Friday, December 25, 2009, 8:37PM ET - U.S. Markets Closed for Christmas.

Conditional Capitalism at Heart of SEC 'Naked Shorting' Restrictions

Posted Jul 17, 2008 01:14pm EDT by Aaron Task in Investing, Newsmakers, Recession, Banking
If the government's goal was to put a temporary floor under financial stocks, the SEC's move to restrict "naked shorting" of related stocks had its desired effect. The 19 stocks (not 17, as I say in the video) targeted by the SEC rose an average of 12% on Wednesday, the WSJ reports, and the financials were higher again midday Thursday.

But the law of unintended consequence applies here, too. Unintentionally (one presumes), the government also sent a message that America's commitment to free market capitalism is conditional, i.e., only when the markets are moving higher.

This isn't the first and, unfortunately, won't be the last time the government has been compelled to step in and "rescue" markets from themselves. Protecting the economy is certainly a noble endeavor for the government, but the end result is often privatized gains during the good times and socialized losses during the bad.

Think about it: When was the last time you ever heard politicians or policymakers rail against speculation during a bull market (unless it's oil, where bull markets are "bad")?

Getting back to the nitty gritty, the SEC's restrictions on naked short selling only apply to a limited number of financial stocks, and only for a proposed 30 days.

Yes, naked shorting is legal for brokers, assuming they "reasonably believe" they can locate the shares if called to deliver them. Thus, brokers and market makers can "naked short" stocks on clients' behalf, theoretically for many clients on the same stock. That, in turn, can lead to manipulation and should be barred outright.

So why isn't the SEC barring naked shorting entirely and in perpetuity? And why are they considering an exemption for options market makers, as the WSJ reports?

Unfortunately, these and other questions remain unanswered as our policymakers remain in "crisis prevention mode."

68 Comments

ELMER
ELMER - Thursday July 17, 2008 01:34PM EDT

I agree no naked shorts period. Also commodity trading futures for pproducers and users only. How about not being able to sell a stock until you own it. Let us legitimate traders once again flourish. Amen!

Denouemont
Denouemont - Thursday July 17, 2008 01:43PM EDT

Naked Shorts - anyone who has studied the '29 crash found out that they don't work properly - if a company has over 100 percent of its issued stock allocated which is what naked shorts are vs. shorts that are covered by stock bought on margin . . . one can wipe that company out by selling, selling, selling, no consequences . . . those pundits who advocate this naked short positions should check out the 1934 act that was put in place to end this practice . . . We know the original reason for shorting a stock was a buyer would be available when a margin postion long wanted to sell

Yahoo! Finance User
Yahoo! Finance User - Thursday July 17, 2008 01:46PM EDT

So it's not ok to hurt these selective 17 companies but rest are fair target..awesome!!

David L
David L - Thursday July 17, 2008 01:50PM EDT

Pardon. What on earth are you saying exactly? I maybe no investor, but I do know most people aren't buying the fact that oil companies and all the other facts aren't consumer caused. They are not stupid. What I'm seeing is a bunch of a facts that do not relate to the causes. We are being duped, period

Longshot
Longshot - Thursday July 17, 2008 01:51PM EDT

Putting all sorts of restrictions on shorting hasn't worked out too well for Japan. The Nikkei was near 40,000 in 1990 and in the 13,000 area currently. The big institutions who really move the markets need their shorts and squeezes to create large, sustainable rallies. And Elmer H's comment is crazy. Stick with glue, Elmer!!

Karl
Karl - Thursday July 17, 2008 01:56PM EDT

Let us get one thing clear Naked Shorting is ILLEGAL and people can and will go to prison. Now if they are talking just regular shorting, then I have no problem with that. Electronic Comments: • Use the Commission’s Internet comment form(http://www.sec.gov/rules/proposed.shtml); or • Send an e-mail to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include File Number S7-19-07 on the subject line; or • Use the Federal eRulemaking Portal (http://www.regulations.gov). Follow the instructions for submitting comments.

Yahoo! Finance User
Yahoo! Finance User - Thursday July 17, 2008 01:57PM EDT

Be very afraid of congress the type of bail outs they are talking about may put the icing on the cake of economic destruction.

KennethK
KennethK - Thursday July 17, 2008 01:57PM EDT

blaming short sellers for the fall of a company is like blaming the vultures circling overhead for the carcass on the ground! If these companies weren't so poorly run the vultures would have never shown up!

John
John - Thursday July 17, 2008 01:58PM EDT

The Author of this Article needs to do more research into the effects of Naked Short Selling. Naked short selling is illegal, when you short a stock it needs to shorted against a Real cert. It is true that not all Certs can be delivered in a timely manner to the Brokerage house, thats the DTCC fault. Yes, it is also true that the Government does permitt Broker to be Naked, however there is a time frame associated with that namely 3 days. After 3 days the brokerage is required by LAW to produce a Real Cert. Naked Short selling has robbed and destroyed many smaller company seeking to raise capital. This has been a 10 year problem. Now that this Criminal behavior has worked it's way up the food chain to our National Banks it only now recieves the attention of the SEC. SEC has established Regulation ho a couple of years ago, but as everyone know Reg Sho is a JOKE. It has no teeth to force these guys to cover. Shame on the Security and Exchange Commission for not enforceing the law. Shame-john

Yahoo! Finance User
Yahoo! Finance User - Thursday July 17, 2008 01:58PM EDT

It's a shame that government gets involved in a "free market".

