Is Zillow overstating the size of its user base?
When Zillow reported second quarter results last week, the company highlighted in its press release that it achieved record all time traffic during the quarter of 89 million unique users in July, a 45% y/y increase. That sounds great, except that when you step back for a moment and really think about that number, it doesn’t make a whole lot of sense.
Zillow only covers the US real estate market, and there are only 121 million households in the US, which means that if Zillow really had 89 million monthly unique users, 74% of all US households would be visiting Zillow every single month. Moreover, existing home sales are currently only running at about a 5m unit annual pace. Are 18x that many people really using Zillow each month? Even Twitter claims fewer monthly unique users in the US than Zillow, and Facebook claims just 2.3x more.
Sure enough if you look at Zillow’s 10-K or Q, they imply that the monthly unique data probably overstates its user count:
“If an individual accesses our mobile applications using different mobile devices within a given month, the first instance of access by each such mobile device is counted as a separate unique user. If an individual accesses our websites using different web browsers within a given month, the first access by each such web browser is counted as a separate unique user.”
In other words, if you were to visit Zillow on your phone, your PC and your tablet, you count as three users. If you visited once on Chrome and once on Safari, you count as four.
This method of counting monthly active users is not unique to Zillow. The company pulls the user count from Google Analytics. Still, this is an important thing to keep in mind as an investor because monthly user counts could overstate users by a factor of 2-4x. Zillow definitely does not have 89 million engaged users.
Also, different companies measure their user counts in different ways. Twitter explicitly says that it counts logins, Facebook only cites “internal company data.” Both companies are explicit in their SEC filings that these are very difficult metrics to accurately count though due to duplicate users, spam, bots, etc. They try to adjust for these factors, and estimate that these variables impact user counts by a mid to high single digit percentage. Funnily enough though, when an analyst asked Twitter about the duplicate user issue on its most recent conference call the call abruptly ended:
“On duplicative accounts, there is some usage of multiple accounts by single users but again that’s not a number of that we just…[call ends]“
Accurately counting users should be an extremely important issue for investors because these companies all trade at high multiples of revenue on the assumption that they will be able to monetize their large user bases. If it turns out that those user bases have been overstated by a potentially large amount, it could have a material effect on these companies’ valuations. Further, it’s not clear that any of these counts are currently independently verified. That probably could be an issue that requires SEC attention.
This is also an extremely important issue for advertisers on these platforms. Currently advertisers are being drawn to these platforms with the promise of high user counts and engagement. It’s clear that advertisers, long skeptical for reasons like the ones mentioned here, are starting to test these platforms. However, the ROI on advertisers’ investments (on a platform saturated with other ads) still remains to be seen.
For Zillow, this actually may be an advantage because its advertisers are real estate agents who can have a more measurable sense of lead generation from the platform. On Zillow’s most recent call they said that existing agents are spending more, which implies that agents are happy with the value that they are currently receiving.
Brand advertisers (e.g. Coca Cola, Procter and Gamble) are never able to measure the ROI of their advertising directly though because their ads don’t generate direct leads. Therefore the ad spend on any form of media, including one like Facebook’s, requires a significant amount of trust that the ads are reaching their intended targets. If customers start to believe that ads aren’t reaching their targets, then revenue could evaporate. The customers of these businesses are the advertisers, not the users. The advertisers had better be able to trust that the users are there.
Photo thanks to Wally Gobetz
Recommended for You
Before you go packing your bags or making other plans for your check from Uncle Sam, you have to make sure you're entitled to that tax refund first.USA TODAY
We scanned our 24/7 Wall St. research data base for stocks priced under $5 with a Buy or Outperform rating, and the potential for large gains.24/7 Wall St.
BEIJING (AP) — China is blocking VPN services that let users skirt online censorship of popular websites such as Google and Facebook amid a wider crackdown on online information, tech companies and specialists said Friday.Associated Press
National Review reporter Katherine Timpf, Newsmax Entertainment columnist James Hirsen and FBN’s Neil Cavuto on Hollywood stars’ criticisms of the movie ‘American Sniper.’Fox Business Videos
A few years ago, Travis Pizel and his wife, Vonnie, found themselves in crisis. But a letter from their credit card company advising them of higher payments forced them to confront the truth: They had accrued $109,000 in credit card debt during their 13-year marriage. "We had essentially been…U.S.News & World Report
This has been touted as a plan to hike taxes on the rich to help the middle class, but in fact it's more of a plan to redistribute money from the upper middle class to the lower middle class. Also raises a lot of money -- the middle class mostly have salary income, and they don't have the ability…Bloomberg
Most people in the know have heard of Carlos Slim and his massive fortune. But what about Mexico's other richest people?Investopedia
SAN FRANCISCO (AP) — More than $300,000 in world-class wine stolen from a famed Napa Valley restaurant has been recovered from a private cellar on the other side of the country.Associated Press
The end of the mortgage refinancing surge has added to the pressure on banks. The result can be seen in foreclosure data: In the third quarter, banks began foreclosure proceedings on only 0.4 percent of mortgages, far below the 1.4 percent level in the peak of the financial crisis. With the federal…Bloomberg
A few small sacrifices now will be worth it in the long run.Investopedia
It is a world turned upside down; the flows are all over the place.TheStreet.com
Take water. Add some sugar, a little carbon dioxide and some flavoring. Sell at a gigantic markup. It sounds almost too simple to work, and yet Atlanta-based Coca-Cola Co. has remained a staple of the ...Investopedia
Mark Hulbert breaks down the investing thesis of ‘how goes January, so goes the year.’MarketWatch
In September 2013, Chris Collins purchased...Business Insider
24/7 Wall St. reviewed Merrill Lynch's updated US 1 list and selected some of the stocks to buy that make good sense for 2015.24/7 Wall St.
Former Republican Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich assesses the candidates who may seek the 2016 GOP nomination. He speaks with Mark Halperin at the Iowa Freedom Summit.Bloomberg Video
FLAGSTAFF, Ariz. (AP) — To those who know and love the Grand Canyon, the names of its historic lodges are synonymous with the national park itself.Associated Press
We expect Apple, Inc. (AAPL) to beat expectations when it reports first quarter fiscal 2015 results on Jan 27.Zacks
A recent study suggests that more people than previously thought will require long-term care at some point but that their need will last for a shorter period of time.Morningstar
MIAMI (AP) — A decade-long addiction to oil subsidized by Venezuela may be coming to an end for several Caribbean nations, with a nudge from the United States.Associated Press