Why oil rigs rose while natural gas rigs fell in 2013 (Part 3 of 3)
Natural gas rigs dropped slightly last week, down 15% over 2013
Baker Hughes, an oilfield services company, reported that rigs targeting natural gas dropped slightly last week, from 374 to 372 for the week ended January 3, 2014. Over the course of 2013, natural gas rigs have fallen from 439 to 372, a drop of 15%. Natural gas rigs fell most in the Marcellus Shale (-11), the Granite Wash (-19), the Barnett Shale (-12), and the Fayetteville Shale (-4). Natural gas rigs rose most in the Mississippian (+8) and the Utica Shale (+15).
Background: Natural gas rigs have fallen sharply over the past few years, also due to low prices
From a longer-term perspective, natural gas rigs have been largely falling or flat since October 2011 in response to sustained low natural gas prices (see the natural gas price graph below). Falling gas prices can spur producers to stop drilling for natural gas.
Natural gas rigs drilling can indicate the sentiment of major natural gas producers such as Chesapeake Energy (CHK), Comstock Resources (CRK), Southwestern Energy (SWN), and Range Resources (RRC). Many of these names are also part of energy ETFs such as the S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF (XOP). If prices continue to rally or producers can significantly lower cost curves even further, that could be an impetus for natural gas rigs and natural gas drilling to increase.
Why natural gas rigs keep falling, but production continues to climb
As discussed above, natural gas rigs have been in a freefall since mid-2011. However, natural gas production has climbed since then. This has been due to a combination of several factors. Firstly, while rigs targeting natural gas have declined, oil drilling has remained active. While companies have targeted oil, most oil wells also have significant natural gas production. So the increase in oil-targeted drilling has helped to contribute to natural gas production. Another factor contributing to growing natural gas is the development of super-prolific areas such as the Marcellus Shale. Wells in the best areas of the Marcellus Shale have extremely high natural gas production rates, which have contributed to supply by being so prolific, and have also encouraged more drilling as the cost per unit of production for such wells is very low and has made drilling these wells profitable.
Natural gas rigs didn’t decline as much as forecasted in 4Q13
On Baker Hughes’ (BHI) 3Q13 earnings call, management noted that it expects natural gas rigs in 4Q13 to average 340, with the drop in rigs due both to normal seasonality in winter months and increased efficiency allowing upstream names to produce more with fewer rigs. Natural gas rigs drilling actually averaged 370, compared to the forecast of 340 and 3Q13 average natural gas rig counts of 380. One factor that may have helped support natural gas rig counts is that natural gas prices had a strong rally over 4Q13, rising from ~$3.50 per MMBtu in late September to current prices of ~4.40 per MMBtu. For more on natural gas prices, see Why names like Chesapeake are better off now than a few months ago.
Browse this series on Market Realist:
- Part 1 - Why the energy industry and investors pay attention to rig counts
- Part 2 - Why did these key areas drive oil rig counts up in 2013?
- Commodity Markets
- natural gas
- natural gas prices