Wednesday, February 10, 2010, 10:02AM ET - U.S. Markets close in 5 hours and 58 minutes.

Forget Reform, Galbraith Wants a "Total Restructuring" of Wall Street

Posted Sep 14, 2009 10:03am EDT by Aaron Task in Newsmakers, Banking
President Obama is slated to make a major address on Wall Street today aimed at reviving the effort to reform the financial system and prove his administration can walk and chew gum at the same time, i.e. simultaneously tackle health care and Wall Street reform.

Even advocates of Wall Street reform don't believe it will occur this year, as Larry Summers suggested Friday. "I would be surprised if it happens that quickly," says James Galbraith, the Lloyd M. Bentsen Jr. Chair of Government/Business Relations and Professor of Government at the University of Texas.

Still, Galbraith wants President Obama to go beyond the reforms proposed to date and lay out a "strategic vision" for the future of the financial sector.

Specifically, Galbraith is advocating:

  • "More discipline on existing players to prevent abuses that led to disaster last year." This includes restrictions on executive compensation and criminal investigations of past abuses (as we'll discuss in a subsequent segment.) He also advocates a tax on financial transactions to reduce churning and short-term volatility.
  • "A total restructuring of the system itself." Galbraith believes many institutions dubbed "too big to fail" should be either broken up or wound down. Generally speaking, "the financial sector grew far too much in relation to the economy in the last 15 years," he says.
    "It doesn't serve any larger purpose to have such a huge presence of financial institutions in the economy. It creates a predominance of casino activity."

Given the struggle of reform efforts to date and growing optimism about economic recovery, Galbraith's "total restructuring" proposal seems like a long shot, to say the least.

132 Comments

The Renaissance Genius of the 21st Century
The Renaissance Genius of the 21st Century - Monday September 14, 2009 10:10AM EDT

Capitalism is retarded!!! Figure it out fellows.

__A_YAHOO_USER__
__A_YAHOO_USER__ - Monday September 14, 2009 10:10AM EDT

right on !!!!!!!!!!!!!

rick
rick - Monday September 14, 2009 10:15AM EDT

Discipline ?!?!!?!? These morons all they care about is to buy bigger houses in the Hamptons.

donfurio
donfurio - Monday September 14, 2009 10:15AM EDT

Hey, idiot Prof, you were wrong about nationalizing the banks, and are just a radical liberal prof who doesnt know how to run a business. Go hide in your little office.

Len T
Len T - Monday September 14, 2009 10:17AM EDT

There will be no reform or only a token appearance of reform. The too-big-to-fail banks are taking more customers from the too-small-to-succeed banks that are being allowed to fail. Money talks and Wall Street is calling the political shots.

Yahoo! Finance User
Yahoo! Finance User - Monday September 14, 2009 10:19AM EDT

We don't have pure capitalism in this country. We are ruled by oligarchies. There is no level playing field for small businesses. This is the case in most sectors of our economy. It kills off competition, the life blood of true capitalism.

Carl
Carl - Monday September 14, 2009 10:20AM EDT

Interesting, genius. What, praytell, would you propose as an alternative?

__A_YAHOO_USER__
__A_YAHOO_USER__ - Monday September 14, 2009 10:23AM EDT

This is good - make smaller,brake up, make "to small to fail" Remember good old days, it was less risk because banks were not trading in stock market so much. Investment Companies did and I think this should be spin-off back to investment companies. Banks should not gammble our deposit. These are our people deposit. Also , government agencies would have less financial risk. Taxes- No No , but proper regulation and simple- Yes, Yes

williamm
williamm - Monday September 14, 2009 10:23AM EDT

Can't comment on this unil I hear what Fox News thinks about it. Talking points to follow.....

john
john - Monday September 14, 2009 10:23AM EDT

greed is embeded in wall street and those that work there,,

Dennis
Dennis - Monday September 14, 2009 10:25AM EDT

Breaking up the financial system will never happen. We'll be lucky to get any change at all. The political system is too dependent on contributions from the big banks and wall street. Now that things are looking good again and the big banks were bailed out, it will be business as usual.

Kman
Kman - Monday September 14, 2009 10:26AM EDT

Capitalism can work if the Fed keeps there fat little fingers out of it. The big crooked banks should been left alone to fail like they should have and smaller honest banks will take over their business. That is what the FDIC is for anyways.

Rey
Rey - Monday September 14, 2009 10:30AM EDT

It Ain't gonna happen WS will not allow it. They will always keep stuffing their pockets with $$$$$ // Besides They tell The Govt. what to do

Douglas
Douglas - Monday September 14, 2009 10:30AM EDT

Why won't these morons go somewhere where they believe academics should plan the economy, and leave us alone? The academic is at his core a little creature twisted by hate and greed because under a free system he is paid less than an Oprah.

