# How to Scare Yourself Stupid

August 7, 2014 3:48 PM

I flew from San Francisco to Washington, D.C. this weekend. Sitting next to me was a woman, probably about 30 years old, who shook so much during takeoff that her knee hit mine several times. She did the same thing in the middle of the flight when we hit a little turbulence. She whispered “Thank God” as we landed.

She was clearly terrified of flying. But when we arrived in Washington, she walked to the curb, got in a car, and drove off.

This reminded me of a section from Gerd Gigerenzer’s book Risk Savvy:

How many miles would you have to drive by car until the risk of dying is the same as in a nonstop flight? I have asked this to dozens of expert audiences. The answers are all over the place: one thousand miles, ten thousand miles, driving three times around the world. However, the best estimate is twelve miles. Yes, only twelve. If your car makes it safely to the airport, the most dangerous part of your trip is likely already behind you.

This has been a deadly year for air travel, with more than 700 fatalities in the last four months. But more than 700 people die in auto accidents every five hours.

Ebola has also been in the news this week, scaring people around the world. Ebola has killed 1,590 people since it was identified in the 1970s, according to the World Health Organization. Measles — which faces a vaccination backlash — kills about as many people every 96 hours.

The craziest thing about risk is that people fear what’s rare and unknown much more than they fear things that are common but deadly.

Why?

Gigerenzer writes:

People aren’t stupid. The problem is that our educational system has an amazing blind spot concerning risk literacy. We teach our children the mathematics of certainty — geometry and trigonometry — but not the mathematics of uncertainty, statistical thinking. And we teach our children biology but not the psychology that shapes their fears and desires. Even experts, shockingly, are not trained how to communicate risks to the public in an understandable way. And there can be positive interest in scaring people: to get an article on the front page, to persuade people to relinquish civil rights, or to sell a product. All these outside causes contribute to the problem.

Several other causes contribute to the problem of what I’d call scaring yourself stupid.

Storytelling. Every teenager can tell you the story of the Titanic. But many educated adults have never heard of the 1987 sinking of the ferry MV Dona Paz, which killed almost three times as many people, a quarter of them children.

Some tragedies become famous because they made good stories independent of their actual damage. The result is that certain things we’re most scared of aren’t that big a deal, while things we’re oblivious to can be major risks.

Gullibility during times of fear. People are more likely to believe lies, misconceptions, and fairy tales when they’re scared or facing an uncertain outcome. In his 1841 book Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds, Charles Mackay wrote:

During the Great Plague of London, in 1665, the people listened with avidity to the predictions of quacks and fanatics. Defoe says that at that time the people were more addicted to prophecies and astronomical conjurations, dreams, and old wives’ tales than ever they were before or since.

This helps explain why so many investors became end-of-the-world goldbugs in 2008. Uncertainty makes you believe things you would have ignored under a more rational state of mind.

Culture. Germans and Austrians are generally terrified of nuclear power and radiation. Most of Europe has banned X-ray scanners at airports over cancer fears. Austria built one nuclear power plant in the 1970s, but voters shut it down before it ever operated.

Americans and the French, on the other hand, could not care less. The French embraced nuclear power long ago, and Americans X-ray and CT scan with abandon.

Some things may seem risky or harmless not because you’ve evaluated the facts, but because you were born into a culture that told you a story one way or the other.

The unfamiliar. Mapmakers once wrote “Here be dragons"over unexplored areas. The unfamiliar is viewed as risky even if you have no evidence that it is.

If hundreds of thousands of people die from heart disease every year, the risk might actually seem diminished, because you become desensitized to its regularity. But if one person dies from Ebola, it is front-page news, only because it’s rare. People would rather do something very risky but common (eat a poor diet) than something trivially dangerous but less common (flying).

Bill Gates recently posted this fascinating graphic. Annoying-but-common mosquitoes kill 70,000 times as many people every year across the globe as terrifying sharks. Freshwater snails kill 1,000 times as many people as wolves:

Nobel Prize-winning psychologist Daniel Kahneman once explained a version of this flaw: “A reliable way to make people believe in falsehoods is frequent repetition, because familiarity is not easily distinguished from truth. Authoritarian institutions and marketers have always known this fact.”

Statistical blindness. Gigerenzer writes about a farmer asking a veterinarian about surgery risk to one of his cows:

Ben, the owner of the farm, asked how likely the cow was to have problems after the surgery. Trying to put it in terms that he could relate to I said, “If we did this procedure on 100 cows, I expect about 10 to 15 would not completely recover within a few weeks of surgery.” He paused a moment and said, “Well that’s good because I only have 35 cows.”

We generally just suck at math.

Americans were widely worried about growing government spending in 2009. After the federal government passed a \$3.5 trillion annual budget to mass protests, a group of economists asked1,000 Americans a simple question: “How many millions are in a trillion?” Only 21% answered correctly. The rest either didn’t know or answered wrong. Most Americans were worried about spending \$3.5 trillion, but most had no idea how much a trillion actually was.

People deal with statistical illiteracy by reacting with their gut. Sometimes that’s good — I don’t need to calculate risks to know that driving blindfolded is stupid. But it can be dangerous, too. It makes us overreact to things that seem dangerous only because they’re unknown, and underreact to things that are dangerous but look benign.

Financial adviser Carl Richards says “risk is what’s left over when you think you’ve thought of everything.” Wherever you’re not looking, or not thinking, that’s where it is.

