Mon, May 28, 2012, 7:53 PM EDT - U.S. Markets closed for Memorial Day

Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

Explore news, videos, and much more based on what your friends are reading and watching. Publish your own activity and retain full control.

To get started, first

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    Will Driverless Cars Become the New Road Rage?

    The sci-fi dream of no-hands vehicles could be real within a decade

    Fantasy Finance

    It’s a late summer day, and I’m sitting in the driver’s seat of a BMW 3 Series at the Mazda Raceway Laguna Seca in Salinas, Calif. Sitting, not driving. When I lift my hands from the wheel at the beginning of this 2.2-mile course, the car accelerates to 75 mph almost instantly, pushing me and my passengers—BMW engineers and executives—into our leather seats. The car’s computer brain, using satellite signals to navigate the track, is in control.

    “Wait until you see what’s coming up,” says Tom Kowaleski, a BMW spokesman, as we head for the Corkscrew, a steep, tight S-curve and the scene of numerous YouTube crash videos. We hit it at about 40 mph, and I have to sit on my hands to keep them from grabbing the wheel back from the machine. The executives chuckle.

    This 3 Series is part of BMW’s ongoing efforts to improve the technology behind driverless vehicles and understand how computerized chauffeurs might be used in the real world. Similar projects are under way at General Motors, Volkswagen, Google, and at research labs around the world. While the current technology is good enough to navigate roadways and recognize obstacles, it needs some refinement before it’s street-safe, says Thilo Koslowski, an industry analyst with researcher Gartner. The component costs also need to come down, he says. Still, there’s enough activity that governments are beginning to think about how to regulate the new smart vehicles. “In 10 years you will see the first kind of autonomous vehicles” on regular streets, says Koslowski. “The privilege of driving is going to be redefined.”

    The idea of self-driving cars is almost as old as the car itself. GM’s vision for the future of transportation at the 1939 World’s Fair in New York included driverless cars. Automakers say recent advances in computing power and networking technologies make it feasible to build real ones. Although the experiments vary in their details, autonomous cars generally use GPS to recognize where they are on the road. Cameras, lasers, and radar help them keep their distance from other cars and recognize objects like pedestrians. Superfast processors weave all the inputs together, allowing cars to react quickly.

    Proponents say the promise is enormous: Turning the wheel over to computers could lead to less traffic, fewer collisions, and more transportation options for aging societies. The world’s population is predicted to grow 33 percent, to 9.3 billion, by 2050. If that population were to live like Americans, there would be 7.7 billion cars on the roads—up from 850 million today. That enormous fleet would consume 375 million barrels of oil per day, more than five times the global production in 2008, according to John Sterman, a professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology’s Sloan School of Management. The traffic problem that already cripples many of the world’s megacities would get a whole lot worse. Bringing the reliability of silicon to the roads would help solve these problems: Autonomous cars could potentially drive at high speeds and close together without fear of wrecks or jams, cutting down on wasted time and gas.

    Some auto executives worry about what will happen to their businesses if traffic continues to get worse and driving becomes more trouble than it’s worth. “The freedom of mobility that my great-grandfather brought to people is now being threatened,” said Ford Motor Executive Chairman Bill Ford at a speech earlier this year at the TED technology conference. “Global gridlock is going to stifle economic growth and our ability to deliver food and health care, particularly to people that live in city centers, and our quality of life is going to be severely compromised.”

    To avoid that future, car companies from Toyota Motor to Tata Motors have to start thinking of themselves as being in the “transportation services” business, says MIT’s Sterman. “The ones that say we’re in the car manufacturing and sales business are not going to survive the big disruptive transition that is clearly coming.” Automakers are already adding features that cede some of a driver’s control to computers in the name of safety or convenience. Features available in some luxury cars, such as cruise control that uses sensors to maintain a safe distance behind other vehicles or automatic parallel parking, are indicators of an industry starting to think about how we drive, not just what we drive.

    Building and servicing intelligent transportation systems, such as the automatic parking feature and real-time traffic feeds, is already a $48 billion industry in the U.S., according to the Intelligent Transportation Society of America. Companies such as Intel and AT&T are eager to grab a piece of that by supplying the microchips and cellular services that help make cars smarter. “Autonomous driving is almost like an evolution of technology rather than a revolution, if you think about the technologies that have been put on vehicles” in recent years, says Chris Borroni-Bird, GM’s director of advanced technology vehicle concepts. His team is working to test the automaker’s EN-V vehicles—autonomous, electric concept cars that made a splash at the Shanghai World Expo in 2010—in the Chinese city of Tianjin.

