Tuesday, December 15, 2009, 8:15AM ET - U.S. Markets open in 1 hour and 15 minutes.

Wall Street's Sick Psychology of Entitlement

Posted Jan 22, 2009 10:12pm EST by John Carney in Banking

From Clusterstock.com

 The news that Merrill Lynch paid out $15 billion in bonuses is sure to ignite new questions about the wisdom of bailing out Wall Street. Merrill Lynch took $10 billion from the TARP, allegedly to fill holes in its balance sheet. But instead of using that to repair its financial health, it simply put the money into the pockets of its employees. There is no way to defend this disgusting payout.

But that won’t stop Bank of America, which now owns Merrill, from defending the bonuses. And across Wall Street there are lots of people who actually believe that Merrill did the right thing.

How can so many smart people be so dumb?

Easily. There is a sick psychology of entitlement on Wall Street that was created during the bubble years. Many simply cannot believe that they do not deserve huge pay packages. Their brains have no caught up with the idea that they are working in broken institutions that would be unable to pay to keep the lights on if not for the fact that Washington has given them billions of taxpayer dollars.

Of course, smart people are very good at rationalizing their fantasies, especially when the fantasy serves to make them money. There are three rationales they’ll offer when pressed on this. Each one is easily skewered.

  • "We made money. It was just one part of the firm that lost it all. So we deserve to be paid."  Sorry, buddy. That’s not the way capitalism works. Ask the guy who just lost his job installing seat belts in GM cars. He was really good at that but since no one is buying those cars, he’s out of a job.  Being really good at what you do doesn’t matter if your firm is broke—and your firm is broke. It’s now on taxpayer supported life-support.
  • "We didn’t use taxpayer money to pay the bonuses." This is the most ridiculous idea ever. Money is fungible. If you use billions to pay bonuses and then need to ask the government for money to stay alive, you are using taxpayer money to fill in the hole you dug by paying the bonuses.
  • "We’ll lose all the greatest people if we don’t pay them." Oh really? Where will they go? Who, exactly, is going to hire them? Also: so what? That’s how capitalism works. Failing firms that cannot afford to pay for talent lose that talent to successful firms. That’s an important part of market discipline.
  • "If we don't pay bonuses when firms take the TARP, they won't take it." This is the most sophisticated argument for huge bonuses. In Germany, this actually happened. As it turns out, executives would rather risk their firm collapsing due to lack of capital than give up their big paydays. But there's an easy solution to this: throw the bastards out. The boards of every single financial company that turned down bailout bucks with a bonus limit cuuld demand a full accounting of why a bank's executives think it is healthy enough to forego a bailout. And if they aren't satisfied they should just fire the management.

Look. We’re not hysterical opponents of paying big bonuses. Actually, I'm on the record as defending huge bonuses from a couple of years ago. If your firm makes money, it can decide how to reward its employees. If it loses money, it can still decide to pay bonuses if it still has cash on hand. But when you pay yourself a bonus with taxpayer money you are simply taking money from someone who earned it and giving it to someone who didn't. If the government hadn’t supplied the means for redistributing that money, you’d just be a mugger.

It was only a few months ago that we were being told that Merrill Lynch, among others, desperately needed billions of dollars to survive, that without injections of new capital the financial system would come crashing down around us. If any of this was true, it should have been impossible for Merrill to pay out $15 billion in bonuses. Even the sharpest critics of the bailout never imagined that it would be used to make wealthy idiots even wealthier.

All of this is a reminder of why it is very, very dangerous to allow the government to rescue firms instead of allowing the market to decide who should survive. Perhaps instead of a bailout, we should have confined the TARP to overseeing the orderly disolution of failed financial institutions.

 

Go to Tech Ticker
335 votes|Recommend this

186 Comments

Yahoo! Finance User
Yahoo! Finance User - Thursday January 22, 2009 10:31PM EST

Welcome to serfdom! The elites get what the want without recourse and the masses get to sit on their hands. We are about to confirm a tax cheat as the head of the IRS. This is not surprising. Who is going to bring charges against these guys and put them in jail. our government? Are you kidding? They're encouraging this activity. An SEC employee finds impropriety with the head of a Wall Street bank (Mack), flags it, and promptly gets fired. This is the reward for honesty. I think I'll go out and buy a house I can't afford, a car I can't afford, and take vacations I can't afford....then stick my hound out for my government check!

__A_YAHOO_USER__
__A_YAHOO_USER__ - Thursday January 22, 2009 10:34PM EST

It's their minds that have been effected......

Duke M
Duke M - Thursday January 22, 2009 10:34PM EST

Every time there is a problem, the gov't thinks throwing money at it will solve it. That is not how capitalism works. Sink or swim time baby. Also I have been hearing that First Merit initially refused the bailout money, but was told if they didn't take it someone else would, and First Merit would be bought out by whichever bank did. So First Merit is being forced to take the loan, pay back at 8% AND sell the federal gov't shares in the company. Making this socialism. Does anyone know if this is true or not?

