Friday, September 5, 2008, 7:35PM ET - U.S. Markets Closed.

Microsoft Walking From Yahoo Deal, Will Not Pursue Hostile

Posted May 03, 2008 11:48pm EDT by Henry Blodget in Internet, Newsmakers, Venture Capital, M and A, IPOs

From Silicon Alley Insider, May 3, 2008: 

Microsoft is withdrawing its bid for Yahoo. It will not pursue a hostile proxy battle.

Microsoft raised its bid to $33. Yahoo's board wanted $37 (Jerry Yang and David Filo reportedly wanted $38.)

Microsoft's release and a gracious letter from Steve Ballmer hit the wires at 7:56 ET. Copy below.

We expect Yahoo's stock will drop to at least the low $20s on this news. Microsoft's should rise.

We think this is a smart move by Microsoft for four reasons:

  • We think the combination as proposed would have been a disaster.
  • We think $37 a share would have been too much to pay.
  • We think there is a reasonable chance that Microsoft might be able to buy Yahoo for less than $30 in six months to a year if Yahoo can't get its act together.

We think Yahoo is taking a big risk not accepting $33, especially if the offer was cash, and we imagine Yahoo shareholder frustration will be intense. We hope Yahoo continues to pursue its search outsourcing deal with Google, as well as its discussions with Time Warner over AOL. We suspect Microsoft might immediately emerge as a counter-bidder for AOL.

Release:

Microsoft Corp. today announced that it has withdrawn its proposal to acquire Yahoo! Inc.

"We continue to believe that our proposed acquisition made sense for Microsoft, Yahoo! and the market as a whole. Our goal in pursuing a combination with Yahoo! was to provide greater choice and innovation in the marketplace and create real value for our respective stockholders and employees," said Steve Ballmer, chief executive officer of Microsoft.

"Despite our best efforts, including raising our bid by roughly $5 billion, Yahoo! has not moved toward accepting our offer. After careful consideration, we believe the economics demanded by Yahoo! do not make sense for us, and it is in the best interests of Microsoft stockholders, employees and other stakeholders to withdraw our proposal," said Ballmer.

"We have a talented team in place and a compelling plan to grow our business through innovative new services and strategic transactions with other business partners. While Yahoo! would have accelerated our strategy, I am confident that we can continue to move forward toward our goals," Ballmer said.

"We are investing heavily in new tools and Web experiences, we have dramatically improved our search performance and advertiser satisfaction, and we will continue to build our scale through organic growth and partnerships," said Kevin Johnson, Microsoft president for platforms and services.

    Below is the text of the letter from Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer to Yahoo! CEO Jerry Yang.


May 3, 2008


Mr. Jerry Yang
CEO and Chief Yahoo
Yahoo! Inc.
701 First Avenue
Sunnyvale, CA 94089


    Dear Jerry:

After over three months, we have reached the conclusion of the process regarding a possible combination of Microsoft and Yahoo!.

I first want to convey my personal thanks to you, your management team, and Yahoo!'s Board of Directors for your consideration of our proposal. I appreciate the time and attention all of you have given to this matter, and I especially appreciate the time that you have invested personally. I feel that our discussions this week have been particularly useful, providing me for the first time with real clarity on what is and is not possible.

I am disappointed that Yahoo! has not moved towards accepting our offer. I first called you with our offer on January 31 because I believed that a combination of our two companies would have created real value for our respective shareholders and would have provided consumers, publishers, and advertisers with greater innovation and choice in the marketplace. Our decision to offer a 62 percent premium at that time reflected the strength of these convictions.

In our conversations this week, we conveyed our willingness to raise our offer to $33.00 per share, reflecting again our belief in this collective opportunity. This increase would have added approximately another $5 billion of value to your shareholders, compared to the current value of our initial offer. It also would have reflected a premium of over 70 percent compared to the price at which your stock closed on January 31. Yet it has proven insufficient, as your final position insisted on Microsoft paying yet another $5 billion or more, or at least another $4 per share above our $33.00 offer.

Also, after giving this week's conversations further thought, it is clear to me that it is not sensible for Microsoft to take our offer directly to your shareholders. This approach would necessarily involve a protracted proxy contest and eventually an exchange offer. Our discussions with you have led us to conclude that, in the interim, you would take steps that would make Yahoo! undesirable as an acquisition for Microsoft.

We regard with particular concern your apparent planning to respond to a "hostile" bid by pursuing a new arrangement that would involve or lead to the outsourcing to Google of key paid Internet search terms offered by Yahoo! today. In our view, such an arrangement with the dominant search provider would make an acquisition of Yahoo! undesirable to us for a number of reasons:

    -- First, it would fundamentally undermine Yahoo!'s own strategy and long-term viability by encouraging advertisers to use Google as opposed to your Panama paid search system. This would also fragment your search advertising and display advertising strategies and the ecosystem surrounding them. This would undermine the reliance on your display advertising business to fuel future growth.

