Thu, Feb 23, 2012, 8:59 AM EST - U.S. Markets open in 31 mins.

US Post Office Needs to Cut 260,000 Jobs: Rep. Issa

The U.S. Postal Service needs to slash 260,000 jobs and end weekend delivery if it is to climb out of its "financially insolvent" condition, Rep. Darrell Issa said.

Despite a mandate to avoid deficits, the post office loses up to $15 billion a year, Issa told CNBC during an informal gathering of senior House Oversight and Government Reform Committee members.

"It's a combination of delivering what people want at a price they're willing to pay," the California Republican said. "We've restricted what the post office can charge for various classes of mail. But the biggest challenge is there are about 660,000 workers at the post office. In the private sector there would be about 400,000."

Though Issa's numbers are likely on the high side - the most recent official estimates from the postal service put the total employees at 574,000 - reducing the size of the workforce and consolidating operations has been a priority.

Figuring out where the waste lies and streamlining operations are assignments for those who oversee the service, which receives no taxpayer funding despite being supervised by the government.

"It's not a debate about whether we need to get to that number. It's about how we get there," Issa said. "Do we get there by inducing retirements and finding ways to trim that workforce? Or do we wait for people to retire from an organization that has three fulltime employees that are 98 years old, literally."

Issa recalled that when he was a boy the post office delivered mail seven days a week and twice from Monday through Friday - though Sunday deliveries have been a rarity since 1912 and twice-daily deliveries were phased out completely by 1990.

In the digital era and its lightning-fast transactions done through e-mail and other avenues, such an ambitious postal service is no longer necessary, he said.

Issa specifically called for the streamlining of the service's 461 processing centers, half of which he would close.

"We have a problem that the post office can't seem to shrink on its own fast enough," Issa said. "Today we're in an Internet age in which mail is for less than it used to be. You can now do documentation and contracts and you can buy and sell billion-dollar entities over the Internet.

He added: "Is there a reason for the post office? Absolutely. Do we need six-day delivery? I personally don't think so."