## Recommended for You

• ### U.S. home prices rise faster than expected in February

U.S. single-family home prices accelerated at a faster pace than expected in February, supported by a low inventory of housing stock, a survey showed on Tuesday. The S&P CoreLogic Case-Shiller composite index of 20 metropolitan areas rose 5.9 percent in February on a year-over-year basis, after an unrevised 5.7 percent increase in January. February's result topped the estimate of a 5.7 percent increase from a Reuters poll of economists and was the biggest year-on-year increase since July 2014.

Reuters
• ### The Latest: Trump says he hasn't changed position on wall

The Latest on Congress and efforts to avert a government shutdown by week's end (all times local): 9:45 a.m. President Donald Trump says that he hasn't changed his position on building a border wall between ...

Associated Press
• ### US home prices rose at the fastest pace in nearly 3 years

U.S. home prices rose steadily upward in February as more homebuyers chased fewer available properties, a trend that many analysts say may not be sustainable. The Standard & Poor's CoreLogic Case-Shiller ...

Associated Press
• ### North Korea looking for a fight with US?

FNC military analyst Gen. Jack Keane (Ret.) on mounting tensions between North Korea and the US, the fight against terrorism and US sanctions against a Syrian research center and President Trump's first 100 days.

• ### Exclusive: Boeing near decision to launch 737-10 jet - sources

Boeing is nearing a decision to launch a larger version of its 737 workhorse jet within two months to counter strong sales of the Airbus A321neo, after a breakthrough on the design for one of its parts, industry sources said. The 737 MAX 10 would narrow the gap between the 178-220 seat 737-9, which first flew this month, and the 185-240 seat A321neo, which dominates the top end of a market for narrowbody jets worth \$2 trillion over 20 years. Boeing has been studying how to solve a tricky problem with the design of the plane's landing gear, without adding cost or delaying a 2020 target for first deliveries.

Reuters
• ### Johnson Controls (JCI) Q2 Earnings: What's in the Cards?

Johnson Controls International plc (JCI) is set to report second-quarter fiscal 2017 (ended Mar 31, 2017) results, before the market opens on Apr 27.

Zacks
JCI \$43.30 0.91%
• ### Verizon Fios finally gets gigabit speeds, slashes price in half in these 8 regions

Verizon is bringing near-gigabit speeds to some of its customers, at a standalone price point of \$69.99 per month, less than half the price of its previous top-tier service.

TechRepublic q
• ### Is the Options Market Predicting a Spike in SeaDrill (SDRL) Stock?

Investors in SeaDrill Limited (SDRL) need to pay close attention to the stock based on moves in the options market lately.

Zacks
SDRL \$0.70 0.01%
• ### Should You Enroll in Medicare if You're Still Working?

Whether or not you should enroll in Medicare while working depends on your particular situation.

Investopedia q
• ### Rite Aid reports 4Q loss

The Camp Hill, Pennsylvania-based company said it had a loss of 2 cents per share. Earnings, adjusted for one-time gains and costs, came to less than 1 cent on a per-share basis. The average estimate of ...

Associated Press
• ### As retail bankruptcies climb toward post-recession high, these companies could be next

S&P Market Intelligence has named the 10 public companies it finds most at risk for filing Chapter 11 over the next year.

CNBC
• ### Bank of America just said there's ‘material risk’ to the long-term viability of Tesla

Bank of America Merrill Lynch cut its view on Tesla shares by \$5 after analyzing the electric car company's combination with SolarCity.

CNBC
BAC \$24.07 1.84%
• ### Amazon gets downgraded on Wall Street for the first time in more than a year

Raymond James lowers its rating on Amazon to market perform, citing the need for better profitability to justify further stock gains.

CNBC
RJF \$75.35 0.36%
• ### DuPont Tops Earnings -- Jim Cramer Calls CEO a 'Miracle Worker'

DuPont posts stronger-than-expected first-quarter profit and says it expects to see first-half operating earnings rise 16% as it grows agricultural sales following its merger with Dow Chemical.

TheStreet.com q
DOW \$64.80 3.15%
• ### Tests find Samsung's S8 phones more prone to screen cracks

NEW YORK (AP) — Samsung's latest phones feature big wraparound screens and lots of glass. They also appear to break more easily, according to tests run by SquareTrade, a company that sells gadget-repair plans.

Associated Press
• ### North Korea engaged in large scale military drills

CNBC's Chery Kang updates from the North/South Korea border on the escalating nuclear threat from North Korea.

CNBC Videos
• ### Is a Surprise in Store for Ford (F) this Earnings Season?

Ford Motor Co. (F) is set to report first-quarter 2017 results on Apr 27.

Zacks
F \$11.48 0.44%
• ### ACKMAN: 'A good time to buy a great business is when it is in temporary trouble'

Activist investor Bill Ackman shared his thesis about why he thinks the long-term shareholders of Chipotle will be rewarded.

Yahoo Finance
CMG \$472.11 0.71%
• ### Is This the Secret to Ensuring an Early Retirement?

Early retirement is still possible, but U.S. workers aren't doing one thing enough.

TheStreet.com q
• ### Oil slips on OPEC cut extension doubts, Russia output worries

Oil prices slipped nearly 1 percent on Monday, extending last week's decline, on lack of confirmation that OPEC will extend output cuts until the end of 2017 and as Russia indicated it can lift output if the deal on curbs lapses. "We think an extension is highly likely, with a growing OPEC consensus in support of that policy, but the market seems to be attributing last week's decline to the lack of a firm agreement," Tim Evans, Citi Futures' energy futures specialist, said in a note. Last week, prices plummeted about 7 percent partly on signs that rising U.S. shale production offset efforts by OPEC and other producers to cut output by almost 1.8 million barrels per day (bpd) in the first half of the year.

Reuters