Friday, December 25, 2009, 1:49AM ET - U.S. Markets Closed for Christmas.

Americans, Get Ready for an Enormous Tax Bill

Posted Sep 19, 2008 01:36pm EDT by Aaron Task in Investing, Newsmakers, Recession, Banking

"America's economy is facing unprecedented challenges. We're responding with unprecedented measures," President Bush declared in a press conference Friday.

Bush, of course, was speaking of the government's coordinated efforts to tackle a financial crisis that has roiled global markets and brought down venerable financial institutions.

"These measures will require us to put a significant amount of taxpayer dollars on the line," the President added.

Ah, yes. There is no free lunch. Just how significant an amount of taxpayer dollars remains unknown, but it's going to be massive.

Estimates of the proposal to let the government buy bad assets from banks range from $500 billion to $1 trillion -- and that's in addition to costs already incurred for various government actions this year, including, but not limited to:

  • $29 billion to fund JPMorgan's takeover of Bear Stearns
  • Up to $200 billion each for nationalization of Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac
  • Up to $85 billion for AIG
  • $50 billion to insure money market funds
  • Approximately $300 billion of Fed liquidity measures this week alone.

"It's impossible to put any reasonable estimate on what it's going to cost us as taxpayers," says Tom Brown of Bankstocks.com and Second Curve Capital. "We know it's going to cost an awful lot [and] the more they borrow the more interest rates go up and the more taxes we'll have to pay."

As discussed in the accompanying video, it's no coincidence all this is happening in an election year. But are either John McCain or Barack Obama really prepared to handle the mess one of them is going to inherit?

717 Comments

Ray
Ray - Friday September 19, 2008 01:59PM EDT

Those 'taxpayer dollars' are worthless anyway.

fred
fred - Friday September 19, 2008 02:00PM EDT

gold is dead --long live gold

Jack H
Jack H - Friday September 19, 2008 02:00PM EDT

From an oldtimer - Near the end of President Reagan's eight years in office we had a similar mess due to under-regulated Savings and Loans. It all fell apart in his last year, and one of the first President Bush's tasks was to clean that up. Now near the end of the second President Bush's eight years we have this mess. There's a lot of bad regulation out there but these are examples of what happens when there's not enough regulation of really important stuff with major impact on most of us.

FredC
FredC - Friday September 19, 2008 02:01PM EDT

Welcome to BNW. The dream has become a nightmare and people can not wake up from it.

Marvin
Marvin - Friday September 19, 2008 02:01PM EDT

And because, as Mike Bloomberg puts it:"there’s no one person to blame other than all of us", we shouldn't object to paying these higher taxes.

Yahoo! Finance User
Yahoo! Finance User - Friday September 19, 2008 02:02PM EDT

And because, as Mike Bloomberg puts it:"there’s no one person to blame other than all of us", we shouldn't object to paying these higher taxes.

BryanS
BryanS - Friday September 19, 2008 02:02PM EDT

Remember that this all happened because people bought houses they couldn't afford. So it isn't just the CEO's its all our stupid neighbors as well.

Yahoo! Finance User
Yahoo! Finance User - Friday September 19, 2008 02:01PM EDT

Get a rope!

Lisa
Lisa - Friday September 19, 2008 02:01PM EDT

Its over people............the USA is giving all of, whatever it has, to Wall street elites. Now, when it comes time for a national health care program - those same billionaires that just got theirs will tell us Americans we can't afford it. Waht a country we have become.

charlier
charlier - Friday September 19, 2008 02:03PM EDT

PRO-BIG BUSINESS Republicans..they bait you with emotional hooks, they tell you they are for lower taxes (BWAHAHAHAHA) but the truth is the Republicans taxes you mroe than the democrats from the back door. Remember the lax regulation for the savings and loans fiasco..who bailed them out..oh yeah you taxpayers..so who is bailing out these under-regulated pro-republicans free-wheeling big boys..um yeah you again taxpayers!! lmfao...republicans = pro big business = pro big money = BIGGER TAXES but they do it under the water..lol just mho

Donald H
Donald H - Friday September 19, 2008 02:03PM EDT

It's way past time for all hard-working common folk who play by the rules, to march enmass to Washington and force Congress to listen and ease our plight rather than their big shot thieving CEO friends. A rally of 500,000 ought to catch at least at 30 second slot on the evening news. And George, poor George he can't even take a question from critics, but Obama can field questions and act more presedential that the dead duck in the oval office. God help this country and quick!

charlier
charlier - Friday September 19, 2008 02:03PM EDT

PRO-BIG BUSINESS Republicans..they bait you with emotional hooks, they tell you they are for lower taxes (BWAHAHAHAHA) but the truth is the Republicans taxes you mroe than the democrats from the back door. Remember the lax regulation for the savings and loans fiasco..who bailed them out..oh yeah you taxpayers..so who is bailing out these under-regulated pro-republicans free-wheeling big boys..um yeah you again taxpayers!! lmfao...republicans = pro big business = pro big money = BIGGER TAXES but they do it under the water..lol just mho

David
David - Friday September 19, 2008 02:04PM EDT

all hail the iron fist of communism!!!

