Wednesday, December 30, 2009, 12:23PM ET - U.S. Markets close in 3 hours and 37 minutes.

Hell hath no fury like an angry, baby-carrying mom armed with a blog, YouTube, and Twitter accounts.
Yesterday, Johnson & Johnson posted a Motrin ad on its Web site and on YouTube all about alleviating the pain of “baby wearing,” or toting around your baby in a sling. It was part of a broader ad campaign about the different pains Motrin can alleviate. In particular with this ad, JNJ tried to use humor to unite moms in some Oprah-like virtual high-five over the rigors of carrying around babies.
The controversial ad
Motrin united moms alright—only they united against J&J. What began over the weekend is continuing today as thousands of Tweets (as individual microblogging posts are called) are still flying about the scandal. Many moms said they felt patronized, disrespected and insulted with language that implied carrying a baby was a fashion accessory. “Supposedly it’s a real bonding experience,” and referring to carrying babies in slings as “these things.” (You can see the ad here)
What’s at the heart of this controversy? Authenticity on the web. The stakes are high in the realm of social media. The right ad—like Obama’s “Yes We Can” —can hit the right populist chord, and outperform even the most glitzy, expensive media buy. But a wrong ad can become not just an embarrassment but make your brand the object of an angry digital mob.
Motrin pulls the ad
Of course, if Motrin was hoping for a viral campaign, they got it. The outrage in the Twitter-verse guaranteed that far more moms saw the ad than those who would have visited the Motrin site. But judging by Motrin’s swift reaction, that wasn’t the intent.
The company apologized, removed the ads, which were also to be featured in magazines, and said on its site, “We are parents ourselves and we take feedback from moms very seriously.”
Lessons in social media
The lesson? If you’re going to produce an edgy ad that speaks for moms—or any group—in today’s fast-moving age of hot-headed Tweets and YouTube uploads, make sure it actually speaks for them. Given the swift megaphone bloggers have, it wouldn’t hurt to send a few of them the ad first and solicit feedback. That way, if a controversy does boil over, advertisers can be sure some thought leaders have their back. A marketer’s best bet is to get influencers on their side from the get-go and then brace for the best or worst in an effort to move swiftly to capitalize -- or quickly do damage control.
"I, as well as Dodie Smith, prefer slinging puppies as accessories, though carrying too many of them at once *can* lead to annoying aches and pains. Twitter that!" -Cruella de Vil, 1956.
Quotes and other information supplied by independent providers identified on the Yahoo! Finance partner page. Quotes are updated automatically, but will be turned off after 25 minutes of inactivity. Quotes are delayed at least 15 minutes for NASDAQ, NYSE and Amex. See also delay times for other exchanges. Real-Time continuous streaming quotes are available through our premium service. You may turn streaming quotes on or off. Fundamental company data provided by Capital IQ. Financials data provided by Edgar Online. Historical chart data and daily updates provided by Commodity Systems, Inc. (CSI). International historical chart data, daily updates, fund summary, fund performance, dividend data and Morningstar Index data provided by Morningstar, Inc. Analyst estimates data provided by Thomson Financial Network. All data provided by Thomson Financial Network is based solely upon research information provided by third party analysts. Yahoo! has not reviewed, and in no way endorses the validity of such data. Yahoo! and ThomsonFN shall not be liable for any actions taken in reliance thereon. All information provided "as is" for informational purposes only, not intended for trading purposes or advice. Neither Yahoo! nor any of independent providers is liable for any informational errors, incompleteness, or delays, or for any actions taken in reliance on information contained herein. By accessing the Yahoo! site, you agree not to redistribute the information found therein.
Yahoo! Finance User - Tuesday November 18, 2008 10:42PM EST
My mom sent me this article and I just watched the video. I didn't think it was politically incorrect....I just thought it wasn't funny. The women who "wear" their babies do so because they want to be good moms, not because a baby is a fashion accessory. It was an insulting ad, and my feelings were a bit hurt by it, even though I haven't had an infant to wear for over 5 years now (and I did wear both of mine, and I started with some pretty damn ugly slings). The women who were upset by it have the right to tell the company how they feel, and J&J has the right to keep airing the ad or pull it. I don't see why the posters here are so angry.