Tuesday, December 22, 2009, 8:22PM ET - U.S. Markets Closed.
To say 2008 has been a tough year for hedge funds would be to (under) state the obvious.
According to two former hedge fund managers, the industry was victimized by its own success.
"The money came in faster than their ability to manage it," said Rick Schottenfeld, chairman of Schottenfeld Group, a proprietary trading firm. "In order to move a big pool [of capital] they were forced into strategies that were leveraged-based, not alpha-based."
Alpha is a measure of a fund's risk-adjusted return; a higher alpha implies a better return vs. other investment objects with the same market risk.
During the low-volatility days of 2004-2007, many hedge funds gave the allusion of providing alpha. But "when there's a flood of capital, you run out of places to do things that create unique value," says Rob Roy, co-chief investment officer at Atlantic Advisors, which has about $3.5 billion under management. "You reach for things that allow you to create returns, which is different from value."
Indeed, the smooth returns of the hedge fund industry proved illusory when market volatility began to surge. Hedge funds posted losses averaging 22% this year through Nov. 24, Bloomberg reported.
As hedge fund performance tumbled this year, many investors clamored for their money back, which only put additional pressure on over-leveraged positions, hence the recent trend of funds halting redemptions.
Many hedge fund investors are in a "prisoner's dilemma," Schottenfeld says. "If they force the funds to open, there might not be any money left."
To Roy, a former hedge fund manager, this raises the question of whether hedge funds really are a suitable asset for all investors — including pension funds and endowments — as had been the trend prior to 2008. In 1990 there were just 610 hedge funds, with $38.9 billion under management, according to Vanity Fair. At the end of 2006 there were 9,462, with $1.5 trillion under management. (The industry's assets peaked at $1.9 trillion in June 2008, according to Bloomberg.)
"There needs to be a place for unbridled capitalism," Schottenfeld says. But "people need to change their expectations of hedge funds."
I think 2008 has taken care of that.
Withdrew your Investment in Hedge Fund........That is the best.......What they are saying is the skin........Not the meat the to the bone..........
unbridled capitalism? it was more like crony capitalism with big broker/dealer trading desks offering sweetheart loans to hedge funds allowing them to flood market with capital & manage badly. while, at the same time, these broker banks charged very high interest rates to PUBLIC companies with REAL production potential who needed capital to develop their REAL assets. these usury type borrow rates eventually bankrpted many of these previously growing companies. and often the assets were taken over by - guess who - hedge funds & private equity who had cheap money bestowed upon them. that's the free market that big finance has wrought.
Sell all the hedge funds let them run dry...........
"... they were forced into strategies that were leveraged-based, not alpha-based." Right. They had guns pointed at their heads, and were threatened with bodily harm. Yup. Not their fault, either. Everybody's hands are tainted, and hedge funds are amongst the dirtiest. F*
think about this. pensions funds investing in high risk hedge funds. that's a risk for very high gains or loss thru leverage. if they gain, pensions get fat & so does fund managers' salary, now, if they lose, who pays to make up the shortfall in pension payouts... PBGC, the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp. paid for by... you, the taxpayer. yes, that's you 401K holder who gets no such guaranty if your 401k funds takes a loss. in our cases, we just suffer this loss. too bad about us. we can't ever deduct these losses from our taxes. and government pensions will further get made whole by we, the taxpayer, we the chumps. that's what this latest brand of capitalism takes us for... chumps.
MOGLEYTHEMAN, WHY DO YOU ALWAYS WANT THE WEALTHY TO CARRY YOUR BURDEN. WHY NOT GO OUT AND BECOME WEALTHY YOURSELF AND FIND OUT WHAT IT IS ALL ABOUT? AMERICANS HAVE LEARNED TO TAKE FREE HANDOUTS INSTEAD OF BEING INNOVATIVE AND CREATIVE. AS MORE AND MORE PEOPLE LEARN TO LIVE ON ENTITLEMENTS, BLOATED SOCIAL SERVICES PROGRAMS AND OTHER WAYS NOT TO WORK, AMERICA FALLS FARTHER BEHIND. BE PART OF THE SOLUTION, NOT PART OF THE PROBLEM
"GLASS STIEGEL"REPEALLED IN 1999,, HEDGE FUNDS , WHAT TTHE HELL WERE THEY HEDGING CORN,TOILET PAPER.TURKEY TAILS, KLONDIKE TERRITORY YOUR"PENSIONS". "IRA, 401,HEDGING,SHORTING, LEVERAGING, NAKED SHORTING, I THOUGH THE STOCK MARJKET WAS TO INVEST IN AMERICA,,??,, WERES WAS THE OVERSIGHT,,,"SOMEBODIES"IN WASHINGTON DC, ARE RESPONSIBLE,,,,OVERSIGHT MY ASS
wall street blood suckers. betting on others suffering
mogleytheman comment to raise taxes on the rich is pathetic to say the least. Maybe he isn't old enough to remember the stagflation of the 70's when the top tax bracket was 78%. No capital investment took place, no jobs created and few businesses created. Why? Because no one wanted to bother risking any capital because if you were successful you would just have to give it all back to the government. So result was, high unemployment, recessions, a terrible stock market, little investment resulting in few technology changes all of which ended up hurting the middle and lower classes. That is until Reagan lowered the tax rate to 35%, then lo and behold investment capital poured in, technology boomed, business boomed and the world became a better place. Why do so many people have trouble gasping this concept? It it the talking heads on TV?...the liberal (and business ignorant) education system brainwashing our kids....or maybe the drinking water....who knows but thinking like that is dangerous.
