Saturday, December 19, 2009, 7:46PM ET - U.S. Markets Closed.

'A Terrible Situation:' Jan. Payrolls Slashed 598K, Jobless Rate Jumps to 7.6%

Posted Feb 06, 2009 11:06am EST by Aaron Task
Friday's unemployment report confirmed what's been evident for a while job: It grim out there for American workers and likely to get worse before it gets better.

In January, U.S. payrolls fell a greater-than-expected 598,000, the most since 1974, while the unemployment rate rose to 7.6%, the highest since September 1992. Adding insult to injury, another 66,000 of job losses were added to revised figures for December and November, bringing the tally since the recession officially began in late 2007 to 3.6 million.

"Mass layoffs are a disaster for the economy and a disaster for individuals involved," says Sydney Finkelstein, a professor at Dartmouth's Tuck School. "It's a terrible situation."

Finkelstein, a management expert and co-author of Think Again and Why Smart Executive Fail, says companies that don't adjust to the economic slowdown risk being like an ostrich with its head in the sand. But "firing people is not the only thing you can do," he says, noting most companies can cut waste in other areas and risk being unprepared for the recovery if they cut payrolls too deeply now.

Finkelstein also has advice for those looking for work and those fearing they may be hit in the next round of cutbacks, as detailed in the accompanying video.

127 Comments

Yahoo! Finance User
Yahoo! Finance User - Friday February 06, 2009 11:13AM EST

If you check on incometaxlist.com You can see rich are still rich, so the bottom earners in country wealth are hurt most

Art
Art - Friday February 06, 2009 11:19AM EST

Expect inflation and a stagnant economy until the democrats are kicked out of office. Some of the Inflated currency will probably find it's way into the stock market.

Yahoo! Finance User
Yahoo! Finance User - Friday February 06, 2009 11:20AM EST

"No man should receive a dollor unless that dollor has been fairly earned. Every dollar received should represent a dollor's worth of service rendered--not gambling in stocks..."

sirdon2
sirdon2 - Friday February 06, 2009 11:24AM EST

Massive layoffs and the Market goes through the roof, HMMM, can we say screwed. To all those who think this economy has turned around and the job rate is really 7.6, I laugh. Look around at your close friends, 7.6 means 7 out of 100 are out of work, I know personally at least 10 right now, just close friends. We are in for a very very long hardship, take note of the older folks who lived during the first Depression, they are pulling money out of the banks, buying food, and trying to prepare for the GREATEST Depression.

franck s
franck s - Friday February 06, 2009 11:25AM EST

Jobless numbers are much greater than reported, sort of like interest rates are at zero percent. Unemployment not a problem for Wall Street, which likes businesses that don't have to pay payrolls.

Yahoo! Finance User
Yahoo! Finance User - Friday February 06, 2009 11:26AM EST

No pain - no Gain. Bankrupt the country just so we can continue unemployment insurance forever.

Yahoo! Finance User
Yahoo! Finance User - Friday February 06, 2009 11:27AM EST

So let's buy stock! Doesn't make sense. The unemployed will not find new jobs. The stocks in their 401k's will need to be sold so they cash in the 401k to survive. They won't be buying anything. Buyers beware.