More From CNBC

 
  • Ghostwolf  •  Denver, Colorado  •  29 days ago
    In the first place, the Post Office was never meant to be a for profit enterprise. Secondly, if the Post Office is losing this kind of money, why does the Postmaster General get about a 1.5 million dollar bonus each year for doing such a "good job"?
  • ExTexan  •  25 days ago
    Instead of charging less for junk advertising mail, charge more.
  • JR Cattle Co  •  25 days ago
    The pre-funding for retirements was made mandatory to able congress to spend more money on pet projects. Nothing more nothing less!!!!!!! Additionslly, the Saturday delivery can be elininated without hurting few. Those dependent on the USPS for delivery of medicines, checks, and other needed supplies will make ordering adjustments accordingly. Distribution centers are situated according to the population; thusly some could be shut down, but not half. A real savings would be for sub-divisions to have a post office box mail center near the entrance. This would reduce driving costs, vehicle costs, and reduce enployee associated costs.
  • Jaun  •  25 days ago
    The problem with the post office is like most other problems-the dumb axxes in DC. Too many chiefs making big money that have nothing to do with delivering mail. What can I say about congress oversight, congress sucks. Most congressman should be in jail cells. Our system does not work for the postal service or anything else tied to main street america. We need to change congress, not everything else. Lobbying should be illegal and sold out politicians should be prosecuted.
  • RichardD  •  Salt Lake City, Utah  •  29 days ago
    What Issa fails to understand, not surprisingly, is that the USPS is not a business in the free market sense. Its function is to provide snail mail access to all Americans at a reasonable cost. It does not charge more for Americans who live in remote areas for example. If the USPS was free market enterprise, then people in remote areas would either have no mail or would have to pay exorbitant rates to send and receive mail.
  • Richard G  •  Albany, New York  •  24 days ago
    we need to cut layers and layers of overpaid management in the USPS....We NEED clerks, carriers, mailhandlers and drivers.....not six supervisors in an office of 75 people...
  • Jef n Laura  •  Warren, Ohio  •  24 days ago
    The govt is regulating the post office out of business. Since 2005 or 06 the govt mandated the usps to pay $5.5 billion each year for health retirement fund for future employees, no other company in the usa is required to do this. And this is the time the usps starting stuggling. What happens with that fund when there are no future employees. They are trying to put down the working class. The usps also has overpaid on its federal employees retirement fund(fers) and civil service retirement fund(csrs), the govt wont allow access to those overpayments. We should be upset with congress for ruining the only govt entity that was doing well and making money till they started taking more from it. Time to contact your representatives and tell them stop putting down working class people.
  • Ranger  •  Cleburne, Texas  •  25 days ago
    When the tail wags the dog it cannot stand. Long ago our Government served it citizens to some degree. Now we serve our masters or pay the price, while these in Washington protect their pensions and health benefits. It is time for change but beware the promise of it....
  • zeke  •  Chicago, Illinois  •  29 days ago
    They never mention that the USPS was doing fine until about six or seven years ago that Congress mandated they pay for FUTURE employees retirement plans in advance by some 20 or 30 years was it? It was and is a ridiculous plan that would sink any business. Mail should be subsidized by the government if it can't turn a profit on its own. Unlike Congress, it's here to serve the people. Mail deficits we can handle, it's the bank bailouts, oil subsidies, tax breaks for the rich ONLY and endless wars we can't afford.
  • Flash  •  Cicero, Illinois  •  25 days ago
    So I'm reading 1/3 of the USPS workforce is dead weight? Who the hell let this happen in the first place.
  • Tool  •  24 days ago
    Issa ia a crook look it up....................Donahoe is worst PMG EVER!
  • Whisky, Tango, Foxtrot  •  St Louis, Missouri  •  24 days ago
    I'd rather pay 15 bil. to our people than to a bunch of people we provide food and aid to that will come back later and crash airplanes into NYC.
  • George Fletcher Won  •  25 days ago
    Yes, kill Saturday delivery. It's not needed.
  • eric  •  25 days ago
    Issa needs to worry about his state, the most diseased and drug ridden state in the US and stop blaming the working man for there problems.
  • prostrated american  •  Stockton, California  •  25 days ago
    problem lies on the management side where theres so many supervisor and managers that wasnt doing anything and they getting paid so much , so many of them that they outnumbered the workers as we speak iknow so because i worked for the post offic
  • The Legend  •  25 days ago
    They lost sight of what the postal service was supposed to be and turned it into a retail business in the 90's. Why were they sponsoring anything? Why were they advertising? Everytime they did that, it just made the rates increase and turned their "customers" toward their "competitors." Additionally, from personal experience, beginning about 10 years ago I started getting the wrong mail ar least once a week -- something extremely rare when I was a kid.
  • Not  •  Dekalb, Illinois  •  24 days ago
    Well I think they should layoff all of you. Farm your jobs out overseas and pay the remainder of you minimum wage with no benefits. When are you all going to get that its not the workers fault but mangement decisions that put companies in bankruptcy.When did the American worker start striving for less wages and no benefits.Are you that stupid to think these politicians are telling the truth,and the ceo's are just looking to be globally competative.You all are so backless sheep you follow these idiots over the cliff. Mangement made the decisions and you think its ok for the workers to take the blunt of it.Maybe you should look into what the postal service has done in the last several years to stay competative. They had employed 900 thousand and now they are at 500 thousand. Its the political nonsense that holds back good decisions. They would have been doing fine until they started using the law they passed to protect the workers retirement and health benefits against them.Take every state and federal governement and look how they funded the retirements and health care of the workers.They didn't,they act as if these people just showed up yesterday.Where do you sit are mangement, jealous of someone who gets paid more,or paid to write stupid stuff in forums for minimum wage.I don't work for or ever have for the Postal Service but I certainly don't blame the workers or think they should take the blunt of the blame.
  • me  •  Nonthaburi, Thailand  •  24 days ago
    ...Or they could just get rid of that ridiculous legislation requiring them to prepay their retirement healthcare costs for 100 years!!!!!!!! A piece of work that was clearly supported by the lobbyists from FedEx and UPS, in an attempt at destroying the USPS and eliminating the competition. If you take away all the money the USPS has had to pay for this absurd legislation, they would have a profit of around $1bln in the last 5 years! Perhaps if the gov't stopped giving FedEx a $500 million tax credit, they could afford to keep the USPS, which offers 10x the service at 1/50 the cost of FedEx. FedEx pays less than 1% taxes while making over $4 billion in profits. Never mind the fact that their delivery prices are absurd and their customer service makes the DMV look friendly.
  • A Yahoo! User  •  Hanoi, Vietnam  •  29 days ago
    The PO spent more money buying and excessing machinery than you would believe. Santa Clarita had a 23 million dollar tray transport system that bit the dust. Probably overseas now.
  • Zande  •  Roanoke, Virginia  •  25 days ago
    I'm a postal worker. I'm also a strong union member. This article is so biased and untrue. It makes me lose faith in even the larger news sources such as CNBC. The article is geared toward the agenda of Rep. Darrell Issa, which is to get his bill passed and to break the USPS. (He has personal interests in this since he owns stock in UPS stores.) He is personally holding up and keeping a another bill from being ratified which already has all the signatures needed, and would straighten out this mess.

    These are the real facts: The USPS is the only segment of the government or of private industry which is forced, by law and act of congress, to prefund its retirement accounts and retirees' medical. The formula for this was given to the USPS by Congress. The problem is the formula is flawed and because of this, the USPS has OVERPAID this account, over a ten year period, by $79 BILLION. If it weren't for this, the USPS would have made money.

    We aren't asking for that money back...not all of it. We are only asking for the overpayment from the last fiscal year, which is $6.9 Billion. As well, we want Congress to correct the formula or do away with this prefunding altogether.

    Congress has to vote on it and we all know how long that takes. As well, with representatives, such as Issa, who have personal interests and agendas, we are literally fighting for the life of the USPS. He heads the committee as well.

    1351 is the Bill which would do away with the give us back the funds just from the last fiscal year. They should return the entire 10 year overpayment, but Issa's opinion is, once that money was paid into the US Treasury, it no longer belonged to the USPS, and so they aren't going to return any of it. Let me ask you this. If you overpaid on a debt you owed, due to an error by the credit company, don't you think that company is lawfully and morally bound to return the overpayment to you? It is no different with the USPS, Congress and the US Treasury!

    Please, check out H.R. 1351 and write your representatives to push for its passage.
Loading...
 
Recent Quotes
Symbol Price Change % Chg 
Your most recently viewed tickers will automatically show up here if you type a ticker in the "Enter symbol/company" at the bottom of this module.
You need to enable your browser cookies to view your most recent quotes.
 
Sign-in to view quotes in your portfolios.

Yahoo! Finance on Facebook

  YAHOO! FINANCE ON TWITTER