Thursday, August 28, 2008, 8:31AM ET - U.S. Markets open in 59 mins..

We're All Homeowners: Nationalization of Fannie, Freddie Unavoidable

Posted Jul 08, 2008 12:09pm EDT by Aaron Task in Investing, Recession, Banking
Fears about Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac retreated somewhat Tuesday after their federal regulator, OFHEO Director James Lockhart, said new accounting rule changes should make "no difference in the risks of the two firms."

On Monday, Freddie and Fannie shares plummeted after a Lehman Brothers analyst said a new FASB rule could require the two firms to write-down as much as $75 billion.

Rather than the accounting rules, what's really got investors spooked is a growing realization the government will have to nationalize Fannie and Freddie, says Kevin Depew, executive editor of Minyanville.com.

The two mortgage lenders are simply too big to fail and too critical to the housing market, Depew says. Given Fannie and Freddie own or guarantee 50% of all housing debt, according to the WSJ, continued stress on their balance sheets means higher borrowing costs for the firms, and ultimately higher mortgage rates for individuals. It also means another round of write-downs for the battered financial sector generally, which owns a lot of Fannie and Freddie-backed paper.

But nationalizing the firms, each created by an act of Congress, would mean a wipeout for equity holders, who have already seen their holdings decimated in the past year.

The nationalization of Fannie and Freddie and would put U.S. taxpayers on the hook for the socialization of the housing market, but Depew says we're already there whether we know it or not.

71 Comments

you
fubarrabuf - Tuesday July 08, 2008 12:35PM EDT

Why stop that Aaron? Why not "nationalize" oil while we are at it? What a joke, just what country am I living in? Your opinion is not only misguided it shows just how ignorant you really are...

Johnny Ike
Johnny Ike - Tuesday July 08, 2008 12:36PM EDT

If there is not alternative why not.

derrobb
derrobb - Tuesday July 08, 2008 12:44PM EDT

right on fubar - just how long can the fed prop up these insolevant entities - the U.S taxpayer is getting hosed

you
russmyu - Tuesday July 08, 2008 12:50PM EDT

Our economy should be based on supply / demand. We need to let the housing market correct to levels that the population can afford. We cannot artificially prop up an overprice market and call ourselves a market based economy. Please let supply & demand control prices. The housing industry is overpriced based on income.

somest0ckguy
somest0ckguy - Tuesday July 08, 2008 12:52PM EDT

Haha, "moral hazard" is out the window. Let's just get it over with and raise the sickle and stars...

you
Yahoo! Finance User - Tuesday July 08, 2008 12:53PM EDT

He's not offering an opinion about it either way. He's commenting on the buzz from others about what is probably a certainty given the current state of affairs with these two GSEs.

you
Yahoo! Finance User - Tuesday July 08, 2008 12:55PM EDT

I thought we won the cold war and beat the commies? Guess not.

you
dvcambodia2000 - Tuesday July 08, 2008 12:57PM EDT

the meat has been picked from the bones so now it's time to dump it on the public. if it had any value whatsoever there would be no talk of nationalization.

you
Richard B - Tuesday July 08, 2008 12:59PM EDT

Welcome to the Communist States of Amerika!

you
nelsje13 - Tuesday July 08, 2008 12:59PM EDT

Taxpayers are already getting hosed. Nationalizing would mean tighter regulation so firms can no longer make risky investments using taxpayer money to back it up.

you
Yahoo! Finance User - Tuesday July 08, 2008 01:00PM EDT

Author of this article is an uninformed idiot. His status as an author should always be questioned if he cannot keep track of a simple fact. Fannie/Freddie and a bunch of other whale-sized loan operations are government sponsored enterprises (GSE) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freddie_Mac

you
mpapet - Tuesday July 08, 2008 01:01PM EDT

Author of this article is an uninformed idiot. His status as an author should always be questioned if he cannot keep track of a simple fact. Fannie/Freddie and a bunch of other whale-sized loan operations are government sponsored enterprises (GSE) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freddie_Mac

you
Velma M - Tuesday July 08, 2008 01:02PM EDT

bye bye Republicans --- that's all I can say.

