Say what you will about the rest of her legacy, but when it comes to the economic disaster today known as the euro, Margaret Thatcher was downright prophetic. In a delightfully acidic speech delivered before Britain's House of Commons in 1990, and posted below, she summed up her feelings about European integration: "No. No. No."
Specifically, Thatcher opposed to the idea of handing political power to a European parliament, giving up the pound for a single European currency, or handing over its monetary policy to a European central bank. As she put it (in the blunt way only English politicians can):
Perhaps the Labour party would give all those things up easily. Perhaps it would agree to a single currency and abolition of the pound sterling. Perhaps, being totally incompetent in monetary matters, it would be only too delighted to hand over full responsibility to a central bank, as it did to the IMF. The fact is that the Labour party has no competence on money and no competence on the economy -- so, yes, the right hon. Gentleman would be glad to hand it all over. What is the point of trying to get elected to Parliament only to hand over sterling and the powers of this House to Europe?
Thatcher's stance towards a greater Europe was a bit more nuanced than some now remember. In that same speech, she said her government would support the idea of a "parallel" European currency that could co-exist with the pound -- a sort of trial run for potential future integration. And it wasn't just her Labour opponents pushing for Britain to become part of a more federal Europe. Thatcher's deputy prime minister, Geoffrey Howe, resigned over his disagreements with Thatcher over the currency issue. That move helped spark the leadership battle that led to her ultimate resignation.
But Thatcher realized that Britain would be better served keeping control over its own financial affairs. In 2002, with the European project still moving along apace, she wrote in her book Statecraft "that such an unnecessary and irrational project as building a European superstate was ever embarked upon will seem in future years to be perhaps the greatest folly of the modern era."
She lived just long enough to see history prove her right.
More From The Atlantic
- Margaret Thatcher's Global Legacy: She Changed the Soviet Union, the Gulf War, and the Oil Industry
- The Big Comeback: Is New Orleans America's Next Great Innovation Hub?
- The Economic Paradox of Major League Baseball—Explained in 1 Word
- Politics & Government
- Margaret Thatcher