How WhatsApp Affects Monitise; Shorting Tesla: Best of Kass

TheStreet.com

NEW YORK (TheStreet) -- Doug Kass of Seabreeze Partners is known for his accurate stock market calls and keen insights into the economy, which he shares with RealMoney Pro readers in his daily trading diary.

Among the posts this past week was an entry about the effect of Facebook's acquisition of WhatsApp on Monitise and reasons to short Tesla.

Please click here for information about subscribing to RealMoney Pro.


The Global Economic Recovery Is Foundering

Originally published on Thursday, Feb. 20 at 10:40 a.m. EDT.

The acquisition of WhatsApp underscores Facebook's  commitment to social, messaging and photos -- the three core components to the social Web.

There is an important read-through to the value of Monitise in a world of increased social engagement. The deal validates the strategic opportunities for banks/merchants to generate new revenue streams out of mobile, which is exactly what Monitise is positioned to help customers with.

One can argue that the WhatsApp deal directly exposes the value of Monitise.

Indeed, one can argue that Monitise's strategic value has more than doubled after the WhatsApp deal.

To most, there is no greater engagement than the concern over money. And Monitise sits squarely in the epicenter of the mobile payments industry.

Monitise has spent over 10 years laying the rails for growth. It is now unlikely that a meaningful competitor will emerge and challenge the company's growing market position, which has the endorsement of Visa .

Compare Monitise's experience with NatWest, in which the average customer looks at his/her bank account an average of 27 times a month.

In yesterday's webcast, Monitise's CEO made it clear that the company is well positioned (in an expanding joint venture basis) with many of the leading financial intermediaries in the world. Indeed, the company could substantially beat revenue forecasts this year if it elected to increase front-end fees at the expense of back-end participation. Intelligently, the company is electing to think long-term and is favoring the latter approach and strategy.

Consider that, in the fullness of time, Monitise has the potential to achieve several hundred million users, paying far more than say Twitter  or WhatsApp are paying on a yearly basis.

Yesterday's deal underscores that if Monitise's engagement strategy and new business endeavors are successful, the company will be worth a lot more than it is today.

Though Monitise's shares have doubled since July 2013, the best might yet be ahead for the company's shareholders.

It is uncommon for me to write this, but if Monitise's management team continues to execute, the shares could rise threefold or more over the next several years.

At the time of original publication, Kass was long MONI.L.


Shorted More Tesla

Originally published on Thursday, Feb. 20 at 7:32 a.m. EDT.

I shorted more Tesla  in after hours last night between $218 and $224 a share.

My short cost basis now approximates $212 a share.

As a professional short seller, I am acutely aware of the risks of shorting valuation. I have the scars on my back to show how harsh those lessons were back in 1999.

Subject to one's risk profile/appetite, however, there is always a place for speculative shorts and longs, and there is always the exception to the rule.

I believe that Tesla might prove to be the exception to my rule of only shorting equities that have low short interest ratios (as measured against daily average trading volume and/or outstanding float), but shorting Tesla or any other stock is not for most investors. Shorting provides an asymmetric risk vs. reward -- you can only make 100% on a short but you can lose a multiple on your investment if you are wrong. I am simply explaining, as I do with my long investments, what, why and when I am doing.

A few months ago and before the silly Apple  talk last weekend, I was uncharacteristically positive about Tesla and avoided shorting the shares as it rose from about $40 a share in early 2013 to over $200 a share this year.

The silly Apple acquisition talk, which made no sense, piqued my interest in shorting Tesla, and I initiated a short at $205 a share.

Yesterday's earnings beat -- albeit, the better profits excluded noncash compensation costs and other expenses -- provided me with an opportunity to expand my Tesla short.

Some of the reasons I have previously expressed in my diary.

Others, but not meant to be all inclusive, include:

  • A sentiment extreme may have been reached with Tesla's equity valuation approaching $30 billion. To me this is reminiscent of the euphoria related to the elevated price of gold in the fall of 2011 (when I went short the commodity). A speculative buying frenzy was reached -- it seemed as if every hedge fund extant had a significant weighting -- and, in quick order, over the next 12 months,  gold's price fell dramatically (for no apparent reason). In fact, additional bouts of easing (QE2 and QE3) and a drop in real interest rates, which were supposed to be a friend of the price of gold, failed to have a positive impact. Just the opposite occurred.
  • The hatred that emerged from my Tesla short (on Tuesday) is eerily reminsicent of my analytical criticism of Apple and many other former market favorites. History may not repeat itself, but it sure does rhyme! Over time, that sort of response (hatred) has yielded me short profits.
  • Beware of iconic figures such as Elon Musk's, who are put on investment pedestals. Brilliant as they might be, they are human beings just like us. Pride goeth before fall.
  • Tesla's competitive leadership position will, in the fullness of time, be supplanted by competition. Similar to Apple, as it breached $700 to the upside during late September 2012, Tesla will likely face a more competitive landscape that will inevitably devastate profitability. I referred to this In my comparison with Audi, but there will be many more competitors. I think it is laughable that the shares are higher and that talking heads are excited by the better margins just recorded in the current quarter (28%). To me, this is fanciful, narrow thinking and fails to see the developing larger picture, much like when AOL  leaped ahead of Compuserve in the Internet service provider space in the late 1990s and ultimately garnered a huge valuation. That notion was shortlived, and AOL's shares dropped from $80 a share to $10 a share as the competitive landscape changed. (I will be expanding on the competitive threats to Tesla in the days ahead.)

As Grandma Koufax used to say, "Dougie, trees don't grow to the sky in the Bronx or on the stock exchange."

I plan to add to my Tesla short on further strength.

At the time of original publication, Kass was long AAPL and short TSLA.

EXCLUSIVE OFFER: See inside Jim Cramer’s multi-million dollar charitable trust portfolio to see the stocks he thinks could be potentially HUGE winners. Click here to see his holdings for FREE.

View Comments (9)