Friday, January 8, 2010, 11:44AM ET - U.S. Markets close in 4 hours and 16 minutes.

Stop Outrageous Executive Pay: Why Businesses Can't Be Like the Yankees

Posted Nov 03, 2009 07:30am EST by Heesun Wee in Investing, Newsmakers, Products and Trends, Recession, Banking

Remember all the reform talk from a year ago? With the massive post-March rally still intact and big profits and bonuses back en vogue on Wall Street, it's easy to lose track of the excessive risk-taking that triggered a near depression and financial system meltdown. 

"Compensation right now is completely screwed up. It is not tied to long-term performance," says our guest William Black, white-collar criminologist and associate professor of economics and law at the University of Missouri-Kansas City. Black recently testified before Congress on executive pay.

Sure special "pay czar" Kenneth Feinberg last week announced seven taxpayer-rescued firms are subject to statutory rules on executive compensation. But the restrictions are temporary and far short of longer-term "prudent" solutions needed, says Black, a former federal bank regulator and a top investigator for the definitive Congressional report on the S&L crisis.

Primarily, Black calls for the:

  1. Need to adopt compensation reform at all companies -- not just the gang of seven under Feinberg's purview (AIG, BofA, Chrysler Group, Chrysler Financial, Citigroup, and General Motors, General Motors Acceptance.)
  2. Focus on tying compensation to true long-term performance.
  3. Curb false accounting practices that are embraced by revolving-door executives with a short-term view. 

Bottom line: "If they fail, we want them to fail in the compensation as well," Black tells Aaron and Henry.

But like baseball, why can't Wall Street hire talent based on past performance? Forget A-Rod; Wall Street isn't hiring superstars, Black says. "They guys took banks off the cliff."

156 Comments

Gabe
Gabe - Tuesday November 03, 2009 07:50AM EST

This guy's a shmuck. Anyone who things government has any say in executive pay, or in fact ANY pay on private companies is a statist socialist pig. Government has no say in anything private industry. Government should never have bailed out any of these firms. Let capitalism run it's course. Let the crappy banks and companies fail and let newer firms emerge from the ashes.

nomore
nomore - Tuesday November 03, 2009 07:52AM EST

It would be nice to use those bonuses for the lower income employees. The Ceo makes one year but the lower employees have to work for life.

Redwoodkape
Redwoodkape - Tuesday November 03, 2009 07:56AM EST

His last sentence says it all: Frauds pay better. I watched it for 30+ years at a SP500 corporation.

Donald
Donald - Tuesday November 03, 2009 07:57AM EST

I don't understand how the guys that Mr Black is proposing to regulate took banks "off the cliff." My experience has been that manufacturing companies must compete internationally in making and selling a product and making a profit before a bonus is paid. The need to borrow money to sustain a manufacturing business is evident by the "superstar" at Ford that mortgaged everything and set up a line of credit before the bubble burst. GM and Chrysler got into trouble when they couldn't borrow to sustain production and finance a dealer inventory of unsold cars.

william
william - Tuesday November 03, 2009 07:57AM EST

what's happening to the "Almighty USA"?? Going to hell in a handbasket!!! While China, Russia and others like are slowly adopting capitalism... America is going the wrong way down a one way street!! Say goodbye to the American dream.... ask yourself what America will look like 20 years from now if it adopts all the moronic government intervention being proposed... never mind, all the bailouts to-date... right now I thank God I don't live in America nor fell for the "American dream"... albeit, I am an active investor/trader in some of America's best companies....

Terry
Terry - Tuesday November 03, 2009 07:57AM EST

The main issue is that these executives are in a big club that have each other cross sitting on the other Board of Directors and vote each other the excessive pay packages. Congress won't change this because Wall St. owns Congress. So the root of the problem is again Congress. This isn't about talent it's about CRONYIZM. The solution to clean house in Congress. No Senator should be in office more than 2 terms (12 years) and no Congressmen/women should be in office more than 3 terms (6 years) otherwise they do too much harm to us all. VOTE OUT the INCUMBENTS in 2010.

Rick
Rick - Tuesday November 03, 2009 07:58AM EST

There are plenty of good excutives out there that can turn around companies ... with hard decisions being made ... without millions in pay. If a company can survive without tax payer help ... give the executives whatever the hell you want ... If I am paying, find someone that can do the job for less.

Frank3
Frank3 - Tuesday November 03, 2009 07:59AM EST

Talent? Are there any talents in the financial industry? An average street person would not do those stupid things they did that brought down their companies and the entire economy.

Rick
Rick - Tuesday November 03, 2009 08:00AM EST

This guy is 100% spot on ... our system encourages these high pay without any tie to actuall performance. The life cycle of a CEO in these companies is very short ... so they leave when the ship starts rocking with millions in thier pocket ... awesome job!

Terry
Terry - Tuesday November 03, 2009 08:06AM EST

A person should only be allowed to sit on the Board of Directors of one public company unless that person is a major (more than 6%) shareholder in a company. It's a simple rule that would limit the cross cronyism on excessive executive pay. Also all shareholders should be required to vote for the board of directors and shares held by mutual funds, pension funds, financial institutions, etc. should be voted by the fund holders not the fund managers. Again Congress would not institute this because Wall St. owns Congress. No Senator should be in office more than 2 terms (12 years) and no Congressmen/women should be in office more than 3 terms (6 years) otherwise they do too much harm to us all. VOTE OUT the INCUMBENTS in 2010.

