Thursday, December 17, 2009, 11:10PM ET - U.S. Markets Closed.
The Obama administration is "clearly doing better than their predecessor" in handling the financial crisis - in that they have a "more or less a coherent plan," says Martin Wolf, chief economics commentator for The Financial Times.
But "the really important point is, effectively, they don't have a plan to solve the banking problem," he adds.
The Obama administration - like the Bush team - is "assuming they can leave the [banking] system together more or less as it is, hoping it will come back to life," the columnist says. This inability or refusal to make more dramatic changes is "going to make recovery that much more difficult to achieve."
More specifically, Wolf says Geithner's toxic debt plan is a "covert, hidden transfer" of liabilities off the banks' balance sheet and onto the government's.
The "nightmare" of the plan is that "when it ‘works' - meaning gets money to the banks - taxpayers lose most," because that means the public-private investment fund will have overpaid for the toxic assets, he explains. "So success is automatically a failure."
As to why Washington has a double standard in its treatment of banks vs. automakers, Wolf offers the following explanations:
In sum, Wolf believes America is repeating the same mistakes Japan made with its banks in the 1990s, and that President Obama has, for now, missed the opportunity to make bold changes to our financial system.
Gee who would have guessed that Obama is all talk with no solution just more yak with less substance. His destruction of the auto co's and all involved will soon be obvious to all with mass unemployment and the loss of the last large manufacturing base. His idea that we need to drive small auto's cause he says so will soon be obvious when he puts a large tax on gas. Ah well we'll get to vote again in 2 years on his administration. Good luck everyone and have a happy day.
Financial Fools Day? Painful.....It's going to take us a while to get out of this.....
Bush laid out a plan but the dem refused to listen, including barney . we need to let barney go home.
He got that right.. this steamroller is just getting started...
Here we go again! These two must be SHORT every financial! I've never seen two guys so adamant on spreading bad news about the banks! Pathetic!!!!!
What esle can you buy for 8 trillion dollars
If anybody but the banks were in charge we might return to normalcy....
Lets keep supporting the banks and car manufacturers so the tax payer can be out a trillion or two before they those entities ultimately go under anyway.......Its not real money to democrats anyway, because evidently they don't pay taxes!!!!
Why doesn't Obama just sell the United States while he's over there, even the French can afford it when he's done with us.
Let's see if our con man can get away with it. Who is carrying his teleprompter ! Oh my God! You can't let him loose on his own!
Obama needed to play hardline on the auto industry...they weren't solvent, and there's no point throwing money at the insurmountable problem. What's funny is that Wolf is talking out of his ass...he has no clue what the administration is going to do once the stress test is completed at the end of April. Why do you think many banks are trying to give the tax m oney back to the govt. There is a real possibility that the banks that fail the stress test will have the same fate of GM as driven by the very action that Wolf is calling for. Some of you on this board are hilarious. On one side you don't want governement interference, and on the other hand you want the govt. to save GM...which is it?
Yeah, just one more yak is right. I'll drive the car I want to drive and can't wait for his term to come to an end. Who needs another with no substance and all the rest telling Obama what to do. President bush did have a plan and the DEMOCRATS would not listen....this was Not in the best interest of the American public......just another yak...... Obama voters are gettin' what they deserve.........yak.
What a bunch of crap. This guy is a huge Liberal, meaning he has no common sense or logic to his argument! First off Liberal/Democratic house/congress got us into this mess with their lending to anyone with a pulse push to all americans regardless of credit or ability to pay. Bush's only mistake was trying to work with the democrats and allowing the budget to get out of wack (democrats always push for more spending and bigger government). Obama has since in his first 60 days spent more in his emergency pork barrel stimulus plan than every president combined before him since George Washington to George Bush! Obama is screwing up this country WORSE and causing Americans to be more reliant on government so that he will be able to FORCE socialism on us! A concept that has never worked economically for the Soviet Union or Europe! The goernment has no experience running banks, does this moron really think that greater government regulation and control of banking is this administrations biggest downfall? The more government starts running business, the more they screw it up! MIT/Harvard educated Wall Street understands this and that is why the market tanked on even the slight impression that government would start running banks. It also went way back up when they smartly said that is was never their intention (and crazy to think that government wanted to take over banking!) Get rid of this Wolf idiot! He is an extreme lib/socialist in sheeps clothing! (get it, Wolf in sheeps clothing) :)
This is once in a life time chance to Fix the corrupted bankers. If these crooks are allowed to continue their deeds, its the death of civilisation.
so let me get this straight, Obama doesn't have a clue how to fix the problem . . . but he is "cleary" doing better than Bush did. This guy contradicted himself like 12 times. typical liberal.
figures don't lie, but liars can figure
What authority does Wolf has as he along with most economists missed the current disastor? Have they been to a recent seminar and are now wide awake or do they write to stay employed as some sort of "expert" of financials . Is it kinda lIke John Grisham, abook a year should keep the income coming in? Really who cares about his opinon. I'll send my moms to ya if you need space to fill
They have a plan.........Socialize and Nationalize......Never let a crisis go to waste....you can do things that would not be possible otherwise.
"Obama Better Than Bush But Still Has No Real Plan to Fix Banks, FT's Wolf Says". So let me get this straight. He has no plan to fix the problem but is doing better than the guy before him??????? Anyone with half a brain could have predicted that Obama was not even remotely ready for this job. Let us look at it this way. Go back in time 2 years and imagine that you are working for a strugling small company, and the board of directors (or the owner) announces to Obama was hired as the new CEO of the company.Would you have any confidence that the right person was hired to lead your place of employment or would you sit there in amazement and thinking just how stupid the board of directors was to make the move? The guy has no executive experience. What else was anyone expecting? You add his socialist leanings, and it is easy to figure out that a couple of years down the road you will not recognize this country. For those who share those socialist views that is a good thing, but for those that do not it is a terrifying thought.
Quotes and other information supplied by independent providers identified on the Yahoo! Finance partner page. Quotes are updated automatically, but will be turned off after 25 minutes of inactivity. Quotes are delayed at least 15 minutes for NASDAQ, NYSE and Amex. See also delay times for other exchanges. Real-Time continuous streaming quotes are available through our premium service. You may turn streaming quotes on or off. Fundamental company data provided by Capital IQ. Financials data provided by Edgar Online. Historical chart data and daily updates provided by Commodity Systems, Inc. (CSI). International historical chart data, daily updates, fund summary, fund performance, dividend data and Morningstar Index data provided by Morningstar, Inc. Analyst estimates data provided by Thomson Financial Network. All data provided by Thomson Financial Network is based solely upon research information provided by third party analysts. Yahoo! has not reviewed, and in no way endorses the validity of such data. Yahoo! and ThomsonFN shall not be liable for any actions taken in reliance thereon. All information provided "as is" for informational purposes only, not intended for trading purposes or advice. Neither Yahoo! nor any of independent providers is liable for any informational errors, incompleteness, or delays, or for any actions taken in reliance on information contained herein. By accessing the Yahoo! site, you agree not to redistribute the information found therein.
STORMSTOCKER1 - Wednesday April 01, 2009 04:39PM EDT
"COVERT, HIDDEN, TRANSFER" of Liabilities......That says it all doesn't IT!!??