John
John - Thursday July 17, 2008 01:58PM EDT

The Author of this Article needs to do more research into the effects of Naked Short Selling. Naked short selling is illegal, when you short a stock it needs to shorted against a Real cert. It is true that not all Certs can be delivered in a timely manner to the Brokerage house, thats the DTCC fault. Yes, it is also true that the Government does permitt Broker to be Naked, however there is a time frame associated with that namely 3 days. After 3 days the brokerage is required by LAW to produce a Real Cert. Naked Short selling has robbed and destroyed many smaller company seeking to raise capital. This has been a 10 year problem. Now that this Criminal behavior has worked it's way up the food chain to our National Banks it only now recieves the attention of the SEC. SEC has established Regulation ho a couple of years ago, but as everyone know Reg Sho is a JOKE. It has no teeth to force these guys to cover. Shame on the Security and Exchange Commission for not enforceing the law. Shame-john

John
John - Thursday July 17, 2008 01:59PM EDT

The Author of this Article needs to do more research into the effects of Naked Short Selling. Naked short selling is illegal, when you short a stock it needs to shorted against a Real cert. It is true that not all Certs can be delivered in a timely manner to the Brokerage house, thats the DTCC fault. Yes, it is also true that the Government does permitt Broker to be Naked, however there is a time frame associated with that namely 3 days. After 3 days the brokerage is required by LAW to produce a Real Cert. Naked Short selling has robbed and destroyed many smaller company seeking to raise capital. This has been a 10 year problem. Now that this Criminal behavior has worked it's way up the food chain to our National Banks it only now recieves the attention of the SEC. SEC has established Regulation ho a couple of years ago, but as everyone know Reg Sho is a JOKE. It has no teeth to force these guys to cover. Shame on the Security and Exchange Commission for not enforceing the law. Shame-john

John
John - Thursday July 17, 2008 01:59PM EDT

The Author of this Article needs to do more research into the effects of Naked Short Selling. Naked short selling is illegal, when you short a stock it needs to shorted against a Real cert. It is true that not all Certs can be delivered in a timely manner to the Brokerage house, thats the DTCC fault. Yes, it is also true that the Government does permitt Broker to be Naked, however there is a time frame associated with that namely 3 days. After 3 days the brokerage is required by LAW to produce a Real Cert. Naked Short selling has robbed and destroyed many smaller company seeking to raise capital. This has been a 10 year problem. Now that this Criminal behavior has worked it's way up the food chain to our National Banks it only now recieves the attention of the SEC. SEC has established Regulation ho a couple of years ago, but as everyone know Reg Sho is a JOKE. It has no teeth to force these guys to cover. Shame on the Security and Exchange Commission for not enforceing the law. Shame-john

John
John - Thursday July 17, 2008 02:00PM EDT

The Author of this Article needs to do more research into the effects of Naked Short Selling. Naked short selling is illegal, when you short a stock it needs to shorted against a Real cert. It is true that not all Certs can be delivered in a timely manner to the Brokerage house, thats the DTCC fault. Yes, it is also true that the Government does permitt Broker to be Naked, however there is a time frame associated with that namely 3 days. After 3 days the brokerage is required by LAW to produce a Real Cert. Naked Short selling has robbed and destroyed many smaller company seeking to raise capital. This has been a 10 year problem. Now that this Criminal behavior has worked it's way up the food chain to our National Banks it only now recieves the attention of the SEC. SEC has established Regulation ho a couple of years ago, but as everyone know Reg Sho is a JOKE. It has no teeth to force these guys to cover. Shame on the Security and Exchange Commission for not enforceing the law. Shame-john

John
John - Thursday July 17, 2008 02:01PM EDT

The Author of this Article needs to do more research into the effects of Naked Short Selling. Naked short selling is illegal, when you short a stock it needs to shorted against a Real cert. It is true that not all Certs can be delivered in a timely manner to the Brokerage house, thats the DTCC fault. Yes, it is also true that the Government does permitt Broker to be Naked, however there is a time frame associated with that namely 3 days. After 3 days the brokerage is required by LAW to produce a Real Cert. Naked Short selling has robbed and destroyed many smaller company seeking to raise capital. This has been a 10 year problem. Now that this Criminal behavior has worked it's way up the food chain to our National Banks it only now recieves the attention of the SEC. SEC has established Regulation ho a couple of years ago, but as everyone know Reg Sho is a JOKE. It has no teeth to force these guys to cover. Shame on the Security and Exchange Commission for not enforceing the law. Shame-john

