision" on the pipeline.

Sen. Max Baucus, D-Mont., said he had "brokered a final deal by bringing lawmakers from both parties together to support jobs."

Officials said that in private talks, the two sides had hoped to reach agreement on the full one-year extension of payroll tax cuts and jobless benefits that Obama had made the centerpiece of the jobs program he submitted to Congress last fall.

Those efforts failed when the two sides could not agree on enough offsetting cuts to make sure the deficit wouldn't rise.

"We'll be back discussing the same issues in a couple of months, but from our point of view, we think the keystone pipeline is a very important job-creating measure in the private sector that doesn't cost the government a penny," said Sen. Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, the Republican leader.

There was no immediate reaction from House Speaker John Boehner. Neither he nor his aides participated in the negotiations, although McConnell said he was optimistic about the measure's chances for final approval.

Hours earlier, McConnell challenged Obama to give ground.

"Let's not just pass a bill that helps people on the benefits side, let's also include something that actually helps the private sector create the jobs Americans need for the long term," he said.

In a political jab, he added, "Here's an opportunity for the president to say he's not going to let a few radical environmentalists stand in the way of a project that would create thousands of jobs and make America more secure at the same time."

Obama said on Dec. 7 that "any effort to try to tie Keystone to the payroll tax cut I will reject. So everybody should be on notice."

More recently, a veto threat issued Tuesday against the House-passed version of the bill cited the introduction of "ideological issues into what should be a simple debate about cutting taxes for the middle class." Senior administration officials later told reporters that was a reference to the pipeline.

The State Department, in an analysis released this summer, said the project would create up to 6,000 jobs during construction, while developer TransCanada put the total at 20,000 in direct employment.

The 1,700-mile pipeline would carry oil from western Canada to Texas Gulf Coast refineries, passing through Montana, South Dakota, Nebraska, Kansas and Oklahoma.

The spending bill would lock in cuts that conservative Republicans won from the White House and Democrats earlier in the year.

Republicans also won their fight to block new federal regulations for light bulb energy efficiency, coal dust in mines and clean water permits for construction of timber roads.

The White House turned back GOP attempts to block limits on greenhouse gases, mountaintop removal mining and hazardous emissions from utility plants, industrial boilers and cement kilns.

After a last-minute veto threat, Republicans abandoned attempts to block an administration policy to ease restrictions on visits to Cuba and on the money sent to relatives on the communist island nation from family members living in the United States.

Additionally, the legislation bars military and economic aid to Pakistan until the administration certifies that Islamabad is cooperating on counterterrorism, including taking steps to prevent such militant groups as the Haqqani network from operating in the country.

The provision stems from concerns that the Pakistani government harbors terrorists and from assertions that some government officials knew that Osama bin Laden had established residence deep inside the country. Bin Laden was killed in May by U.S. commandos who raided his fortified compound in Abattabod.

___

Associated Press writers Donna Cassata and Jim Kuhnhenn contributed to this report.

 