    -- Given this, it would impair Yahoo's ability to retain the talented engineers working on advertising systems that are important to our interest in a combination of our companies.

    -- In addition, it would raise a host of regulatory and legal problems that no acquirer, including Microsoft, would want to inherit. Among other things, this would consolidate market share with the already-dominant paid search provider in a manner that would reduce competition and choice in the marketplace.

    -- This would also effectively enable Google to set the prices for key search terms on both their and your search platforms and, in the process, raise prices charged to advertisers on Yahoo. In addition to whatever resulting legal problems, this seems unwise from a business perspective unless in fact one simply wishes to use this as a vehicle to exit the paid search business in favor of Google.

    -- It could foreclose any chance of a combination with any other search provider that is not already relying on Google's search services.

Accordingly, your apparent plan to pursue such an arrangement in the event of a proxy contest or exchange offer leads me to the firm decision not to pursue such a path. Instead, I hereby formally withdraw Microsoft's proposal to acquire Yahoo!.

We will move forward and will continue to innovate and grow our business at Microsoft with the talented team we have in place and potentially through strategic transactions with other business partners.

I still believe even today that our offer remains the only alternative put forward that provides your stockholders full and fair value for their shares. By failing to reach an agreement with us, you and your stockholders have left significant value on the table.

But clearly a deal is not to be.

Thank you again for the time we have spent together discussing this.

Sincerely yours,
/s/ Steven A. Ballmer

73 Comments

you
vinman20 - Saturday May 03, 2008 11:59PM EDT

Yang is going to get sued if this deal dies. 33 was very fair. Maybe Yahoo should buy back my shares @ 33.

cmdunn1972
cmdunn1972 - Sunday May 04, 2008 12:23AM EDT

One must wonder if the next big merger in the tech industry would be a posible merger between Apple and Google.

you
Jay S - Sunday May 04, 2008 12:50AM EDT

good for Microsoft... walk, walk, walk! i dont think this deal would've been good for either of holding shareholders! yahoo needs to get its act together.

you
dinkar1 - Sunday May 04, 2008 01:00AM EDT

what a nut ,jerry ,google will eat you and humilate you ,it is a new monopoly worse than redmond ,

you
ericdcr1 - Sunday May 04, 2008 01:16AM EDT

This is going to really anger the shareholders who bought in at the 26 - 28 range hoping to make a few bucks when the stock sold for 32 - 34. Monday should see a drop back to 20 - 22 a share, maybe teens.

you
Ken L - Sunday May 04, 2008 02:04AM EDT

Yahoo-Yang blew it and Microsoft knows it. Clearly, Microsft's goals (and needs) are to gain "at least some ground" in online advertising, a space that Google owns. However, that merger was the only way out for Yahoo-Yang and its shareholders. Yahoo's stock will tank on Monday and Billy-Boy's will be in the low 30's, if not higher. Great job Yang. I'd want you as my leader - IDIOT!.

you
pauly6734 - Sunday May 04, 2008 02:11AM EDT

Six months ago Yhoo was trading at 33.9 without microsoft's bid.

Yahoo! Finance User
Yahoo! Finance User - Sunday May 04, 2008 02:54AM EDT

Finally! Now, watch the MSFT stock price go way up again!

you
blasacoma - Sunday May 04, 2008 03:49AM EDT

What a big idiot jerry yang is, yahoo stock will never ever see thirty again. Back down to 20 on Monday and when the markets turn down again after this myopic bear market rally, yahoo stock will sink to 10 by the end of 08. What fools the yahoo people are, do they really think that idiot ben and co., fixed the markets and that it is all just going to be a smooth uphill ride for the rest of 08, that the numbers that the govt., is putting out on gdp and jobs are real? That the consumer is really spending? Yahoo at 10 by the end of 08, what a fool you are yang, you should go back to stanford and take a class "how not to be such a fool!"

Yahoo! Finance User
Yahoo! Finance User - Sunday May 04, 2008 03:53AM EDT

I think Microsoft offered a fair price which would be good for both company sharholders in the long run. As a MSFT shareholder I am glad that MS walked away. I really congratulate Ballmer for not taking this thing as personal and for walking away keeping the best interest of the share holders.

Yahoo! Finance User
Yahoo! Finance User - Sunday May 04, 2008 04:31AM EDT

I have nothing to say but sell all my shares on Monday!

Yahoo! Finance User
Yahoo! Finance User - Sunday May 04, 2008 04:53AM EDT

If the shareholders have no faith in Yahoo!, they had ample time to dump it. If they didn’t, its greed or stupidity. They could’ve folded but waited for the River card. So they have nobody to blame but themselves. People never learn from Kenny Rogers. Of course I’m hoping that Yahoo! really can execute and right the ship.

