Starbucks loses 'Charbucks' appeal

Reuters

By Jonathan Stempel

NEW YORK, Nov 15 (Reuters) - Starbucks Corp hasfailed to persuade a federal appeals court to stop a small,family-owned New Hampshire roaster from selling coffee known as"Charbucks."

Ruling in a case that began in 2001, the 2nd U.S. CircuitCourt of Appeals said Black Bear Micro Roastery and its owner,Wolfe's Borough Coffee Inc, may keep selling "Charbucks Blend,""Mister Charbucks" and "Mr. Charbucks" coffee.

Circuit Judge Raymond Lohier wrote for a three-judge panelthat Seattle-based Starbucks did not deserve an injunction tostop Charbucks sales, having failed to prove that consumerswould be confused through a "blurring" of its brand.

The New York-based appeals court let stand a December 2011finding by U.S. District Judge Laura Taylor Swain in Manhattanthat Charbucks was "only weakly associated with the minimallysimilar" Starbucks trademark.

Many retailers, especially those selling luxury or premiumproducts, file trademark lawsuits against large and small rivalsthey believe are misusing their brands, potentially reducingprofit and revenue and damaging their reputation.

A centerpiece of Starbucks' case had been a phone survey of600 people by the pollster Warren Mitofsky, which found that"the number one association of the name 'Charbucks' in the mindsof consumers is with the brand 'Starbucks.'"

But the 2nd Circuit said the survey was "fundamentallyflawed" and drew its conclusions from how consumers thought of"Charbucks" in isolation, not its real-world context.

It said that while 39.5 percent of participants thought of"Starbucks" or "coffee" when asked what came to mind uponhearing "Charbucks," just 4.4 percent said "Starbucks" or"coffee house" when asked who might sell a "Charbucks" product."Grocery store" was the most popular answer to that question.

"Viewed in light of Starbucks' fame," Lohier wrote, "thefact that more survey participants did not think of 'Starbucks'upon hearing 'Charbucks' reinforces the district court's findingthat the marks are only minimally similar."

Zack Hutson, a Starbucks spokesman, said, "We are respectingthe court's decision."

Christopher Cole, a lawyer at Sheehan, Phinney, Bass & Greenrepresenting Black Bear, said in an interview, "This is a sounddecision. It flows from the dramatic dissimilarity between howthe different products actually appear in commerce and are seenby consumers."

Starbucks has grown since 1971 from a single store inSeattle's Pike Place Market into the world's largest coffee shopchain, with close to 18,000 stores in 60 countries and more than$14.8 billion of annual revenue.

Black Bear is based in Tuftonboro, New Hampshire. It created"Charbucks Blend" in 1997 and now sells dark-roast coffee as"Mister Charbucks" and "Mr. Charbucks."

The 2nd Circuit noted that one reason Black Bear used"Charbucks" was the public perception that Starbucks uses anunusually dark roast for its coffee.

The case is Starbucks Corp et al v. Wolfe's Borough CoffeeInc d/b/a Black Bear Micro Roastery, 2nd U.S. Circuit Court ofAppeals, No. 12-364.

View Comments (0)