437 comments

  • crock  •  5 months ago
    Obama recently announced he was postponing a decision until after the 2012 elections on the much-studied proposal. The only problem with this statement is that it has already been under the microscope. Everyone involved has said it was a good thing. Now he wants to wait till his administration looks into it. Sorry but his administration does not have a good record, his czars are not as knowledgable as he wants to believe they are and it seems that everything this administration gets their hands on goes south for the winter.
    • LOL 5 months ago
      again, read a book!
    • LOL 5 months ago
      Rep. Gerry Connolly (D-Va.) says the "oil is not for domestic consumption," but is destined for foreign export. The existing pipeline now ends in Cushing Oklahoma: The XL will extend the pipeline to Gulf Coast refineries, providing the "tar sands' first major pipeline to a port." In short, Canada needs to reach ports where it can ship its oil overseas.
      While the full nature of the arrangements agreed upon by the Canadian shippers is unclear, there is clear indication that there is a coordinated 'strategy' among Canadian suppliers to gain higher prices. According to TransCanada, the proposed Keystone XL pipeline can be used by Canadian oil shippers to add up to $4 billion to U.S. fuel costs.''
      Cornell University Global Labor Institute: Based On TransCanada's Numbers, "The Project Will Create No More Than 2,500-4,600 Temporary Direct Construction Jobs." From Cornell University Global Labor Institute's report:
      Lean the true facts this keystone xl has been a LIE from day one
    • Bill 5 months ago
      Jarret beat me to it
      also crock go look at the you tube videos posted about this there have been deaths from the toxic water left over it has the potential to kill millions
      and by the way if you look at who hired the people to do that enviromental impact study it was a shell company of trans canada
      and in the fact that sunco oil now has 4 representatives in Alberta's govt that were all former oil exec's
  • SweetCoCoLuv  •  5 months ago
    WELL...I PRAY FOR A POSITIVE CHANGE N THIS WORLD OF , "WHAT THE ?????," !!!!!!!!
  • Joseph C  •  5 months ago
    Obama veto the bill, Why should our government finance a pipe line bill, If the oil companys want a pipe line lit them fund it....
    • DR. NEGA E-99 5 months ago
      a good point since Exxon Mobile need money for workers..............and a funny thing is they don't have a convenience stores to run.............
    • Michael Rehkop 5 months ago
      Where is the money going to come from with our country on the brink of bankrupcy. This is mixing apples and oranges insted of taking care of the here and nowq. extend the benefits and leave the pipeline issue out of it for now. People are starving and losing their homes, etc. because of the unemployent rate created by the Bush administration.
    • Daniel 5 months ago
      Wait their folks the pipeline is funded by the oil companies. the approval is a regulation issues. Get your facts before you comment.
  • TomS  •  5 months ago
    This is stupid - destroy the earth for 2 months of a tax cut? Veto this nonsense Obama - show the world you have a backbonedestroy the earth for 2 months of a tax cut? Veto this nonsense Obama - show the world you have a backbone
    • Mr Bill 5 months ago
      And how does this "Destroy the Earth"?
  • 38special  •  5 months ago
    Here in Southwest Michigan we had an 800,000 gallon oil spill from an oil pipeline into a local river two years ago.
    They're still trying to clean up the mess and it isn't going away any time soon.
    Health officials are still warning people not to eat any of the remaining fish in the river.
    Where I live city water is available so I'm not sweating it like others who depend on wells.

    Why any state would allow a pipeline to be built through it for the tiny bit of economic gain puzzles me but hey, if Nebraskans and Texans don't care about possible man-made environmental disasters happening in their neck of the woods why should I?

    The government is going to waste my tax money either in Afghanistan, or giving aid to Pakistan, or making wealthy people wealthier so if I'm paying for a pipeline too, so what?
  • Dark Penguin  •  5 months ago
    So... we're going to get some "jobs" at last. So Bammie has to choose between the unions and nature nazis? The unions have been in the tank for the Dems a lot longer, he knows what side his bread is buttered on. It seems to me that the dems are in as much dissarray as the the repubs usually are, Kinda nice to see it at last.
  • Tiger  •  5 months ago
    90% of the pipeline is in Canada....guess who will get those jobs? Thank God, we have once again saved the multi-millonaires from being taxed, for they are the job creators. We've all enjoyed the fruits of labor by all the jobs they have provided for us in this recessionary period. Thank heavens we have the republicans who have given us jobs, jobs, jobs...and its a great way to reward the oil companies for looking out for us, instead of their CEO's and top management....I'll take a little vaseline with that....NO INCUMBENTS IN THE SENATE FOR 2012!!!
  • Joel  •  5 months ago
    yeah, put on a bandaid so you can go home for weeks for the holidays while everyone else who IS working, can put time in their two jobs...
  • jkeyner  •  5 months ago
    No pipeline!
  • Mick Mick  •  5 months ago
    So to pay for the measure the Party of Con calls for a "fee". More egg management "fees" from the Party of Con, the anti-tax, but okay with fees party.

