Saturday, December 26, 2009, 3:19PM ET - U.S. Markets Closed.

Shilling: Housing Market Could Fall Another 20 Percent

Posted Jan 06, 2009 08:30am EST by Aaron Task in Investing, Recession, Housing

The already crumbling housing market could plummet an additional 20%, says Gary Shilling, president of A. Gary Shilling & Co., and author of the popular INSIGHT newsletter.

Although housing is already down 25% peak-to-trough based on the latest S&P/Case-Shiller numbers, there's no near-term bottom in sight, says Shilling, one economist who presciently saw the crash coming.

Excess inventory - nearly a year's worth supply - is the "mortal enemy" of any recovery in housing, says Shilling, who does not believe the Fed's efforts to lower mortgage rates will resolve the crisis.  

Barring a prolonged period of weaker prices, Shilling believes only radical action - like bulldozing homes or letting immigrants into America to buy homes - can solve the crisis, as detailed here last month.  

Plus, Shilling's predictions for 2009. 

Click "more" to embed the new video. 

 
Go to Tech Ticker
108 votes|Recommend this

241 Comments

Yahoo! Finance User
Yahoo! Finance User - Tuesday January 06, 2009 11:06AM EST

Instead of moving to China, do not purchase products made in China, where would the jobs go then? Now that gas prices have come down, what happen to the bandwagon of finding alternate means? The day after 911 almost every vehicle, house and business flew the american flag, where are the flags now? So the banks are not lending.....what would happen if every account holder at BOA pulled there money out in protest? It would require a radical act such as this to get them to start lending again, if not let them sink. Then move on to the next largest bank and do the same, we need another tea party type movement to send a message to the Feds.

RainbowMeow
RainbowMeow - Tuesday January 06, 2009 11:14AM EST

I foresee an absolute collapse in real estate in NYC.

STORMSTOCKER1
STORMSTOCKER1 - Tuesday January 06, 2009 11:22AM EST

Yeah, right Henry,"The Government", will "buy up" all the "toxic mortgages".A Stimulus Package of What and by WHOM? AND WITH WHAT MONEY?? THE TAXPAYERS MONEY?...The Taxpayer is Broke!! The GOVY Gravy Train has rode this rail over the Cliff. TAX CORPORATIONS?... and they pass the "TAX-COST" ON to the consumers, again, the taxpayer! ALL Governments,FED,STATE,COUNTY,CITY, has got to quite spending and start CUTTING, Income Taxes, Sales Taxes,Property Taxes, Fees,Licenses,ETC. ETC.Our Economy "IS OUT OF BALANCE" Government has "Free Healthcare","Subsidized Housing","Early Retirement Lifetime Pensions and Healthcare"....what does the Non-Government employees Have? Dnt.Hv.SHT!! Just More Taxes.

Yahoo! Finance User
Yahoo! Finance User - Tuesday January 06, 2009 11:27AM EST

The real estate boom was made possible by America borrowing 2 to 3 billion dollars a day from overseas. Common sense tells you that this was not sustainable. And, not if but when these nations stop lending to America, the sh** will hit the fan. Bye, bye real estate. Ten cents in the dollar for your home.

Ray Fun Relax
Ray Fun Relax - Tuesday January 06, 2009 11:35AM EST

I am a renter. I like home prices to fall 25% so that I can buy one. Presently I cannot afford it. Many homeowners would also buy a bigger house if home prices fall another 25%. Even if home prices fall 50%, the mortgage's monthly payment is FIXED. So the homeowner's monthly costs have NOT increased. I don't see any problem - falling home prices is good for the renters.

sukiyaki
sukiyaki - Tuesday January 06, 2009 11:46AM EST

Gary Schilling is the new Dr.Doom

CarlosL
CarlosL - Tuesday January 06, 2009 11:49AM EST

Well the excess inventories will come down to equilibrium with time is goint to be sometime before we call it the end of the bubble.