Yahoo! Finance User
Yahoo! Finance User - Thursday January 22, 2009 10:34PM EST

Sorry for the spelling. the - they, hound, hand...etc...

StevenB
StevenB - Thursday January 22, 2009 10:35PM EST

Congress, the President, the state legislatures, and the state governors can still direct the appropriate agencies to declare the "zombie banks" and other "zombie financial firms" officially insolvent, force those institutions irrevocably into receivership (or whatever similar thing can be done to firms that don't answer to the FDIC), force the write-downs and fire sales to make the "troubled assets" stop stinking, and restart the financial system. This won't stimulate the economy (that still needs to happen), but it will plug the worst leaks in the system. (Thank you, Paul Kedrosky, for that excellent term "zombie banks;" you were talking about functionally insolvent small and regional banks, but I think even several U.S. money-center banks are zombies.)

thomasromancer
thomasromancer - Thursday January 22, 2009 10:37PM EST

Just read this article - 'The economy gets top billing, but Congress may also try to revamp 401(k) and IRA plans.' - America, be very weary of any attempt by the government to force you to have your own retirement account. It is just another scheme to force you to invest money into the corrupt system. Do not put money into any account that penalizes you if you take it out. Present 401k, 403b and many other accounts will penalize you 10% of your money if you liquidate to cash. So you will be trapped as you watch you investments sucked away by the same entities that will penalize you if you take it out early. So now that people have lost trillions in investments, the government is looking for ways to force you to invest into a corrupt ponzi scheme that penalizes you if you thy to get what is yours back under your control. I invested diligently like a good little soldier. Now realizing that my money is held hostage for years and when I can take it out without a 10% penalty, the taxes rates will be so high that I will have lost way more than I gained through any tax deferral. Stay out of these accounts. Keep your own cash.

newclkcabrio
newclkcabrio - Thursday January 22, 2009 10:40PM EST

I live in an area that has hundreds families all living on the huge bonus money that Mom or Dad brought home from their jobs on Wall Street. Not dozens, hundreds and hundreds. Here, a million dollar house is obviously not close to the water and the 3-10m range is pretty average. The amount of Mercedes Benzes, Range Rovers and Porsches in the Wegmans parking lot on an average morning is beyond staggering. All of this is from Wall Street salaries and bonuses. What's wrong with that? Nothing, if their firms didn't take Fed money to make the payout. If it can be argued in a court that they did, they need to return it or face civil and criminal penalties It's not theirs until it's been earned. Until then, it's stealing.

newclkcabrio
newclkcabrio - Thursday January 22, 2009 10:42PM EST

I live in an area that has hundreds families all living on the huge bonus money that Mom or Dad brought home from their jobs on Wall Street. Not dozens, hundreds and hundreds. Here, a million dollar house is obviously not close to the water and the 3-10m range is pretty average. The amount of Mercedes Benzes, Range Rovers and Porsches in the Wegmans parking lot on an average morning is beyond staggering. All of this is from Wall Street salaries and bonuses. What's wrong with that? Nothing, if their firms didn't take Fed money to make the payout. If it can be argued in a court that they did, they need to return it or face civil and criminal penalties It's not theirs until it's been earned. Until then, it's stealing.

EddieL
EddieL - Thursday January 22, 2009 10:43PM EST

How can we learn ETHICS from the WALL STREET GANTSTERS.

Earl
Earl - Thursday January 22, 2009 10:46PM EST

There used to be a time when the FBI, SEC, and other regulatory institutions would consider the theft of $15 billion as something serious but I guess they are so busy celebrating Obama's inauguration that the government is no longer concerned over peanut losses.

JackE
JackE - Thursday January 22, 2009 10:47PM EST

Excellent Comments posted from a former ML Employee. I worked on the inside of the firm and saw the outrageous bonuses and expense money being spent. Needless to say I complained and was laid off. Guess I did not agree with the inside greed of these ML executives who raped the of ML stockholder and American taxpayer. ML bonuses were traditionally paid on the fourth week of January. It appears that Thain was corrupt as well as many ML executives in using bailout money to satisfy their pocket to push up the bonus payout to late December. When I was at ML I was told to look the other way, that I had no control of what was going on, that there were more smart people at the top that deserved these bonuses. I can now say bullshit to all of them cause they screwed ML employees.stockholders and American taxpayers. I hope some of them do go to jail.

Paul
Paul - Thursday January 22, 2009 10:48PM EST

The reason these problems keep recurring is that the people responsible never get punished in any meaningful way. They simply sail away from the Titanic in their money laden luxurious lifeboats. It doesn't matter how bad things get because of their actions, not one cent of their obscene bonuses ever has to be returned. Why should they change, it is working beautifully for them. I wonder if the election of Obama will change anything. I doubt it.