John
John - Thursday July 17, 2008 02:04PM EDT

The Author of this Article needs to do more research into the effects of Naked Short Selling. Naked short selling is illegal, when you short a stock it needs to shorted against a Real cert. It is true that not all Certs can be delivered in a timely manner to the Brokerage house, thats the DTCC fault. Yes, it is also true that the Government does permitt Broker to be Naked, however there is a time frame associated with that namely 3 days. After 3 days the brokerage is required by LAW to produce a Real Cert. SEC has established Regulation ho a couple of years ago, but as to cover. Naked Short selling has robbed and destroyed many smaller company seeking to raise capital. This has been a 10 year problem. Now that this Criminal behavior has worked it's way up the food chain to our National Banks it only now recieves the attention of the SEC. Shame on the Security and Exchaneveryone know Reg Sho is a JOKE. It has no teeth to force these guys ge Commission for not enforceing the law. Shame-john

Kyril
Kyril - Thursday July 17, 2008 02:09PM EDT

They will not outlaw naked shorts outright because this is how hedge funds are making most of their profits. Once a hedge fund identifis a troubled company they will sell its stock short thus further depriving the company from a chance to obtain funding (stock is worthless and keeps falling). Then they ride it down all the way to bankruptcy and at the end do not even have do deliver any stock, period. This one practice where none of fundamentals or market research or product quality matters. The only thing that does is the size of a hedge fund. Where else can you find a guaranteed 300% return on your invesment? The only way to withstand this is to pay cash dividend that only most stellar companies can afford. No surprise then that ever since 2000, scores of decent small-to-medium companies are taken back private... and what's left is just more fodder for hedge funds to feast on.

AlexL
AlexL - Thursday July 17, 2008 02:11PM EDT

To Elmer: Are you the one who will decide who's a "legitimate" trader and who's not? And what about put call buyers? They will be outlawed too? What the SEC has done is a shame in itself and a terrible precedent for the future. Rolling down this road will bring us to Chaves style socialism.

Longshot
Longshot - Thursday July 17, 2008 02:12PM EDT

johnc222: I think we got the point on your first post! ;-) I'm not in favor of illegal naked shorting, but am against regulations against standard shorting. Like I said, Japan and now China have tried that and it backfired. I fear further attacks on "shorting," "unbridled speculation" etc. could come next...especially during a bear market and election year (prime time for politicians to "save" us from something).

Uncle Rico
Uncle Rico - Thursday July 17, 2008 02:19PM EDT

Obviously a much needed change, as the markets have been destroying companies due to trading based on emotions and speculation rather than fundamentals. It's the same thing as the tech boom but in reverse. In the tech boom, companies became way overvalued and investors got stung for poor investment decision - tough break for the investors, that's life. When shorting, however, good companies with solid fundamentals are being driven into desperation by emotional bets against them. In the latter model, which we are in today, there is no opportunity for the company to recover. You could argue that that is the risk of selling your company to the public, but that argument wouldn't hold water with me. And to the idiots that say "the government shouldn't interfere in a free market" what do you say about all of the other SEC regulations? My only issue - this gives an unfair advantage to the short list of companies that are protected from short selling. In other words, Wachovia and JPM can still be killed by shorts while Citi and BofA are protected. Either disallow short selling across the board or allow it across the board - the government shouldn't pick and choose which individual companies are subject to regulation.

Yahoo! reserves the right to refuse, or remove any comment that does not comply with the Yahoo! Terms of Service. The submission of spam, hateful, or obscene messages may result in the termination of your Yahoo! ID.
About Tech Ticker - Send FeedbackDisclaimer. Copyright © 2007 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Copyright/IP Policy - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy - Help
Quotes delayed, except where indicated otherwise. Delay times are 15 mins for NASDAQ, NYSE and Amex. See also delay times for other exchanges.

Quotes and other information supplied by independent providers identified on the Yahoo! Finance partner page. Quotes are updated automatically, but will be turned off after 25 minutes of inactivity. Quotes are delayed at least 15 minutes for NASDAQ, NYSE and Amex. See also delay times for other exchanges. Real-Time continuous streaming quotes are available through our premium service. You may turn streaming quotes on or off. Fundamental company data provided by Capital IQ. Financials data provided by Edgar Online. Historical chart data and daily updates provided by Commodity Systems, Inc. (CSI). International historical chart data, daily updates, fund summary, fund performance, dividend data and Morningstar Index data provided by Morningstar, Inc. Analyst estimates data provided by Thomson Financial Network. All data provided by Thomson Financial Network is based solely upon research information provided by third party analysts. Yahoo! has not reviewed, and in no way endorses the validity of such data. Yahoo! and ThomsonFN shall not be liable for any actions taken in reliance thereon. All information provided "as is" for informational purposes only, not intended for trading purposes or advice. Neither Yahoo! nor any of independent providers is liable for any informational errors, incompleteness, or delays, or for any actions taken in reliance on information contained herein. By accessing the Yahoo! site, you agree not to redistribute the information found therein.