    Why do you clowns vote for these people?
  • Lee P  •  5 months ago
    Republicans do not want to cut Oil Subsidies for Oil companies making record profits, they don't want to cut subsidies for Conglomerate Farms, they don't want to have the top 1% pay their fare share of taxes, instead the target the Disabled, the Poor, the Retired, the Unemployed, the Middle class, they only seek to defund or underfund them anything that helps them. They wish to go to wars for war profiteers, but not take care of the Vets and keep their promisses to them for serving. The Republican way skrew the people!
  • Cathy  •  5 months ago
    It seems the GOP/TP think that they can circumvent the separation of power that is the cornerstone of our democracy by demanding that the President do their bidding to get even the tiniest thing done - two month extension for a "Do what we want you to do, or else" legislature.

    As an INDEPENDENT, I am offended by the constant power grab attempts of the GOP/TP in Congress.

    I would like them to stick to the subject of individual bills and stop attempting to insert 'add-on' amendments that have nothing to do with the intent of the bill. .
  • Lee P  •  5 months ago
    What does an oil pipeline have to do with this bill, once again Republicans holding the American people hostage and obstructing!
  • Lee P  •  5 months ago
    Once again Republicans holding the Disabled, The Retired, The Poor, The Unemployed, and the Middle Class hostage. A Pipeline has knowthing to do with the bill at hand. Republicans are playing with a very dangerious game skrewing with peoples lives and I am not going to forget it come November!
  • luca brasi  •  5 months ago
    If i was Obama I would veto it ,Please stick to your guns Mr.President
  • Curious G  •  5 months ago
    Why don't we build oil refineries in Montana?
    So that, we don't need that loooong pipe-line across the country...
  • Curious G  •  5 months ago
    When Obama asked Congress not to go home for Christmas unless the deal is done, they suddenly start working together... How funny is that!
  • epd537  •  5 months ago
    Thks for including the pipeline.Now thats a "JOBS" bill.
    • William 5 months ago
      See Cornell Study and Pentagon. From double counting and other corrupt stats.
    • Mad Dog 1 5 months ago
      For Canadains
  • Ryan  •  5 months ago
    In a nutshell the lib&tards didn't jamb another healthcareesque bill up our azzes. Instead we have legislation that does what needs to be done (extend tax cuts) and creating UNION jobs along the pipleine and in refineries whilst not impeding those pesky capitalists from bringing in more petroleum (the stuff we pretend we don't use every day at the gas pump).
  • Pat  •  5 months ago
    The oil pipeline is not for American interests ! Trans Canada wants access to the Gulf of oil spill so they do not have to spend 90 - to 120 days on the water to get around South America to move there oil to China and they cant get through the Panama Canal with those super tankers. Even after the expansion of the Canal it will be very very expensive to ship that way and they will have to just keep on paying Panama.NO BENIFIT FOR AMERICAN CITIZENS HERE . So why do the REPUBLICANTS want to hold the middle class and the people currently at the poverty level HOSTAGE. Maybe for $$$$$$ there big business friends $$$$$$ . The jobs that they are referencing are mostly transient construction jobs and don't apply to most of Americans. ( probably see more of Haliburton here) This construction will only be temporary as in here today and gone tomorrow. I think the president should stand tall and fulfill what he said he would do. VETO VETO VETO .and if middle class America has any brains in there head, they would stand behind him with everything they stand for or believe in. TELL THE REPUBLICANTS TO GET THE HELL OUT OF THE WAY,NOW AND IN NOVEMBER 2012.
 
Recent Quotes
Symbol Price Change % Chg 
Your most recently viewed tickers will automatically show up here if you type a ticker in the "Enter symbol/company" at the bottom of this module.
You need to enable your browser cookies to view your most recent quotes.
 
Sign-in to view quotes in your portfolios.

Trading Center

Yahoo! Finance on Facebook

  YAHOO! FINANCE ON TWITTER