Mon, May 28, 2012, 6:38 PM EDT - U.S. Markets closed for Memorial Day

Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

Explore news, videos, and much more based on what your friends are reading and watching. Publish your own activity and retain full control.

To get started, first

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    The 10 Most Charitable Companies in America

    Fantasy Finance

    Of the many chants and slogans that have defined the frustrations of the past months’ Occupy Wall Street protests, one recurring theme has focused on the idea that greedy corporations do whatever they can to avoid sharing the wealth. But a look at the numbers tells more of a nuanced story.

    The Chronicle of Philanthropy, a magazine that monitors the charitable giving industry, tracks donations from the largest corporations in the United States from the annual Fortune 500 list. The magazine’s 2011 Survey of Corporate Giving includes data on 2010 donations for 180 of those top companies.

    To get down to the best of the best, MainStreet looks first at the five most generous corporations – those that gave more than 5% of their 2009 profits to charity in 2010. We then round up the five biggest donors – those corporations that gave the absolute most money to philanthropic causes last year. Read on to see if your favorite brand made the cut.

    The Most Generous: Kroger

    2010 Giving: $64,000,000

    Percentage of 2009 Profits: 10.9%

    Kroger, the largest grocery store chain in America, was the only corporation to give more that 10% of its previous year’s profits to charity in 2010. While its charitable giving efforts target the communities in which its stores operate through volunteering and donations, the Kroger Foundation supports national initiatives that go far beyond the company’s home base of Cincinnati.

    At $64 million, the company’s significant giving in 2010 shows no signs of slowing down this year, as it has been an active participant in the Food 4 Less program to feed the hungry, and has also raised $1.5 million for military families and welcomed Salvation Army donation kettles into its stores this holiday season.

    2nd Most Generous: Macy's

    2010 Giving: $41,226,887

    Percentage of 2009 Profits: 8.1%

    Having long ago made a name for itself around the holidays by sponsoring New York’s Thankgiving Day Parade and making kids believe in Santa Claus again, Macy’s has also used the holiday shopping season to promote its various philanthropic efforts.

    Part of the retailer’s more than $41 million in 2010 giving went to a new initiative that took its stores’ national efforts to the local level. By funding more than 1,200 grants to organizations in the communities where the giant retailer operates, Macy’s made itself seem a bit smaller to the local population, and its overall efforts made it the second-most generous corporation of 2010.

    3rd Most Generous: Safeway

    2010 Giving: $76,500,000

    Percentage of 2009 Profits: 7.5%

    In addition to the many charitable promotions that Safeway administers at the checkout line in its 1,694 stores in the U.S., the company was one of the most generous corporations in 2010, with donations equivalent to 7.5% of 2009’s profits.

    The company provided funds, volunteers and in-kind donations to popular causes such as the Easter Seals, Special Olympics, Muscular Dystrophy Association, and prostate and breast cancer initiatives.

    4th Most Generous: Dow Chemical

    2010 Giving: $34,237,817

    Percentage of 2009 Profits: 7.3%

    Based in Michigan, Dow Chemical Corporation sells products and services to almost every country in the world, and the company uses some of the returns to invest in environmental sustainability and mutually beneficial relationships with the communities that it works in. This is just one example of how the company strives to live up to one of its common taglines – that it supports the “human element” in everything it does, through cash donations and the volunteer efforts of its many employees.

    Unfortunately, Dow’s giving tends to fluctuate widely depending on the company’s finances (2010 donations totaled 26.9% more than the previous year’s giving, which itself was more than 30% lower than in 2008), so next year might see a bit of belt tightening in the area of corporate philanthropy, as the company has seen a roughly 25% drop in its share price in the past year.

    5th Most Generous: Morgan Stanley

    2010 Giving: $55,641,610

    Percentage of 2009 Profits: 5.7%

    Most people know New York-based Morgan Stanley as one of the largest investment banks in the world, but its philanthropic efforts set it apart from most of its peers. With a corporate giving philosophy that maintains that “generosity can certainly improve the communities in which we live and work, [and] it can also help us financially,” the company put its money where its mouth is in 2010, giving away 5.7% of the previous year’s almost $1 billion pre-tax profits. For clients with more modest budgets, Morgan Stanley also offers plenty of information on how to integrate charitable giving into individual investment plans.