just a man
just a man - Friday February 06, 2009 11:28AM EST

Buy KFT

mike
mike - Friday February 06, 2009 11:38AM EST

hello folks... I'm not sure where I fall on this whole STIMULUS debate...I can see both sides of the coin. I think we are too late to the party on hoping that the stimulus will have any positive effect on the economy as a whole. BUT...President Obama is right that "ones man's pork MIGHT SAVE ANOTHER man's job". Our highway system was pork at one point...so was the technolgy and investment that became the internet. This 'pork" will build infrastructure like roads, bridges, and hospitals that have been ignored for decades in our country.------------------------------------------------------------------------------- President Obama did himself no favors by allowing his appointmants mess to make hime 'take his eye off of the ball" on the stimulus plan for a few days.---------------------------------- The same Republicans htat are fighting him tooth and nail are the same dudes that were so gung ho on spending appx the same amount of money to provide rebuilding Iraq. The same dudes that allowed the national debt to double over the last 8 yrs....why the sudden urge to act fiscally responsible? _____________________________________ I don't envy the President....even though this mess was easy to see coming......the answers on what to do are much more complex and muddied than people realize. If the stimulus will not work ( have my doubts) is doing NOTHING really the answer?______________ This deal is just getting stated, anyone who thinks we are near the bottom is a fool. cash is King.....plant a garden....pay down your debts (if you can).....I have never owned a gun in my life...but things may get bad enough that I need it to protect my home at some point._____________ We need a total "reboot" of our country, in general, and our economy, in particular. I am not sure that the president has all the answers....but he has already done more thn our last President would have ever done for the average citizen in our country. He was elected by more people than anyone in history and deserves our full support. Its a bigg freakin mess....again-i don't envy him.

thomasromancer
thomasromancer - Friday February 06, 2009 11:42AM EST

Take a different angle on the freeing up of credit for more consumption of goods, etc. Every time you hear the word credit, replace it with the inverse meaning; 'DEBT.' Debt is what comes to the American people. When you see the word 'debt' picture yourself as a hamster running on a debt wheel as fast as you can trying to pay off the debt. Now picture all American's as hamsters running on debt wheels as fast as they can to pay off their debts and the countries debts. No take a snapshot of that. Look closely at it. Now you see yourself as the perfect pets the government and big business wants you to be...

Yahoo! Finance User
Yahoo! Finance User - Friday February 06, 2009 11:47AM EST

Most people have ears that are fairly well balanced between the upper and lower portions. But in some there are significant differences.

Reedersong
Reedersong - Friday February 06, 2009 11:49AM EST

Guess what? the Government's overhead is much bigger than it was 30 years ago...Jobless rate does not include all that have been on Disability, Supplemented Housing, Supplemental Daycare, Single mother-no or low income child reimbursement, and supplemental Daycare, etc., for years.

Frank
Frank - Friday February 06, 2009 11:52AM EST

Mr finkelstein is right about better to cut other cost other than labor...What he is wrong about is that cutting costs has been used for 30 years. There is just not that much fat left in many companies. Where do you think much of the recent wealth came from? It was not really just invented by trading stocks and what not in wall street. Government usually does not create wealth. They can convert wealth from one source to another. Construction projects and such are about neutral in creating and utilizing wealth. A service economy does not create wealth. The wealth is mostly just redistributed around. Where is the wealth then? We all know who some of them are! They are those who were successful and created large amounts of wealth and put that wealth to work for themselves. The wealth decreased markedly over recent months. and psychologically they feel poor. The two billion they had last year is suddenly maybe 1.2 billion or something. So Protect the wealth projects have come into play. I do not blame them! Will that attitude improve the economy or help push the ecomomy down? Will Government spending help? Can the snow ball be stopped before it crushes the nation? I have no good answers but I do know the current effort is like rolling a ballon at bowling pins. they may hit the target. But will any of the problems be solved?

Frank
Frank - Friday February 06, 2009 11:52AM EST

Mr finkelstein is right about better to cut other cost other than labor...What he is wrong about is that cutting costs has been used for 30 years. There is just not that much fat left in many companies. Where do you think much of the recent wealth came from? It was not really just invented by trading stocks and what not in wall street. Government usually does not create wealth. They can convert wealth from one source to another. Construction projects and such are about neutral in creating and utilizing wealth. A service economy does not create wealth. The wealth is mostly just redistributed around. Where is the wealth then? We all know who some of them are! They are those who were successful and created large amounts of wealth and put that wealth to work for themselves. The wealth decreased markedly over recent months. and psychologically they feel poor. The two billion they had last year is suddenly maybe 1.2 billion or something. So Protect the wealth projects have come into play. I do not blame them! Will that attitude improve the economy or help push the ecomomy down? Will Government spending help? Can the snow ball be stopped before it crushes the nation? I have no good answers but I do know the current effort is like rolling a ballon at bowling pins. they may hit the target. But will any of the problems be solved?

