Mon, May 28, 2012, 6:39 PM EDT - U.S. Markets closed for Memorial Day

Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

Explore news, videos, and much more based on what your friends are reading and watching. Publish your own activity and retain full control.

To get started, first

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    The Big 401(k) Match Mistake

    Are you getting the most out of your employer 401(k) match? A high-income earner who frontloads contributions in the beginning of the year could be losing thousands of dollars in free employer matching money.  Yikes!

    “The industry has a tendency to talk in formulas and jargon and that doesn’t always translate with individuals,” says Catherine Golladay, vice president of 401(k) education and advice at Charles Schwab. But hear this: it’s gravy; here’s help to collect it, all of it.

    Different employers have different ways of figuring the match—that is, how much your employer contributes to your 401(k) account. The problem is that depending on the match formula, employees can lose part of the match. Most employers do it on a payroll basis, contributing a little bit with each paycheck, “matching” the amount the employee saves out of each paycheck.  A common formula is to match 50% of employee contributions up to the first 6% of salary.

    Look who that can hurt. If you’re saving just 3% of salary, you’re missing out on half of the potential match. Many employers automatically start employees at a 3% savings rate if they don’t opt out or elect otherwise. Don’t be fooled thinking your employer has your best interest at heart; it costs your employer to provide the match after all. Bump up your savings rate to 6% to grab the full match.

    High earners trying to save the max run into another problem. They’ll often want to contribute as soon as they have the salary (or bonus) to do so. But watch out. Here’s an example of how that can backfire, courtesy of Schwab’s Gollady.

    Take an employee under age 50 earning $240,000 who elected to have 25% of salary deferred at a company that provides a 50% match on the first 6% of compensation. (The company kicks in its matching amount each pay period that the employee contributes). She would have contributed the maximum $17,000 by April 15, giving her a match of $2,100. By contrast, if she spread out her contributions throughout the calendar year, she would get a match of $7,200.

    Some plans have what’s called a “true-up” feature to help you get the maximum match. The employer looks at your account to determine if the average percentage you contributed would have resulted in a larger match; it that’s the case, the employer makes a “true-up” contribution. Check with your plan provider and/or your benefits department.

    For 2012, the maximum an employee can contribute to a 401(k) is $17,000, up from $16,500 in 2011. For those 50 and older, in addition to the new $17,000 max, they can contribute an additional $5,500 a year as a catch-up, so the total annual contribution for these folks would be $22,500.

    For folks who really want to be sure they’re saving the $17,000, they need to check that the percentage they’ve set to contribute will get them there, says Beth McHugh, vice president of market insights with Fidelity Investments. In a December Fidelity survey, only 31% of those surveyed knew that the contribution limit had changed for 2012, and given a list of choices, only 20% of those surveyed could correctly identify the new limit for 2012 as $17,000 with a $5,500 catchup.

    Some employers will let you pick a fixed amount (instead of a percentage) to contribute each pay period. The danger with doing that is that if you neglect to revise the amount in a year when the dollar contribution limit goes up based on inflation, you’ve lost out on saving the max.

    January is a good time for a 401(k) checkup. Look at your first paystub. McHugh recommends 401(k) savers first take stock to make sure they’re taking full advantage of their employer match, and second, double check that they are saving as much as they can. Typically you can change your contribution amount at any time during the year. The easiest way to do this is online at your plan provider’s web site.

    Are you getting the maximum match from your employer?