    A major challenge for driverless roadways is finding a way for vehicles to safely and reliably communicate with one another. That requires getting all the automakers and regulatory agencies to agree on a standard. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration has begun studying various technologies for vehicle-to-vehicle communication and plans to make a decision by 2013 about whether to continue to study the issue and make rules to regulate it. The NHTSA says intervehicle communication could reduce up to 80 percent of vehicle crashes involving nonimpaired drivers. “That really is the moon shot,” says NHTSA Administrator David Strickland. Car-to-car communication could also allow cars to pass warnings about collisions or traffic to each other. Nevada received national attention this summer when the state enacted a new law requiring the creation of regulations governing autonomous vehicles on highways.

    State regulations, however, are far from my mind as the BMW I’m “driving” races through the Corkscrew. The car hugs the curve while taking a right turn, and the wheels thump off the track. An engineer reaches over to grab the wheel to keep us on the road. “Sorry about that,” he says, and later tells me the GPS signal was acting glitchy that day. Obviously, there are still issues to work out before we let go of the wheel for good.

    The bottom line: Intelligent transportation systems like self-parking cars are already a $48 billion business and a harbinger of autonomous driving.

    Higgins is a reporter for Bloomberg News.

     
    • Feckless Leader  •  Breckenridge, Colorado  •  5 months ago
      I see 1000's of driverless cars on I-25 in Denver all the time. People are eating, on the phone or even reading... what's the big deal?
    • Tony  •  5 months ago
      Pretty soon they will put up retina scanners everywhere and be able to stop crime before it happens using the pre-cogs
      • Looey 5 months ago
        And then using genetic code scans, and various drugs, prevent folks who would have criminal offspring from ever meeting! Police could sit back and become fat and lazy!
      • Richard 5 months ago
        hay #$%$ they allready made a movie about that.
      • Matt 5 months ago
        The cops can harass you even more
    • RichardP  •  5 months ago
      GPS is wonderful, but GPS is not reliable and accurate enough for controlling cars. Boats and Airplanes regularly use GPS, but the oceans and skies have a much greater margin for error. We know that GPS can be manipulated, the Iranians did it when they hijacked our drone.
    • citizen  •  5 months ago
      The Air France airbus at the bottom of the ocean was largely computerized. The gps signals are very weak and the receivers can be manipulated to read false information. How many computers crash every hour of every day?Computers cannot think or reason and are simply machines which can malfunction. If we dont exercise our bodies they will deteriorate. Human beings make computers. Computers do not make human beings. People who make computerized devices make a lot of money when they sell them to other people. Computers are not greedy. People can be greedy. Many people cannot think or do math because they rely on computers and do not develop their mental faculties. Computers can rob us of the joy of doing things ourselves. I want to drive my car. I do not want a computer driving my car. I do not want people to sell us computers we do not need because they want to make more and more money. I want to be a human being who functions instead of relying on a machine to do it for me! Computers can be useful but there is a limit. We do not want to lose our humanity to a machine!
      • Jon 5 months ago
        Absolutely correct.
      • Richard 5 months ago
        Wrong I want to sit in the BACK seat and let my car dtive itself
    • The Benjamins  •  Melville, New York  •  5 months ago
      Simple question: What about motorcycles. This whole idea seems to only make sense if everyone is in a car and everyone has autonomy. On the other hand, I believe most people would prefer auto drive and given the horrible driving habits of most people, it's definitely worth giving it to them. Just let me ride my motorbike in peace.
      • J 5 months ago
        I doubt motorcycles would become automated anytime soon. Most cyclists I know specifically buy them because they love being in control. There won't be a market for automated bikes, but like you say, there will be a huge one for cars.
    • butch.miner  •  5 months ago
      think what an ElectroMagnetic Pulse (EMP) would do.....
      • Looey 5 months ago
        It would only take that one to make the world's tallest auto wreck! A monument for many years to the virtues of automation in reducing overpopulation!!!
      • VincentA 5 months ago
        An EMP would do the same thing TODAY...All cars built in the last 5 years have chips in them
    • Joe D  •  Las Vegas, Nevada  •  5 months ago
      driverless cars can't be any worse than the idiot drivers here in Las Vegas, drivers out here will run over anything that walks in front of them
      • Joey 5 months ago
        Agreed, I have lived and driven there. However, it has to take the second spot to Lauderhill, Florifda a suburban hellhole in Ft Lauderdale, Florida, where one hundred cars in traffic may take you an hour to move around. You have to check your brain at the Georgia, Florida border, that is a partial brain coming out of Georgia. Between the old senile people, the drugggies and the Caribbean immigrants who never owned a car and still think they are in Jamaica, this is by far NO 1, stupid and rude drivers USA hands down!
    • todd  •  Sioux Falls, South Dakota  •  5 months ago
      in the year twenty five twenty five...cool song
    • Jon  •  Escondido, California  •  5 months ago
      Can anyone say SKYNET?
    • Jon  •  Escondido, California  •  5 months ago
      Take all the fun out of driving ,go ahead.
    • TheEndOfObamagedden  •  5 months ago
      "“Sorry about that,” he says, and later tells me the GPS signal was acting glitchy that day. "