you
wisdom-seeker@sbcglobal.net - Tuesday July 08, 2008 01:02PM EDT

NO SOCIALIZATION OF BANK LOSSES! THIS IS NOT "NATIONALIZATION", it is ROBBERY. People who did the right things should NOT pay for the mistakes of the FRAUDSTERS. PROTEST - This Thursday - Washington DC - http://www.tickerforum.org (see "General" and "Breaking" threads)

mulanijem
mulanijem - Tuesday July 08, 2008 01:07PM EDT

It makes you want to give up, I mean why work just let the gov bail you out. I should go out and buy a 500k McMansion with a neg amortizaton arm make one payment and then quite job and stop paying mortgage claim I'm a 'victime" and get bailout, also collect wellfare and foodstamps, and then if I have to get medical care pretend I'm an illeagle who does'nt speak english, of course when winter comes I will need more gov money to cover my heating bill for my 3000 sqf McMansion....Where is the motivation to get ahead? I'm tired of paying for wars for the rich and for subsidies to appease the poor...

you
Crazy Cheney - Tuesday July 08, 2008 01:08PM EDT

Why don't we privatize oil? Because the new capitalism only socializes losses not gains.

you
Yahoo! Finance User - Tuesday July 08, 2008 01:11PM EDT

Nothing wrong with owning houses, but will American taxpayers also take their flipside - mortgage debt?

you
Dale C - Tuesday July 08, 2008 01:13PM EDT

Isn't it amazing ... over the decades ... Some would argue with good cause, it goes all the way back to 1913 or so with the creation of the "FED" ... we just continue to move to being the United Socialist States of America. Whose to blame ... find the closest mirror ... and take a good look. Even back to the days of the great Depression ... look at photos from that era ... there is still determination in their eyes ... Folks there were VERY reluctant to accept the offer of government help, and when they did they did so with great reservation. NOW, we just stand in line with our collective hands out. Probably one of the better examples of the sheeple we have become is Katrina. Compare that terrible, terrible disaster with another, the 1906 San Francisco Earthquake ... Where was FEMA, The Federal Government Handouts ... it was the people, helping people along with what the Federal and State government could do .. NOT EXPECTED to do. Perhaps this is why I really fear the outcome of another great depression, I am afraid we no long have the metal that it takes to survive.

Jeff B
Jeff B - Tuesday July 08, 2008 01:13PM EDT

How about banks stop giving money to people who can't afford houses.

you
Dale C - Tuesday July 08, 2008 01:14PM EDT

Isn't it amazing ... over the decades ... Some would argue with good cause, it goes all the way back to 1913 or so with the creation of the "FED" ... we just continue to move to being the United Socialist States of America. Whose to blame ... find the closest mirror ... and take a good look. Even back to the days of the great Depression ... look at photos from that era ... there is still determination in their eyes ... Folks there were VERY reluctant to accept the offer of government help, and when they did they did so with great reservation. NOW, we just stand in line with our collective hands out. Probably one of the better examples of the sheeple we have become is Katrina. Compare that terrible, terrible disaster with another, the 1906 San Francisco Earthquake ... Where was FEMA, The Federal Government Handouts ... it was the people, helping people along with what the Federal and State government could do .. NOT EXPECTED to do. Perhaps this is why I really fear the outcome of another great depression, I am afraid we no long have the metal that it takes to survive.

Post a Comment

you
Sorry. There was an error posting your comment. Please try again later.
Yahoo! reserves the right to refuse, or remove any comment that does not comply with the Yahoo! Terms of Service. The submission of spam, hateful, or obscene messages may result in the termination of your Yahoo! ID.
About Tech Ticker - Send FeedbackDisclaimer. Copyright © 2007 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Copyright/IP Policy - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy - Help
Quotes delayed, except where indicated otherwise. Delay times are 15 mins for NASDAQ, NYSE and Amex. See also delay times for other exchanges.

Quotes and other information supplied by independent providers identified on the Yahoo! Finance partner page. Quotes are updated automatically, but will be turned off after 25 minutes of inactivity. Quotes are delayed at least 15 minutes for NASDAQ, NYSE and Amex. See also delay times for other exchanges. Real-Time continuous streaming quotes are available through our premium service. You may turn streaming quotes on or off. Fundamental company data provided by Capital IQ. Financials data provided by Edgar Online. Dividend data provided by Hemscott Americas. Historical chart data and daily updates provided by Commodity Systems, Inc. (CSI). International historical chart data and daily updates provided by Hemscott Americas. Fund summary, fund performance and Morningstar Index data provided by Morningstar. Analyst estimates data provided by Thomson Financial Network. All data provided by Thomson Financial Network is based solely upon research information provided by third party analysts. Yahoo! has not reviewed, and in no way endorses the validity of such data. Yahoo! and ThomsonFN shall not be liable for any actions taken in reliance thereon. All information provided "as is" for informational purposes only, not intended for trading purposes or advice. Neither Yahoo! nor any of independent providers is liable for any informational errors, incompleteness, or delays, or for any actions taken in reliance on information contained herein. By accessing the Yahoo! site, you agree not to redistribute the information found therein.