In the short-term VTI does not seem to be like a good trade. Not sure how awesome-STOCKS finds all these incredible trade ideas but im happy.
What gives? What's with the new format? It wasn't broke - so why fix it? New finance portfolio page incomprehensible. There is a multitude of differences. A very simple one is that portfolios cannot even be alphabetized. I can't even figure out how to enter $cash$ in a portfolio. Did you by chance hire someone new who has the audacity to think he/she is smarter then the thousands of us who have used this site for years, and years, and years? PLEASE BRING BACK THE OLD FORMAT. PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE!!!!!
Has anyone noticed that US-Personal Finance format has gone thru another change in the last couple days. It now does not total up the funds in the Portfolio? It has not yet effected the Canada Yahoo Finance. Does anyone get what's going on in the USA format??
Vanguard Total Stock Market ET NYSE $VTI Correlation Histogram
X axis : Stocks Price Correlation Coefficient Y axis : Quantity of stocks Sep-2016 1,000 Day Parameter 4,338 NYSE Stocks Price Analysis This stock mode of correlation coefficient is -0.8 In other words, the correlation coefficient of the other stocks
Can dividend be automatic reinvest with this fund?
Does anyone use Robin Hood? Do they charge you for anything???
I never saw the old format .how was it better?
what's with up $.56--actually up $.16.Seems Yahoo is becoming undependable on everything.
can a checking account be opened in vtsax
yes Yahoo consistently changes what works and tries to sell how much better the change is for you!.
Does anyone like the new format? I see only disadvantages and am having to look elsewhere.
I can't understand why Yahoo changed this site. It's almost totally useless now. I have had to go to Vanguard and Fidelity directly to find information about my stock funds. Does anyone know why Yahoo did this?
Any suggestions on finding a new site?
WHAT??? THIS IS HORRIBLE - BRING BACK THE OLD FORMAT. Planned to stay with your site, but it does NOT have all the information I want and need.
Why would Yahoo make such a dramatic change? Makes no sense. I will start looking for another venue for tracking funds.
I think by now most users have switched over to another venue for tracking stocks and mutual funds. I know I have. I check back to see if you've gone back to the old and better format--apparently not. I hope your advertisers are happy, because your users are not.
I hate the new format. I want to know what the annual average returns for a fund are...each year... going back many years. The new format doesn't provide that.
This new format is missing essential information. Where is the total returns for 1, 5, 10 and more years?
The chart is missing labels to indicate what type of return that it is charting. No way to select total return or to show it.
Compared to the old format it is almost useless..
Where are the fund expense numbers?
I dislike (HATE) this new format. why change a good thing? Cannot locate the annual performance of each mutual fund; i.e. the annual win and loss for each year.