Jolante Y
Jolante Y - Sunday May 04, 2008 04:59AM EDT

Thanks alot Yahoo, just when the stockholders like myself finally have a glimpse of light and believe that you actually cared about us, you go and make a bone head decision and cost us to loose out tremendously. My childrens education fund truly thanks you. I guess as a shareholder you guys don't think about this because you have millions of dollars and your future is secure. The problem is that the common workers like myself, who invest our money into companies like yours, always seem to be the last person to have a voice in these big decisions. I am going to sell every share on Monday as soon as the stock market opens and take my 20,000-50,000 dollar loss. Once again, thanks for being a selfish company and forgetting about all of us whom have stayed invested with you, even when you were drowning. Regards, Jolante

you
jaycee - Sunday May 04, 2008 05:25AM EDT

I hold stock/option positions in both companies, but 5 times as many Microsoft shares as Yahoo shares. I applaud Microsoft's protracted attempt to 'create' an opportunity in the marketplace..and their decision to back off for now and look at more viable options. Microsoft management has clearly demonstrated that it is not the stodgy, lackluster company that a lot of people were thinking it was. And we need to realize how hard it is for Jerry Yang to part with his 'baby' but more than that the bigger picture, meaning that this is a market with huge potential for not only one or two market entrants.

you
chefs_jobs - Sunday May 04, 2008 05:37AM EDT

that was a lot of money 53 billion, some of that could be better spent on developing MSN. A google monopoly is not good for the web i think there is space for 3 web engines. I do not think microsoft will put in another offer in the next couple of years

you
david j - Sunday May 04, 2008 06:43AM EDT

This is a Yahoo blunder. A close Yhoo/Goog business partnership can't work, practically and/or regulatorily. MSFT's offer was generous and JY should have put aside his ego. Ballmer and his negotiating team are astute and if they still want Yhoo will get it for less than their last offer. Yhoo's search engine seems even less effective than it was a few years ago while Goog's is even better. Many home pages that were Yhoo are transforming to Goog - out of sight, out of mind Yhoo!!!! Yhoo lost its way years ago when it was riding high and in this type of business if you lose the high ground to another giant there is no recovery possible because you can't diversify or become a conglomerate. That is MSFT's genious - it is a conglomerate of its own brilliant inventions, even more so than 5 years ago and so will grow in several ways. Yhoo does not have these tech or management skills. As the saying goes, MSFT will be back to pick up a dispirited Yhoo. And JY may soon be out of a job...

jesus d
jesus d - Sunday May 04, 2008 07:09AM EDT

I think Yahoo is a good company and there was great potential with a MSFT merger. I dont deride MSFT saying thanks but no thanks, too bad for people with Yahoo, I will be a vulture picking up the remains from poor longers.

you
Bobbydee - Sunday May 04, 2008 07:25AM EDT

I'm glad I only lost $800. I thought JY had more sense that he displayed. I underestimated his stubborness. Back to the biotechs for me.

you
constant - Sunday May 04, 2008 08:01AM EDT

A fool and his money are soon departed--will jerry get a bonus for screwing up.

you
kym27d - Sunday May 04, 2008 08:30AM EDT

Jerry just looks like an idiot... I don't mean figureativley

Post a Comment

you
Sorry. There was an error posting your comment. Please try again later.
Yahoo! reserves the right to refuse, or remove any comment that does not comply with the Yahoo! Terms of Service. The submission of spam, hateful, or obscene messages may result in the termination of your Yahoo! ID.
About Tech Ticker - Send FeedbackDisclaimer. Copyright © 2007 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Copyright/IP Policy - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy - Help
Quotes delayed, except where indicated otherwise. Delay times are 15 mins for NASDAQ, NYSE and Amex. See also delay times for other exchanges.

Quotes and other information supplied by independent providers identified on the Yahoo! Finance partner page. Quotes are updated automatically, but will be turned off after 25 minutes of inactivity. Quotes are delayed at least 15 minutes for NASDAQ, NYSE and Amex. See also delay times for other exchanges. Real-Time continuous streaming quotes are available through our premium service. You may turn streaming quotes on or off. Fundamental company data provided by Capital IQ. Financials data provided by Edgar Online. Dividend data provided by Hemscott Americas. Historical chart data and daily updates provided by Commodity Systems, Inc. (CSI). International historical chart data and daily updates provided by Hemscott Americas. Fund summary, fund performance and Morningstar Index data provided by Morningstar. Analyst estimates data provided by Thomson Financial Network. All data provided by Thomson Financial Network is based solely upon research information provided by third party analysts. Yahoo! has not reviewed, and in no way endorses the validity of such data. Yahoo! and ThomsonFN shall not be liable for any actions taken in reliance thereon. All information provided "as is" for informational purposes only, not intended for trading purposes or advice. Neither Yahoo! nor any of independent providers is liable for any informational errors, incompleteness, or delays, or for any actions taken in reliance on information contained herein. By accessing the Yahoo! site, you agree not to redistribute the information found therein.