    Loading...
    Poll Choice Options
    • Yes
    • No
     
    • Colorado CPA  •  4 months ago
      I work with large companies to set up executive compensation plans and there are plenty of people earning $250K and above that don't have a clue about managing their finances. Many will spend every penny they earn and would be bankrupt in two months if they lost their job.
      • * 4 months ago
        They are really no different than many people. You have people who live pay check to pay check, never save a cent but they have cell phones, eat out every day, go to Starbucks and often drive a new car. Many people seem to think they will worry about it tomorrow and never realize how fast time goes by.
      • ZiaoZi 4 months ago
        That made me chuckle! There is no a priori reason to think that executive compensation is related to having "a clue" about anything.
      • frandrea 4 months ago
        Colorado is right! My family went from making $60000 to $300000 per year in about 15 years. We save less now then we did then. We still live hand to mouth, just putting nicer thing in our mouths.
    • Italian Stallion  •  Middleboro, Massachusetts  •  4 months ago
      I really hope that this doesn't need to be explained to someone who's making $240k per year....
      • Casey 4 months ago
        Seriously... anyone who has this issue doesn't deserve to be told how to correct it.
      • LindaK 4 months ago
        I couldn't agree more.
      • jmsimon 4 months ago
        Agreed!
    • carol  •  Fayetteville, New York  •  4 months ago
      If you would read the article throughly, it started out "A high-income earner" which is not referring to the average Joe
      • scottw 4 months ago
        It's "thoroughly", but yes; you're right. Unfortunately, you're expecting way too much. The average person has an attention span of about 15 seconds, and asking them to do anything thoroughly is a stretch. Just as unfortunate, they expect every article to be aimed for sheep like them. They have no business being here in the first place.
      • Cali 4 months ago
        BAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!
      • scottw 4 months ago
        ^ Thanks for making my point for me, calisheep. Now how about you shut up and go back to watching Judge Judy?
    • Michael  •  Lancaster, Pennsylvania  •  4 months ago
      I'm sure the overwhelming majority of people that make $240K understand this 'nuanced' approach to squeezing out the biggest match over the course of a year. Notice the author provided no stats from a 401K provider regarding how many numbskulls miss out on matching funds when they front-end load their 401k contributions. My guess is the percentage was so small the author did not bother to include it.
      • David 4 months ago
        Front end loading your 401K also reduces the benefit of dollar cost averaging. If you invest with every paycheck as stocks bounce up and down during the year, you will benefit from purchasing at a lower cost for much of the time. Over the course of a career, you tend to end up with more shares for your investment.
      • John 4 months ago
        "My guess is the percentage was so small the author did not bother to include it." My guess is that he didn't even look into it. He came up with some theoretic situation to showcase his finesse in solving it; I doubt this applies to more than a handful, and they don't read Forbes.
    • TheoTheCat  •  Beaverton, Oregon  •  4 months ago
      Folks, the example was weak because it was so extreme, but the problem is valid. If you make $115,000, you will limit out before the end of the year contributing 15%. ($115k *.15 = $17,250). $100k at 20% means you stop contributing in October since you hit the limit. So for the rest of the year, you don't contribute so you don't get the match.

      I had to correct a co-worker on this about 10 years ago -- he lost $1000 match by doing this wrong. But the math is really simple $17k / is the percentage you should be below. To get closer to the max, you may need to adjust that percentage upward near the end of the year to hit the max in the last December paycheck (thereby not losing any match)
      • M 4 months ago
        Easy if your pay is earned ratably throughout the year. If you get a large bonus, or work on commission, can be much tougher to manage.
      • Corny 4 months ago
        The last year I worked I had planned to retire in May but actually ended up retiring in October. I had ratcheted up my contributions to be sure to defer the maximum allowable 22,000. (We are allowed to defer up to 70%) even though I was not that highly compensated I could have run into that situation had I not recalculated my deferral rate and adjusted accordingly. Years before the year I retired I calculated the withdrawal rate so it would take the whole year to make the max allowable.
      • Mark 4 months ago
        You should have written the article... your explanation made it much clearer. And you're right... I don't think every knows it. Someone may think that getting the entire match by the end of November may be the way to go so they have more in their paycheck to pay for Christmas... big mistake.

        Other comments about bonuses, salary increases mid-year, or even the fact that you many have to choose a whole number % of you salary each paycheck when the true calculation works out to be a percent and a fraction can make it challenging.