    The Biggest Donor: Wal-Mart

    2010 Giving: $319,454,996

    2009 Giving: $288,091,839

    Change: 10.9%

    Topping the list for the overall biggest corporate donor in 2010 is Wal-Mart, which has claimed that distinction for three years running. With more than $300 million given to local and national initiatives to combat hunger and promote local economic development in the communities in which it operates, the retail giant has worked hard to overcome the image of an uncaring company that mistreats workers and puts mom-and-pop shops out of business.

    But a massive company should be capable of making massive contributions to the lives of struggling Americans, and the company’s philanthropy serves that purpose. This holiday season, Wal-Mart is promoting charitable donation through its “12 Days of Giving” campaign, just one example of its continuing commitment to lead the pack in giving for 2011.

    2nd Biggest Donor: Goldman Sachs

    2010 Giving: $315,383,413

    2009 Giving: $69,569,895

    Change: 353.3%

    In 2010, Goldman Sachs was one of only two corporations to give more than $300 million to charitable causes – an incredible 353% jump from the previous year.

    CEO Lloyd Blankfein explained to The New York Times back in November 2007, “We know we make a lot of money, and we know that we live in this world and we have a responsibility to give something back.”

    After a few slow years, the company’s various philanthropic efforts ramped up significantly in 2010, catapulting the firm up to number two in the rankings.

    3rd Biggest Donor: Wells Fargo

    2010 Giving: $219,132,065

    2009 Giving: $202,014,244

    Change: 8.5%

    Wells Fargo isn’t in quite the same hot water as Bank of America, but after wrangling with customers over its own fees, the company has seen its stock fall 22% in the past year.

    That’s a shame, since the 8.5% increase in the company’s giving in 2010 – which went to programs that targeted important initiatives like homeownership and minority-owned small businesses – put the company’s level of giving at close to 2008 levels. The trend may be set to reverse though, considering the company’s struggles in 2011.

    4th Biggest Donor: Bank of America

    2010 Giving: $207,939,857

    2009 Giving: $209,116,567

    Change: -0.6%

    Despite the terrible time Bank of America has had so far in 2011 (remember Bank Transfer Day?), the company had a decent year in 2010 that allowed it to maintain roughly the same level of corporate giving that it did in 2009, at more than $200 million.

    While the bank would surely like to burnish its public image by making even more of an impact on the world of corporate philanthropy this year, it may be impossible considering the huge 66% drop in the company’s share price in the past year.

    5th Biggest Donor: Exxon Mobil

    2010 Giving: $198,692,197

    2009 Giving: $187,121,560

    Change: 6.2%

    With a variety of projects that operate in communities at home and abroad, Exxon Mobil’s philanthropic efforts jumped more than 6% in 2010 after a slight decline in 2009.

    Through its charitable foundation, the company supports projects in the U.S. that focus on creating economic opportunities for women and promoting math and science education in American schools. The group also administers the company’s main international project, the Exxon Mobil Malaria Initiative, to address the illness in partnership with nonprofit organizations around the world.

     
     
    Top Locations Las Vegas Sydney

    1,541 comments

    • dennp  •  5 months ago
      Walmart affect a community when it brings a store by pushing out Mom & Pop stores?
      No Mention of a similar happenings when a Kroger comes to an area.
      Also why is Kroger listed as #1 when they later credit Walmart as being the biggest?
      The article shows it bias against Walmart and the truth about them.
      I'm not a big fan of Walmart but this article is biased against them. A dumb way to
      write this article.
      Kroger is know for its' own employee relation problems too if that the
      beef the author has with Walmart.
      • Paul D 5 months ago
        If you had read the article and comprehended the meaning of the words within, you would have understood the difference between "Most Generous" and "Biggest Donor" The first is donations as a percent of profit. The second is size of donation. They are not exclusive of each other.
      • DEUCE 5 months ago
        I thought the same thing at first, but after a re-read of it, I see that its percentage first, then raw dollars second.
      • Dave Newman 5 months ago
        Which would you call more generous
        1. Google donates $100 million dollars (2011)
        2. Anybody on 100K a year donates $1000
        It may surprise you to know that the 2nd option has given up 4 times as much of their income than Google. So who is more generous. In fact Googles donation was only 0.82% of their profit.
        Most companies that make huge donations have equally huge money to do it from so the % of profit is a fairer measure. What would be good is if the ones that made the biggest donations also showed what % of profit that equated to.