Yahoo! Finance User
Yahoo! Finance User - Tuesday January 06, 2009 11:54AM EST

No recovery yet. In CA, the housing inventory is 3 times the 2002 & 2003 inventories when hi-tech downturn hit bayarea. The median prices are still higher than the avg 4-6 times median income. Therefore, prices need to go down to here average buyer can afford. Also, qualifying for loan is no longer possible for many buyers with undocumented (tax evasion) earnings and not able to afford as there are no longer mortgage lenders (Countrywide, IndyMac, etc) who offer teaser-rates. This was a historic housing bubble, and it will take long time to clear and recover. Moreover, 68 million houses owned 70 million baby-boomers are now ready to retire and their houses will coming to add to housing inventory.

AceF
AceF - Tuesday January 06, 2009 11:55AM EST

In the SF Bay Area the Med Price was 200K in 1997 then it skyrocketed past 750K... It will take more than 50% to get back to normal price to income ratios. The past bubbles were nothing like what we saw today. I wonder why no one is investigating the realtors for all the nonsense and fraud they commited.

AceF
AceF - Tuesday January 06, 2009 11:59AM EST

Actually Y!User.. the decline is the recovery!

David
David - Tuesday January 06, 2009 12:00PM EST

I sure do love turbulent markrts - every idiot who's made a million wrong predictions over the course of time makes one that hits. Then they want you to believe their next prediction is bassed on strong track record. One right out of a million wrongs aren't odds I'll bet with.

Yahoo! Finance User
Yahoo! Finance User - Tuesday January 06, 2009 12:02PM EST

Not many shows will take this Schilling clown hence why he keeps coming back to this gig. Look at history - a fall like 2008's has never been followed by a fall like the one he is predicting. Is it possible? Yes. Is it probable? Not even close. I know, I know - this time's different, right? Isn't that what we said in the tech bubble? And in S&L crisis? And in 1987? And in the 70's? You get my drift. THIS ISN'T DIFFERENT THIS TIME!!

Yahoo! Finance User
Yahoo! Finance User - Tuesday January 06, 2009 12:04PM EST

Another 20% would be a mediun home price of around 150K. The yearly interest is will be less than that of renting. Using the 25% of gross income you get about 40K to buy the medium home. The medium income is 48K. We have almost never had a situation were the medium income could afford the medium home because they are not the same thing. The medium home is homes for the top 70-80% while the medium income includes all 100%. I calculated based upon historic data of medium income vs medium hous payment (that years interest rate assuming 10% down) and came up with a price of 185K. For every 10% drop millions of renters will be pushed into the market. catinabank is correct about the real problem.

Yahoo! Finance User
Yahoo! Finance User - Tuesday January 06, 2009 12:07PM EST

Anyone that thinks we have hit the bottomis clueless about economics. There is absolutely no catalyst in sight to stop the falling real estate prices. 1 - A huge supply (really, really huge) and almost no demand - pices fall. 2 - While interest rates are low, credit is severly tight. You need a 780 FICO score and 20% downpayment to even be considered. There are some people that fit that, but very, very few. People that do qualify, see prices falling faster and faster. Why buy now? That is just foolish. The most basic financial rule is NEVER pay intest (use leverage) to but an asset that is falling in value. The only way to hit bottom is to have prices fall dramatically further, tot he point that a house is affordable in the current economic circumstances (we have a long way to go baby). Or alternatively, the banks need to dramatically relax the lending standards again, so people can buy and increase demand. But that is what got us into the problem in the first place.

Yahoo! Finance User
Yahoo! Finance User - Tuesday January 06, 2009 12:08PM EST

Anyone that thinks we have hit the bottomis clueless about economics. There is absolutely no catalyst in sight to stop the falling real estate prices. 1 - A huge supply (really, really huge) and almost no demand - pices fall. 2 - While interest rates are low, credit is severly tight. You need a 780 FICO score and 20% downpayment to even be considered. There are some people that fit that, but very, very few. People that do qualify, see prices falling faster and faster. Why buy now? That is just foolish. The most basic financial rule is NEVER pay intest (use leverage) to but an asset that is falling in value. The only way to hit bottom is to have prices fall dramatically further, tot he point that a house is affordable in the current economic circumstances (we have a long way to go baby). Or alternatively, the banks need to dramatically relax the lending standards again, so people can buy and increase demand. But that is what got us into the problem in the first place.

