• Home
  • Mail
  • Flickr
  • Tumblr
  • News
  • Sports
  • Finance
  • Celebrity
  • Answers
  • Groups
  • Mobile
  • More
  • FirefoxTry Yahoo Finance on Firefox »
Yahoo
    • Sign in
    Finance Home
    • Originals
    • Events
    • Personal Finance
    • Technology
    • Markets
    • Industries
    • My Screeners
    • My Portfolio
    U.S. Markets close in 1 hr 26 mins
    • S&P 500
      2,382.66
      -2.60 (-0.11%)

    • Dow 30
      20,948.25
      -1.85 (-0.01%)

    • Nasdaq
      5,899.83
      -0.22 (-0.00%)

    Trump gives blunt, 3-word reply when asked if his campaign rhetoric had gone too far

    Oliver Darcy
    Business InsiderNovember 11, 2016
    GettyImages 622159424
    GettyImages 622159424

    (President-elect Donald Trump.Mark Wilson/Getty Images)
    President-elect Donald Trump in an interview published Friday expressed no regret for his inflammatory campaign rhetoric.

    Asked by The Wall Street Journal if he had gone too far during the heated 2016 cycle, Trump offered a blunt response.

    "No. I won," he said.

    Trump was strongly criticized for extreme rhetoric he regularly employed to defeat his Republican rivals in the primary and to triumph over Hillary Clinton in the general election.

    The Republican businessman, for instance, had suggested Fox News host Megyn Kelly pressed him at a debate because she was menstruating, floated a conspiracy that Sen. Ted Cruz's dad was part of the plot to assassinate President John F. Kennedy, and mocked a New York Times reporter with a disability.

    Nevertheless, Trump emerged as the victor on Tuesday night, upending the political world with a shock upset over Clinton.

    NOW WATCH: A model that has correctly predicted the presidential election since 1980 says Clinton will have a landslide victory



    More From Business Insider

    • Donald Trump says protests against him are 'incited by the media,' calls them 'very unfair'
    • Donald Trump will be the ultimate test of America's 'special relationship' with Britain
    • LARRY SANDERS: My brother Bernie 'would have beaten Trump'
    Recently Viewed
    Your list is empty.

    What to Read Next

    • Trump suggests little-noticed interview between Fox News host and Paul Ryan helped fuel his explosive wiretap claims

      Business Insider
    • Stephen Colbert Lampoons Rachel Maddow’s Maddening Look At Donald Trump’s 2005 Tax Returns

      Deadline
    • Trump defends Obama wiretapping accusation

      International Business Times
    • Trump's approval rating drops by five points in new poll

      International Business Times
    • Yes, Trump paid taxes in 2005, they just don't look much like a billionaire's taxes

      Business Insider
    • Americans are quitting jobs at the fastest pace in 16 years

      Yahoo Finance
    • Today's charts: Snap gets downgraded; GoPro shares soar; McDonald's gets hacked; Canada Goose goes public

      Yahoo Finance
    • Snapchat execs are finally showing how irritated they are by Facebook's constant copying

      Business Insider
    • March Madness' big bet on live streaming

      Yahoo Finance Video
    • The hottest college major for Wall Street

      Yahoo Finance
    • Here's how banks can offer credit cards like the Sapphire Reserve with enormous sign-up bonuses and still turn a profit

      Business Insider
    • Trump's budget to slash foreign aid and green-energy funding

      Yahoo Finance
    • When it comes to copying Snapchat, Facebook will only get so far

      Business Insider
    • Classic video game Pong given new life 

      Yahoo Finance Video
    • Goldman Sachs defends having so many ex-bankers go into politics

      Yahoo Finance
    • How Fed hike will affect mortgages, car loans, credit cards

      Associated Press

    Taiwan says capable of strike against China

    zamian: If China wanted to bring Taiwan back into the fold, they should have done it over 60 years ago. How long can a country lay claim to a territory before it loses its right to the land? You can't take over a land that broke of generations ago. You would be fighting a people who grew up only knowing an independent way of life. And there is no way they will give that up. I am not saying wither side is right or wrong. The point is, that the more time passes. The less legitimacy and chance China has of bringing Taiwan back into the fold. A mutually beneficial and symbiotic trade relations would be better than a war.

    Join the Conversation
    1 / 5

    297

    • Former Yahoo exec: Lawyer 'took the hit' for Marissa Mayer

      CNBC
    • Trump calls for privatizing air traffic control operations

      Associated Press
    • You’ve never played tag like this before

      Yahoo Finance Video
    • Oracle eyes new high, GoPro spikes, Tesla to raise cash, Canada Goose goes public

      Yahoo Finance
    • An Army general says an ally used a $3 million Patriot missile to shoot down a $200 drone

      Business Insider
    • Sick of Feeling Overwhelmed by Mutual Fund Choices? Zacks Mutual Fund Rank is Your Remedy

      Zacks
    • F-35s and Navy SEALs: Trump’s Powerful Warning to North Korea

      The Fiscal Times
    • A combo of duct tape and LEGO blocks

      Yahoo Finance Video
    • 7 ways Facebook tried to copy Snapchat

      Yahoo Finance
    • One of the biggest rumors about the iPhone 8's design is becoming less and less true

      Business Insider
    • You can stream every March Madness game

      Yahoo Finance
    • Goldman Sachs downgrades stocks

      Yahoo Finance
    • The Canada Goose is loose on Wall Street

      Yahoo Finance Video
    • Investors warm to the Fed's rate move and weigh Trump's 'skinny' budget

      Yahoo Finance
    • Two fake news writers reveal how they ply their trade

      Yahoo Finance
    • Cramer's Lightning Round: Blown away by how badly this stock is doing

      CNBC