        In the case of Walmart in 2010 they had Net Income over 14 Billion dollars (and that would include the donations taken out). That equates to a % of 2.2% of profit.

        More of these companies should donate more. So much good can be done. I'm involved with a company that is donating 10% of gross revenue to charity. As they grow they will make a big difference.
    • Don in Dallas  •  5 months ago
      These are the greedy Corporations that you people love to hate. Lets get rid of all the Corporations so that they can't make any money to give to Charity and so we won't have to work because they provide jobs that are evil....down with Corporations ! See how stupid you people are.!
      • PETER 2 months ago
        Right on Don
    • A Yahoo! User  •  5 months ago
      They should publish corporations and companies who are "humane" to their rank and file employees.
    • Notashamedtobeamerican  •  5 months ago
      Wells Fargo has plenty of money to give. They just upped a transaction fee and upped my charge for not having enough money in their bank. Talk about kicking someone while they are down.
    • -  •  5 months ago
      Charity Search Engines give up to HALF.
    • -  •  5 months ago
      What are the current tax deductions?
    • A Yahoo! User  •  5 months ago
      I'm not a wealthy person. More along the broke lines. Every year I go to a register, buy a gift card for $20 and give it to the person working. They look at me like its never happened before. Its a really good feeling. Have a nice day.
      • Tony 5 months ago
        I'm stealing your idea this year, and from now on. Somehow I don't think you'll mind. *high 5* EKUL.
      • shirley 5 months ago
        my kind of person,........you know who you are .
      • A fella 5 months ago
        Inspiring
    • Jason  •  5 months ago
      To me the most surprising thing is that no entertainment or media companies are on these lists.They seem to give themselves a lot of credit for helping people, why aren't the numbers there?
      • DavidS 5 months ago
        with most of them being liberal they have the perception of generosity without actually having to be generous...
      • Tim 5 months ago
        its because most of the media has the means to say they give. they say it over and over. Pretty soon people believe it cause they hear it over and over. and then the media and entertainment companies don't have to actually do anything :( its called self promotion
      • David 5 months ago
        you mean the bleeding heart corporations with lip service to the people
    • lorna444birds  •  5 months ago
      I know a man who goes to GoodWill and waits by the cashier. When people come to the register to pay for children's clothing, he pays for it. When he finds someone who needs food, he gets it for them. He is a mechanic, and has helped countless strangers fix their vehicles, and didn't charge them for his time. He does this so that he knows his money and efforts will go directly to people who are truly in need. This man is my son.
      • A 5 months ago
        There are a lot of folks that do something similar, because that is what we as individuals can do. We don't have the deeper pockets to help larger organizations. I commend your son, hopefully you and others will follow in his footsteps.
      • Mike 5 months ago
        I shop at goodwill and I make great money....not everyone at goodwill is in need, it's a good place to great deals
      • christinek 5 months ago
        I do some of that too, as it is the only real way of knowing this money or items are going where they need too.
    • Paul D  •  5 months ago
      This is all well and good and nobody is going to give back the money but, it is a little bit like trying to buy your way into heaven.
      The donations won't make up for the sins of some of these corporations.
    • Paul  •  5 months ago
      Before you give, know where the money is going. For the last year I have numbers(2009). The CEO of UNICEF earned 1.2million, not including perks 14% of your dollars actually go to help. The CEO of the United Way earned 375K and that does not include the wildly extravigant perks 51% goes to charity - The CEO of the Red Cross earns 650K+ and again the perks are too many to count 39% went to help people - The Commissioner of the Salvation Army earns 13K + housing for running a 2 billion dollar charity 93% actually gets to the people your money was intended to help.
    • GW  •  5 months ago
      General Electric.not on the list...go figure..14 billion in profits and they pay no taxes and they do not make the list...bammers jobs czar sure knows how to play the system to a tee..
      -
      solyndra ,13 other solar /greenie companies...not on the list
      govt motors ,not on the list
      fannie and freddie..not on the list
    • Iamnotreallyhere2  •  5 months ago
      If a tax deduction is all they are after then why isn't GE tops on this list? They made 6 Billion and didn't pay a dime in taxes....
    • Ada  •  5 months ago
      Biggest donor in America?? The US taxpayer.
    • Robin  •  5 months ago
      So Much For GE....No Taxes...No Donations.....Say Hey Mr. President!!!
    • Observer  •  5 months ago
      My local bank, Brattleboro Savings and Loan, which you have never heard of, gives 10% of its profit back to the community every year via various charities, and is the primary coordinator of an enormous annual fundraiser for food pantries called Feed the Thousands. You CAN do well and do good at the same time!
    • bcsitx  •  5 months ago
      Heres one: Girl Scotts must sell a lot of cookies to support the CEO that makes a whooping $450,000 annuly
    • James  •  5 months ago
      Has anyone ever wondered where all this money goes, what it's done and who it has actually helped? Billions of dollars donated every year and true, the major contributers can write this off but how about the receivers? How much actually goes to individuals and how much goes into the coffers of the organizations raising this money? Isn't anyone ever interested?
    • Betty  •  5 months ago
      How much did the Kardashians donate out of 65 Million they made last year?
    • John  •  5 months ago
      Uh, did anyone factor in Goldman Sach's investment in South America? Yeah, BIG MONEY! All in the name of giving though. Not to doubt the originators of this article - but I'd like to take a gander at the distribution of those gargantuan amounts inside the US of A. For all that giving one would think we'd be the highest scorers in math and science hands down. Odd that school districts around the nation are clammering for more money. An audit of school districts would go far to adjusting money vs. amount of education received. Everyone pays into school coffers - having children or not - perhaps it's time to find out all what it's really spent on.