Frank
Frank - Friday February 06, 2009 11:52AM EST

Mr finkelstein is right about better to cut other cost other than labor...What he is wrong about is that cutting costs has been used for 30 years. There is just not that much fat left in many companies. Where do you think much of the recent wealth came from? It was not really just invented by trading stocks and what not in wall street. Government usually does not create wealth. They can convert wealth from one source to another. Construction projects and such are about neutral in creating and utilizing wealth. A service economy does not create wealth. The wealth is mostly just redistributed around. Where is the wealth then? We all know who some of them are! They are those who were successful and created large amounts of wealth and put that wealth to work for themselves. The wealth decreased markedly over recent months. and psychologically they feel poor. The two billion they had last year is suddenly maybe 1.2 billion or something. So Protect the wealth projects have come into play. I do not blame them! Will that attitude improve the economy or help push the ecomomy down? Will Government spending help? Can the snow ball be stopped before it crushes the nation? I have no good answers but I do know the current effort is like rolling a ballon at bowling pins. they may hit the target. But will any of the problems be solved?

Yahoo! Finance User
Yahoo! Finance User - Friday February 06, 2009 11:53AM EST

Blame Canada...Blame Canada...

eskimo
eskimo - Friday February 06, 2009 11:53AM EST

Thanks Bush

Mike
Mike - Friday February 06, 2009 11:53AM EST

Welcome to THE GREAT RECESSION - I would like to HOPE we don't see higher unemployment, but let's face it... people are the most expensive thing on the balance sheet. Companies will cut and burn payrolls to drive revenue (and stock price), always have always with. This year is going to be INCREDIBLY hard on those servicing debt.

Yahoo! Finance User
Yahoo! Finance User - Friday February 06, 2009 11:56AM EST

Universal Health Care for everyone.

Donald
Donald - Friday February 06, 2009 11:56AM EST

Job advisors best advice for getting and holding onto your job is "kiss ass."

Yahoo! reserves the right to refuse, or remove any comment that does not comply with the Yahoo! Terms of Service. The submission of spam, hateful, or obscene messages may result in the termination of your Yahoo! ID.
About Tech Ticker - Send FeedbackDisclaimer. Copyright © 2007 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Copyright/IP Policy - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy - Help
Quotes delayed, except where indicated otherwise. Delay times are 15 mins for NASDAQ, NYSE and Amex. See also delay times for other exchanges.

Quotes and other information supplied by independent providers identified on the Yahoo! Finance partner page. Quotes are updated automatically, but will be turned off after 25 minutes of inactivity. Quotes are delayed at least 15 minutes for NASDAQ, NYSE and Amex. See also delay times for other exchanges. Real-Time continuous streaming quotes are available through our premium service. You may turn streaming quotes on or off. Fundamental company data provided by Capital IQ. Financials data provided by Edgar Online. Historical chart data and daily updates provided by Commodity Systems, Inc. (CSI). International historical chart data, daily updates, fund summary, fund performance, dividend data and Morningstar Index data provided by Morningstar, Inc. Analyst estimates data provided by Thomson Financial Network. All data provided by Thomson Financial Network is based solely upon research information provided by third party analysts. Yahoo! has not reviewed, and in no way endorses the validity of such data. Yahoo! and ThomsonFN shall not be liable for any actions taken in reliance thereon. All information provided "as is" for informational purposes only, not intended for trading purposes or advice. Neither Yahoo! nor any of independent providers is liable for any informational errors, incompleteness, or delays, or for any actions taken in reliance on information contained herein. By accessing the Yahoo! site, you agree not to redistribute the information found therein.