John A
John A - Tuesday November 03, 2009 08:07AM EST

I like the idea of letting them fail, but what about the risk of systemic damage? I do think the government should have some sort of clawback law. If the person writing the CDO's has taken his bonus and left before it all implodes they should have the ability to take back all his fraudulent gains and perhaps more than just the bonus.

Terry
Terry - Tuesday November 03, 2009 08:07AM EST

What a joke, the fed allows these goof balls to run these companies into the ground and then bails them out. Heads must roll or it will be buisness as before. America take a stand against the greed that grips OUR country, we need real men and women running wall street not the spineless scum that is there now. MAKE A STAND!

Ying Jyi
Ying Jyi - Tuesday November 03, 2009 08:11AM EST

When everyone's vote is equal to the vote as Bill Gate or Warrent Buffet, then the system will be just like a mess. The elected officers are busy to BUY VOTEs. The system will not be like the great Microsoft or Berkshire Hathaway where the Bosses work for the company besides themself.

Albert
Albert - Tuesday November 03, 2009 08:11AM EST

Shareholders should have more of a say on executive pay, so from that standpoint yes, gov't should have a say on the firms still holding bailout money. But for the rest of companies (publically traded) shareholders should have a vote on exec comp. After this bailout crap ends, the gov't shouldn't be a shareholder anymore (and ever again), but for the time being, let them cap pay for the tarp recipients.

Yahoo! Finance User
Yahoo! Finance User - Tuesday November 03, 2009 08:11AM EST

They should worry more about high government pay and pensions than private industry.

Hugh
Hugh - Tuesday November 03, 2009 08:17AM EST

Cafeteria capitalists pick and choose debating points to suit their agenda, with little or no consistency. The global competition argument is used when it suits them and totally ignored in other cases. Activists for more commonsensical executive pay, including the Federal Government should put more effort in comparing outlier compensation packages to benchmark domestic/global companies and nations. How outlandish are these U.S. outliers to Berkshire Hathaway, Toyoda or executive pay in the Scandinavia counties? If that outlandish, relative to performance, these benchmark comparisons with give stockholders, boards of directors and non-executives ammunition to actually bring the culpable executive to the “global table of reality”.

David
David - Tuesday November 03, 2009 08:18AM EST

This is dancing around the real issue which is that Wall St. is making out-sized 'profits' though mechanisms that are essentially a racket. Take away these ill gotten gains, turn Wall St. back into the mundane business it used to be, and all those massive pay packages go away! A few simple measures that aren't allowed to be discussed will do this: 1) bring back Glass-Steagall, 2) a tax on every trade, 3) ban derivatives, 4) severely limit the leverage allowed to buy financial assets. Voila! The end of the Wall St. Racket!

JohnH
JohnH - Tuesday November 03, 2009 08:20AM EST

His ideas are great, but it's not the government's problem. WHERE ARE THE STOCKHOLDERS? WHERE IS THE BOARD? Where I work, I was asked to take a 15% pay cut while my CEO got a 4.2 million bonus because we ONLY lost 12 cents a share.

Tom F
Tom F - Tuesday November 03, 2009 08:20AM EST

William, the Chinese government sinks $9 billion PER MONTH in their PRIVATE clean energy sector. And, sure enough, China (along w/ Japan & Germany) are crushing the U.S. in terms of developing the clean energy & energy efficiency industries, which will soon be making a ton of $$ on that investment. So, tell us, what's the lesson there?

Bub
Bub - Tuesday November 03, 2009 08:21AM EST

Not much we can do- our elected officials are in bed with the crooks. Take your money out of big banks.. take your business to local credit unions.

Yahoo! reserves the right to refuse, or remove any comment that does not comply with the Yahoo! Terms of Service. The submission of spam, hateful, or obscene messages may result in the termination of your Yahoo! ID.
About Tech Ticker - Send FeedbackDisclaimer. Copyright © 2007 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Copyright/IP Policy - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy - Help
Quotes delayed, except where indicated otherwise. Delay times are 15 mins for NASDAQ, NYSE and Amex. See also delay times for other exchanges.

Quotes and other information supplied by independent providers identified on the Yahoo! Finance partner page. Quotes are updated automatically, but will be turned off after 25 minutes of inactivity. Quotes are delayed at least 15 minutes for NASDAQ, NYSE and Amex. See also delay times for other exchanges. Real-Time continuous streaming quotes are available through our premium service. You may turn streaming quotes on or off. Fundamental company data provided by Capital IQ. Financials data provided by Edgar Online. Historical chart data and daily updates provided by Commodity Systems, Inc. (CSI). International historical chart data, daily updates, fund summary, fund performance, dividend data and Morningstar Index data provided by Morningstar, Inc. Analyst estimates data provided by Thomson Financial Network. All data provided by Thomson Financial Network is based solely upon research information provided by third party analysts. Yahoo! has not reviewed, and in no way endorses the validity of such data. Yahoo! and ThomsonFN shall not be liable for any actions taken in reliance thereon. All information provided "as is" for informational purposes only, not intended for trading purposes or advice. Neither Yahoo! nor any of independent providers is liable for any informational errors, incompleteness, or delays, or for any actions taken in reliance on information contained herein. By accessing the Yahoo! site, you agree not to redistribute the information found therein.