mogleytheman comment to raise taxes on the rich is pathetic to say the least. Maybe he isn't old enough to remember the stagflation of the 70's when the top tax bracket was 78%. No capital investment took place, no jobs created and few businesses created. Why? Because no one wanted to bother risking any capital because if you were successful you would just have to give it all back to the government. So result was, high unemployment, recessions, a terrible stock market, little investment resulting in few technology changes all of which ended up hurting the middle and lower classes. That is until Reagan lowered the tax rate to 35%, then lo and behold investment capital poured in, technology boomed, business boomed and the world became a better place. Why do so many people have trouble gasping this concept? It it the talking heads on TV?...the liberal (and business ignorant) education system brainwashing our kids....or maybe the drinking water....who knows but thinking like that is dangerous.
There is a simple solution: don't invest with them. It's your money and you have the choice on what to do with it. I am not sure why some of you are so vindictive? Choice is everyone's option.
I have no sypathy to all them........They deserve to loss..They all suck your blood and meat to the bones.........get burn
The US in the 950-1960 period was lot better of as a country and as world power with 90% taxe on the wealthy. It is the greed of the new money crowd that is causig the problem now. There is a place for hedge funds but not for the jo six pac of the new money crowd.
It's true that when there is an excess of money for investments that means taxes are too low. We need to increase the tax rate on the wealthy between 5 and 10 percent in order to remove this excess money which is messing up the markets for the rest of us. Besides, there are very pressing infrastructure problems that need to be dealt with in our dying country. The wealthy here have had a free ride for too long, since Reagan, and they have grown accustmed to thinking they are not obligated to pay dues in order to live in a fine country club like our nation. They have been a very disloyal bunch.
(The industry's assets peaked at $1.9 trillion in June 2008, according to Bloomberg.) And oil went up to $147/barrel in July 2008. Coincidence, I think not. There hasn't been a severe supply disruption since Katrina in 2005, yet oil skyrocketed. Along with a lot of other commodities, like corn, steel, gold, etc. Sounds like speculators to me. I hope they lose their shirts, because most of us almost did.
They're telling everyone to not pull their money out, while their friends, you betcha bottom dollar, are cashing out. If you listen to these hedge hogs, guess who'll be left holding the bag when "there is no money left to cash out"? Hahaha, that's what you greedy suckers get for investing in these hedge hogs!
Hmmm... Hedge funds lost 20%+ and the Dow has lost around 45%.
Quotes and other information supplied by independent providers identified on the Yahoo! Finance partner page. Quotes are updated automatically, but will be turned off after 25 minutes of inactivity. Quotes are delayed at least 15 minutes for NASDAQ, NYSE and Amex. See also delay times for other exchanges. Real-Time continuous streaming quotes are available through our premium service. You may turn streaming quotes on or off. Fundamental company data provided by Capital IQ. Financials data provided by Edgar Online. Historical chart data and daily updates provided by Commodity Systems, Inc. (CSI). International historical chart data, daily updates, fund summary, fund performance, dividend data and Morningstar Index data provided by Morningstar, Inc. Analyst estimates data provided by Thomson Financial Network. All data provided by Thomson Financial Network is based solely upon research information provided by third party analysts. Yahoo! has not reviewed, and in no way endorses the validity of such data. Yahoo! and ThomsonFN shall not be liable for any actions taken in reliance thereon. All information provided "as is" for informational purposes only, not intended for trading purposes or advice. Neither Yahoo! nor any of independent providers is liable for any informational errors, incompleteness, or delays, or for any actions taken in reliance on information contained herein. By accessing the Yahoo! site, you agree not to redistribute the information found therein.
william - Wednesday December 10, 2008 08:03AM EST
Simple solution to this problem, raise taxes on incomes above 400K to 78% In all of our history taxes on the wealthy were higher. In 1985 taxes were lowered on the wealthy, other cuts have occured in Capitol gains and other corpoprate rates to basiclly reduce federal income to the same levels they were leading up to the great depression.