        Bottom line... it requires some attention. I've been maxing out for years. Since I get paid twice a month, 24 paychecks, I've got to pay close attention to make sure I still have at least 6% more to add to my 401K in my last paycheck or I'm loosing out on free money.
    • A Yahoo! User  •  Washington, District of Columbia  •  3 months ago
      For those who interested, the number that really matters is $50K for 2012. That's the max employee and employer total contributions to a 401k. I have to believe those making decent six digit salaries are aware of this because they likely have a tax professional helping out - or possibly they should if they are unaware of the ramifications of front-loading a 401k. None of my high-salary coworkers are this stupid. We all plan to be under the 50k cap, max out the pre-tax, and then kick over to after tax contributions. It's actually pretty easy using a spreadsheet to do the calculations. The after tax contributions can then move to a Roth when the time comes (retirement, new job) - a pretty sweet deal at the moment, unless Obama puts an end to it!
    • Halevay  •  Concord, California  •  4 months ago
      Also ask your benefits area about whether you have a Roth 401(k) option on your plan. Your deferrals go in AFTER-tax but all of the growth is tax-FREE at retirement. Not a bad deal if tax rates go up in the future.
    • Sactownboy  •  Folsom, California  •  4 months ago
      Problem solved for me... I don't get an employer match! :D
    • clarence  •  4 months ago
      401k is just another long term bait and switch. You can bet they will change the rules before it needs to be used.
    • Appletree  •  3 months ago
      If you get laid off or change jobs, you need to ask about going "inactive" in the 401k instead of being sold out. This means you keep your holdings in the 401k, but don't add any more. I was laid off during the runup to Gulf War I, so they sold me out at the very bottom of the market. I lost a substantial amount of money that way. (Of course when they rehired me 6 monts later I demanded they pay it back, so I came out not as bad off). Live and learn from my experience. I like my IRA better, I have better choices and nobody scr3ws with it. This assumes you get no company match.
    • White Goodman  •  4 months ago
      I throw in 17%, employer throws in 10%. We save another 15% or so of our after-tax income, and also invest the year end bonus. We also save aggressively in our one year old daughter's 529.
    • V dogg  •  Chicago, Illinois  •  4 months ago
      Who was this article written for? I mean, if someone is making $250k a year and don't know this already, something is wrong with them that goes way past there improper 401k funding.
    • Kevins432  •  Pennsauken, New Jersey  •  4 months ago
      $250,000... I wish... I read these articles to help me plan for retirement. If I were making that kind of money it would certainly be a lot easier...
    • ken  •  Dublin, California  •  4 months ago
      "The industry has a tendency to talk in formulas and jargon that doesn't always translate with individuals"

      Individuals making 240K can be as unaware of maximizing thier results as somone earning 30K. While 240K can seem to be an amount that many people will never see in thier working lifetimes as a salary there is still a specific percentage of those that will not retire financially independent in this 240K category.

      Financial knowledge is available to everyone; equal opportunity to succeed or fail at 30K or 240K. 240K doesn not mean that you are smart, live within your means or that you are educated in financial matters.
    • M  •  4 months ago
      This used to be the case at my company until I pointed it out to HR at the corporate office. Now at the end of the year, they go back and true up any people who got short-changed during the year.
    • Jason F  •  Spring, Texas  •  4 months ago
      use this advice to build the retirement portforlio your whole life and hope the government doesn't derail you with taxes 30 years down the road.
    • theshawn  •  Dayton, Ohio  •  4 months ago
      Under 50 with a $240,000 salary? Who is she kidding? How many of those people are out there?

      It would have been nice to have some scenarios a larger percentage of Americans could relate to.
    • Say it like you see it  •  4 months ago
      401K's are better than nothing, but, they could be better. The government changes the rules anytime they want while you are in the middle of the game. Does that sound fair? The plans also limit you on what you can invest in. They should be open so that you can invest anyway you desire, just like the big boys. Why should you be limited only to certain choices? I have yet to see a plan where you can pick your own individual stocks. They are usually limited to mutual funds within the plan. This puts the mutual fund managers in charge of investing your money. What is to say that they do not at times rob Peter to pay Paul? Such as selling equity shares from one fund to another fund in order to balance out returns between their funds. It puts a lot more money into the stock market and the Big Money could be influencing those fund managers in order to control share prices. The feds have a 10% penalty for early withdrawal. Why? It is your money isn't it? Like I say, 401K's could be a lot better. If our politicians truely worked for the people instead of the entities that got them elected they probably would be.
    • ken  •  Dublin, California  •  4 months ago
      For those who do not understand the High Tech working environments, Silicon Valley and other similar areas in the US.

      Read , listen and learn.

      As outrageous as these comments appear to be to the "average Joe" these companies have terrific compensation plans for thier employees. They go out of the way to assure they get highly qualified people and keep them. Some times this is even on the border of what might be considered questionably legal. But they are always trying to be as innovative with thier compensaion plans as they are with the products they create.

      And, there are "average Joes" who also work for these companies. Average Joes based on this area. Much is high risk and as risk and reward goes they take the chance. Some do well, some don't and many stay long enough to make a small fortune and leave. It is a very different place and I have had the pleasure of working in Silicon Valley for 30+ years.

      Kudos to those who make the numbers and get the compensation.
    • Gadzuks  •  Chicago, Illinois  •  4 months ago
      And if your employer doesn't match?

    FOCUS ON RETIREMENT