Essentially, people are saying Sinofsky was too big of a reason why this famous comic about Microsoft's org structure is true:
Sinofsky, apparently fed up with this narrative, appears to have finally responded
We say "appears" because he did so in the form of a comment on a blog, and it's hard to verify those things.
Former Microsoft Distinguished Engineer Hal Berenson wrote a post about how Sinofsky, already Windows boss, had also wanted to bring Windows Phone and the Developer Division under his control as well.
In comment, Sinofsky denied this charge specifically – " no one ever approached me to manage them as part of Windows 7 or 8" – and said that "historically," he was never someone who tried to bring other organizations into his:
If we had worked together you would know that historically, very few things moved into teams I managed as (you’ve no doubt seen in internal blogs) and when they did I usually pushed back hard looking for a cross-group way to achieve the goal (in other words, decide open issues rather than force an org change to subsequently decide something). it is far better to collaborate with the org in place and avoid the disruption unless it is on a product cycle boundary and far better to plan and execute together than just organize together.
More From Business Insider
- Here's A Clue About How Many Surface Tablets Microsoft Made
- THE BOTTOM LINE: Steve Ballmer Isn't Going Anywhere
- Here's One Example Of How Steven Sinofsky Alienated Microsoft's Top Executives
- Steven Sinofsky