      Malaria? Bill, Linda and Warren are taking care of that. Gracious, one'd think gabillions just wouldn't solve the problem since all the money poured into African Nations seems to go to despots and murderers. Wonder how they've gotten around THAT nightmare. Trillions have been spent over half a century and there's been nary a democracy presenting even a glimmering hope. Malaria nets alone won't contain or cure it Mr. Gates - and all the money in the World won't solve the problem unless a Government is in place to see to the equal distribution of your largess. Remember CARE? Ahuh, they tried with all sorts of backing from World Organizations. No dice. They're ANIMALS. Hungry for power - using YOUR money to buy weapons and kill their own people. Without International support from the US, China, Russia, Europe, Australia, Japan - it's good money after bad. That is, unless you have a way - other than simple "trust" to feed, medicate and rebuild from all those that came before. But keep on raping nations for their natural resources and as long as they can get away with it - they will. Think DeBeers gives to the communities they mine in? Rio Tinto? "Governments" under despotic rule? Diamonds, gold, Tanzinite, uranium, bauxite, multi-ferrous ores? Democratic or UN Rule are the only choices for these nations. The slaughter going on Tuesday is much the same as what's in store Saturday. Get it? Taking advantage of - all of them - and until the tacit approval of the World addresses this - it's a waste.

    RATES

    Stay in touch with Yahoo! Finance

      YAHOO! FINANCE ON TWITTER

    Subscribe

    [X]

    How to subscribe

    Roll over each section to subscribe using Add to My Yahoo! or RSS Feed feeds.

    Yahoo! News offers dozens of RSS feeds you can read in My Yahoo! or using third-party RSS news reader software. Click here to find out more about RSS and how you can use it with Yahoo! News.