Mon, May 28, 2012, 6:52 PM EDT - U.S. Markets closed for Memorial Day

Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

Explore news, videos, and much more based on what your friends are reading and watching. Publish your own activity and retain full control.

To get started, first

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    Study: Errors in 84 percent of SF foreclosures

    Study finds errors in more than 80 percent of San Francisco foreclosures

    Fantasy Finance

    SAN FRANCISCO (AP) -- More than 80 percent of residential mortgage loans that have gone into foreclosure in San Francisco have missing documents or signatures or otherwise violate the law, according to a review ordered by the city assessor.

    The results hint at potentially broader problems with how foreclosures have been handled since the collapse of the housing market.

    While many of the errors were technical and related to paperwork, the problem shows the state needs to change its antiquated real estate regulations, Assessor-Recorder Phil Ting said on Wednesday.

    "The whole process ... is absolutely, 100 percent broken and not working for any of us at this time," Ting said. "These rules were made for people who walked or rode their horse to the bank."

    The review found that signatures of some original owners of loans were missing and that affidavits were not filed showing lenders had contacted borrowers to discuss their options 30 days before a mortgage default notice.

    The review was conducted by Newport Beach-based Aequitas Compliance Solutions. The company looked at 382 of the city's 2,405 foreclosure sales between January 2009 and October 2011.

    The report said it was possible that homeowners were accused of defaulting on loans that they had never agreed to in the first place, and were being foreclosed by lenders that didn't own the loans.

    "How can we expect homeowners to have a fighting chance of saving their homes when they can't even find who currently owns their debt?" Ting said in a statement.

    The report was not aimed at individual lenders, but the system in general. It suggests similar problems could be found elsewhere in the state, Ting said.

    He said it would be up to the District Attorney's Office and state Attorney General's Office to determine whether the violations were prosecutable.

    Richard Green, director of the University of Southern California's Lusk Center for Real Estate, said he would like to see similar audits done in other California cities to confirm San Francisco is not an isolated case.

    But considering the high rate of errors with foreclosures in the city, which suffered a comparatively mild downturn when the housing bubble burst, Green said he would not be surprised if the audit's findings foretold a broader problem.

    "Mistakes happen. But it's the robustness of this happening. It's that it's happening over and over again," he said.

     

    11 comments

    • Leonard  •  San Antonio, Texas  •  3 months ago
      Ting is wrong about the system being broken - it's being ignored by executives of lending companies/banks that are too busy lining their pockets with fees/bonuses, etc., by selling loans, merging, etc., to do their real jo#$%$ As a title examiner, I know that the rules are critical to see that a buyer gets good title to a piece of property or that another lender gets a good lien to secure a loan. There is no execuse for not keeping a real estate lien note in a place where it can be found - wouldn't you keep a document that shows you are the owner of a $100K+ debt? Also, if you buy that loan, wouldn't you want to have a written assignment of that debt (note) and the liens securing same? The law says you must. The arrogance of these lower executives is playing havoc in almost every state in America. Don't fall for the #$%$ Consider what you would do if you cash a check for someone - they sign it on the back and add "pay to the order of "you. I would look silly trying to present that to the bank without producing the check - same situation in the real estate lending business.
    • I cant handle the truth  •  Carrollton, Texas  •  3 months ago
      close you're eyes and just run the red light.
    • dead-on  •  Trinidad, Colorado  •  3 months ago
      Yep, more foreclosure problems.
      The one I like was the foreclosure on a couple that had paid cash, had a clear title, and had NOT taken out a mortgage AT ANY TIME, and had owned the house for over 20 years! However,that was NOT in California.
    • JeffreyL  •  3 months ago
      if they cant produce the paperwork they have no claim on the property and then you take them to court and if they still cant produce the paperwork the house belongs to the tenant who is paying the mortgage i had to do this and they couldnt produce the paperwork and the judges gavel fell and i walked out free and clear only to owe taxes which nothing as compared to what the company wanted with no paperwork
    • cavemonkey  •  Davenport, Iowa  •  3 months ago
      ive had that problem with a forcloser. i was getting a lower rate and found out the company i was using is under an investagation!!!!
    • Fydra  •  Los Angeles, California  •  3 months ago
      what do you do when you do a refinance, and are told by your lender that your loan are denied, because you have a private lender and they do not want to cooperate?
    • Mom  •  3 months ago
      Yup, the bank took my house after we went thru the loan mod process, my DTI 31.25 they required 31, I asked them to lower the value of the home (which it was clearly overvalued) and they said NO!!!! Had us jumping through hoops for months and then told nope. Tried to argue it with them but to no avail. Did a self test on their NPV (Net Present Value) test and lowered the value of the home - guess what - we qualified for the loan modification. SHAME, SHAME, SHAME on Wells Fargo!!!!! Once they said no they set a sale date. Hired an attorney to do a CH13 to buy time to try and negotiate and that attorney botched the paperwork and the sale date got moved up and the attorney ignored my calls!!! We called the reconveyance company and were told their internal notes said we didn't want the property, told the lady, not true, we are fighting for our house. We watched the reconveyance website all day (and still no returned call from the attorney). To my shock n it said - reverted to lender. Is this really what the bailout was for? It's broken and it's not being fixed anytime soon.
    • Yrag  •  3 months ago
      Wasn't the biggest error the fact that the people didn't repay the loan or that they bought more house than they could afford. I guess those errors don't count.
    • azdharma  •  3 months ago
      Everyone of the foreclosure filings occurred because the borrower did not make the payments.
      Borrowing money and buying a home are distinct transactions. The obligation to repay the loan is not dependent on the market price of the home, the employment of the borrower, or anything else. The remedy for non-payment is for the lender to take the collateral, when the collateral value is less than the value owed the borrower should be liable for the difference, however many states enacted anti-deficiency statutes which allow borrowers to walk without consequence, until those laws change there will be continuous “strategic defaults” that will drag down real estate values for everyone and make it increasingly difficult for would be homeowners to obtain financing.
    • Joshua  •  3 months ago
      Aha, the technical detail defense. "They forgot to note they were using recycled paper on my documents, I was wrongly foreclosed on!" You either payed your mortgage or you didn't.
    • chuck r  •  3 months ago
      And where is the Attorney General of the US in all this? Not a single case has been filed against any of the individuals or firms on Wall Street responsible for the financial collapse. Would it have something to do with the fact that virtually every top executive in these companies was/is Jewish and Obama needs their votes to stay in power? How about the fact that the biggest fraud promoter, Goldman Sachs, had its people pulling strings in both the Bush and Obama administrations to exempt them from regulations and to speed up their bailout and those of the other firms? How about the fact that even after it was disclosed that these companies where using Jewish law firms in places like Florida to robo-sign documents in complete violation of the law the practice has still continued with not a single financial firm being prosecuted? Obviously, our government has completely sold out to these people and couldn't care less about the general public.
      • Karen 3 months ago
        I now know what is wrong with this country. Your comments sound like nazi talk. Sick.

    RATES

    Stay in touch with Yahoo! Finance

      YAHOO! FINANCE ON TWITTER

    Subscribe

    [X]

    How to subscribe

    Roll over each section to subscribe using Add to My Yahoo! or RSS Feed feeds.

    Yahoo! News offers dozens of RSS feeds you can read in My Yahoo! or using third-party RSS news reader software. Click here to find out more about RSS and how you can use it with Yahoo! News.