Joaquin
Joaquin - Thursday January 22, 2009 10:49PM EST

This goes on not just in financial institutions but across most large corporations. The boards are participants in the scam. They get a small piece of the action, and allow the insiders to stick it to the "stuck-holders." If you want to invest with honest, hard-working teams, invest in smaller, entrepreneurial companies where the management has a large stock ownership and reasonable salaries. Forget the big Titanics.

JLF
JLF - Thursday January 22, 2009 10:50PM EST

Even the sharpest critics of the bailout never imagined that it would be used to make wealthy idiots even wealthier. Are you kidding? Oh yes many people did,myself included. Why should they start thinking about other people now?

Rick
Rick - Thursday January 22, 2009 11:02PM EST

This stupid greed needs no explanation. Common sense tells us.

andrew
andrew - Thursday January 22, 2009 11:15PM EST

What happened to Sarbanes Oxley? Wasn't S/O supposed to protect Americans from Enron II? This is 100X worse. Has any bank executive been indicted? These guys were certifying fnancial statements they knew were bogus...and our government ignores it. Bring on Geitner....and maybe Bernie Madoff could be an sssistant.

Mark
Mark - Thursday January 22, 2009 11:15PM EST

WHAT'S 15 BILLION? BERNANKE CAN PRINT THAT MUCH IN AN HOUR.

Yahoo! Finance User
Yahoo! Finance User - Thursday January 22, 2009 11:21PM EST

Did you hear about the little addition to the TARP bill that Barney Frank added...... Some help to a local bank in his district in the tune of 14 or 15 million dollars. Not a huge sum of money in the grand scheme of things but it helps him out with some votes down the road. The greed of all in Wall Street and government makes me sick.

fahrender
fahrender - Thursday January 22, 2009 11:31PM EST

the American myth is that the country was founded to get away from the excesses and lack of regard for the ordinary person displayed by kings and their hangers-on. what we can see today is that democracy and capitalism can be perverted and manipulated just as surely as all of those other systems and political philosophies. Enron, Tyco, Arthur Anderson, Merrill, and (add your own companies and corporations) the politicians that enable them keep proving just how corrupt and immoral American capitalists can be if left to their own devices. mark my words: these people will continue to do this. they have no shame. as evidenced by their own words they don't feel as if they have done anything wrong. this is the system working properly according to them. it will take a great amount of resolve by a large number of people working to set up safeguards to reign in the impulses of their greed and their sense of entitlement. don't bet a lot of money that this will actually happen. chances are a lot of smoke and mirrors will be employed to make people believe that things are being fundamentally changed. whatever happens in that direction will then be dismantled, sooner or later by the likes of Phil Gramm and hucksters like Larry Kudlow. you can bet some money on that one for sure. i believe in the fundamental promise of our country. i've lived in several countries which are no better or worse. i would like to believe that a substantial number of Americans are now awake to what has been going on. i hope that we will remain so and have the resolve and determination to force our politicians to put some effective and practical restraints on the shysters and crooks that are stealing us blind and making a mockery of what we as a nation claim to revere. if we don't do it now and do it right our children and grandchildren will simply get more of what we've gotten.

Yahoo! Finance User
Yahoo! Finance User - Thursday January 22, 2009 11:33PM EST

Wall Street is in for much more ridicule. By the time it stops, most of these guys will have been fired, and the ones left won’t even recognize the place anymore. The party’s over.

Yahoo! reserves the right to refuse, or remove any comment that does not comply with the Yahoo! Terms of Service. The submission of spam, hateful, or obscene messages may result in the termination of your Yahoo! ID.
About Tech Ticker - Send FeedbackDisclaimer. Copyright © 2007 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Copyright/IP Policy - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy - Help
Quotes delayed, except where indicated otherwise. Delay times are 15 mins for NASDAQ, NYSE and Amex. See also delay times for other exchanges.

Quotes and other information supplied by independent providers identified on the Yahoo! Finance partner page. Quotes are updated automatically, but will be turned off after 25 minutes of inactivity. Quotes are delayed at least 15 minutes for NASDAQ, NYSE and Amex. See also delay times for other exchanges. Real-Time continuous streaming quotes are available through our premium service. You may turn streaming quotes on or off. Fundamental company data provided by Capital IQ. Financials data provided by Edgar Online. Historical chart data and daily updates provided by Commodity Systems, Inc. (CSI). International historical chart data, daily updates, fund summary, fund performance, dividend data and Morningstar Index data provided by Morningstar, Inc. Analyst estimates data provided by Thomson Financial Network. All data provided by Thomson Financial Network is based solely upon research information provided by third party analysts. Yahoo! has not reviewed, and in no way endorses the validity of such data. Yahoo! and ThomsonFN shall not be liable for any actions taken in reliance thereon. All information provided "as is" for informational purposes only, not intended for trading purposes or advice. Neither Yahoo! nor any of independent providers is liable for any informational errors, incompleteness, or delays, or for any actions taken in reliance on information contained herein. By accessing the Yahoo! site, you agree not to redistribute the information found therein.