JohnC
JohnC - Friday September 19, 2008 02:04PM EDT

We cannot keep thinking that the US can maintain its past standard of living. Why? We do not manufacture or prioduce any real commodities. We are a country where employment means a sales position at a mall, a hamburger flipper or manager(?), restaurant server, cell phone saleperson or telemarketer. Steel mills? Factories? Apparel? Footware? computers? All overseas or Mexico. No wonder the banks went belly-up. Who's actually saving money? The flippers don't make enough to pay rent, the middle class are investing for retirement with their financuial advisors or paying for kiddies college tuition, and the rich... well I am sure they don't use banks, at least not in our country. I am affraid I agree with one of the other comments... hold on for round 2 of the Great Depression. When the US comes out of it, the US will be lucky to be a third world country looking for handoutd for other countries.

- Friday September 19, 2008 02:03PM EDT

I hate it when reporters distort the facts in order to generate fear, concern, outrage, or whatever. That's what's going on here. The costs above are NOT ultimately an invoice to the taxpayer. The Bear $29B is a guarantee against assets with varying and unknown value in this credit crunch. Ultimately, I believe the asset value will increase over the next few years over the (marked down) book value as of the Bear takeover, so it may not cost taxpayers a cent. The nationalization, in the same vein, may not cost taxpayers anything, and it all depends on the realizable value of some of the more questionable mortgage assets that Fannie and Freddie own. Time will tell. The AIG loan is a maximum of $85B, and we don't know how much it will be yet. And, as everyone fails to mention, the US government is making 11% interest, or over $8B a year, in the case that AIG borrows close to the maximum. Given that the loan is secured by all AIG assets, the risk here is relatively low that it ultimately costs taxpayers anything (especially including the interest income). The same thing goes for the $300M in liquidity measures this week. And, I might add, the same goes for a RTC-type entity that may be created in the near future. I don't know the exact figures, but while the RTC in the 90's shelled out a lot of money to bail out the defunct S&L's, as I remember the RTC got almost all or all of its money back by the time it was done liquidating the assets. The same is expected this time around. While that requires some good luck, its not a foregone conclusion either that it will cost us anything like the $500B to $1T numbers that some idiots are using. Bottom line, the ultimate taxpayer bill for these measures may end up being very small, if anything. The government is taking these written down and low-value assets at a market low. Remember the saying 'buy low, sell high?' Not a bad strategy, especially if it all bails us out of a global financial crisis.

__A_YAHOO_USER__
__A_YAHOO_USER__ - Friday September 19, 2008 02:04PM EDT

We have all got to handle this, by not voting for any one thats supports this mess, as you call it, I call it a mess put forth by our Predisant of today, not the one in the future. Charles Bandy

Yahoo! Finance User
Yahoo! Finance User - Friday September 19, 2008 02:05PM EDT

and just wait the costs arising from the climate change - the scientifc truth that Bush denied until very recently.....

Neil H
Neil H - Friday September 19, 2008 02:05PM EDT

Why is everyone starting to cry at this late stage? When the Government began the conscious effort of deficit spending, and then the Government started selling our debt to foreign interests, so the interest payments were no longer just going to our citizens, THAT is the time people should have cried out. By the way, when are we going to REQUIRE financial aptitude tests for the Congressional individuals we allow to run the largest "Company" on Earth? As long as they, themselves are on the dole, with salaries guaranteed by the Government (even AFTER their "service" to the American people), there is NO incentive for Congress to make financially sound decisions.

Hon
Hon - Friday September 19, 2008 02:05PM EDT

Look in the mirror and you will see who is responsible for all this mess. It isn't just a local USA problem either . It is a global problem. Can you say GREED????

Mike
Mike - Friday September 19, 2008 02:05PM EDT

Gonna borrow it from the Chinese and eventually default on the debt anyway so, WHO CARES ?

Yahoo! reserves the right to refuse, or remove any comment that does not comply with the Yahoo! Terms of Service. The submission of spam, hateful, or obscene messages may result in the termination of your Yahoo! ID.
About Tech Ticker - Send FeedbackDisclaimer. Copyright © 2007 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Copyright/IP Policy - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy - Help
Quotes delayed, except where indicated otherwise. Delay times are 15 mins for NASDAQ, NYSE and Amex. See also delay times for other exchanges.

Quotes and other information supplied by independent providers identified on the Yahoo! Finance partner page. Quotes are updated automatically, but will be turned off after 25 minutes of inactivity. Quotes are delayed at least 15 minutes for NASDAQ, NYSE and Amex. See also delay times for other exchanges. Real-Time continuous streaming quotes are available through our premium service. You may turn streaming quotes on or off. Fundamental company data provided by Capital IQ. Financials data provided by Edgar Online. Historical chart data and daily updates provided by Commodity Systems, Inc. (CSI). International historical chart data, daily updates, fund summary, fund performance, dividend data and Morningstar Index data provided by Morningstar, Inc. Analyst estimates data provided by Thomson Financial Network. All data provided by Thomson Financial Network is based solely upon research information provided by third party analysts. Yahoo! has not reviewed, and in no way endorses the validity of such data. Yahoo! and ThomsonFN shall not be liable for any actions taken in reliance thereon. All information provided "as is" for informational purposes only, not intended for trading purposes or advice. Neither Yahoo! nor any of independent providers is liable for any informational errors, incompleteness, or delays, or for any actions taken in reliance on information contained herein. By accessing the Yahoo! site, you agree not to redistribute the information found therein.