Thomas Nelson
Thomas Nelson - Tuesday January 06, 2009 12:09PM EST

Anyone that thinks we have hit the bottomis clueless about economics. There is absolutely no catalyst in sight to stop the falling real estate prices. 1 - A huge supply (really, really huge) and almost no demand - pices fall. 2 - While interest rates are low, credit is severly tight. You need a 780 FICO score and 20% downpayment to even be considered. There are some people that fit that, but very, very few. People that do qualify, see prices falling faster and faster. Why buy now? That is just foolish. The most basic financial rule is NEVER pay intest (use leverage) to but an asset that is falling in value. The only way to hit bottom is to have prices fall dramatically further, tot he point that a house is affordable in the current economic circumstances (we have a long way to go baby). Or alternatively, the banks need to dramatically relax the lending standards again, so people can buy and increase demand. But that is what got us into the problem in the first place.

M
M - Tuesday January 06, 2009 12:12PM EST

If you want to but a home here in CA, good luck. Just for a mediocre home you need a family income of at least 106K. Even then, the banks are making it harder to qualify. So even if the market drops another 20% here, it doesn't mean squat. This country has too much red-tape with just about everything from tax forms to bank loans. Just wish it was alot simpler, sheesh!.

Blam
Blam - Tuesday January 06, 2009 12:29PM EST

AFAIK, robert schiller testified at congress in 2005-2006, housing price was 70% over-priced. then about 1 year later, he said it was 50% over-priced. it's been only 1 and half year of decline. it would be foolish to believe it can bounce back from now. if you're going to buy, make sure you can weather 20-25% further down side...

Yahoo! Finance User
Yahoo! Finance User - Tuesday January 06, 2009 12:31PM EST

I don't care the housing price. I love my house which I bought for $1.1M and went up to $2.2M and back down to $1.8M. I intend to live in and pass to my kid. I won't sell it if either goes up to $10M or down to $1.

wuuj
wuuj - Tuesday January 06, 2009 12:32PM EST

Let's bulldoze Shilling's house.

Yahoo! reserves the right to refuse, or remove any comment that does not comply with the Yahoo! Terms of Service. The submission of spam, hateful, or obscene messages may result in the termination of your Yahoo! ID.
About Tech Ticker - Send FeedbackDisclaimer. Copyright © 2007 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Copyright/IP Policy - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy - Help
Quotes delayed, except where indicated otherwise. Delay times are 15 mins for NASDAQ, NYSE and Amex. See also delay times for other exchanges.

Quotes and other information supplied by independent providers identified on the Yahoo! Finance partner page. Quotes are updated automatically, but will be turned off after 25 minutes of inactivity. Quotes are delayed at least 15 minutes for NASDAQ, NYSE and Amex. See also delay times for other exchanges. Real-Time continuous streaming quotes are available through our premium service. You may turn streaming quotes on or off. Fundamental company data provided by Capital IQ. Financials data provided by Edgar Online. Historical chart data and daily updates provided by Commodity Systems, Inc. (CSI). International historical chart data, daily updates, fund summary, fund performance, dividend data and Morningstar Index data provided by Morningstar, Inc. Analyst estimates data provided by Thomson Financial Network. All data provided by Thomson Financial Network is based solely upon research information provided by third party analysts. Yahoo! has not reviewed, and in no way endorses the validity of such data. Yahoo! and ThomsonFN shall not be liable for any actions taken in reliance thereon. All information provided "as is" for informational purposes only, not intended for trading purposes or advice. Neither Yahoo! nor any of independent providers is liable for any informational errors, incompleteness, or delays, or for any actions taken in reliance on information contained herein. By accessing the Yahoo! site, you agree not to redistribute the information found therein.