Cogito
Cogito - Monday September 14, 2009 10:32AM EDT

Many major countries have been 'settled' from 2,000 to 4,000 years. In a mere 300 years America has surpassed them in every economic measure solely because of Capitalism. Those who perfer Socialism or Communism can move to Cuba or any Socialist/Communist Country, earn $4 dollars per day if lucky, get free health care, and, like Obama's half-brother, live in a 3 x 9 meter goat hovel. Try it! You'll like it!

Dave
Dave - Monday September 14, 2009 10:35AM EDT

These big banks are NOT capitalism. They are fascist! Collusion of government with big business against the interests of the American people. This is Corporatism not Capitalism that is the problem. The government has failed in its duty to protect citizens against unfair practices that are already against the law. All the reform BS is just that - BS designed to make "US" think that something is being done for the benefit of "US". Ya, right! Dems vs. Reps is just a distraction as they both dance to the financial elite and large corporations. Until we get rid of the Fed and lobbyists are are screwed.,..

Dave
Dave - Monday September 14, 2009 10:38AM EDT

These big banks are NOT capitalism. They are fascist! Collusion of government with big business against the interests of the American people. This is Corporatism not Capitalism that is the problem. The government has failed in its duty to protect citizens against unfair practices that are already against the law. All the reform BS is just that - BS designed to make "US" think that something is being done for the benefit of "US". Ya, right! Dems vs. Reps is just a distraction as they both dance to the financial elite and large corporations. Until we get rid of the Fed and lobbyists we will continue to be screwed like the sheeple we are...

27hosting.com
27hosting.com - Monday September 14, 2009 10:41AM EDT

Very good suggestions but the Govt. is too weak to implement anything that ruffles Wall Street,s feathers.

I'm Just saying
I'm Just saying - Monday September 14, 2009 10:42AM EDT

For some reason, saying "strategic vision" and associating that with this administration just doesn't sound right. This administration is strategically challenged to begin with, then they would have to get the Senate and House to work together... like that's gonna happen in our lifetime. It comes down to enforcing the current set of regulations and holding the violators responsible for their actions. Of course, it would also mean several State Attorney Generals, The leads in the SEC, several Senators and House members would have to be put on trial, but isn't that what should happen when you break the laws????

taopraxis
taopraxis - Monday September 14, 2009 10:44AM EDT

The government is unresponsive to the people, rendering their protests utterly futile. Millions of people protested the Vietnam war for years and it had absolutely no effect on government policy. That war finally ended only because objective economic reality made it impossible to maintain the necessary levels of government spending to support it. Today's wars are following a similar course. They will continue until reality bites. Basically, the people have only one effective means of redress left, which is to withdraw from economic life. Voting has not worked. Given withdrawal from economic life requires considerable personal sacrifice, people do not readily engage that option. However, in a general economic collapse, they often find it has been engaged for them, albeit involuntarily. Nevertheless, regardless of how it is engaged, the economic contraction that obtains when people withdraw from economic life will ultimately promote recovery by starving and killing the parasites that have been drawing off its life blood.

Yahoo! reserves the right to refuse, or remove any comment that does not comply with the Yahoo! Terms of Service. The submission of spam, hateful, or obscene messages may result in the termination of your Yahoo! ID.
About Tech Ticker - Send FeedbackDisclaimer. Copyright © 2007 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Copyright/IP Policy - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy - Help
Quotes delayed, except where indicated otherwise. Delay times are 15 mins for NASDAQ, NYSE and Amex. See also delay times for other exchanges.

Quotes and other information supplied by independent providers identified on the Yahoo! Finance partner page. Quotes are updated automatically, but will be turned off after 25 minutes of inactivity. Quotes are delayed at least 15 minutes for NASDAQ, NYSE and Amex. See also delay times for other exchanges. Real-Time continuous streaming quotes are available through our premium service. You may turn streaming quotes on or off. Fundamental company data provided by Capital IQ. Financials data provided by Edgar Online. Historical chart data and daily updates provided by Commodity Systems, Inc. (CSI). International historical chart data, daily updates, fund summary, fund performance, dividend data and Morningstar Index data provided by Morningstar, Inc. Analyst estimates data provided by Thomson Financial Network. All data provided by Thomson Financial Network is based solely upon research information provided by third party analysts. Yahoo! has not reviewed, and in no way endorses the validity of such data. Yahoo! and ThomsonFN shall not be liable for any actions taken in reliance thereon. All information provided "as is" for informational purposes only, not intended for trading purposes or advice. Neither Yahoo! nor any of independent providers is liable for any informational errors, incompleteness, or delays, or for any actions taken in reliance on information contained herein. By accessing the Yahoo! site, you agree not to redistribute the information found therein.