      Yeah... FLASH! 500 million cars were in a pile-up today, killing 900 million people. Police investigations reveal that the cause of the accident was the GPS signal was glitchy.
    • Mike  •  5 months ago
      Locate John Connor.......Terminate John Connor.
    • Joey  •  Miami, Florida  •  5 months ago
      I hope they get this done fast. Please experiment in Lauderhill, Florida. The overpopulation and the #$%$s that drive here make this city the worst place in AQmerica to drive. I have lived and driven in many urban and rural areas of North America, Europe and even Mexico, the Caribbean, etc. There s guaranteed no worse drivers, no more drivers here that are too old and senile too drive, too drugged out to drive, too stupid too drive and too nasty to drive. If this area were automated, this would be a boon to the few capable and intelligent drivers in this area. If you think I am kidding, you have to see the cars that end up in canals, on the median upside down and you have to drive in rush hour traffic. While New york and Los Angeles and other major urban centers have loads more cars, they at least for the mosdt part were given brains. The people here have brains that have rotted out, or are the walking dead from the neck up. The drive the same way they manoeuver their shoipping carts in the supermarket without lookng at the aisle, just wha they want to look for to buy. Their driving is no different.Nasty, mean and rude and stupid behavior, the drivers here has made me a supporter of the death penalty for nasty, stupid, #$%$ic and unconscious driving. Can we use these people as crash dummies in the meantime, while you are testing driverless cars for the next few years. it would be a short term effective way to reduce accidents and get rid of #$%$s on and off the road while you are perfecting the #$%$ proof electronic GPS system.
    • Scott  •  5 months ago
      Stupidcide.
    • VincentA  •  5 months ago
      This will probably start with a well travelled route..say a Long Island Expressway park and ride to Wall Street...leaving everytime a 4 or 6 passenger vehicle fills up to go to a certain exit point...the company puts sensors in the roadway to keep it safe on track...pay one bridge/tunnel toll, share gas, use the HOV lane, which will have extra sensors for safety in case GPS goes out...companies expand it as it sees the need for certain routes...they could even advertise in the vehicles...think of it...sporting equipment and bars advertised on a trip to a ball game...soup and bread advertised on a trip to the supermarket...ok, pay more for a no ad vehicle...you are still saving money by not having to pay for the oil change, the windshield wipers, etc...
      It would reduce traffic tremendously, ease the wear and tear on infrastructure, decrease accidents...save energy (yeah, you would actually have to think about where you want to go if you paid per trip)...and migh even get more people walking or biking...
      Think of it as a VERY flexible railroad advancement...rail/taxi on demand...no track, takes you where you want to go...
      If you are cheap, you pay hub to hub and walk a few blocks...more pay gets you closer to your destination...but with no parking snarls or traffic in Manhatten, this could revolutionize city traffic...
    • VincentA  •  5 months ago
      I think it's brilliant...don't think of it as a web of control. Instead, each unit would have to be autonomous...I would pay about 15 bucks a day right now to not own a car, but be able to call a car to get me to and from work each day...even if I had to share part of my trip and it took longer...I could read or browse the net or communicate while riding.
      Don't pay for gas, insurance, or automobiles...the cars would pick you up and take you..no traffic because no one is cutting people off or getting into accidents.
      15 bucks per day...let the companies competing to be the most reliable pay for roads, gas, ans vehicle upkeep and maintainance...it could be active 22-23 hours per day...deliveries, commutes, shopping...you could call discount share cabs for less money or spurge for private ones...cameras in the cab for safety (and to fine the idiot who defaces the vehicle).
      Awesome possibilities.
    • lenber  •  Toronto, Canada  •  5 months ago
      " Companies such as Intel and AT&T are eager to grab a piece of that by supplying the microchips and cellular services that help make cars smarter."

      That is exactly what our society need to avoid, just to stay alive and try be more competent
      in a sane and safe environment.
    • ABCD  •  5 months ago
      it will never work
    • Bertorama  •  5 months ago
      No more DUI's...no more 85 year old drivers, plowing into pedestrians on the sidewalks...no more drag racers, putting the rest of our lives in danger...no more high speed chases for the police. Get used to it, it's coming soon.
    • Gene  •  5 months ago
      Now they come up with this convenience-when I'm too #$%$ old to fully employ the back seat Who said there's still justice in this world?

    RATES

    Stay in touch with Yahoo! Finance

      YAHOO! FINANCE ON TWITTER

    Subscribe

    [X]

    How to subscribe

    Roll over each section to subscribe using Add to My Yahoo! or RSS Feed feeds.

    Yahoo! News offers dozens of RSS feeds you can read in My Yahoo! or using third-party RSS news reader software. Click here to find out more about RSS and how you can use it with Yahoo! News.