Thursday, January 7, 2010, 1:53PM ET - U.S. Markets close in 2 hours and 7 minutes.
From Silicon Alley Insider, July 15, 2008:
A source close to Yahoo, a source close to Microsoft, and Carl Icahn disagree about a critical part of the search proposal that Yahoo rejected over the weekend: whether or not it required that Carl Icahn be given control of Yahoo.
This is important because this condition was an obvious deal-killer. Absent such a condition, Microsoft's new search proposal is actually reasonable (or at least worth serious consideration).
The source close to Yahoo says:
The source close to Microsoft says:
Carl Icahn says:
We asked the source close to Microsoft whether Microsoft had changed its proposal since Friday. The answer was no. We asked the source close to Yahoo whether Yahoo might have been wrong about the change-in-control provision. The answer was, approximately, 'Yahoo just filed a statement with the SEC saying the proposal included a change-in-control requirement and Yahoo did not commit fraud.'
So here's what we think happened: We think Carl Icahn's personal agenda screwed up what otherwise might have been a reasonable search offer from Microsoft. (This is one hazard of having a deal-broker who also has major skin in the game.) We think Microsoft has since recognized this and is running as far from Carl as it can.
Microsoft does not care about anything but Yahoo's search business. All of the other terms in the convoluted proposal--dividends, tender offers, Asian assets, loans, etc.--are just a sop to Carl Icahn and other Yahoo shareholders still annoyed about the blown merger deal. These terms are obscuring a Microsoft search offer that is starting to get interesting.
With a revenue guarantee of $2.3 billion a year for five years that is only dependent on Yahoo maintaining its current home page traffic, we think Microsoft's latest search proposal at least merits a close look and, possibly, a counter-offer from Yahoo. Thanks to the baggage of all those other terms, however, we understand why Yahoo rejected the proposal out of hand. And we suspect the majority of Yahoo's shareholders would have rejected it, too.
Tomorrow, we start brokering a peace...
Icahn could've taken over the whole GM for $5 billion instead of bothering compaies he knows nothing about. What a loser.
Yahoo will live forever, now matter what!!
Microsoft needs to realize that without Yahoo's search engine they can't compete. They should be negotiating not bullying.
Microsoft needs to realize that without Yahoo's search engine they can't compete. They should be negotiating not bullying.
HENRY. yesterday it was crazy crazy crazy!!! now Henry's onboard? what's up? buy yourself some options yesterday after the close?
I agree with Yahoo finance user. Ichan is too big for his britches and it will be interesting to see just how well Ballmar does without Gates holding his hand.Go Jerry, go!!
The only one who loses in this deal is Yahoo. Seriously. Microsoft has lost billions on MSN over the last 15+ years and those losses show no sign of abating. Microsoft is a distant third in search even though they have the number one operating system and the number one Web Browser. How is that even possible to fail that badly? Yahoo is far better off alone than as a division of Microsoft.
Is it the search engine that got Google ahead? Hell, no! Google success is based on its abilities to display sponsors ads through their adwords and adsenses programs. Yahoo! Search and Microsoft poor management don't got a chance against Google!
Henry Blodget? Shouldn't this slimeball be in jail?
yahoo get your head out of your behind and make a deal with MSN. We don't need one search engine controling the web search results we need this deal to go through PLEASE make it happen
If Microsoft would think about spending that kind of money it would be better off getting its act together making investments internally and buying smaller companies that have good potential and need capital instead of chasing Yahoo that is only going downhill.
This Blodget sure speaks and gestures like he would be valuable in jail. Did I mention looks ?
Why is Yahoo so afraid of selling search to MSFT? That is no use for yahoo now. No business sense here!
Yahoo worth more than $33 a share? You're dam% skippy, so lets hang in there!!!!!!
Wow, we have two Yahoo employees supposedly giving unbiased opinions about a buyout that could potentially effect their jobs. It's funny how Aaron says Yang is his boss as he talks. I seem to find out more information about how Yahoo thinks on Tech Ticker. I see how Yahoo is communicating with shareholders and others their views on the deal and what should happen through Tech Ticker. It's obvious at this point that you guys want to ditch Carl Icahn and talk directly with Microsoft about a deal that doesn't involved firing all of the management and possibly affecting the premium severance plan that you would get even if you or some of your co-workers were fired (The severance plan that Mr. Icahn wants to throw out). I understand both of you, Henry and Aaron; if I was a Yahoo employee myself it would be hard for me to say anything that would not be in my best interests concerning my job (not necessarily the best interests of the shareholders). In addition, from the looks at Capitol Hill, it looks like the only people that like the idea of consolidating 90% of the seard ad market is Yahoo and Google. With not even knowing if that Yahoo-Google deal
C'mon, this is excellent gamesmanship by the guy who is holding a good hand. Icahn started with this proposal that he wanted Yahoo to reject. Over the coming weeks we'll see better proposals that will seek to either do the deal in the $31 range OR establish for most shareholders that the Yahoo board is the stubborn party in all this and force a board change. Yahoo is worth a lot more to MS with a compliant board, and their price will reflect this. I wouldn't even be surprise to see MS state soon that with Icahn's board in power they'll pay $33+ per share, but with current board no higher than, say $29. How many share
Henry Blodget: (from wikipedia) settled without admitting or denying the allegations and was subsequently banned from the securities industry for life.
I see this YHOO/MSFT like a man (Steve ballmer), who can afford to buy himself a dinner that can help him make even much more to pay for. Just go home eat a bag of economic instant noodle that he can pay for as little as 15 cents per meal. Keep up Jerry!!!
Quotes and other information supplied by independent providers identified on the Yahoo! Finance partner page. Quotes are updated automatically, but will be turned off after 25 minutes of inactivity. Quotes are delayed at least 15 minutes for NASDAQ, NYSE and Amex. See also delay times for other exchanges. Real-Time continuous streaming quotes are available through our premium service. You may turn streaming quotes on or off. Fundamental company data provided by Capital IQ. Financials data provided by Edgar Online. Historical chart data and daily updates provided by Commodity Systems, Inc. (CSI). International historical chart data, daily updates, fund summary, fund performance, dividend data and Morningstar Index data provided by Morningstar, Inc. Analyst estimates data provided by Thomson Financial Network. All data provided by Thomson Financial Network is based solely upon research information provided by third party analysts. Yahoo! has not reviewed, and in no way endorses the validity of such data. Yahoo! and ThomsonFN shall not be liable for any actions taken in reliance thereon. All information provided "as is" for informational purposes only, not intended for trading purposes or advice. Neither Yahoo! nor any of independent providers is liable for any informational errors, incompleteness, or delays, or for any actions taken in reliance on information contained herein. By accessing the Yahoo! site, you agree not to redistribute the information found therein.
__A_YAHOO_USER__ - Tuesday July 15, 2008 11:43AM EDT
Damm, why is Msft so interested in getting out of the way, this is sick